Encrypt Electronic signature Document Myself

Our team at Readdle develops a number of solutions to help people be more productive and go paperless.PDF Expert — a great tool to edit, annotate, sign PDFs, and fill formsScanner Pro — iOS app to turn your iPhone into portable scanner. You can scan any document and save it in PDF. The app supports OCRFluix — the solution for business to set up a paperless office

What is Digital Signature? And Benefits of Digital Signature CertificatesA digital signature is basically a way to ensure that an electronic document (e-mail, spreadsheet, text file, etc.) is authentic. Authentic means that you know who created the document and you know that it has not been altered in any way since that person created it.Digital signatures rely on certain types of encryption to ensure authentication. Encryption is the process of taking all the data that one computer is sending to another and encoding it into a form that only the other computer will be able to decode. Authentication is the process of verifying that information is coming from a trusted source. These two processes work hand in hand for digital signatures.How do I get a Digital Signature?Digital Signature Certificate (DSC) is a secure digital key that certifies the identity of the holder, issued by a signNowing Authority (CA). There are many companies provide Digital Signature , i.e.SIFYeMudhra(n)codeThese companies gives LRA to several companies that are basically known as LRA. You may directly apply online and purchase from your local authority.signNow - offers a 14 day free trial and 3 types of pricing plans starting from $9.99 when paid monthly. All plans include sending unlimited amount of documents for signature. Available for Mac, iOS, Windows, Android and Web-browser.signNow - offers a 14 day free trial and 2 types of pricing plans starting from $29 when paid monthly. All plans include sending unlimited amount of documents for signature. Available for web-browser, iOS and Android.signNow - offers a 30 day free trial and 3 types of pricing plans starting from $15 when paid monthly. The number of document sends included each month differs by plan type. Available for Web-browser, iOS and Android.signNow - offers a 14-day free trial and 3 types of pricing plans starting from $15 per month when paid monthly. All plans include fair user restrictions to sign documents and send them for signature. Available for web-browser, iOS and Android.signNow - offers a 14-day free trial and 3 types of pricing plans starting from $15 per month when paid monthly. Unlimited document sending is subject to fair use thresholds. Available for Web-browser, iOS and Android.signNow - offers a free trial and 2 pricing plans starting from $16 per month when paid annually. All plans include sending unlimited amount of documents for signature. Available for web-browser, iOS and Android.Digital Signature for E-tenderingThere are three types of digital signature certificates depending on the validation of identity and type of use. They are:Class I DSC – Individuals get it for validating the email identification of the users and in situations where risk is minimal and here the signature is stored in software.Class II DSC – Business organizations or individuals use this digital signature certificate to validate the information given by the subscriber in the application against the information available in a trusted consumer database and in other such situations where security risk is moderate. In this case a hardware cryptographic device is used for storing the signature.Class III DSC – This digital certificate is directly issued by the signNowing authority and it is required that the person applying for DSC must be present at the signNowing authority’s premises and prove his/her identity in front of the authority and the security risk involved in this case is very high. In this case also a hardware cryptographic device is used for storing the signature.The Necessity of Digital Signature CertificatesFor e-filing of the income tax returns by any individual, the Government of India has made it mandatory to affix digital signatures to the income tax returns documents. For affixing the digital signature one must have digital signature certificates issued by licensed certification authority.In addition, Ministry of Corporate Affairs has set the mandatory guidelines for the companies directing them to file all reports, applications and forms using a digital signature only and this again requires a digital signature certificate.For GST also a company must verify its GST application by affixing a digital signature using digital signature certificate in order to get registered for GST.These days many Government procedures, filling different applications, amendments and forms require digital signatures made by using