Remove Electronic signature PDF Later

[full disclosure: I’m VP Digital Transformation at Solutions Notarius Inc., a company that supplies electronic and digital signature solutions]It completely depends on the requirements. I do not believe there is a uniquely better e-signature solution for all scenarios. For example, if the type of documents to be signed require low to medium reliability only, most modern e-signature platforms could be ok, subject to meeting legal requirements in the applicable jurisdiction, but if the document must meet stringent regulatory and statutory requirements that include high reliability of identity of signers, those platforms do not typically meet that threshold.Ideally, you would analyze, define and obtain agreement as to what constitutes the minimal acceptable legal reliability threshold you are willing to accept - or that readers of that document will accept. Next, define the technology requirements that correspond to that threshold. Finally, research e-signature options that meet these requirements and provide the best combination of price, features, scalability, etc..Finally, it should be noted that higher legal reliability e-signature platforms and solutions can always accommodate lower reliability documents while the converse is not true…

Edit: I wrote this answer for “must have Android apps” but these are same apps which have changed the way I used to live my life. Each and every App has helped me in one or the other way. I hope you will also find them helpful and a bit life changing. So here is the list: 10. Psiphon For those who use WiFi with proxy settings. So Psiphon bypasses and tunnel the websites or app through a different IP Address. 9. Mirror It's a simple app to record your mobile screen. Based on the concept of CamStudio in PC where you can record your screen, Mirror offers recording of your Mobile screen. 8. NTES- National Train Enquiry System If you are from India and you want to know the running status, cancelled train (partial or fully), Live Station and other features, this App is a must have. 7. VOLT Simple but effective for those who want to learn new vocabulary. That's too obvious, then why not others? Coz here you get the “memory key” which helps you relate the words and easier to remember them. 6. Parchi It a note making app. But here’s a catch. You can view, review, edit and add right from your lockscreen without need to open the app. Isn't that amazing! I personally find this app very useful. 5. edX If you are student or a learner who wants learn something new everyday, and cannot afford to go in the prestigious institutions like MIT, Harvard University, Cambridge, IITM, etc ten it is a must have app. Enroll yourself in any course and Bazinga!! You are ready to learn from the most amazing professors. Similar to edX, we have Coursera. 4. Walnut Manage your expenses on your finger tips. Its easier then that. It shows you your monthly expenditure, ATM locations, bill remainders and many more features. Its a must have app. 3. CamScanner Everyone doesn’t own a scanner but most of us have camera. So click the pic, upload to CamScanner and voila you are done. You have the scanned copy of your documents, notes, Marksheet and upload them on your DigiLocker. 2. inshorts Till now you all must be knowing this app. The tagline is also simple “News in 60 words” and trust me it is worth having. In this “I don't have time” world, you need news to be fast and accurate so here it is. 1. DigiLocker If you have this app then you don’t need to carry your personal documents like driving license, Adhar card, voter ID card, or even your Marksheets. Keep them safe in actual locker and leave the rest to your DigiLocker. And the best part is that it is acceptable as the original ones at every governmental or non governmental institution because it is developed under Digital India initiative. That's it for the day. Thank you and Enjoy !!! Update 1: Today I came across two new apps which I found useful. Hope it would help you all. 1.Forest : Stay focused Features • A self-motivated and interesting way to help you beat phone addiction • Stay focused and get more things done • Share your forest and compete with friends • Track your history in a simple and pleasant way • Earn reward and unlock more tree species • Customize your whitelist : Leaving Forest and using apps in whitelist won’t kill your tree. 2. Swachh Bharat Toilet Locator Swachh Bharat Toilet Locator is specifically useful for Indians who're committed for Swachh Bharat. Update 2: So I am back with yet another interesting app for you all. And trust me it is worth hanving. You are bored just go through it and kaboooom !!! You are into a black hole. Enjoy the ride. 3. Curiosity It is the latest app I installed but got addicted to it. It’s exactly works like its name, generates a curiosity which inturn increases your knowledge. It covers a large field of scope from Humanity to science to faith and many more. This app deserves more snapshots but why to increase the length of my answer. Comment below if you think the list should be updated? Thank you.

