Sign Nebraska Profit Sharing Agreement Template Secure

Check out Sign for Profit Sharing Agreement Template Nebraska Secure function from airSlate SignNow. Speed up business document signing process. Create, edit and send custom templates instantly. Mobile friendly. No downloading!

Make the most out of your eSignature workflows with airSlate SignNow

Extensive suite of eSignature tools

Discover the easiest way to Sign Nebraska Profit Sharing Agreement Template Secure with our powerful tools that go beyond eSignature. Sign documents and collect data, signatures, and payments from other parties from a single solution.

Robust integration and API capabilities

Enable the airSlate SignNow API and supercharge your workspace systems with eSignature tools. Streamline data routing and record updates with out-of-the-box integrations.

Advanced security and compliance

Set up your eSignature workflows while staying compliant with major eSignature, data protection, and eCommerce laws. Use airSlate SignNow to make every interaction with a document secure and compliant.

Various collaboration tools

Make communication and interaction within your team more transparent and effective. Accomplish more with minimal efforts on your side and add value to the business.

Enjoyable and stress-free signing experience

Delight your partners and employees with a straightforward way of signing documents. Make document approval flexible and precise.

Extensive support

Explore a range of video tutorials and guides on how to Sign Nebraska Profit Sharing Agreement Template Secure. Get all the help you need from our dedicated support team.

