Sign Word for Administrative Now
Make the most out of your eSignature workflows with airSlate SignNow
Extensive suite of eSignature tools
Discover the easiest way to Sign Word for Administrative Now with our powerful tools that go beyond eSignature. Sign documents and collect data, signatures, and payments from other parties from a single solution.
Robust integration and API capabilities
Enable the airSlate SignNow API and supercharge your workspace systems with eSignature tools. Streamline data routing and record updates with out-of-the-box integrations.
Advanced security and compliance
Set up your eSignature workflows while staying compliant with major eSignature, data protection, and eCommerce laws. Use airSlate SignNow to make every interaction with a document secure and compliant.
Various collaboration tools
Make communication and interaction within your team more transparent and effective. Accomplish more with minimal efforts on your side and add value to the business.
Enjoyable and stress-free signing experience
Delight your partners and employees with a straightforward way of signing documents. Make document approval flexible and precise.
Extensive support
Explore a range of video tutorials and guides on how to Sign Word for Administrative Now. Get all the help you need from our dedicated support team.
Sign Word for Administrative Now
Keep your eSignature workflows on track
Make the signing process more streamlined and uniform
Take control of every aspect of the document execution process. eSign, send out for signature, manage, route, and save your documents in a single secure solution.
Add and collect signatures from anywhere
Let your customers and your team stay connected even when offline. Access airSlate SignNow to Sign Word for Administrative Now from any platform or device: your laptop, mobile phone, or tablet.
Ensure error-free results with reusable templates
Templatize frequently used documents to save time and reduce the risk of common errors when sending out copies for signing.
Stay compliant and secure when eSigning
Use airSlate SignNow to Sign Word for Administrative Now and ensure the integrity and security of your data at every step of the document execution cycle.
Enjoy the ease of setup and onboarding process
Have your eSignature workflow up and running in minutes. Take advantage of numerous detailed guides and tutorials, or contact our dedicated support team to make the most out of the airSlate SignNow functionality.
Benefit from integrations and API for maximum efficiency
Integrate with a rich selection of productivity and data storage tools. Create a more encrypted and seamless signing experience with the airSlate SignNow API.
Collect signatures
24x
faster
Reduce costs by
$30
per document
Save up to
40h
per employee / month
Our user reviews speak for themselves
-
Best ROI. Our customers achieve an average 7x ROI within the first six months.
-
Scales with your use cases. From SMBs to mid-market, airSlate SignNow delivers results for businesses of all sizes.
-
Intuitive UI and API. Sign and send documents from your apps in minutes.
A smarter way to work: —how to industry sign banking integrate
FAQs
-
What do you think about your chief minister?
I'm from Kerala and hence I can say about our CM Mr Pinarayi Vijayan. In my opinion he is a good old fraud.In his initial months as a CM he removed a sincere IPS officer from the post of State Police Chief. The officer filed a lawsuit against the govt,and he won. SC ordered he must be reinstated to the post.https://www.thenewsminute.com/ar...A boy Jishnu Pranoy was found hanging in his hostel room. His death was suspicious. It was suspected to be a murder. His parents along with 3 or 4 other people went to the capital to meet the State Police Chief. They were stopped at the entrance, manhandled, dragged through the road kicked, all because they wanted the people behind their son's death to be arrested. The mother was subjected to more tortures. He did not even visit the boy's house. He neither apologized for the actions of the police nor did he take any action against the misbehaving officers. The greatest irony is that the dead boy was a staunch supporter of SFI and LDF govt.Kerala: Political parties call for strike as Jishnu Pranoy’s mother is manhandled by policePolice did not drag Mahija: CM Pinarayi VijayanThe video clips shown by TV channels clearly show Mahija was dragged. He justified the police’s action.Ockhi cyclone hit the southern coasts hard. The CM despite being present in the capital refused to meet the victims. He visited them 4 or 5 days after the cyclone.https://m.timesofindia.com/city/...The angered crowd did not even allow him near them. He is an irresponsible CM. The Keralites now reminiscence how the former CM was active 24x7 when the Puttingal fireworks tragedy took place. The tragedy took place as the elections were near. The then CM Mr Oomen Chandy requested the election commissioner to suspended the protocols.Mr Vijayan is a savior of the corrupt. He tried his best to protect a former minister in his cabinet,until the media and the public took it up. The minister had encroached acres of land and lake to build up his resort.http://www.dailypioneer.com/sund...Kerala State RTC is suffering huge loss and it is unable to pay the pensions for the retired employees. 