What is it you actually believe?So I did some reading.  I didn't manage all of it, it was exhausting just reading the stuff I did.  There are some interesting conclusions.Despite your continued appeals for me to read your prior work, the information I was after was remarkably scarce.Assuming you are not defined as a person by the absence of something, I simply asked ''what is it you DO believe in?''Well, here Lack of belief in something does not demand an alternative belief by Barry Hampe on Basic Atheism you say "yes, of course my personal life is full of opinions and beliefs. They just have not much to do with gods and religions.."....but go no further.  That's as close as we come.  oooooook.Here is close to what I was after Barry Hampe's answer to Can anyone offer what they would consider the best '10 Commandments for Atheists'?Ah! good, let's see what your belief system is."One of the advantages of being atheist is that there is no dogma, therefore there can be no commandments."Hmm.. ok.This is an interesting question Username's answer to What do atheists hope to gain by discussing their lack of religious belief on internet forums?Not your answer Barry, but an endorsement by 'upvote'."To put this as clearly as I can for the theists out there: Atheism is not an alternative to Theism"ok great! got it.  But what do you believe Barry?  What guides your actions or motivates you to get out of bed? Your entire purpose for being surely isn't to argue the absence of something?  Day to day, what is it that is most important to you?This is the closest I got Barry Hampe's answer to If there is no God or gods, then what is there?"Life.The moment.Love and loved ones.Accomplishment.Friendship and friends.The fascinating journey from birth to death.Self-confidence.A whole world of ideas.Doing what is right because it is right.And so much more . . ."Well, that is a great answer.  Honestly.  It gets close to what I was asking for.  But look at my answer here, made independently. Gavin Marshall's answer to What is your religion and what are some religious experiences you had?I'm not saying you are actually a theist, you are not.  I am not saying I am secretly a humanist or atheist.  I'm not.I'm claiming that the human experience is incredibly rich and deep and meaningful.  It is awesome and incredibly painful.  Religion and dogma don't even close close to doing it justice.  Having an IPA with my best friend from high school blows any church experience I have had clean out of the water. It satisfies the deep spiritual longing in all of us for connection, just like the things on your list.You will not be intellectually satisfied by Christians on Quora, and you know this very well.  What you will get is validation.  Validation that you are smarter and sharper than most and that feels good.  After 1500 answers concerning a negative though, I would ask, is it really working?  Like an alcoholic you keeps coming back for 'one more'.  Jesus knew this only to well and so said ''whoever drinks the water I give willneverbethirsty"THAT is the heart of the message. You do not step in or out of the circle depending on what you believe or think.  You do not choose, then join a club and then help with the recruitment process yourself.  These are smokescreens.You recognise what it means to be fully human.  You keep adding to your list and one day you say "thank you", but you don't know why.''For he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust." Matt 5:45Everyone.

I will have to make this answer quick as time is short at the moment, and then add the work I've originally put into this question previously.I'll first start with who I am for relevance.  I am a Philosophical Theist.  In other words, I am not part of a particular religion, yet I believe in the existence of what can be defined as 'god'.For the purpose of this question, I will defined god as 'platonic information processing cosmic consciousness'.My reason for believing in the existence of such a being resides in modern scientific experimental data - specifically in the field of Quantum Physics.I've put together an essay (admittedly incomplete) that outlines my findings over the last few years of research.  I've put it in argument format to help organize the essay and also give the reader an opportunity to falsify any of the points/break down their logic.Here is said essay/argument for the existence of 'god':What I want to demonstrate in my argument is this:1.) Local Realism is false and Quantum Mechanics has demonstrated this.2.) Quantum Mechanics (weirdness) applies to everything.3.) There are ways in which you can attempt to falsify this via showing Bells Inequality has not been violated.4.) The universe is likely a hologram or virtual simulation and we can test this.5.) The information processing the hologram is coming from a mind - rather than a highly advanced computer.“Quantum experiments hint at a worldview that has not yet been grasped.  The existence of something beyond what we usually consider physics – beyond what we usually consider the “physical world”.- The Quantum Enigma: Physics Encounters Consciousness------> Local Realism is false and Quantum Mechanics has demonstrated this. <------Quantum mechanics began it's tests with particles (i.e. electrons, protons, etc.)The particles (or matter) behaved like waves of probability when not being measured, and like balls of matter while being measured.(http://physics.mq.edu.au/~jcress...)(Young's Double Slit Experiment)(Page on mit.edu)This implied either that the detectors were screwing up the results, or that matter is not really as stable as we originally thought it was.The results of experiments seemed to show that matter is dependent on observation, or 'measurement', to exist in any defined location.We also found that two particles connected by Entanglement can somehow communicate with each other instantaneously at any distance in space.  This phenomena was called "spooky action at a distance" by Albert Einstein.Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (Later known as the EPR Paradox) came together to find a 'local hidden variable'.  This hidden variable is something that would connect the particles somehow to show that reality wasn't as "spooky" or strange as the experiments were implying.