Document type sign profit sharing agreement template nebraska secure

good afternoon everyone my name is dev bandai greece and i want to welcome you to this court improvement project webinar on structured decision making just so you know the webinar has been approved for 60 minutes of continuing legal education and for the attorneys who are joining us today we ask that you type in the chat your name and bar number this information will be submitted to attorney services following the webinar in addition the presentation is being recorded and available on the cip youtube channel next week the 2017 child and family services review identified that courts and stakeholders requested education on structured decision making earlier this year and towards the end of last year cip and dhhs partnered to develop an sdm bench card which you should have received with a reminder for today's webinar also just so you know in that same email there was a link to the slides of the presentation so without any further ado it is my pleasure to introduce j.h eds cfs legal for the southeast service area and justine nelson cfs supervisor from the central service area thank you trustee and jay for being with us today and i will turn it over to both of you we appreciate that i'm going to go ahead and get things started here as these slide on on your screen should show sdm is a set of research and evidence-based tools for important decisions in the life of a case using sdm assessments brings everyone together with a common set of criteria for decision making and common language to describe the reasoning behind those decisions research has demonstrated that when decision makers who generally in our situation are case workers know exactly what information to consider and what to ignore that they do better children and families will experience treatment that is more equitable and more consistent for those of you who may have been around prior to 2012 when this was first instituted may remember that there was a lot more subjective decision making the goal of sdm certainly is one of the goals is to be more of an objective system so the sdm model is a suite of assessment instruments that promote safety and well-being for those most at risk from children to vulnerable adults the sdm model combines research with best practices and offers workers a framework for consistent decision making and offers agencies a way to target in demand resources towards those who can benefit most some of the research that's been done goes back as far as 1997 there was independent research publication and evaluations in 1997 that i'm aware of 2004-2011 there's peer-reviewed publications from 1999 2000 and 2005 that support the sdm models the structured decision making model for child protection assist agencies and workers in meeting their goals to promote the ongoing safety and well-being of children this evidence and research-based system identifies the key points in the life of a child welfare case and uses structured assessments to improve the consistency and validity of each decision the model additionally includes clearly defined service standards mechanisms for timely reassessments methods for measuring workload and mechanisms for ensuring accountability and quality controls today no set of cps assessments has demonstrated the degree of reliability and validity nor the improved outcomes of the stm model the goals of the sdn system are to reduce subsequent harm to children which would be another investigation of substantiated finding injury or placement and to expedite permanency so sending children home as swiftly as safely possible or moving to a different goal as swiftly as possible by the time a family is involved with children family services obviously something negative has happened or we suspect a negative incident and our goal using structured tools is to prevent the next negative incident svm focuses both on safety and risk sdm was piloted first in nebraska in 2012 went statewide in 2013. many states across the u.s utilize this model as a means of driving case management decisions nebraska has made some additions to the model integrating narratives and the assessment tools to provide evidence as to why decisions were made nebraska continually monitors the fidelity of the model for each assessment through an internal cqi process nebraska has completed external reliability evaluation with the nccd in 2016 to look at the intake safety and initial risk assessments and then dhhs has also entered into a contract with nccd to conduct another fidelity review that will look at how all the tools are currently used and identify any modifications that need to be made to better fit the policy and practices change now justy's going to go ahead and take you through some of the next slides just going to kind of discuss what each of our assessments are and how we use them um first of all our workers receive about 290 and a half hours of training and out of that training 77 of those hours are specifically in sdm so they do receive really extensive training in scm so really this is just a quick overview of our assessments and what all of them are if you have any questions specifically go ahead and put them in the chat and we'll try to address them when we're done so it all begins with the intake which is when someone calls a concern into our abuse neglect hotline so the intake worker looks at the information and runs that through our intake screening definitions um they always have to see if the concerns impact the child um so if it's something about drug abuse um by the caretaker they need to see how how that impacts the child and how severe that may impact the child they will decide if that going to screen in if we're going to do an investigation or if that's going to screen out if it doesn't meet definition and it's going to screen out um someone else looks at that just to ensure that that's correct if it screens in then they decide what priority that gets um the priority will be dependent on how quickly we go out and we investigate it um a priority one means we go out within 24 hours priority two is within five days and those are calendar days and then a priority three is within ten calendar dates um from there we do two assessments within the initial assessment phase and within those within the initial assessment phase we're assessing two things it's safety and then it's risk so you can see on our little chart there we have the maltreatment occurrence and that happens within that day one that's what we're assessing so safety is the eminent danger um and that occurs right away our safety assessment is just assessing that eminent danger and then risk is the um likelihood of future danger so we're talking about within one to two years what's the risk of further maltreatment so those are two terms that i think get interchanged a lot but for the department they're two very different terms when we talk about safety that's right now is that child safe to remain in the home and then risk are they going to be safe there long term and those are two different assessments we do write an initial assessment so within that first 30 days so when we make first contact we do the safety assessment and that's what we're going to talk about first and the safety assessment we have specific safety threats we look at um there are 11 of them and i won't go through them all but just some examples of i guess probably our common ones would be caregiver cause serious physical harm to the child or made a plausible threat to cause serious physical harm as indicated by any of the following and then there are some kind of subsections one would be current excessive discipline or physical force or domestic violence likely to injure the child another one we use pretty commonly would be caregiver does not cannot or will not meet the child's immediate needs for supervision food clothing and or medical or mental health care needs may be basic or exceptional so those are some examples of what our safety threats are and these these are objective not subjective like jay was saying um there used to not maybe be very objective things that workers could look at could look at um but our our safety assessment form when when a worker goes through and fills it out and puts in their narrative it's probably only going to be a few pages long but when our workers do on their training these are i mean they're probably like 10 pages long because every single safety threat is really outlined for what exactly is excessive discipline what exactly does lack of supervision mean so um it just so just so everyone is aware those really are spelled out within the workers sdm training on so it's not subjective um so their worker in lincoln will think the same as a worker in broken bow which is the offer i work out of mainly so um they go through in their assessment to see if any of those safety threats would match um if there are no safety threats in that home then that child is going to be considered safe and what that means is that there's no um eminent harm going to happen to that child which means you know within those next few days within that week whatever um no eminent harm going to happen if one of those safety threats is found to be in that home um then we look to see if we can do a safety intervention that can keep that child in the home if there is then we find that child conditionally safe and we safety plan around it that parent has to agree to that safety plan to be able to find them conditionally safe so we could um have a safety monitor in there someone who would go check you know daily and make sure that mom and dad are doing what they need to do we could also have mom agree to have the kiddo go stay with grandma something like that and grandma can be a safety monitor if there's no way that we can assure safety with a safety plan that child's going to be unsafe and we have to either request court intervention