Submit Electronic signature Word Fast
Make the most out of your eSignature workflows with airSlate SignNow
Extensive suite of eSignature tools
Robust integration and API capabilities
Advanced security and compliance
Various collaboration tools
Enjoyable and stress-free signing experience
Extensive support
How To Add Sign in eSignPay
Keep your eSignature workflows on track
Our user reviews speak for themselves
Submit Electronic signature Word Fast. Discover by far the most end user-pleasant exposure to airSlate SignNow. Control your entire file digesting and expressing process digitally. Go from hand held, papers-dependent and erroneous workflows to automatic, computerized and perfect. It is possible to produce, supply and indicator any paperwork on any system just about anywhere. Ensure that your important enterprise situations don't move over the top.
See how to Submit Electronic signature Word Fast. Stick to the straightforward guide to start:
- Create your airSlate SignNow accounts in mouse clicks or sign in along with your Facebook or Google bank account.
- Enjoy the 30-day time free trial or choose a costs strategy that's ideal for you.
- Get any legitimate design, build online fillable types and share them firmly.
- Use sophisticated capabilities to Submit Electronic signature Word Fast.
- Signal, customize signing order and accumulate in-man or woman signatures 10 times more quickly.
- Established intelligent reminders and receive notices at each and every move.
Transferring your jobs into airSlate SignNow is uncomplicated. What follows is a simple process to Submit Electronic signature Word Fast, along with ideas to maintain your fellow workers and lovers for better partnership. Inspire your staff with the best resources to be on the top of organization operations. Improve productivity and scale your business speedier.
How it works
Rate your experience
-
Best ROI. Our customers achieve an average 7x ROI within the first six months.
-
Scales with your use cases. From SMBs to mid-market, airSlate SignNow delivers results for businesses of all sizes.
-
Intuitive UI and API. Sign and send documents from your apps in minutes.
A smarter way to work: —how to industry sign banking integrate
FAQs
-
What do you do everyday to promote your website?
Great question!There are several ways that you can promote your website. Here are a few of my favorites:Schedule social media posts (blog articles, quotes, bit size content from your website) via Hootsuite to post on multiple channels such to get maximum signNow.Channels such as Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, TwitterLook up hashtags specific to your business on Twitter and engage with others or even better yet provide them a free resource that you’re giving away (preferably one that leads back to your site).Engage with people on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram by asking questions, answering questions, and starting new conversations.Pin new content on Pinterest a couple of times a week.There are many ways you can promote your website and it’s hard to not to get overwhelmed–so pick a few and give them a try. Once you’re ready you can always do more to promote.
-
How should I prepare for skill test of stenographer ssc?
I will answer this question in bullet points so as to make it easy to embrace and remember the important points.The first and foremost important thing you should do daily is that practice gramologues or shortforms of stenography as it covers more than 60% of the total matter.practice phrases..for eg. “I would like to draw the attention of the Hon’ble Minister” it is a phrase you can mail me if facing a problem in stenography.write dictation first at the speed of 80 wpm (which is eligibility for ssc grade D)either from youtube or elsewhere. then write it atleast two times so that you get used to of the words in the dictation. after writing dictation read it in your mind. And then either type it or speak it and analyse your mistakes and then write them in a notebook and practice the words which you didnt write correctly.Once you have mastered 80wpm then try 90wpm and then slowly go till 110 wpmSpecial tipsThe first and foremost important thing to achieve success is consistency.Try to write only with steno pencil.make your outlines small.write initials of names and places.practice shortforms and phrases as much as you can.Don’t write continuously as it will affect your outlines.Learn spellings of legal words , general words, etc. thoroughly because while transcribing the matter, sometimes we get confused in spellings of even simplest and easiest words due to exam pressure.Try to write names in your own way in shorthand. I prefer to write initials.Practice more and more.In shorthand, there is a simple rule, the more you practice, the more you get proficient and acquire more speed.Analyse your own mistakes and work on them.And don’t forget to practice grammalogues or shortforms and phrases as they account nearly 60 % of every matter.The most imp. thing: Try to get accuracy first not speed.I found this book useful, it has highly advanced outlines and phraseography which are important for skill test of stenography for ssc, courts, parliament, govt. departments, etc. By using the words and phrases in this book you can increase your speed 70–140 wpm.Great book for high speed stenographers Instamojo:https://www.instamojo.com/guide_...If you face any difficulty in writing any word or phrase in steno, you can mail me at e-mail provided in my profile.Tips for typingType “The Quick Brown Fox Jumps Right Over The Lazy Dog” as much as you can as this sentence involves all the alphabets.Type a paragraph of 200 words again and again.Keep your palm (except your fingers) in the air , don’t let it rest on the keyboard or keyboard table. Doing this will impart activeness.The most important thing: Don’t look at keyboard.For beginners , i suggest to start with typewriter if you can.At last, i just want to say “Practice makes man perfect”The more you sweat in peace, the less you bleed in war.All the very best.Hope it is useful.Thanks for reading:)
-
What are the best ways of increasing your blog traffic?