(http://www.drchinese.com/David/E...)Other experiments were devised to remove the problem of the detectors in order to show that it wasn't the detectors causing the problem.The Delayed Choice Quantum Erasure proposed by Scully and Dr ̈uhl in 1982 (http://arxiv.org-ph/9903047.pdf) (Page on drexel.edu), was the experiment that drove us further down the rabbit hole.The experiment succeeded in showing that the detectors played no role in the interference and clump patterns shown by the particles.However, local realism has been violated:http://phys.org/news/2010-11-phy...Violation of local realism with freedom of choiceExperimental Test of Local Hidden-Variable Theories------> Quantum Mechanics (weirdness) applies to everything. <------The data has been done for large enough objects to see with the naked eye.  As the experiments use larger and larger subjects, physicists no longer doubt the results will be the same.Time moves along less like an analog clock and more like a digital clock with individual, computable states.  Each state containing a specific amount of informationAs the experiment is scaled up in size, at some point quantum behavior (interference) should give way to classical behavior (no interference). But how big can the particles be before that happens?Quantum Mechanics shows that not only particles are defined by interference, but much larger objects as well.  The results repeat no matter how large the object being used in the experiments.Quantum Interference is shown in large organic molecules -http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/...Imaging of the experiment, as well as the equipment used:http://www.nature.com/articles/n...------> There are ways in which you can attempt to falsify this via showing Bells Inequality has not been violated.------If you can show that Bell's Inequality has not been violated, you will win a Nobel Prize:The Quantum Randi Challenge: [1207.5294] Quantum Randi ChallengeBell’s Inequality:http://www.nature.com/nature/jou...http://www.nature.com/nature/jou...Leggits Inequality:[1304.5133] Leggett-Garg Inequalities------> The universe is possibly a hologram or virtual simulation and we can test this. <------Physicists such as Yoshifumi Hyakutake and colleagues of Ibaraki University in Japan have previously provided convincing evidence for the idea of holographic universes:Page on arxiv.org"In this article we provide the first quantitative evidence for the gauge/gravity duality at the level of quantum gravity. We perform Monte Carlo simulation of the dual gauge theory in the parameter regime that corresponds to a quantum black hole. Our results agree precisely with a prediction for an evaporating black hole including quantum gravity corrections. Thus we find that the dual gauge theory indeed provides a complete description of the quantum nature of the evaporating black hole."The evidence provided by the  Physicists at Ibaraki University of Japan show that the information that is projected into a black hole by information at the edge or the "event horizon", actually occurs at a cosmic scale.http://arxiv.org/pdf/1311.7526v3...- Yoshifumi HyakutakeIs this concept testable?Absolutely.  The concept is currently being experimentally tested at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.http://www.fnal.gov/pub/presspas...I've sent an email to FNAL with a request for the results of the experiment.  The data is expected to be reviewed this year.The experiment is searching for "holographic noise" at the fundamental level.“If we find a noise we can’t get rid of, we might be detecting something fundamental about nature – a noise that is intrinsic to space-time,” - Fermilab physicist Aaron ChouThe noise is found by using two separate interferometers situated on top of one other. Each interferometer sends a one-kilowatt laser beam (the equivalent of 200,000 laser pointers) at a beam splitter. Then, once the light beams are split, they travel down two perpendicular 40 metre arms. Next, the light is reflected off a mirror back to the beam splitter, where the two beams finally recombine. However, during this journey, even the tiniest vibrations can interfere with the light's frequency, causing fluctuations in the brightness of light.The analysis of the light fluctuations is critical to the results of the experiment. It enables them to discover whether space itself is vibrating.These vibrations will be the "holographic noise".Other experiments are being done by a group of Physicists at the University of Washington looking for "signatures" that would indicate our universe is graph-like, much like you would use in a 3-dimensional world in a virtual system.(http://arxiv.org/pdf/1210.1847.pdf)And here's the laymen presentation of the PDF:(Constraints On Our Universe As A Numerical Simulation)------> The information processing the hologram is coming from a mind - rather than a highly advanced computer. <------If the cosmos is a hologram, where is the information coming from?We know that simulations of virtual realities can be processed via computers.  However, in order to build a computer to process every qubit of our universe, one would need to create a computer larger than the universe itself.  It's not practical and largely unnecessary to postulate.However we do know that our brains can process information much more smoothly and compactly into platonic information.The above science has shown, however, that the brain is also a part of the hologram.  Therefore, the matter that makes the brain is also observer dependent.  That means that the mind is fundamental and can be a separate entity. (http://www.newscientist.com/arti...)(Page on science.uu.nl)If this is true, then our universe can more simply be explained by inferring a mind processing the universe through platonic information processing.This mind would be a cosmic mind that envelopes all of space-time in our four dimensions."What I mean by 'consciousness' is, consciousness is the one thing that cannot be an illusion."- Sam Harris---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Edit: If you have any questions on the material (and I do mean any), just ask and I am happy to elaborate.Also, if I made a mistake in my information or any typos, please don't hesitate to make me aware of them.