or request that law enforcement put them in a 48-hour hold we also have a check section for child vulnerabilities things like the child's age if they're six or under if they have medical conditions mental health conditions that impact their ability to protect themselves that's important as well um for instance if you have a dirty home or unplaced home but with has a 16 year old in there that's probably not going to be an issue because the 16 year old can probably assist in cleaning that up but if you have a two-year-old in there then that could very well be a safety threat so that is our safety assessment we fill that out within 24 hours of the first victim contact it has to be finalized within four days of that so that's kind of the timeline from there we do the risk assessment and once again risk is within you know one to two years what's the risk of future maltreatment for that child this has to be completed within 30 days of accepting an intake we have 16 domains we look at in the risk assessment so it's not just that one incident what happened in that one incident but a large variety of what's going on with that family in a whole so you look at their past involvement with the department open cases and intakes you look at that child's vulnerability do they have mental health issues do they have past behaviors look at how many kids are in the home how old they are if you have little babies in there if the caregiver is blaming the child or justifying about treatment of it if they have any mental health issues substance abuse domestic violence is the home safe or if it's not safe if they're homeless just a wide variety of issues and that's going to give us a risk score as well with that there's there's either risk or prevention they're very very similar prevention is just um for dependency cases when there's no abuse neglect but they're very very similar so with our risk scores if the family scores low or moderate risk which would mean lower moderate risk of having any maltreatment in the next one or two years we're going to recommend case closure and we're going to refer to any appropriate community services the child also has to be safe if the child is not safe conditionally safe or unsafe we're not going to recommend that the case closed closes obviously um if it's high or very high risk that there will be maltreatment or if the child is conditionally safe or unsafe we're going to recommend that we open a case and that can be a voluntary case or that can be a court case just depending on what's going on um oftentimes if we staff kind of within the department staff with a county attorney we don't feel like there's enough for a court case and we would ask the family if they want to do a voluntary case i would say more often than not the family says no thank you so we say all right and then we um we refer to community services and then we just kind of have it all documented in case they would come in again and oftentimes these high and very high families they do come in again because that's what the tool tells us they will um so we may get another intake and then we'll see um you know that we've offered services you know before and if that should go to court that'll show us you know the pattern as well so so once again this is within 30 days safety assessments within just a few days that's when those will be done okay so if the case closes out then we're done that's all the assessments we'll need if the case goes to ongoing we're going to do a family strength and need assessment next and what that tells us is what we're going to base the case plan around so what um this looks at a number of domains for adults there's eight the caregivers in the family for children there's 12 domains that it looks at um so for the adults it looks at like their coping skills their substance abuse if there's any problems with relationships if they have financial stability any health issues those kind of things are what it focuses on um it also looks at every single child in that household and what their strengths are and what their needs might be it looks at their emotional and behavioral development it looks at their education any kind of sexualized behavior the older kids that looks at their life skills and how they're doing with that it also looks at substance abuse how they are with their peers um it's just kind of a large comprehensive assessment of what they're doing well at and what they're needing some help with ideally this should really be showing us the things that they're doing well at should be able to help us and we should be able to build on those to help them with the things they aren't doing so well with so once we gather that information put that in the assessment um we are going to prioritize it this is kind of what it looks like and we show if it's related to a safety threat if it's related to anything else in that family we're worried about um are they willing to address it and do we need to prioritize it for our case plan um every now and then the family is absolutely not willing to address something um and you may not be able to put it or we are not supposed to put it in our case plan if they're not willing um to address it i do think our workers do a really good job at being able to engage families um for instance if it's a court-involved case and on substance abuse and they really don't want to work on their substance abuse but i think they're very good at being able to engage them and and letting them know hey you're really going to have to work on this you know we understand you don't think it's a problem but the court's really going to need to see you work on this so um hopefully you aren't seeing a lot i guess of of reasons that people are adjudicated not being in the face plan um so that's what the family's strengths and needs are is really um seeing what the family's struggling with hopefully getting strength in there to be able to kind of build up how we can help them with their struggles and getting the case plans built around that this assessment is done every six months it should kind of coincide with how often we're doing case plans as well we can do it every three months if we need to sorry i missed it okay um from there if the kids are at home we do a risk reassessment we do this every three months and what this tells us is if the case should stay open or if the case should be closed um what we look t in this assessment and what we score is their prior history with the department um if the caretaker has had any abuse or neglect in their history and a lot of these are similar to a risk assessment it's the risk reassessment the characteristics of the children again mental health and substance abuse is a caretaker if they're meeting their physical needs and then of course their progress with the case plan so this is very similar to the risk assessment if they score a low or moderate we're going to ask for case closure if they score a high or very high um then we're going to ask for it to remain open and we do understand too that there's a lot of other factors going on if it's a court case and there's a family team involved in things but these are the um this is the assessment that we like to use just to just objectively see is this a case we should keep open or is this a case that we should be recommending for case closure on an objective level um along with that we are assessing for safety the entire time um anytime there's a change of circumstances in that home and changing circumstances include a large variety of things but if there's another incident in the home if mom has a new baby that be a change of circumstances if there's a big blow up in the home if mom brings her boyfriend in the home we should be doing a new safety assessment and see if there's any safety threats that are being met okay if those kiddos are at a home we're doing a reunification assessment um and that's every three months as well to see if um that kiddo can go home so in that just a second i'm sorry there's different domains we look in there we're reassessing the risk and looking at our old risk assessments to see where they scored and to see if any new intakes have came in in the meantime we're looking and seeing how visitation is progressing if those visits are still supervised or not supervised we're going to see if there's any new safety threats in that home or not we're seeing what their progress is on the case plan if they've learned any new skills or if they're not doing very well on that and then it's going to give us a recommendation on that um the recommendation for the risk reassessment if they score low or moderate um and then the visitation if they're not supervised and the visitations are going well and the kids are safe or conditionally safe it's going to recommend that we reunify however if none of those factors exist it'll recommend that we keep them at a home so if the risk level is high or very high if visits are still supervised if safety is unsafe it's going to recommend we keep those kids out of home um as well as it can also recommend we change our permanency objective so um if it's if the kids have been at a home for 15 out of 22 months um the assessment will recommend that we change our permanency objective to whatever is appropriate at that point one other assessment that can be done when the kids are at a home is an assessment of placement stability and suitability and that would be when the kids in a foster home and an intake comes in on that foster home um and that that would be something happens in that foster home there might be allegations of abuse or neglect it's not quite the same as for the parents we're not assessing um necessarily that they're safe or unsafe we're assessing if that placement is suitable for them or unsuitable for them so the assessment looks a little bit different um but and it's a little bit of a higher standard than it is for our parents um for suitability