digital signature certificates.Benefits of Digital Signature CertificatesSaves Money & Time: As there is no need of physical presence you can digitally sign your PDF files and other documents using DSC anywhere & anytime. You need not sign your paper documents and then scan them to send them across through internet if you follow the above given option. You can save the money which would otherwise be spent on printing and scanning the document. You can also go green by saving paper.Secured Data: The digitally signed documents are tamper proof as the digital signatures are secured with a private key and public key and they cannot be edited after digitally signing the document.Authentic: Digitally signed documents are authentic and the receiver can be completely sure about the sender’s identity and integrity. The receiver can easily execute the information in the document without worrying about the document being forged.Certificate (DSC) is essential for companies and organizations that take part or intend to take part in eTendering processes on various Government sites. If a organisation going to apply for any Government eTender needs to have a Class 3 Digital Signature Certificate registered in the name of a representative who is authorized to submit online offers for e-Tendering applications.How to apply digital signature ?We enable compliance with legal and regulatory requirements for end-to-end electronic transactions for any kind of E-Business.What Documents required for Class 3 Digital Signature ?Documents required for Class 3 Digital SignatureApplication Form (Duly Signed)Recent Passport Size Photograph (Pasted on the Application form and Signed across the Photo)Identity ProofPAN CARD * (Income Tax F Filing Portal requires PAN Encrypted DSC)PassportDriving LicensePhoto ID Issued by Central Or State GovernmentVoter IDAadhar CardApply for Digital SignatureAddress ProofPassportDriving LicenseLatest Utility Bills - Not Older than 3 Months (Telephone, Electricity, Water, Tax, LIC)Ration CardVoter IDBank Account Statement ( Not Older than 2 Months)Service Tax/ VAT registration CertificateProperty tax/ Municipal tax ReceiptProof of Right to do Business (Any one of the Following)Certificate of IncorporationMemorandum of Association & Articles of associationRegistered Partnership deedValid Business licenses like VAT , Service Tax RegistrationLicense under shop and Establishment Act (For Proprietorship Concerns)PAN Card of the Company/FirmProof of Right to do Business (Any one of the Following)Latest annual Report / BalancesheetLatest Income Tax ReturnsOrganization Bank Details on Banks Letter Head/ Latest Bank statement attested by BankAuthorization Letter in Favor of the applicationAll Documents to be Self Attested by the applicant & Attested by the Authorised Signatory of the Business with Stamp & Seal. For More information about Best Digital Signature company in kanpurDifferent software solutions exist for different platforms, hence I am going to give one (the most common one) for each one of them:Windows: Open the PDF in signNow and click the “Fill & Sign” button in the right pane.Mac: Open the PDF in Preview, click the Toolbox button, then click SigniPhone and iPad: Open the PDF attachment in Mail, then click “Markup and Reply” to sign.iPhone and Android: Download signNow Fill & Sign, open the PDF, and tap the Signature button.Chrome: Install the signNow extension, upload your PDF, and click the Signature button.n short, “best” varies by your specific need - and there are dozens of comparison vectors. The 2 most important, IMHO, are do you needA “standing order” doc that can be easily signed anytime by anyone, such as an injury waiver at a karate school / trampoline park / etc- that sort of thing. The signor is not pre-defined. For that, we (SwiftCloud) may well be best, but there are dozens to compare, and important to consider is volume, HIPAA medical compliance, integration to marketing, etc.Specific doc / signor - such as a real estate sales contract. The parties are pre-defined, and automation can be added to flow from group 1 (say, “the seller(s)”) to group 2 (seller’s agent, for example) to group 3 (the buyer(s) consecutively or concurrently.The #1 reason to use e-signature is to save time + integration on the data i.e. so marketing is 100% automated for example, and reducing time-to-close which results in higher sales pull-through rates. Don’t get me wrong, saving money on paper, printer, ink, printer jams, etc. is important - but that’s a money saver, not a money maker. Marketing and sales will actually create new revenue for you, so to not use electronic signature is for most businesses, downright neglectful. Granted, I’m a bit biased, but happy to do a formal study to prove it with real numbers, should anyone be so inclined.And you are good to go!!