Each company owner who has ever hosted a website has experienced the frustration of attempting to obtain readership. Though we would like it if viewers only magically came to us, the truth is it requires a while to construct an audience.It's easy to become frustrated and just give up on blogging, but as soon as you experience the advantages, you will realize that your site may have a huge influence on your company by bringing visitors to your website, assisting you to construct a social networking audience and creating an impression on prospects and customers alike.Following are 20 proven techniques which could enable you to boost traffic and boost visitors to your site.Promote your blogs with Social media:Share every new blog article across your social networking networks, such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, Google+ and Pinterest. If you spend some time boosting your own networks and discuss good content, social networking websites can develop into some of your best traffic resources.Keep evolving, write more:Studies indicate that the more frequently you update your site, the more traffic it will get. Google gives higher priority to sites with new content, so in case you would like to get more attention in the search engines, then update your site at least twice per week.Figure your niche out:Although you might be considering marine life, exotic travel destinations, Little League baseball and weight reduction, you are going to confuse your viewers if your content does not comply with a clear motif. Decide who your target audience is, what they wish to see and what particular messages that you wish to convey.Come up with catchy titles:The titles for your blog articles are almost more important than the material itself. That's because names help prospective readers decide whether they need to click and read more. Look closely at this post titles you see on magazine covers. They lure readers with promises and solutions. When you do the same, your readership increases.Insert images:Various studies have shown that photos in blog posts boost readership. Not only does a photograph make the post more visually attractive, but you can also have keywords in the Alt Picture tag on the photograph, fostering search engine optimization (search engine optimization ) to your site. Remember that you can't just pull any photo from Google since you risk violating copyright laws. Instead, find royalty-free pictures from sites that provide free images.Include Keywords:Talking of SEO, Key Words are in the heart of SEO. Among the simplest methods to create more visitors to your site is to make certain that each and every page on your website includes a keyword plan. So for every blog article you write, select one keyword that you think readers will use to discover that article. Then add that word to the name of this article, the headline on the page, inside the articles on the webpage at least twice, at a featured picture on the webpage and as part of the webpage link. Keyword immersion helps Google comprehend what that page is all about, which may ultimately cause more traffic in the search engines.Include links:When you cite another organization's product or service at a blog article, add a link to this organization's page. Does Google prefer to view links on your website, the business that you mention may also detect that your article and link back to you personally. Additionally, readers love it when you supply tools to make it much easier for them to discover the items they're searching for.Put social sharing buttons:In the very top and bottom of the blog articles, be certain that you incorporate social sharing buttons for both Twitter, LinkedIn, and also other important social networks. Make it simple for visitors to spread the word.I hope these tips will help you get more traffic to your site.
-
How does one earn from blogging?
How I Made My First $200 With My BlogMaking money online for many is a dream. I know for myself NOT having a boss is one of the best feelings alive. And because of this feeling I want to help others. So in this article, I will explain how I made my first $200 with my blog.If you are tired of your 9 to 5 hellhole and are looking to pursue making money online — then continue to read on as I will explain my 3 simple SIMPLE steps in how I made my first $200.This may not seem like a lot too many — but my blog is only 2 months years old. It is still a baby and so far it has been improving every week.So, I am really happy with that.How I Made My First $200 With My BlogStep # 1: Picked A Topic I Both Was Interested In and EnjoyThe website that I created was on an issue that touched home to me and that affected many other people. It started out simply as a blog for me to express my thoughts on a certain societal issue.I wrote a few articles and posted some of my answer on Quora (Quora is a great place to get traffic for your website) and in just a manner of a day or two, my website was getting hundreds of views a day.And all, just from Quora.Step number one create a blog around something that you talk about on a daily basis. It will make your blogs or articles much more relatable and you will be amazed at how many people will share your work thus increasing your traffic on a daily basis.Step # 2: Pinterest Is Your Best FriendQuora is a great place to get traffic and to also build a substantial following. I am peaking in at around 1.1 K followers with one of my Quora accounts.And it has been less than two months!!!!Pinterest however, will be the steroid injection to your blog. By creating captivating and inserting pins you can drive an insane amount of traffic to your blog.Step # 3: Google AdsLastly the way that I monetized my website was through Google Adsense. For the first two weeks I was earning around a few pennies a day.Until the 30th of June where I made $6.10 cents.That may not seem like a lot — but the going from pennies to dollars was a huge surprise to me.I had soon realized that the reason I was making pennies a day before (to which I now make dollars and it’s growing) was because of how I was using the google ads.When you create your blog make sure that you go for Native Content Ads.I was only using the Display ads and that was really cutting into my earnings for a day. By placing ads in your article you will be able to potentially get more clicks.The ads you will want to use is the ad with the yellow icon floating.How I Made My First $200 With My BlogIf you are serious about learning how to make money online and would like video imagery to better elucidate the steps and means to start taking action then click the link here at Skillshare.This is an affiliate link, and when you sign up to it for you will get two free months to learn how to make money by means of:Affiliate marketingDropshippingBloggingYouTubingVideogamingand much moreThe most important thing to do to make money is to…TAKE ACTION.So…take action and all the best to you.