or unsuitability there are a few overrides um in any of our assessments there's policy overrides and then discretionary overrides under four policy overrides and i can tell you what they are their sexual abuse and the perpetrators likely to have access to the child the non-accidental injury to a child was younger than two a severe non-accidental injury and the caregiver's action or inaction resulted in death of a child due to abuse or neglect and what those policy overrides do is automatically bump the level up to a very high risk level in any of our assessments and then there's a discretionary override as well where the cfs special specialist can increase the risk level up just by one level or down by one level and that's an automatic consultation point with their supervisor as well if they feel like there's something that just wasn't captured within that assessment and then they have to justify why they're doing it and then the supervisor has to um look over it and agree with that justification as far as how often the override the discretionary overrides are used it's very minimal um in the risk assessment it's 1.9 prevention is 0.7 the risk reassessment is the highest with 15.3 and reunification is 3.8 so it's not that often um for case closure once again we would always do a risk reassessment to close a case and we will always do a safety assessment because we always need to make sure that that child is safe um and obviously during during a court case or a voluntary case we should have a family team involved we need to make sure that that that child is going to be safe and that all members of the team generally are going to feel comfortable with that um if the safety plan is still in place we're not going to close the case and if the child is not safe we're certainly not going to close the case um obviously we can't ever with a hundred percent certainty say there's never going to be another intake or there's never going to be another issue of maltreatment in the home but that's why we have our teams and that's why we have our safety networks and speak to everyone speak to the collateral to try to reduce that risk and that's why we're trying to rely on our assessments too because it will show us there's a low risk or there's a moderate risk and that makes us more comfortable being able to close those cases feeling that the risk has been mitigated by the time we're able to do case closure okay i think um i think this is mine sorry jake for our for sharing our assessments um we do share our assessments with our families um they are able to work a lot more collaboratively with us when they know what's going on with our case um when they understand the purpose of what's happening with the case when we make a safety plan that absolutely has to be given to the family and to every single party um that's involved with it and i think dave was going to speak more about how this can be beneficial to sharing with the courts that's correct thank you jesse obviously transparency is an issue that is important to the department we believe that if all parties are informed about the process of what is expected of them that it makes everything go smoother for those of you who are familiar with the process in family drug courts um in both the separate juvenile court and then obviously in criminal court it works as well the information that's being presented to everyone is so that everyone's on the same page and knows what to expect and i believe the outcomes are generally better and there's less surprise for everyone i want to make a couple of points i've been keeping my eye on the chat so i think now's a good time to address a couple of questions one was the whether there were people could get a copy of this presentation and deb has posted a link in the chat for a copy of the presentation there's also a link in the chat for the powerpoint itself so you can download that and print it out for your reference in the future there was a question is there a value assigned to the number of complaints filed concerning a child's well-being and the answer to that is yes and perhaps just he could expand on when you say value i don't think it's not a numerical value per se but that is certainly one thing that is taken into account correct justine i guess i'm not sure um do you mean on the number of intakes um that come in is that what the question is well the question was is there a value assigned to the number of complaints filed concerning a child's well-being so i guess i was taking that to mean perhaps intakes for a family okay yeah there is um there is on the risk assessment on the risk reassessment and on the reunification assessment yes that raises the level on all of those yes if that's what the question meant yeah okay i guess one other point that i wanted to make from a legal standpoint and hope that the attorneys understand the difference is the definition again between safety and risk oftentimes in the courtrooms i'm in i hear those two terms used together safety risk okay for the worker evaluating using the sdm tools safety is separate from risk and if we can do a better job of remembering the definitions of those terms and how the department is is using those differently and get away from using them together safety risk uh i think it will help um help move things along in the court system and help perhaps uh avoid confusion in the future as to what people are really talking about because if you're coming from the same mindset of definitions it would be helpful to everyone involved i see there's another question uh so if 15 calls have been received what is the escalation okay so it's once again those same assessments like the risk assessment and then it'll be the reunification and the risk reassessment every until you get up to probably around three yeah until you get around to three or more then it probably doesn't matter if you have three or fifteen it raises the um it raises the level of risk assessment and they do divide it out for the risk assessment between abuse cause and neglect calls um but it'll raise your level and i can tell you for um like the risk assessment specifically if you have um like let's say 15 calls and half are for abuse and heifer for neglect and then you have if you normally have that many calls you're probably going to have some open cases at least some voluntary ones um if you have that many calls and that many open cases that alone probably put them at high or very high um of a level so it it really does make a pretty big difference when you have a lot of past department involvement in those assessments another question received is if family declines to work on identified issue and it is not included in case plan is such info shared with parties so i guess i'm not sure when you ask such info if you're referring to the identified issue or perhaps if the clarification of that question might help um you unless you want to take a stab at that just i'm not sure yeah so you can put in your case plan um a certain issue like if they come in for substance abuse and they absolutely aren't going to work on it the court is going to require it let's say you can put that and then the client refused to work on it um there's a box you can check and that will print off on your case plan if that does that make sense so it will show all legal parties that the the person's refusing to do it i think that answers the question okay um another question has nebraska completed a validation study of the sdm the answer is yes in 2016 nebraska dhhs completed an external liability evaluation with the nccd [Music] to look at the intake safety and initial risk assessments so i think that the answer is yes and we're continually looking at um through our internal cqi process to evaluate um the assessments and the validity of it and then the follow-up question was if so how has that study modified the current svm i i don't have an answer to that i don't know specifically um what things have changed within the stm from the time it was rolled out and uh statewide in 2013 until where we are today in 2000 to 2020. um i will just for just giggles i guess i will show this this here i don't know if everybody can see it um this is this is the book that i received when i first went through sdm training back in 2012 i was uh in grand island at the time and grand island was one of the pilot areas that first evaluated sdm before it was rolled out statewide and so this is a very thick binder and i spent days in the classroom along with caseworkers training on these assessments and the process so again as justice said earlier in the presentation the workers really are trained extensively in different scenarios um what did the definitions mean how to apply them um so it's not just a process where you check boxes there's a lot more to it than that so i hope everybody understands that and appreciates that the sdm bench card is a quick reference that should be should have been attached in the materials and if not please just request it from [Music] the ccfl and i'm sure they'll provide that to you again but it has on it a background of sdm the overview of all the assessments uh the timing of the assessments in relation to the hearings and then what the workers should be able to describe based on their assessments the bench card was developed you know mainly for the judges when the sdm model was first rolled out i know uh is provided to all of them hopefully they have that handy and use it on a regular basis [Music] and i do see that the bench card pdf link has been put in the chat so it looks like we didn't uh stretch this out long enough justy um if there are more questions we'd be happy to try and answer them jay this is deb and there was one question in the chat um what is the dhhs policy regarding providing assessment forms to parties when requested i did miss that thank you dave um our policy is that we provide the assessment forms to