Wow! This is one hell of a question!This is gonna be a long answer.For the sake of this argument, I'm considering each person mentioned, to be at his/her prime, which we have seen or read about, at least somewhere. For those who don't know them, I'll do a brief bio.Gandalf the White, a more powerful incarnation of Gandalf the Grey. He's one of the most famous wizards of modern fantasy, a character from The Lord Of The Rings series. Some of his abilities[1] include -The ability to appear and disappear, come and go, without making a sound or being noticed.Use magical kinesis in order to push, flip, trip, and levitate his enemies through the air using his staff. He can also grab distant objects by holding out his hand and magically pulling things toward him, as well as psychokinetically cause physical things to happen in his immediate surroundings, such as close or open doors using his mind alone.Speak to/manipulate animals like butterflies, moths, birds, eagles, and horses.Focus and charge lightening strikes into his sword Glamdring[2] allowing him to fight with a blade charged and glowing with powerful energy. He can also create powerful lightening strikes to stun or kill his foes in great numbers.Create a massive shockwave knocking over, stunning, or killing anyone in his vicinity or causing great structural damage to the surroundings caught in the blast.Being a Maiar[3] (a lesser god), he can never truly die. Which means he can be resurrected, which did happen. He died as Gandalf the Grey, and was reborn as Gandalf the White, who was more powerful than ever before.Repel arrows shot at him and axes thrown at him using magic.Heal people near death or passed out using his hands and incantations.Create powerful illusions.And much more. If you want to check out the whole list, the link is in the footnote.A moderately old Dumbledore, with all his power, reflexes, and knowledge intact. He possesses the Elder Wand which is the most powerful wand in the wizarding world.[4]Abilities[5] include -Proficiency at Occlumency and Legilimency. He is able to peer deep inside peoples’ minds and correctly decipher what they are thinking. Also, he can plant ideas and thoughts in his victim's mind.Can manipulate all elements like fire and water, etc with his wand.Can psychokinetically repel, push, pull, trip, flip, move, and levitate objects using his wand. Can psychokinetically cause physical things to happen in his immediate surroundings, such as move, create, and activate devices or create powerful illusions in a room.Transfigure and alter animals, people, and objects.Can put powerful enchantments on people or objects, severely altering their nature.Cause memory loss.Apparate/Disapparate, which is basically teleportation for non Potter heads.And much much more. Although, without his wand, he can't do much magic. But Dumbledore is a genius, who tends to be correct 99% times, whenever he predicts something. He won't let anyone disarm him.(This scene is so cool!)The mature Luke Skywalker, with all his knowledge and experience with the Force[6]. As a student and as a teacher.Abilities include -Using the Force to predict the future.Using the Force to levitate, push, pull objects.Extremely proficient with his Lightsaber.Using the Force to manipulate wills of people.Adult Harry. (His magical prowess was not explained very much in The Cursed Child. So, I don't know how good he is in that. Let's consider him to be a powerful wizard, but of course not as much as Dumbledore. I think Potter heads will agree with me when I say that Harry could never signNow Dumbledore's level of power.)Abilities are pretty much the same as Dumbledore, but of course not as powerful as him. Also, he doesn't have the Elder Wand and the magical proficiency of Dumbledore. Dumbledore was considered the most powerful wizard of his time, if not of all time. Also he has The Cloak Of Invisibility,[7] which can render him completely invisible.The seven Demigods from The Blood Of Olympus. (The Last book of the series because I consider them to be at their prime in this book). As this argument is solely considering only them, I won't be considering them getting help from their Godly parents. They're on their own.Abilities include, except from their proficiency with a weapon like a sword, or a spear.