22 ex employees committed suicide due to various financial difficulties. He never cared to visit those families or offer any monetary help. But he noticed that Indian media published a fake news on UAE sheikh. He couldn't see what was right in front of his eyes.Fake news about UAE condemned by Kerala chief ministerShuhaib, a 29 year old Youth Congress worker was brutally murdered. It was political revenge. He had 37 deep cuts in his body,made by swords or similar sharp weapons; not the ordinary knives or daggers. CPIM workers and DYFI workers were arrested for the murder. No wonder he did not visit Shuhaib’s family. But he visited Junaid’s family in Haryana;I agree its a compassionate gesture.He was more concerned about the case filed against Priya Prakash Varrier starring song “ Manikya Malaraya Poovi” in Hyderabad. He did not forget to offer his support to the film crew. More worrying thing is that 12 or 19( not sure of the number) murder accused were given parole just before Shuhaib’s murder,all related to CPIM. This was brought to the public attention by the former home minister Govt of KeralaShuhaib murder: Pics debunk CPM denialShuhaib murder: Parole given to 18 prisoners, says Ramesh Chennithala - Kaumudiglobal | DailyHunt‘Religious intolerance can’t be tolerated’: Kerala CM on ‘Oru Adaar Love’ controversyKerala refused to pass the National Food Security Bill implemented by the center. As a result Kerala faced shortage for food grains during Onam. At first,though he blamed Modi and his yeah “ fascist regime ” he was happy after he met with Modi and discussed matters.His response towards media is abominable. It could be because he either is afraid of media or he detest them. Be it that he has some responsibilities towards the public as the CM of the state. He once asked them to get out'Get Out': Kerala Chief Minister Snaps At Media Before Meeting With BJPAnd this was his response when a journo asked about nurses' pay revision( video)Yet he never misses a chance to criticize other state CMs,particularly Yogi. In Yogi's rule goons are denying parole and bail,in Pinarayi's regime murderers are given mass paroleNow you tell me is he a CM or a gangster? I'll bet you anything that those who voted for him and his party are regretting.More will come….Edit:- The great leader who stands for freedom of expression has issued order to the police that the Facebook troll groups should be instructed not to troll himPolice warn trolls for targeting CM Pinarayi Vijayan - Times of IndiaEdit 2- Pinarayi Vijayan is an idiot. When Modi visited Israel last year as a part of strengthening diplomatic ties,Mr Vijayan took to Facebook and posted Israel is a terrorist nation,WOW!! Little did he know that Mark Zückerberg was a Jew too! Widely persecuted Jews fought for a nation for them and Israel actually belonged to Jews,didn't it? That's what is said in the story of Jesus isn't it? Jesus was from Israel and Israel was a land of Jews since time immemorial. It was others who took Israel from them.As Modi, Netanyahu bond on a beach, Kerala CM calls Israel terrorist stateMaybe he thinks Israel is different from N Korea. Israel protects its citizens irrespective of their race and religion. Kim's Korea kills people for possessing Bible. His ideologies go hand in hand with those of Korea's. He cannot be blamed for thinking N Korea is the most ideal nation(according to his Commie logic) and Israel is some kind of shit hole( which does not have Communism)When a goon himself is the CM police will also turn goons. A youth Sreejith died in police custody. CM who is in charge of Home Dept took three days to suspend the accused police officers and 7 days (approximately) to break his silence on the issue. This was the fifth custodial death after LDF came to power.Yet another custodial death in Kerala shines a harsh light on 'criminals in the police’ttps://scroll.in/article/875579/fifth-custodial-death-in-two-years-shines-harsh-light-on-kerala-polices-abusesCM avoided visiting Sreejith's house and travelled extra 30kms all because Sreejith was an RSS BJP supporter. He is behaving like a party secretary and not a CM.Tripura CM slams Vijayan for not visiting house of custodialAnother incident occurred in Mahe where a CPM worker was killed and an RSS worker was killed minutes after. He only visited the CPM worker's house.CPM, BJP men hacked to death; hartal in Kannur and Mahe - Times of IndiaHe refused to meet BJP worker's familyKerala CM meets slain CPM leader’s kinNotorious Kevin murder caseKerala 'honour killing': police cited CM's visit as excuse not to trace my husband, says wifeCM said not to drag him into this. Why? The police refused to take action because they were on CM's security duty. And he was arrogant in responding too.If anything happens in a nook of UP Yogi is responsible and must resign. If anything happens anywhere in the country PM should resign. But when something happens right under his nose,its not his responsibility. Why? CM handles the Home dept and he is entirely responsible.The link below is in Malayalam as I could not find any English news regarding it.https://m.dailyhunt.in/news/indi...
-
What are some words in your language that sound inappropriate to English speakers?
Russian here.Three top words on the list of inappropriate-sounding hilarities for English speakers are:Fákel (“torchlight”). Mostly known as the name of a Russian soccer team.Assól, fictional female name of the protagonist in a hugely popular love story “Scarlet Sails”. There have been many bars, cafes and restaurants around Russia named after this dainty romantic girl who long waited for her hero because he promised to return home from his adventures on a ship with red sails. (The ‘l’ at the end is palatalized in Russian. When one of my Swedish colleagues asked me in the 1980s to take him to “the asshole cafe”, I simply didn’t understand what he meant.)Samshít (“boxwood shrubbery”). A nightmare word for translators from Moscow when they take foreign guests to the Black Sea resorts. We don’t have these in Moscow, and Moscovites are often poorly prepared to translate local guides boasting in Russian about their home place like, “The air in our city is famous for its healing effects, not least thanks to the omnipresence of boxwood shrubbery”.Below, the face of Assól in the movie “Scarlet Sails”:
-
What evidence is there that we have not lost all records of written languages that developed, say, 25,000 to 100,000 years ago?