the parties when requested with the exception of of one that's the aps and that provides that contains information that would be considered confidential because the assessment's really on on someone or someone's who are not a legal party to the case if somebody desires to have that information they just need to ask the court for an order to release it uh the court so orders then we're going to provide that assessment uh pursuant to the court's order i see there's another question is there a process for weeding out someone who's abusing the hotline number and are just calling 15 times for nefarious reasons um justine can you answer that well i wish so um but you know um because of because of confidentiality reasons that um that really anyone's able to call in um confidentially it doesn't it doesn't appear like there is really um a way to do that so i i feel like just one time in my area they wanted to file false reporting charges on someone but you know people are able to call into the hotline um anonymously as well so it's very very difficult to do i would say i agree yeah obviously we want people to be able to report um that's what leads to child safety in the long run uh and i do agree that there are people out there who would use the system and on my in my experience over 25 years in practice um too often it's it's a tool that disgruntled uh divorcing parents uh or separating parents seem to use and and that is unfortunate um there's a question about oh i'm sorry what is apss good question i i hate those terms as well i should have used the full term it's assessment for uh placement safety and suitability and that's on a foster placement so that's why i said they're not really necessarily a legal party uh is there a deadline on when legal team will receive safety plan i'm not aware of a deadline justine am i correct i don't yeah i don't think there's really a deadline but you sh um you know our safety plan participants who would be you know parents and whoever safety monitor should really have it as soon as it's signed and it's you know reasonable to get it to them if they need it in a certain structure um i just as soon as it's available i would think you should be able to get it or reasonable to get it but i don't think there is a deadline per se okay another good question here as the risk level can never be lowered due to prior intakes is there a formula for overriding such as how long ago um yeah you know that is one thing so that would be like the risk reassessment right and that is one thing a lot of the time it can be high due to static factors um because sometimes it's like their past history with the department is always going to be there their mental health is always going to be there you know for parents so um it can basically always be high for them so hat would be when the worker might want to use an override a discretionary override and override it to moderate that would be a reason they'd want to do that because sometimes no matter how great those parents are going to do it will never ever be moderate because everything else is a static factor for them and the question to clarify all except placement assessments are available to parties upon request and placement assessments are available with a court order yes now understand that's that's um the way it should be and i understand across the state perhaps some service areas um do things a little bit differently but that's my understanding of our internal policy as far as making assessments available right they they should all be available upon request and i know in some in some areas you maybe have an agreement where um you're always going to provide you know whatever your safety i know in our area we provide safety and risk at all removals um so that's kind of up to your area what you have agreed upon okay um just to kind of close up um again the bench card has been provided to everybody it's in a link in the chat and i would encourage everybody to print that out and have it handy for reference again there's definitions that are contained on the bench card that are very useful in helping to understand how it is that the workers are making the decisions that they make through the sdm assessment tools and i want to point out again or point out that safety and risk as used in terms of the sdm assessments are different i often hear in court the term safety risk used as one word in one concept and we would hope that after you hearing the webinar today you would understand that when we do these assessments that safety and risk are two separate items that are to be considered so we hope you can kind of take that away from today's webinar justin mentioned the apss which is the assessment of placement safety and suitability one reason why the department won't provide that without a court order is that it contains information that would be confidential considered confidential of a foster home so the department doesn't believe it can provide that information without a court order but as justice said the other assessment information can be provided upon request um so again hopefully today we have met the goals of help helpfully hopefully sharing with you the objectives of the sdm model and we have time still for questions next question uh which assessment did you say could only be shared with a court order i i think i just answered that michelle the apss so that's an assessment for placement safety and suitability if a family is asked to work a voluntary case and they refuse at what point does hhs not accept that okay sorry um we try to engage them in voluntary services if if we feel like there's a safety threat in that house um and we really can't mitigate it and can't engage them in voluntary services we'll we'll staff among ourselves at hhs and then we staff it with the county attorney to see if we need to file a petition so but we really try to if we feel like we can um work with them voluntarily we really try to do that and we try to um be very upfront with the family too and i always say this is not a threat this is this is being honest with you that we we're really going to have to discuss with the county attorney um if you won't you know kind of work with us the last thing we want to have to do is to is to bring things into court honestly and to have to um remove children we don't want to have to do that because we all know it gets very complicated um when we have five other people telling us what to do but if we can't keep those children safe and the parents just won't work with us then that's what we do and again as a reminder the department can ask the county attorney but the county attorney's offices the the ones who are able to file a petition uh we can't we can't file that through the department um is there a comparison that is done between each of the assessments specifically between the first and last assessment you know it's kind of included that would be the risk assessment and then the risk reassessment and it's a little bit included in the risk reassessment because you compare a part of the risk reassessment is what is what would be your initial risk risk assessment so it can be like very high for your initial risk value and then you come up with the end what's your current one so yeah it's kind of within that risk reassessment if that makes sense um are there still cases being screened for response there are a lot um because it was just to prove um that that there was a randomizer where all of the alternative response um cases came in and then they went 50 50 to alternative response and traditional response and that was completely taken off just very recently and so now all of them that are coming alternative response go to alternative response so yes thank you so you'll have the the link to um the pdf for the slides and then of course there's the link as we discussed for the bench card which i think is a very handy reference tool um i do see we have judge corey on on the line perhaps he can speak as to whether or not he thinks the bench card is useful okay no um i from my end i appreciate the uh what was posted uh in order to give a perspective in regards to the uh specifically the definitions in regards to this decision-making that's being used in regards to what the the department's doing so um i i do appreciate that and i appreciate the uh opportunity to that you all had this webinar today so thank you very much okay sorry to put you on your spot no no no um it no like there's another question here has the department announced publicly in some form the results of the alternative response randomized cases i'm not aware of justine are you aware you know i don't know i don't know if someone else on the department here knows why don't i i'll jot a note down and see if we can get an answer to that and perhaps get that information out to the people who are present through cip yeah i know i think that covered all the questions uh we've covered the material we uh thank you for everybody to everybody for spending your lunch time um with us hopefully this this gave you kind of an overview and will be helpful to you going forward um again as i touched on there's so much more here and you could spend days learning about this um and we just hope this overview will help you in the future um with your um with your practice jay and jessie thank you so much for um for providing this overview of sdm and as a reminder the bench card link is in the chat the presentation link is in the chat the cle number is in the chat so there's a lot of information there and then also we will be providing the same webinar next week on november 16th so if you know of others that would be interested in attending that webinar please encourage them to attend the same presentation just at it on a different day and time so with that i will close the webinar uh for today and um hope that everyone enjoys the rest of this sunny beautiful day and will take care bye