-
Does negative mass go backwards in time?
Does negative mass go backward in time?No. Only antimatter is shown in Freymann diagrams as going backward in time. According to special relativity, the arrow of time goes uniformly forward in the rest frames of all particles. Length contraction and time dilation result from the constancy of the speed of light, when things are measured from frames that are not traveling with the particle. According to special relativity, negative mass must travel at faster than the speed of light. According to the Lorentz transformation, we would measure their time as going backward. But it is not going backward in their rest frame. Neutrinos have negative mass and travel (at least infinitesimally) faster than the speed of light. But we cannot see or measure them in flight because light cannot travel that fast. Like light, only the neutrino’s start and end points can be detected. For much more on faster than light, negative mass and neutrinos, please see the links, questions, and answers below that follow:How can there be higher speeds than the speed of light that do not contradict the theory of special relativity?How can there be higher speeds than the speed of light that do not contradict the theory of special relativity?Some results of special relativity are that: (1) particles with the positive mass that we are familiar with must travel at slower than the speed of light, particles with zero rest mass must travel at the speed of light, and (3) particles with negative mass must travel at faster than the speed of light. The latter does not “contradict” special relativity, or result in a “Lorentz violation.” Faster than light is a result and prediction of special relativity.For much more on faster than light, please see the links, questions, and answers that follow:If particles without mass can travel at the speed of light, could something with negative mass travel faster?If particles without mass can travel at the speed of light, could something with negative mass travel faster?Yes. In fact, you can replace the “can” and “could” and with “must.” According to special relativity, particles with zero (rest) mass must travel at the speed of light; and particles with negative (relativistic) mass must travel at (infinitesimally) faster than the speed of light. Also the positive (relativistic) mass particles we are familiar with must travel at less than the speed of light.So what has negative (relativistic) mass? Neutrinos have negative-real relativistic mass, and negative-imaginary rest mass. Neutrinos must travel (infinitesimally) faster than the speed of light, where their Lorentz factor is also negative-imaginary. Such particles can’t rest, and that is why the math is telling us that their rest mass is imaginary.For proof that neutrinos travel (infinitesimally) faster than the speed of light in a vacuum, please see the below link, questions, and answers that follow:Can neutrinos travel faster than the speed of light?Can neutrinos travel faster than the speed of light?Yes! And here’s the proof:A new observation proves that a neutrino was traveling at infinitesimally greater than the speed of light. It was published July 13, 2018, and calculated the speed of a single ultra-high-energy neutrino (E > 200 TeV, dubbed IceCube -170922A) captured by the South Pole IceCube neutrino detector, on September 22, 2017, to be precisely infinitesimally faster than the speed of light;”https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.05155...The neutrino was emitted by a blazar (TXS 0506+056), ~ 4 x 10^9 light-years distant. The neutrino arrived about 10 days ahead of the light signatures, from the same event, arriving at telescopes around our planet Earth. Because of the phenomenally long baseline of “~ 4 x 10^9 ly” (light-years, over half the radius of our observable universe), the precision of this observation is unrivaled. It has “many orders of magnitude” greater precision and many orders of magnitude less probable error than any previous observations. This marks a milestone in the history of physics and astronomy. And you heard it first on Quora.I had previously compiled an answer to this question, but did not submit it, because of the hostility of the physics community to, “faster than the speed of light,” Now that my prediction has been confirmed, I submit it below:Yes! In fact, neutrinos must travel (infinitesimally) faster than the speed of light. I will prove this from their properties below. But first a word about the false conclusions of the CNGS2 (ICARUS) experiment. The purpose of that experiment was to prove the previous CNGS1 (OPERA) results wrong. This experiment failed to achieve this. The average speed measured by ICARUS was greater than the speed of light. These factswere meticulously covered up in the conclusions. The press was not even aware. They probably didn’t even read the paper, only the conclusions. When the average measured speed is greater than the speed of light, this cannot prove that it was less! Nothing was proved by this experiment, except that the speed was even closer to the speed of light. And being infinitesimally