rubs hands togetherBecause, in short, they hadn’t invented accountants yet.This, while it might seem unlikely, is a very good question. The obvious answer, which the other three answers have given more pithily than I can ever hope to be capable of doing, is that there is no evidence of those records. Our earliest examples of writing come from the Sumerians in Mesopotamia in roughly 3500 BC, as covered here.An early cuneiform tablet, from somewhere around 3000 BC.Before that, there’s no evidence of written language. Cuneiform, the Mesopotamian writing system, is the first script we can point to and say, “Yes, that’s definitely a written language.” There are a few potential (though extremely, absolutely, very not at all likely) contenders, e.g. the Vinča symbols, but, even if they did represent a language, those only date to maybe a couple millennia earlier. Again, there’s no records on the scale presented here.But there’s another question, a fun question, below that. Sure, it’s unlikely that there ever were lost written languages - but is it impossible that there were? Could - not was, but could - there have been a written language, invented 100 000 years ago, that was lost to time?It’s not immediately unthinkable. Some writing systems, like Brahmi in India and Phoenician in, well, Phoenicia were originally written on bark or leaves or papyrus, which decay quickly, so we have few records of early Brahmi or Phoenician writing. Maybe our hypothetical lost writing system was written on bark or leaves or animal hide or some other quickly-compostable material, hence why we’ve got no records of it. Come to think of it, the idea of a lost, ancient, etc. writing system isImpossible. I’ll stop the suspense there. It’s not possible. There could not have been a writing system from before 4000-5000 BC at most, and most likely none before Mesopotamian cuneiform in 3500 BC. Why this is the case is an excellent question; to answer it, I’m going to talk about wheels.The wheel is the archetypal simple invention. It’s a ubiquitous round thing that moves stuff: how hard could it be to come up with it? Any group of people who hasn’t come up with it must be stupid or backwards or uncivilized or some variant thereof, right? Except it’s a harder than that. There’s more to inventing the wheel than inventing, um, the wheel.Invent the wheel. Great. In fact, invent three more.Now what? You’ve got four wheels, sure - what are you going to do with them? A modern person would say transportation, but that isn’t obvious. Most early wheels were instead used for pottery, as pottery wheels.Stumble upon the idea of using them for transportation.Alright, sure. How do you plan to go about doing this? In order to invent the cart, you first have to have invented the box, and, again, that isn’t an obvious invention.Invent the box. You’ve got your cart now!Nail the wheels to the side of the cart and you’re - oh, hey, uh…It turns out that if you nail a wheel to the side of a cart, all the cart has now is a circular piece of wood with a hole in the middle nailed to it. In order for the wheels to turn, you have to connect them.Invent the axle. Invent another one, if you’d like.Connect the wheels to the axles.Nail them to the bottom of the cart and you - no, not again…It turns out that if you have stationary wheels, you can move your cart in exactly one direction, excepting some pushing and pulling. It’s finicky. You can either limit your cart to two wheels or else you have to come up with a way to make the front wheels turn.Either limit your cart to two wheels or come up with a way to make the front wheels turn.Congratulations! You’ve got a functioning cart! It’s complete with box, wheels, axle(s), and optional wheel-turny-bit! Now all you’ve got to do is…oh, well, now, um, you see…You’ve got to make the cart move. Without a way to make the cart move, it’s useless. You could pull it yourself (time-consuming and tiring), or buy a slave (expensive, and also time-consuming and tiring for the slave). Or you could get an animal to pull it. That sounds like a great idea: get a horse or ox, then…uh…about that horse…You need to have domesticated animals. If you’re in a civilization that happens to have animals that are a.) domesticated, b.) large, c.) willing to pull things, and d.) of a body structure that can support pulling heavy things over long distances, great! If your animal is missing any of those elements, though, you’re not going to be using your wheeled cart much. But let’s say you do have that horse.Just strap the horse to the cart andYou have to invent a way of attaching the horse to the cart. This, like everything else so far, is harder than it sounds. A bad harness can come undone or break, be horribly inefficient, and/or harm the animal it’s attached to.Invent a good harness.And with that, you dedicated wheel-inventor, you have a box on wheels that can turn which is itself full of stuff and also attached well to your pack animal of choice. Your cart is ready. There are no more problems with your cart.Set off on your journey and…well, this might be the biggest problem of them all.You need a flat, cleared surface. Your cart can’t go through the bush or the rain forest. Basically, if you’re not on a perfectly flat, clear plain, you need roads. If you haven’t got roads, you can’t drive your cart very far.Invent roads.There you are. Finally. The wheel will be improved from then on, with things like spokes and rubber and motors, but that’s all you need for a primitive wagon sort of vehicle. (Edit: This is not entirely true; see Alan Dillman’s comment here.)If you’re an observant person, you may have noticed that there are an awful lot of steps to inventing a proper wheeled vehicle. To us, we with the wheels, the wheel appears obvious. But it’s only obvious because we’ve had it for so long. Without box, axle, pack animal, or roads, the wheel has no purpose, no necessity to produce it, and thus no invention, or at least no large-scale implementation.Wheel usage, then, is independent of technological advancement. The Mayans, Aztecs, and Incas, who were advanced and civilized by any standard, never made much use of the wheel: their terrain was often mountainous, and their pack animal, the llama, of the wrong build for cart-pulling. The only place wheels were ever used was in children’s toys.There are a lot of steps, conditions, and so on needed to make the wheel useful. Without these conditions, you don’t get wheels.To take it back on topic: it’s a similar case with writing systems.Writing is, like the wheel, ubiquitous. It’s easier for your average literate urban person to imagine a world without farming than one without writing. You write symbols for the sounds you say: how hard could it be to come up with that? Any group of people who hasn’t come up with it must be stupid or backwards or uncivilized or some variant thereof, right?Except, once again, it’s harder than that. Writing has been invented four times: in Mesopotamia; in Egypt; in China; and in Mesoamerica. Every