(I think these are pretty irrelevant when we're dealing with magical beings.)Percy - Can control Water due to his parentage. (Father - Poseidon, the Greek god of Oceans, Storms and Earthquakes.) As a result he can also conjure up miniature storms, tidal waves, and miniature earthquakes.Jason - Can control Lightning and Wind. (Father - Jupiter, the Roman God of the Sky.) As a result, he can create hurricanes.Piper - Can Charmspeak. Which means she can impose her will on other people with her voice. (Mother - Aphrodite, the Greek Goddess of Love.)Annabeth - Master Strategist. Extremely Clever. (Mother - Athena, the Greek Goddess of Wisdom.)Leo - Expert Craftsman. He can literally make anything with a few materials. Also, can control Fire. (Father - Hephaestus, the Greek God of forges, metal working and Fire)Frank - Can shapeshift. Also, proficient with a bow and arrow. (Father - Mars, the Roman God Of War.)Hazel - Can control metals, and has a friend Arion, an immortal horse which can run at the speed of sound. (Father - Pluto, the Roman God of Wealth and Dead.)Although, they get weaker as they use their powers.Now, we can start.Now, Dumbledore and Gandalf are seriously overpowered. They're two of the most powerful wizards in modern fantasy fiction. Combining their powers, they can literally do anything.Both of them are capable of rendering all their foes incapable of motion, or mentally unstable, before them even knowing what happened. But let's say they didn't take this shortcut.We can expect them not to take any rash decisions because of their unbelievable power. I’ll venture a guess that they will take on all of them one by one. They can teleport(Apparate) which only Harry can do. Harry can easily take his teammates along with him, so to make teleportation their true advantage, I'll say that they'll take out Harry first.It'll be very easy, as Harry is extremely inexperienced when compared to both these wizards. Also, they are capable of blocking their minds from external penetration, so Luke's Mind Tricks won't work on them. There's no way anyone will know what Dumbledore and Gandalf are upto.The seven, having no feasible power, will be even easier to take down. Knowing Dumbledore and Gandalf, they won't be killing them. They'll just truss them up like a turkey.So, in the end I expect an epic showdown with Luke single-handedly, fending off and deflecting spells from Dumbledore and Gandalf. But in the end, it's 2v1 with the most powerful people ever to exist, in one team.So, I conclude that Gandalf and Dumbledore will win!To be honest, it was a pretty one sided affair. If we considered help from the Jedi Council and The Demigods' parents, it would probably have been a more interesting fight.Cheers! :-DThanks for the Edit Beryl Jade!Footnotes[1] The Magic and Abilities of Gandalf[2] Glamdring[3] Maiar[4] Elder Wand[5] The Magic and Abilities of Dumbledore[6] The Force[7] Cloak of Invisibility

The most glaring flaw in General Relativity is that there is no such thing in Physics called spacetime. Spacetime is a mathematical concept. It is the bread and butter of General Relativity. General Relativity invokes spacetime to provide a physical interpretation to gravity. But how can you explain the physical mechanism of gravity with an abstract concept?And this leads to a second major flaw: the inconceivable physical mechanism that General Relativity offers for gravity. If spacetime is not a physical entity, then what physical entity out there does in fact block the Earth from flying out of the Solar System? Why does the Earth stay faithful to the Sun if spacetime is not the physical entity that stands in its way?Gravity through analogyGeneral Relativity is hailed as the theory of Mathematical ‘physics’ that explains what causes the Earth to remain in its orbit. The physical mechanism is explained through an analogy. The analogy version is that the Sun weighs down the ‘canvas’ or ‘fishnet’ of spacetime and the Earth orbits the depression caused in this medium like a tiny ball rolls around a roulette. That’s the physical interpretation that mathematical theorists offer for why the Earth doesn’t drift out of the Solar System.Let’s make it crystal clear. The physical entity is the warped wall of spacetime, a wall that is warped because the Sun allegedly weighs the spacetime ‘fishnet’. Any 4-year-old can understand this mechanism very easily by merely watching a tennis ball circle a bowling ball placed in the center of a rubber platform. There is no mystery.However, as just stated, spacetime is an abstract mathematical concept and cannot serve as a physical entity for the purposes of Physics. It is because of this that the proponent of Relativity has no choice but to place spacetime beyond your grasp. Spacetime is beyond anyone’s imagination allegedly because it is 4-dimensional.