Keep your eSignature workflows on track

Make the signing process more streamlined and uniform
Take control of every aspect of the document execution process. eSign, send out for signature, manage, route, and save your documents in a single secure solution.
Add and collect signatures from anywhere
Let your customers and your team stay connected even when offline. Access airSlate SignNow to Sign Nebraska Profit Sharing Agreement Template Secure from any platform or device: your laptop, mobile phone, or tablet.
Ensure error-free results with reusable templates
Templatize frequently used documents to save time and reduce the risk of common errors when sending out copies for signing.
Stay compliant and secure when eSigning
Use airSlate SignNow to Sign Nebraska Profit Sharing Agreement Template Secure and ensure the integrity and security of your data at every step of the document execution cycle.
Enjoy the ease of setup and onboarding process
Have your eSignature workflow up and running in minutes. Take advantage of numerous detailed guides and tutorials, or contact our dedicated support team to make the most out of the airSlate SignNow functionality.
Benefit from integrations and API for maximum efficiency
Integrate with a rich selection of productivity and data storage tools. Create a more encrypted and seamless signing experience with the airSlate SignNow API.
Collect signatures
24x
faster
Reduce costs by
$30
per document
Save up to
40h
per employee / month

Our user reviews speak for themselves

illustrations persone
Kodi-Marie Evans
Director of NetSuite Operations at Xerox
airSlate SignNow provides us with the flexibility needed to get the right signatures on the right documents, in the right formats, based on our integration with NetSuite.
illustrations reviews slider
illustrations persone
Samantha Jo
Enterprise Client Partner at Yelp
airSlate SignNow has made life easier for me. It has been huge to have the ability to sign contracts on-the-go! It is now less stressful to get things done efficiently and promptly.
illustrations reviews slider
illustrations persone
Megan Bond
Digital marketing management at Electrolux
This software has added to our business value. I have got rid of the repetitive tasks. I am capable of creating the mobile native web forms. Now I can easily make payment contracts through a fair channel and their management is very easy.
illustrations reviews slider
walmart logo
exonMobil logo
apple logo
comcast logo
facebook logo
FedEx logo

Award-winning eSignature solution

Wondering about Sign Profit Sharing Agreement Template Nebraska Secure? Nothing can be more comfortable with airSlate SignNow. Its an award-winning platform for your company that is easy to embed to your existing business infrastructure. It plays perfectly with preferable modern software and requires a short set up time. You can check the powerful solution to create complex eSignature workflows with no coding.

Sign Profit Sharing Agreement Template Nebraska Secure - step-by-step guidance:

  • Sign up if you have no account yet. You can also log in with your social account - Google or Facebook.
  • Get started with a 30-day free trial for newcomers or check airSlate SignNow pricing plans.
  • Create your customized forms or use ready-to-use templates. The feature-rich PDF editor is always at your fingertips.
  • Invite your teammates and create an unlimited number of teams. Collaborate in a single shared workspace.
  • Easily understand Sign Profit Sharing Agreement Template Nebraska Secure feature by self serve on our website or use the customer support.
  • Create document signing links and share them with your clients. Now you can collect signatures ten times faster.
  • Get instant email notifications about any user action.
  • Try out the free mobile application to be in touch on the go.

Improve your experience with airSlate SignNow. Creating your account, you get everything needed to close deals faster, enhance business performance, make your teammates and partners happier. Try out the advanced feature - Sign Profit Sharing Agreement Template Nebraska Secure. Make sure it's the best solution for the company, customers, and each individual.

How it works

Upload & open your document in the editor
Fill it out and eSign it in minutes
Save the signed document or share it with others

Rate your experience

4.5
56 votes
be ready to get more

Get legally-binding signatures now!

  • Best ROI. Our customers achieve an average 7x ROI within the first six months.
  • Scales with your use cases. From SMBs to mid-market, airSlate SignNow delivers results for businesses of all sizes.
  • Intuitive UI and API. Sign and send documents from your apps in minutes.

A smarter way to work: —how to industry sign banking integrate

Make your signing experience more convenient and hassle-free. Boost your workflow with a smart eSignature solution.

How to eSign & fill out a document online How to eSign & fill out a document online

How to eSign & fill out a document online

Document management isn't an easy task. The only thing that makes working with documents simple in today's world, is a comprehensive workflow solution. Signing and editing documents, and filling out forms is a simple task for those who utilize eSignature services. Businesses that have found reliable solutions to document type sign profit sharing agreement template nebraska secure don't need to spend their valuable time and effort on routine and monotonous actions.