other writing system comes from one of those four. (Our own alphabet is from Egyptian, as covered here.) Each of those four times, writing has developed in the same way, which is as follows:In the beginning, civilization is created. (ahem: This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.)Now you have cities, and people in the cities, and people making and buying and selling food and livestock and slaves and things, and governments taxing people, and a great big stew of transactions that need to be taken care of. There’s a need for administration, for keeping track of records.So, people - and this is the great unsung invention of humanity, ultimately responsible for all of history, art, culture, literature, mathematics, and tradition in the civilized world from five thousand years ago through to today - invent accountants.Then they invent bureaucrats. Administrators. Record-keepers. The people who sit at desks and write things down.And it’s that “write things down” bit that revolutionizes the world. In order to keep track of purchases, taxes, trades, who sold cows to who in exchange for what amount of barley, things that no human can hold in their mind, they come up with a system: draw pictures to represent different things. Write, say, “[BOB][2][COW][to][JAMES][for][300][unit][BARLEY]”, using pictures for “cow” and “barley” and dots and lines for “2” and “300”.But how do you write “Bob” or “James” or “to” or “for”? You can’t draw a picture of a preposition! What you can do, however, is draw a picture of a thing that sounds like “to” or “for”. We still do a version of this: “2” sounds like “to”, so you can write “Bob sold 2 cows 2 James 4 300 units of barley”. Substitute the rest of the words for pictures, numbers, or pictures that sound like another word for the thing they represent, and you have a way to keep track of anything.As the civilization would eventually realize, you can do more than accounting with this system. Add some more pictures for the rest of written language and you can write anything you’d like. You can write letters. You can write stories. You can write down the poems that have been floating around orally for centuries. The pictures steadily become more stylized until they no longer look like pictures but rather like abstract symbols.Writing has been invented. By accountants. (In fact, the first name we have record of isn’t the name of a king, or of a legendary hero, or of a poet: it’s of an accountant named Kushim, signing his name on a receipt to file away.)The so-called Kushim tablet, dating to the 3400s BC. It reads: “29 086 units of barley were received over the course of 37 months. Signed, Kushim.”Writing is only practical in a situation where a large amount of information, too large for any one person or even group of people to remember and too boring and specific for any of them to need or want to, has to be recorded for a long period of time. In a tribal hunter-gatherer society, you really only need to remember:edible and poisonous plants and animals: This is something you need to remember, so it’s a.) unlikely anyone would forget it, b.) something practical that needs to be immediately retrieved, and c.) visual in any case. It doesn’t benefit from writing, so writing does not need to be invented to keep track of what you can or can’t eat.histories/stories/traditions: These could benefit from being written down, which is why, when writing was invented, they were some of the earliest things to be written down. In a tribal society, they were passed down orally instead. This didn’t require a superhuman memory, and so worked well enough that writing wasn’t necessary.In an early agricultural societies, writing wasn’t needed, either, for much the same reason; nor in proper towns, because trade was not yet so complicated that it required accountants. It’s like the wheel: it’s useless if you’re missing any of the right parts, the right context, the right environment. Necessity is the mother of invention; inversely, lack of necessity is the, er, contraceptive of invention.The earliest that writing could have arisen is the earliest that complex cities with administration existed, with the oldest surviving records dating from a few centuries later, with the older ones having been lost or destroyed.When is that? It’s about 4000–5000 BC, if you’re stretching the estimate, in Mesopotamia and Egypt, whose governments evolved roughly parallel. From there, they developed accountants, then writing. And when are the earliest records of writing? From just a little after that period. Writing would have been invented in 4000–5000 BC, which is the earliest it could have been invented.The only way writing could have been invented in 100 000–25 000 BC is if there were complex cities with administration back then. It’s easy for writing materials to decay; it’s a lot harder for an entire civilization (and, necessarily, agriculture itself, which is only thought to have been invented 10 000 years ago) to go unnoticed.To answer your question, it isn’t possible that any writing systems existed before 4000-5000 BC at the earliest, because writing (and thus the entirety of literature, and so forth) was invented by accountants. In order to have writing, you need accountants; to have accountants, you need cities; to have cities, you need civilization; to have civilization, you need agriculture.Thanks for asking!
-
Do you think that Islam had destroyed the Persian, Turkish, and Egyptian cultures?
About Persians i can say to some extent.One needs to read the book “Two Centuries of Silence” by Abdolhossein Zarrinkoob to understand how Persians turned into Muslims. Libraries were burnt, (since they include non-Arabic non-Quran books), rebelling cities slaughtered, palaces looted, the Administrative language was forced to be Arabic, and any signs of other religions were highly suppressed.Persians and other related ethnicityhave still always celebrated events like Norooz, kept a different language, etc. So their traditions were NOT TOTALLY destroyed.Iranians have started to embrace their Pre-Islamic calendar, culture, symbols and figures as well, following the advancements in archeology, that has revealed parts of that old nation.About Egypt I am no expert, but the majority in Egypt now speaks Arabic. But regarding the rest of the aspects of the culture I am not savvy.Turks: They entered the middle east centuries after the Islamic expansion. When they entered and started settling and governing, in some cases like the Ottoman empire they adopted Persian language for administration. Nowadays we often see words with Arabic and Persian roots in Turkish, but (since the Arabic sword wasn’t the sharpest on the block anymore) Turkish culture and language was merely influenced by Islam. In fact, the Turkish ethnicity and the Persian Administration in Empires like “Ottomans”, “Safavid”, “Ghaznavids”, “Khwarazms”, “Seljuqs”, were so tangled and intermittent, that Persian and Turkish have had more effects on one another I’d say.