From my own understanding, Digital signatures are unique identifiers used to verify the authenticity of an electronic document. This signature which is usually in the form of code (encrypted) contains information about the sender of that document.In security, the 3 most important attributes of data is the Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability (CIA). The importance of of a digital signature here is to verify the integrity of a digital document to see if it’s data has been tampered with at any point. This feature is really useful in the digital forensic investigation cases.Hope this could help as I’m still also new to security myself.

I believe that Apple should be compelled to comply, and ultimately, I believe that it will be good for security and privacy in the future.Here's the reason.The government is not asking for a "backdoor" like Tim Cook disingenuously stated.  The government is asking for the following:Turn off the "10 failed passcodes and you wipe" functionTurn off the delay between failed passcodesAdd support for external PIN entry.The FBI will then brute-force the passcode (for the non-techies, this means that they will use an external system to try every passcode combination, in sequence, until they hit the right one.  Also note that the government is not requiring Apple to build the feature into all iOS releases, nor is it preventing Apple from immediately reverting such a change.  It's also not required to actually release the code to the FBI; all the work can be done at Apple's headquarters.Here's where this is Apple's problem: the iPhone 5C's security algorithms are all built into the software.  Since then, they are built into a piece of hardware called the Secure Enclave, which can only be unlocked using the fingerprint scanner or the passcode.  It's arguable that Apple could possibly update the software on the Secure Enclave through a patch as well, but they're not saying.The bottom line here is this: Apple released a product which can already either be updated while it is still passcode-locked, or that the contents of the flash drives can be downloaded to a VM and executed there.  The simple fact that Apple did not immediately state that it was technically impossible to do either of these things means that they do have the capability to do so.This also means that Apple can load a custom OS designed to run on that IMEI only (which they can do) which will disable the functions listed.  They don't even have to give the code to the FBI, they only need to run it and unlock the phone.  Even if the FBI got hold of Apple's crippled software and tried to reverse-engineer it to run on other phones, it's digitally signed, so any modification of the code will cause it to fail, rendering it unusable.Apple's concerns about making "backdoors" which could unlock any iDevice in existence are simply fear-mongering, and as I already stated, are disingenuous.Why is this good for security?We need to demand from our hardware manufacturers smartphones that do not have similar security holes that the government can demand through the court a manufacturer bsignNow.  We can't trust the government to do the right thing all the time.  So what's the alternative?  We demand a tougher smartphone.  We need to demand security that even the manufacturer cannot break.  We want Apple (and other manufacturers) to get their hardware to a point where even they will not be able to break it.  This can only mean more secure smartphones in the future.Which, in the long run, will be good for us.(EDIT) The government released a scathing renewal of its filing on Friday, stating, among other things, that Apple has overblown the issue and has made misleading statements.  In part, the updated filing says:The order does not, as Apple's public statement alleges, require Apple to create or provide a "backdoor" to every iPhone...It does not provide 'hackers and criminals' access to iPhones...and does not give the government "the power to signNow into anyone's device" without a warrant or court authorization.No one outside Apple would have access to the software required by the order unless Apple itself chose to share it.Apple's concern is that all iPhones would be affected, but not by the requested software.  Apple is attempting to make a "slippery slope" argument by stating that if the prosecutors in this case are victorious, other prosecutors around the country will start asking for the same technology, and then other countries would follow.  Apple also stated that this is not a simple fix, it will take weeks or months to develop.The government filing states that Apple is failing to do its civic duty as a good corporate citizen of the country:This court should not entertain an argument that fulfilling basic civic responsibilities of any American citizen or company -- complying with a lawful court order -- could be obviated because the company prefers to market itself as providing privacy protections that make it infeasible to comply with court-issued warrants.Finally, the government made the same point that I did above: Apple never said it can't do it (emphasis mine):At no point has Apple ever said that it does not have the technical ability to comply with the order, or that the order asks Apple to undertake an unreasonable challenging software development task.  On this point, Apple's silence speaks volumes.

Anyone claiming to have your Aadhaar card number and phone number cannot sign on your behalf. Digital signing is generally backed up by two-factor authentication that means any document sent out to you for signing you'd need two-factor authentication for that, i.e., login credentials and an OTP or Passcode on your phone number. So it would be a hoax call if someone makes such a claim.There are many different 2 FA used these days to protect your information. Some of the great examples are Google, PayPal, Takeaway, Rackspace, Campfire and many more.Visit the site to learn more about digital signatures here.