Use airSlate SignNow and document type sign profit sharing agreement template nebraska secure online hassle-free today:

  1. Create your airSlate SignNow profile or use your Google account to sign up.
  2. Upload a document.
  3. Work on it; sign it, edit it and add fillable fields to it.
  4. Select Done and export the sample: send it or save it to your device.

As you can see, there is nothing complicated about filling out and signing documents when you have the right tool. Our advanced editor is great for getting forms and contracts exactly how you want/need them. It has a user-friendly interface and complete comprehensibility, giving you complete control. Register today and start enhancing your eSign workflows with powerful tools to document type sign profit sharing agreement template nebraska secure online.

How to eSign and fill documents in Google Chrome How to eSign and fill documents in Google Chrome

How to eSign and fill documents in Google Chrome

Google Chrome can solve more problems than you can even imagine using powerful tools called 'extensions'. There are thousands you can easily add right to your browser called ‘add-ons’ and each has a unique ability to enhance your workflow. For example, document type sign profit sharing agreement template nebraska secure and edit docs with airSlate SignNow.

To add the airSlate SignNow extension for Google Chrome, follow the next steps:

  1. Go to Chrome Web Store, type in 'airSlate SignNow' and press enter. Then, hit the Add to Chrome button and wait a few seconds while it installs.
  2. Find a document that you need to sign, right click it and select airSlate SignNow.
  3. Edit and sign your document.
  4. Save your new file to your account, the cloud or your device.

With the help of this extension, you avoid wasting time on monotonous assignments like saving the data file and importing it to an electronic signature solution’s collection. Everything is close at hand, so you can quickly and conveniently document type sign profit sharing agreement template nebraska secure.

How to eSign forms in Gmail How to eSign forms in Gmail

How to eSign forms in Gmail

Gmail is probably the most popular mail service utilized by millions of people all across the world. Most likely, you and your clients also use it for personal and business communication. However, the question on a lot of people’s minds is: how can I document type sign profit sharing agreement template nebraska secure a document that was emailed to me in Gmail? Something amazing has happened that is changing the way business is done. airSlate SignNow and Google have created an impactful add on that lets you document type sign profit sharing agreement template nebraska secure, edit, set signing orders and much more without leaving your inbox.

Boost your workflow with a revolutionary Gmail add on from airSlate SignNow:

  1. Find the airSlate SignNow extension for Gmail from the Chrome Web Store and install it.
  2. Go to your inbox and open the email that contains the attachment that needs signing.
  3. Click the airSlate SignNow icon found in the right-hand toolbar.
  4. Work on your document; edit it, add fillable fields and even sign it yourself.
  5. Click Done and email the executed document to the respective parties.

With helpful extensions, manipulations to document type sign profit sharing agreement template nebraska secure various forms are easy. The less time you spend switching browser windows, opening multiple accounts and scrolling through your internal data files seeking a template is a lot more time and energy to you for other important tasks.

How to securely sign documents in a mobile browser How to securely sign documents in a mobile browser

How to securely sign documents in a mobile browser

Are you one of the business professionals who’ve decided to go 100% mobile in 2020? If yes, then you really need to make sure you have an effective solution for managing your document workflows from your phone, e.g., document type sign profit sharing agreement template nebraska secure, and edit forms in real time. airSlate SignNow has one of the most exciting tools for mobile users. A web-based application. document type sign profit sharing agreement template nebraska secure instantly from anywhere.

How to securely sign documents in a mobile browser

  1. Create an airSlate SignNow profile or log in using any web browser on your smartphone or tablet.
  2. Upload a document from the cloud or internal storage.
  3. Fill out and sign the sample.
  4. Tap Done.
  5. Do anything you need right from your account.

airSlate SignNow takes pride in protecting customer data. Be confident that anything you upload to your account is secured with industry-leading encryption. Intelligent logging out will protect your information from unauthorised access. document type sign profit sharing agreement template nebraska secure out of your mobile phone or your friend’s phone. Protection is key to our success and yours to mobile workflows.

How to electronically sign a PDF document with an iOS device How to electronically sign a PDF document with an iOS device

How to electronically sign a PDF document with an iOS device

The iPhone and iPad are powerful gadgets that allow you to work not only from the office but from anywhere in the world. For example, you can finalize and sign documents or document type sign profit sharing agreement template nebraska secure directly on your phone or tablet at the office, at home or even on the beach. iOS offers native features like the Markup tool, though it’s limiting and doesn’t have any automation. Though the airSlate SignNow application for Apple is packed with everything you need for upgrading your document workflow. document type sign profit sharing agreement template nebraska secure, fill out and sign forms on your phone in minutes.

How to sign a PDF on an iPhone

  1. Go to the AppStore, find the airSlate SignNow app and download it.
  2. Open the application, log in or create a profile.
  3. Select + to upload a document from your device or import it from the cloud.
  4. Fill out the sample and create your electronic signature.
  5. Click Done to finish the editing and signing session.

When you have this application installed, you don't need to upload a file each time you get it for signing. Just open the document on your iPhone, click the Share icon and select the Sign with airSlate SignNow button. Your doc will be opened in the application. document type sign profit sharing agreement template nebraska secure anything. In addition, using one service for your document management demands, everything is faster, better and cheaper Download the app today!