-
How would Trump supporters have viewed an Obama/Kim meeting that yielded the same results?
Original QuestionHow would Trump supporters have viewed an Obama/Kim meeting that yielded the same results?ResponseHere is a summary of the Iran deal(from it’s Wikipedia page) that Trump and most “conservative” pundits and radio personalities have claimed to be the worst deal in human history. Subsequently Trump has began sabotaging this deal.Summary of Iran agreementParameters of prospective actions by P5+1 [21]Lift all sanctions within 4 to 12 months of a final accord.Develop a mechanism to restore old sanctions if Iran fails to comply as per IAEA reports and inspection.The EU will remove energy and banking sanctions.The United States will remove sanctions against domestic and foreign companies who do business with Iran.All UN resolutions sanctioning Iran will be annulled.All UN-related sanctions will be dismantled.Parameters of prospective actions by Iran [21]Reduction in the number of installed centrifuges from 19,000 to 6,104 and only 5,060 of these enriching uranium for 10 years. [22] [23]No enriched uranium above 3.67% purity (suitable for civil use and nuclear power generation only).Reduce stockpile of enriched uranium from current 10,000 to not more than 300 kilograms 3.67 percent enrich uranium for 15 years.Fordo uranium enrichment facility will operate not more than 1,000 centrifuges for research. 5,000 R-1 centrifuges will be running at Natanz. The remaining 13,000 centrifuges will be used as spare, as needed.Arak facility will be modified so as to produce a minimal amount of plutonium but will remain a heavy-water reactor.Allow inspection of all its nuclear facilities and its supply chains such as uranium mining sites .Summary of North Korea agreementWe will halt war games with South KoreaNorth Korea will seek complete nuclear disarmament and we will have to take their word for it.Edit: Actual language from agreement signed by Kim1. The United States and the DPRK commit to establish new U.S.-DPRK relations in accordance with the desire of the peoples of the two countries for peace and prosperity.2. The United States and the DPRK will join their efforts to build a lasting and stable peace regime on the Korean Peninsula.3. Reaffirming the April 27, 2018 Panmunjom Declaration, the DPRK commits to work toward complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.4. The United States and the DPRK commit to recovering POW/MIA remains, including the immediate repatriation of those already identified.Read: Full text of the Trump-Kim agreementConclusionOne of these things is not like the other.If Obama had made this kind of deal, Trump supporters would have been right to criticize Obama and his administration. The problem now is the blatant hypocrisy from Trump supporters. They will now trumpet this agreement as the greatest in history (they are wont to hyperbole) while continuing to complain about Obama’s deal. I am sure that if Trump’s deal somehow ends up failing they will find a way to blame Obama, or Hillary’s emails, or something just a preposterous. So, to quote Ivanka Trump, “You just can’t fix stupid” - Chinese Proverb.Edit:Please remember what the question asked me when you make your comments. I am not debating the validity of either deal, I am merely pointing out how I feel Trump supporters would act, which is hypocritically, in response to Obama making this same kind of deal.
-
What happened when your boss got fired?
Back in the early 2000s when my boss was fired, I found that I too was soon out of a work contract.My health service contract had been on a fixed-term basis. It was initially a 2-year contract and, if funding was available, the contract was to be renewed for another 2 to 3 years. The applications for funding and renewal were to be made by my boss a few months before the end of the initial fixed term.We didn’t work in the same building: my boss was based in a different venue about a mile away. However, we spoke on the phone a lot until, suddenly, she was hard to get hold of.Her private secretary was in a difficult position. She knew that Jane (not her real name) was in trouble with senior management and had been suspended - however, she was unable to say this openly to anyone. For days then weeks I was informed that Jane would get back to me, that my messages had been passed on, that Jane was due to be out of the office for the next week, that she was now on annual leave, etc. My emails went unanswered or met with an auto-reply.In the meantime my work project went from strength to strength. My evaluation report had been well-received by the health board. The doctors I worked with sang my praises and patient satisfaction was high. All of the health professionals at my work-base wanted the project to continue and we were making plans for expansion in the years to come.But I had heard nothing about the applications for renewal of our funding and of my contract.Quite early on in all of this I had asked Jane’s private secretary about the progress of these applications. She assure me that everything was in hand. I waited. I enquired again. I was informed that Jane had submitted the applications in good time and that there was nothing to worry about.Then we heard that Jane had left the health service - but the in-house grapevine informed us that she had actually been sacked for negligence in a whole range of her duties.And it turns out that one of those areas of negligence was not submitting the applications for both my work contract and the project funding.Due to deadlines for applications, and the finite nature of funds available for projects such as mine, at this point there was little we could do. We were forced to close the project and I had to look for another job.At least the health service does offer redeployment and I was fairly quickly given a new post - but it wasn’t in the line of work for which I was best qualified. I deliberately accepted a temporary, maternity cover post in order that I had a get-out clause to leave some months later if I wasn’t happy.I enjoyed the post and was fairly happy in my work environment, but still I chose to leave the NHS at the end of the contract. Too much delay, too much disorganisation, poor communications. There is so much that is good about the NHS , but also so much that is infuriating.
-
Did Latin alphabet evolve from Egyptian hieroglyphs?