What are some cryptocurrencies in which I should invest? After several months of trading cryptocurrencies and watching the market become saturated with “hype” coins, I started to concentrate on platform coins with working products. Platform coins are blockchains that other blockchains can be built off of— like Ethereum. Nearly every utility token was built off Ethereum’s blockchain. In addition, they often have smart contract and ICO capabilities.Platform coins are also great to hold because they often have “proof of stake” consensus, or variants like Delegated Byzantine Fault Tolerance (DBFT) in Neo’s case. Long story short, holding these type o...

For me it really comes down to this. There are a lot of gun laws on the books right now as it is. These gun laws have varying degrees of success. Some I don’t like but can live with, but other just plain aggravate me.To speak of where I currently call home, New York boasts some of the “toughest gun laws in the country”. Most importantly is their so-called “assault weapons” ban. It is an insane law in that I can own an AR-15, minus a few evil features. But the actual gun, the so-called “assault weapon” is entirely legal. The law is entirely ineffective as well. They imposed a ten round magazine limit, thinking this does anything, yet the Parkland shooter used 10 round mags quite effectively to carry out his heinous act. It clearly isn’t effective.What do we measure effectiveness by? For me, it is statistics. According to the FBI, there were 628 murders in New York state in 2016, 367 of these with guns. That leaves us with a per capita gun homicide rate of 1.86 per 100,000 people. New Jersey, with similarly strict gun laws has a whopping rate of 3.1 per 100,000 people. Go north to Vermont, where the gun laws were lax in 2016, that rate drops to 0.9 gun homicides per 100,000. Next door in New Hampshire has a rate of 0.6 per 100,000 people, and they have VERY lax gun laws. Head south to Massachusetts, with its tough gun laws, and that number jumps back up to 1.25 per 100,000 people. So let’s break that down, NH vs NY, in 2016 there were 16 murders in the entire state of New Hampshire, 8 of those with guns. In just the city of Syracuse NY in that same year there were 31 murders, from a quick count 19 of those were by gun. So much for those tough gun laws, but breaking down the statistics you are 3x more likely to die by gun in NY than NH (0.6 vs 1.8/100,000 people). It is simply the fact stated bluntly.9 of 16 killings solved in 2016 | New HampshireMeet the 30 homicide victims killed in Syracuse in 2016, the city's deadliest yearTable 12So now let’s get to the crux of the argument I am making here. Its quite clear from the data that the supposed “toughnes” of gun laws don’t effect crime. Some lax states have high gun homicide rates, some very low (NH is the lowest, BTW). Anti-gun groups like Giffords would have you believe in graphs like this:Reality is the data, using the same grades they give states for gun control level, looks more like this:With no statistical significance between any of those groups. Perhaps the discrepancy lies with inclusion of some other criteria, probably suicides or perhaps it also includes people shot but not killed. I’m not sure and would love to pour through their data myself, but they don’t publish it.Likely stronger determinants of gun crime are population density and poverty level of the region/state in question. Thus, most gun laws in the state of NY, as an example, are nothing but feel good legislation with no actual effectiveness on crime, they don’t tackle the root causes of why people commit crime (chiefly poverty). Thus it doesn’t make sense that a state like NY with tough handgun laws has a handgun homicide rate of 1.5 while a state like New Mexico, with incredibly lax handgun laws, has a handgun homicide rate of 0.6/100,000.So getting back to the question at hand. If you want to start talking about what legislation we need, let’s also talk about legislation you don’t need. It shouldn’t take you 6 months to go through the permitting process in NY to get a handgun when it clearly isn’t helping. And in NY I should be able to concealed carry (they make it virtually impossible here). Then maybe I’ll sit down and talk with you about Extreme Risk Protection Orders. Let’s remove the absolutely laughable concept of magazine limits, and then I’ll sit down and discuss the merits of a bump stock ban. And that’s not even touching on the subject of federal laws, such as 922r compliance (aka the “sporting purposes” clause; protip - the 2nd amendment isn’t about sports).So to summarize keep pushing for more laws when the ones we have are infringing on our rights and not keeping us safe, and what you will end up with is simply a pushback from us. If instead you want to come to the table and comprise, scratch our back and maybe we’ll scratch yours. We’ll see.