“the four coordinates of an event… specify… its position in a four-dimensional space called space-time. It is impossible to imagine a four-dimensional space.” S. Hawking, A Brief History of Time, Chp. 2The argument is that evolution barred us puny 3-dimensional beings from imagining a 4-dimensional entity:“You and I evolved in a world of three dimensions. We can’t visualize more dimensions… The architecture of the brain itself… evolved in a world of three dimensions… I can’t say, now ‘close your eyes and view in your head 5 dimensions’ because I can’t do it either… evolution did this to us.” Leonard Susskind, Why does mathematics work? - Differential Equations in Action (2015)What the theorist has done, actually, is convert “you need four coordinates to specify a point within spacetime” into “spacetime is a 4-dimensional object”. He then has an excuse to say that 4D spacetime is an unimaginable ‘object’. Of course, if spacetime is just an abstract concept it is irrational to say that it is 4-dimensional or to attempt to imagine its shape..Don’t take the analogy so literallyIt is at this point that the theorist accuses you of taking the analogy too literally. The mathematician claims that he cannot put the relativistic equations into ordinary language. The warped canvas / fishnet is the closest thing he can illustrate that will remotely mimic what is happening in the real world according to the calculations.This excuse is acceptable only to an irrational individual. The Earth does not leave the Solar System. This is a fact. Therefore, either there is a physical wall of spacetime that blocks the drifting of the Earth out of the Solar System or there isn’t. It’s a black or white, yes or no type of issue. If the canvas/fishnet is ‘just’ an analogy, if spacetime is not a physical wall that obstructs the drifting of the Earth out of the Solar System, then what is the canvas / fishnet an analogy of? How can an abstract mathematical concept such as 4D spacetime be an analogy for a real object that physically prevents the Earth from leaving the Solar System?Relativity’s spacetime cannot explain ANY cosmic phenomenonBut let’s concede spacetime as an unimaginable physical object, for the sake of argument, despite this blatant fatal shortcoming. Why can spaceships travel through the same ‘medium’ that blocks the Earth? Why can NASA probes travel all the way to Mars? How is it that Halley’s comet goes back and forth every 75 years through the spacetime wall that blocks Earth?To make matters worse, the amusing fishnet analogy can only be applied to a 2-object system. It cannot be used to explain, for instance, the orbits of the moons of Pluto or Uranus..The positive role of General Relativity and spacetimeBut all is not lost. Relativity’s spacetime analogy does indeed serve a useful purpose. It enables the ordinary layman to spot a non-physicist and distinguishes this individual from a genuine physicist. A non-physicist is an individual who cannot discover or understand any of the flaws that General Relativity has. He sees nothing wrong with spacetime. It all sounds rational to him. A non-physicist lives and will die with spacetime no matter what and against all odds. Call him a born-again relativist!A physicist, on the other hand, has a long list of objections, the most relevant being:Spacetime is an abstract mathematical concept that the proponents of General Relativity have morphed into a physical object in order to provide a semblance of a physical interpretation to their equations.Spacetime is widely deemed to be unimaginable… much like the spirits of traditional religions. How convenient!Spacetime is unimaginable allegedly because it is a 4-dimensional object.Actually, it’s not that spacetime is a 4D object, but that you need four number lines to locate an event within spacetime.Relativists not only cannot visualize spacetime, but they cannot tell you what medium or entity is outside of and encapsulates spacetime.Relativists tell you that spacetime is a balloon that expands.Hence, spacetime cannot be used as a medium for the purposes of Physics. But even if we make the assumption that spacetime is a physical medium we cannot simulate:why the Earth doesn’t drift out of the Solar Systemwhy comets and spaceships are not obstructed by the same mediumwhy the spacetime analogy doesn’t work with 3-object systemswhy astronauts don’t scratch their elbows against spacetimeThe list goes on and on.Special Relativity only proposes irrational mechanismsSpecial Relativity (SR) proposes even more irrational mechanisms than General Relativity. Here’s a short list of the most flagrant:SR claims that a twin could be 40 years older than his brother who came out of the same mother’s womb on the same day… despite that the word ‘year’ is defined as one revolution of the Earth around the Sun.SR claims that all clocks run slower near the center of gravity and faster farther away… despite that it is easy to show that an hourglass (sand clock) does exactly the opposite.SR never defined the word time (and never will).SR claims that the mass of an object increases if it travels at near the speed of light (300,000 km/s)SR never defined the word mass (and never will).SR claims that a stick becomes shorter if traveling at near the speed of light, confusing reality – what actually happens to the stick – with what an observer measures.ConclusionNeither General Relativity nor Special Relativity have anything to do with Science, let alone with Physics. Science is circumscribed to rational explanations, causes, and mechanisms....