Yes, it derives from it at several removes, and we understand the process more clearly now thanks to new discoveries in Egypt. It seems that writing was invented four times: by the Sumerians, by the Egyptians (although some people think they learned from the Sumerians), by the Chinese, and by the Mayans. The Latin alphabet is based indirectly on the Greek, which was adapted from Semitic speaking peoples, who ultimately adapted theirs from the Egyptians.Already in the earliest evidence (c. 3200 BC) the Egyptian writing system used three different kinds of symbols: (1) logograms, which represented whole words, (2) determinatives, which limited or defined other signs, and (3) phonograms, which represented phonetic components of words. The phonograms only represented consonants, not vowels, and a phonogram could represent a single consonant, or a series of two or three. These signs were particularly useful for writing foreign names. Although the Egyptians had a complete set of monoconsonantal phonograms, and could have written any word using only those symbols, they never used it as a discrete system, but always in combination with logograms and determinatives.At some point, an unknown group of Western Semitic speakers took advantage of this possibility and created a small set of monoconsonantal phonograms (still no vowels) that could be used to write not only any existing word in their language, but any conceivable word—that is to say, it was a universal system. They used an acrophonic principle to link Egyptian symbols to West Semitic sounds. For example, the logogram for the word “hand” was chosen to represent /d/ in Egyptian because the Egyptian word for “hand” began with /d/. The same logogram was used to represent /k/ in the West Semitic system, however, because the West Semitic word for “hand” (*kapp) began with /k/.Until recently, the earliest evidence were some inscriptions in the Sinai, but now we have found older inscriptions in Egypt itself, at Wadi el-Hôl, near ancient Thebes and modern Luxor (Darnell et al. 2005). Wadi el-Hôl was used as a military base, and it seems possible that the script was developed for the administration of West Semitic mercenaries, to record their names and basic information. They've been dated between 1850-1700 BC by various scholars, perhaps to the reign of Amenemhat III (c. 1853-1809). One of the things they've shown us is that the symbol which would become Greek beta was taken from a hieratic character rather than a hieroglyphic as was previously assumed. Between that time and the 10th c. BC the system spread among Semitic speakers and evolved. Originally it could be written vertically or horizontally, like Egyptian, but early on it tended to horizontal; the symbols became less pictorial and more linear; eventually it became normal to write from right-to-left. It was adapted by the Phoenicians sometime before the 10th c. BCE.At some location where they lived or traded with the Phoenicians, Greek speakers adapted the script to their language. The major innovation was the addition of vowels. This made it possible to approximate the sound of unknown words, whereas before you had to know what the vowels were already. This might have been because, unlike Semitic languages, there were some Greek words that had only vowels and no consonants. The location is a matter of debate; the most common candidates are Al Mina, Rhodes, Cyprus, Crete, and Euboea. Perhaps it was for the administration of Greek mercenaries in the East, as we speculated at Wadi el-Hôl; some people have suggested it was invented to record Homer's poems, but that seems unlikely to me, despite the metrical nature of many early inscriptions. The date is also hotly disputed. Our earliest inscriptions are from the 8th century, but the variation in letter forms suggests it was several decades earlier at least; there are some details which suggest a much earlier date still.I explained all this in more detail as well as the adaptation of the individual letters in an article for Brill's new Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics, which is available online already if you have access, and will be available in print July 2014. I know less about the final steps of your question by which the Latin alphabet was derived from the Greek. There were several versions of the Greek alphabet in use, and it was a western version that was adapted by the Etruscans, who dominated early Italy, including Rome. The Roman alphabet was created from this Etruscan script.
-
How will the Trump trade wars affect President Xi Jinping's plans for his presiding over a resurgent and rising China?
My opinion: Trump’s trade war is his style of ‘bully politics’. His complaints about IP theft and trade deficit are overdone rhetoric to take advantage of the perceived evil of China. The real issue of the trade war, is the realization that China has a plan to pass the US in technology. If ‘Made in China 2025’ succeeds, the US will have little leverage politically and economically to compete with the China. This initiative removes China’s dependence on the US for technology and makes it a leader instead of a follower.What is interesting, is up to now, for China to be a follower was the ideal situation for the US. It could continuously claim a narrative that made China look bad to the world and the US could command both business and moral leadership to dominate China’s economy.The US, and other developed countries covet China’s growth because it is metamorphosing into the world’s largest domestic market. It gives capitalist states a new venue to make money. China recognizes this and also feels that it should get most of the benefits of this growth. Both sides are showing their fangs as they push each other to claim as much market share as they can in what they see as the ‘next game’ in town. What is unknown to most is that the US trade deficit is about $375 billion, but the US market share in China’s retail market is about $600 billion, almost twice the trade deficit.The tariff war, could be the last hurrah for the US before it starts on a downward economic slide. Trump professes ‘free trade’ but he uses tariffs to bully others to command the high ground. He is betting big in a ‘high stake’ poker game, but he is causing collateral damage with others who could potentially support his cause, but do not. Somehow, Trump thinks this is like getting the best bid from contractors bidding for work on one of his buildings or golf courses. It won’t work. China is too much of a strategic player. What I expect to see, is China throwing out some sacrificial lambs and conditions that will allow Trump to save face, but their long range plans stay intact.The problem with our democratic process is that it keeps us from following a similar strategic pattern. We set short term goals that are often compromises and with changing of administrations, our overall strategies can be cancelled or modified to an extent that the reasons for our longer range plans get blunted or nullified. We see that in Trump. All things Obama are being erased by Trump. Good or bad, it doesn’t seem to enter his thought. His focus on deleting Obama’s place in US history is his goal.As of today, everyone is waiting to hear and see what Trump discusses with Putin, especially the Europeans. Will the US align itself with Russia over the EU? Is he playing both sides against each other to create chaos? What does Donald Trump want from both Europe and Russia? For China, it matters little, because the damage will be either the US, the EU, Russia, or all three. China becomes a bystander and may gain the most from this tension, especially of past alliances get weakened.