How to eSign a PDF document on an Android How to eSign a PDF document on an Android

How to eSign a PDF document on an Android

What’s the number one rule for handling document workflows in 2020? Avoid paper chaos. Get rid of the printers, scanners and bundlers curriers. All of it! Take a new approach and manage, document type sign profit sharing agreement template nebraska secure, and organize your records 100% paperless and 100% mobile. You only need three things; a phone/tablet, internet connection and the airSlate SignNow app for Android. Using the app, create, document type sign profit sharing agreement template nebraska secure and execute documents right from your smartphone or tablet.

How to sign a PDF on an Android

  1. In the Google Play Market, search for and install the airSlate SignNow application.
  2. Open the program and log into your account or make one if you don’t have one already.
  3. Upload a document from the cloud or your device.
  4. Click on the opened document and start working on it. Edit it, add fillable fields and signature fields.
  5. Once you’ve finished, click Done and send the document to the other parties involved or download it to the cloud or your device.

airSlate SignNow allows you to sign documents and manage tasks like document type sign profit sharing agreement template nebraska secure with ease. In addition, the security of the data is priority. File encryption and private web servers can be used for implementing the most recent capabilities in data compliance measures. Get the airSlate SignNow mobile experience and operate more efficiently.

Trusted esignature solution— what our customers are saying

Explore how the airSlate SignNow eSignature platform helps businesses succeed. Hear from real users and what they like most about electronic signing.

Great eSignature Program!
5
Neil Saini

What do you like best?

The ability to do bulk invites at lower plan levels.

Read full review
Efficient and very usefull tool
5
Jessica Mora

What do you like best?

That it is a software very easy to use, allows to manage correctly each document you upload, it is very friendly with the signers and the platform in which you edit is very complete.

Read full review
Awesome solution
5
Administrator in Health, Wellness and Fitness

What do you like best?

The ease of the platform and UX/UI make it very easy to use.

Read full review
be ready to get more

Get legally-binding signatures now!

Frequently asked questions

Learn everything you need to know to use airSlate SignNow eSignatures like a pro.

How do you make a document that has an electronic signature?

How do you make this information that was not in a digital format a computer-readable document for the user? " "So the question is not only how can you get to an individual from an individual, but how can you get to an individual with a group of individuals. How do you get from one location and say let's go to this location and say let's go to that location. How do you get from, you know, some of the more traditional forms of information that you are used to seeing in a document or other forms. The ability to do that in a digital medium has been a huge challenge. I think we've done it, but there's some work that we have to do on the security side of that. And of course, there's the question of how do you protect it from being read by people that you're not intending to be able to actually read it? " When asked to describe what he means by a "user-centric" approach to security, Bensley responds that "you're still in a situation where you are still talking about a lot of the security that is done by individuals, but we've done a very good job of making it a user-centric process. You're not going to be able to create a document or something on your own that you can give to an individual. You can't just open and copy over and then give it to somebody else. You still have to do the work of the document being created in the first place and the work of the document being delivered in a secure manner."

How do i insert an electronic signature into a word document?

How do I sign a text file with a text editor? How do I convert an .rtf, .otf, or .woff file to a proper .doc format? How do I edit an .doc file using an application like MS Word? How do I save an .doc or .rtf file in Adobe Illustrator format? Can I import a .doc, .rtf, or .otf file in Microsoft Publisher? How do I convert WordPerfect (.doc), MS Word (.doc), OpenOffice/LibreOffice/Adobe Acrobat (.odt). How do I import a file using MS Outlook? How do I import a Microsoft Office Document? I'm having trouble saving a document (how do I find a particular document in the archive? what does that mean? what does it mean to add something to a file or folder in Exchange? I'm having problems saving documents in Microsoft Office, is there any way I can export or save these documents? If so, what settings would make the file most helpful to me? I'm having problems saving a file in Microsoft Office (Exchange). Is it possible to find out how a file is saved? I'm trying to get a document to print but cannot find the printer I want to use. How do I set up the printer and find it on the network? Do you have a tool that shows me which Exchange servers can access the Exchange Online folder structure? What are the differences between the Exchange 2003, Exchange 2004, Exchange 2007, Exchange 2010 and Exchange 2013? Can you describe the differences between the three Exchange Server versions? If an Exchange user has multiple email addresses, how can I change their email...

What is needed to electronicly sign documents online?

What is the difference between the Electronic Signature Act (S. 1746; 43 sec. 1681 et seq.) and the Uniform Electronic Signature Act (S. 1746; 43 sec. 1702 et seq.)? What does the "digital signature" mean? What are the benefits of having a "digital signature"? How can a signature be forged? Will a false signature or document be used to commit a crime? How will a false document be detected, and what can be done to detect a fraud or false document? Why does the Federal Government need electronic signatures? How can an electronic signature be verified? How can a signature be created? What is a digital signature? The term digital signature refers to a type of cryptographic algorithm which enables you to electronically sign your documents. The algorithm is the algorithm which enables the signature to be digitally recorded and stored electronically. In some cases, the signature has a unique number. The number is called a Digital Signature Identifier or "DNID". The unique number helps to protect against fraud, forgery, and other illegal actions. A digital signature can be created by one or more people or a company with the help of an electronic or a digital signature service, such as a signature service, signature provider, or electronic signature service. The key to a digital signature is the ability of the party that creates the digital signature to prove that the person or company to which it was issued actually signed the document. The party that creates...