-
If you could ask Robert Mueller just one question about the release of his report, what would it be?
I would ask him about his contradictions.Mueller tries to play this game where he attempts to say the OLC opinion makes it impossible for him to make a decision either way on obstruction. It does not. No special Counsel or Independent Counsel in the past has been charged with disobeying the OLC policy and making a decision on whether criminal acts occurred. It has been done before. Mueller invented this issue.Whether Mueller felt he could make a decision or not due to OLC policy isn’t even relevant because the Attorney General and the Assistant Deputy Attorney General pushed the Special Counsel to do just that, and in the end they were left to make the binary decision. Furthermore the Special Counsel does make a decision on conspiracy/coordination. Also notice that no one else was charged either. That means that only the President himself took any actions that may be considered obstruction…or not. Does the OLC policy say that those other than the President could not be charged?Mueller makes the statement that “fairness” is why it would be unconstitutional to make such as decision because since the OLC opinion does not allow him to indict a sitting president, the President does not get his day in court to argue against the charges. This is in direct contrast to the actual report itself. If fairness was the standard, the Special Counsel would not spend almost 200 pages smearing the president and pointing out actions that he believes might be interpreted as obstruction offenses, and pretty much trying to influence and bias the public. If that were the case it would have to be wrong to even investigate a sitting President at all. It would be unconstitutional to even have a Special or Independent Counsel. That is exactly what the Special Counsel did though. He did exactly what he is claiming he could not do due to “fairness.” No wonder he has no desire to answer questions.The Special Counsel claims to be hemmed in by one OLC policy but just ignores several others. While Mueller and his team of dildos claim that indicting a sitting President is not possible because of an OLC policy against such, he ignored the fact that prosecutors speak through indictments. In the case of no charges, prosecutors do not release disparaging information about the targets of the investigation. Both volumes of his sloppy report do just that. Particularly volume II.The Special Counsel also may have signNowly left out several things about law and exculpatory information. Case in point is the recent release of audio of the President’s attorney John Dowd talking with Flynn’s lawyers and telling them that they would like a heads up on any information they would be giving to the Special Counsel that could be harmful of the President. On it’s face, as represented by the Special Counsel, this seems to be a clear case of obstruction. What was left out of the Special Counsel’s report, and is on the audio is John Dowd giving the reason for wanting the heads up. He wanted a heads up not just as protection for the President but in case there was a national security implication that had to be dealt with. That changes the dynamic completely.This changes that dynamic because it is policy and precedent that if there are competing reasons for the actions or directives of the President, the President is given the benefit of the doubt. This means that if an action may seem to be corrupt, in that it might benefit the President personally, that is overruled if the President also had a legitimate reason for the action. In the case of the phone call, there is a nation security interest that is actually expressed on the call. So Mueller contradicts himself by sticking to an OLC Policy on indictments but not so on giving the president the benefit of the doubt, and in the process, excludes exculpatory evidence. While John Dowd may have actually just included that line about national security because he is a smart lawyer, but he did do it so that gives the President a legitimate out. Why was that held back?This is the same reason why “hush money” payments are likely not to be campaign finance violations. The candidate Trump’s campaign may have benefited from the payments to the two women but saving his marriage is a separate reason that cancels the campaign benefit out, which saved John Edwards in his case. This also goes to the firing of James Comey. The President had plenty of other reasons to fire James Comey that had nothing to do with Russia, and his reasoning for firing him for anything Russia related is still likely no crime because the reasons were more to the side that the President felt Comey lied to him. Flynn was fired for lying to the Vice President, so why would Comey not be fired for lying to the actual President?Trump once called White House Counsel Don McGahn and told him to talk to Rosenstein about getting rid of Mueller because he had conflicts of interest. This also sounds like obstruction, but what was he really asking? There is no indication that this was to completely end the investigation. Rosenstein would more than likely just have to appoint a new Special Counsel to take his place. Had this happened it would have certainly surged interest in impeachment, but it actually was not carried forward anyway. This “incident” is not obstruction. It never was carried out, and the President felt there was cause. Even though McGahn told the President that the things he felt were factors that meant Mueller was conflicted, did not rise to that level, we can see just from the things politicians, lawyers, and others there are a whole lot of differences in what people see as reasons for recusal. It is not clear cut.Mueller also makes no clear indication of what exactly, he feels, was the President’s actual intent in any of the incidents that he ponders about. So, if he were to actually indict what would he claim was clearly the President’s corrupt intent? Just stopping the investigation would not suffice. They would need to prove why. The Special Counsel takes a few swipes at off hand guesses like the President may have thought certain things were crimes when they were not, etc, but they are going to have to overcome the fact that they did not prove this whole collusion conspiracy nonsense, and that the President is going to have a strong defense that he felt he was the target of a conspiracy himself.I mean, why was Comey not charged with obstruction of justice for leaking notes to a professor friend? Why are Democrats not calling for an obstruction charge against Comey as he both wrote a book, and continues to attack the President while the DOJ is investigating the actions of the FBI under him. It is almost inconceivable that Mueller didn’t charge McCabe, Strzok, Rosenstein or Comey with obstruction given his babbling volume II stories. Adam Schiff, and Eric Swalwell too. If you want to impeach Trump for obstruction of justice Jerry Nadler would likely be the next one you would have to impeach. That guy is trying to hold the Attorney General in contempt for NOT committing a crime that he ordered… See how absurd this is getting.Next, why is he seeming to some to be making an invitation to impeachment? The Special Counsel was not appointed to do that and that is why he works under the DOJ and Attorney General. His job is to investigate points of law, not make an impeachment case that is a political action. Furthermore Mueller claims that he does not want to be seen as overtly political and is supposed to be above the partisan fray. Instead he makes an overtly political decision to not make a decision, completely spends 200 pages smearing the President, claiming fairness, and possibly making an invitation to impeachment, a job he was not assigned.Barr and Rosenstein made the correct call. There was no obstruction, especially under the specific citings of law that Mueller makes. The report and Mueller contradict on several issues. The claim, that they could not say the President committed a crime but could not exonerate, itself contradicts the non-partisan stand and also is sloppy propaganda. Prosecutors do not exonerate. They just decided whether they have enough evidence to go to trial or do not. In this case they had no evidence to go forward on conspiracy nor obstruction. It appears that they wrote a document that is intended to say that they harbor suspicion but do not have enough evidence. They make creative use of words, they try and escape their own decision making.Mueller’s press conference is more proof that Mueller is incompetent in his task. He really did not say anything that was not already in the report. The media want to jump all over it as something new and are pushing it hard just because they hate Trump. This is the same information that has been out since the report was released.Mueller’s biggest shit show move was to come out and say that his report stands by itself and he shall not speaketh of these things further, as if he is some tyrant dictator, or is Saint Peter himself, guarding the gates of heaven. How fucking wonderful of his highness to declare that. It seems Mr. Mueller has warmed to the ass sucking press and in return they have anointed him as their new god as they never even pushed him for answers to that. Mueller does not deserve the same scrutiny as the former White House Counsel, Hope Hicks, Secretary Mnuchin, or anyone else. cased closed Mueller has spoken…So besides becoming a partisan democrat, contradicting himself on several issues, leaving out exculpatory information, and not making a decision as his job description and his superiors told him to do. He also did not mark grand jury information in the way he was directed to do which slowed down the release of the full report and gave him the opportunity to write a “snitty letter.” He also likely lied to the Attorney General, and it turns out he is too cowardly to face scrutiny in the form of testifying to any body of Congress or any from the media.
Trusted esignature solution— what our customers are saying
be ready to get more
Get legally-binding signatures now!
Related searches to Sign Word for Administrative Now
useonlinecontent
this feature has been disabled by your administrator outlook 2016 office 365
Frequently asked questions
How do i add an electronic signature to a word document?
When a client enters information (such as a password) into the online form on , the information is encrypted so the client cannot see it. An authorized representative for the client, called a "Doe Representative," must enter the information into the "Signature" field to complete the signature.
How to create an electronic signature pic?
it/PV4eVY — Donald Trump Jr.'s Lawyer (@mandy_cooper13)
Trump Jr. also sent the email after news broke that former acting Attorney General Sally Yates had alerted the White House that Flynn might have lied about discussing sanctions with then-Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak.
The White House, which initially said that Trump didn't know any details about Flynn until he learned about it later — then said that the president only found out about them through media reports — has faced questions about why Trump's son was seeking to establish communications with the Russian government in the first place.
In a series of tweets, Trump Jr. denied that he and others had received the emails, and called the Times story "a COMPLETE and TOTAL FABRICATION" of his meeting. He said the Times' "fictional account" was "100% made up."
This morning's NY Times Magazine cover: "How Vladimir Putin Created Donald Trump." — Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr)
Flynn's resignation Monday came the same day that he was interviewed by FBI agents about the meeting — as part of Robert Mueller's probe of Russia's meddling in the US presidential election.
How to digitally sign pdf file verified?
by vidyanagar on Jun 27, 2016 - 2:35pm, so what are you asking?
No, what are you doing.
You can't use software to digitally sign files or it wont work.
That is why this site says not to use software to digitally sign.
There you go.
Just so you understand, you won't be able to upload the document to the web site or use other software to digitally sign it.
Nowhere in there does it say you need to use a free software to do that.
So what are you talking about?
Why are you asking that?
If you can't tell me what this "digital signature" thing is, I'm not sure you are qualified to speak on it.
Get more for Sign Word for Administrative Now
- Help Me With Electronic signature Missouri Sports Presentation
- Help Me With Electronic signature Missouri Sports Presentation
- How Can I Electronic signature Missouri Sports Presentation
- Can I Electronic signature Missouri Sports Presentation
- How Can I Electronic signature Missouri Sports Presentation
- How Can I Electronic signature Missouri Sports Presentation
- How To Electronic signature Missouri Sports Presentation
- Can I Electronic signature Missouri Sports Presentation
Find out other Sign Word for Administrative Now
- New york mv 285 form
- Enhanced license ny form
- The ds875q form
- Mv104an 7 11 codes form
- Article 19 a written examination form
- Nf 10 form 2012
- New york insurance proof form
- Mv44cr form
- Oh highway patrol report form
- Penalties insurance ohio form
- Equipment lease form template
- 2011 standard ppi invoice the city of portland oregon form
- Oregon medical exemption form
- Job completion form
- Penndot te 300 form
- Pa drivers permit physical form 2016
- Sc lost plate application form
- Sc tr 310 form
- Tennessee temporary printable form
- 14 128 form