over is strong evidence that it cannot travel at less. The slight indication that it was greater than the speed of light was unfortunately overwhelmed by the probable errors. They were then totally overblown in the media as proving that it was less! This has convinced almost everybody, as demonstrated by the former 34 “No” answers on Quora. Almost all are based on that single experiment’s false conclusion. It is critically important for the progress of physics that the truth is brought to light. Now the damage is done. I am going to try to correct it. And hopefully, restore progress to physics. Why is this important? Because unexplained dark energy, dark matter, and recessional redshift energy, the dominant energies in our universe, among other things; cannot be satisfactorily explained without faster than c, negative gravity, negative relativistic mass, invisible, symmetric to positive mass neutrinos, that only interact through their gravity. Now for the proofs.Proof no. 1. Neutrinos never stand still (rest). According to the principle of relativity, if neutrinos traveled at less than c, there must be a reference frame, traveling at less than c, in which they stand still (rest). Since this never happens, neutrinos must travel at greater than c.Proof no. 2. Helicity is a state of particles that is referred to as right-handed helicity if the direction of its spin is the same as the direction of its motion; and left-handed helicity if the direction of its spin is opposite to the direction of its motion. The direction of spin is in the direction of the right thumb when the right fingers point in the direction of rotational motion. It is not Lorentz invariant. All observed neutrinos have left-handed helicity and all observed antineutrinos have right-handed helicity. All other particles (which travel at less than the speed of light in a vacuum, c) can have right or left-handed helicity. If a particle had one handedness helicity in one reference frame it would have the other handedness helicity in a reference frame exceeding the velocity of the particle in that direction. This is because in the latter frame the velocity of the particle would be reversed but the spin would not so that it would take on the other handedness helicity. Neutrinos in all reference frame velocities that we can travel at, always remain with left-handed helicity and antineutrinos always remain with right-handed helicity. If neutrinos traveled at less than the speed of light in a vacuum, c; there would have to be a reference frame with a velocity between that of the neutrino and the speed of light in a vacuum, c; in which neutrinos would have reversed velocity and therefore helicity. By the principle of relativity, the laws of physics are the same for all inertial frames of reference. Thus there can be no such frame.Einstein’s special theory of relativity does not predict that nothing can go faster than the speed of light in a vacuum, or that negative-imaginary rest mass is impossible, or that information cannot be transmitted faster than light, or that time cannot be viewed as traveling backward. These are some of the common misconceptions alluded to for dismissing theories and experiments on negative mass neutrinos.Now for the details on faster than c, negative gravity, negative relativistic mass, negative energy, invisible, symmetric to positive mass neutrinos, that only interact through their gravity;The postulates of Einstein’s special theory of relativity are: (1) The laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference. (2) The speed of light in a vacuum has the same value c in all inertial frames of reference. These postulates lead to the Lorentz transformation and the Lorentz factor, γ ≡ 1/√[1 – (v/c)^2]. The Lorentz transformation, in turn, leads to all of the special relativity predictions. They predict: (1) Positive-real rest mass particles (ordinary matter) must travel at less than the speed of light in a vacuum. (2) Zero rest mass particles (light photons) must travel at the speed of light in a vacuum. (3) Particles that travel at greater than the speed of light in a vacuum (neutrinos) must have mathematically negative-imaginary rest mass. These latter particles, like light, can't rest. Because their Lorentz factor is also negative-imaginary, γ' = –i x >10^6, their product relativistic mass (m'γ'), is negative-real, as is their gravity. Due to their extreme velocity, negative-real relativistic mass neutrino particles are almost all energy. There is symmetry between ordinary particles that travel at less than the speed of light and neutrinos that travel at greater than the speed of light in a vacuum. I call it, “relativistic mass symmetry.”Relativistic mass symmetry is symmetry between positive matter and negative (yes, negative) matter. It is highly improbable that it could exist between positive masses. Ordinary matter, which we see, has positive-real relativistic masses (mγ), rest masses (m), Lorentz factors (γ), but negative Newtonian predicted gravitational accelerations [a = –mγ x (vector r/r)/(r^2)] because mγ is positive-real. Relativistic mass symmetry neutrinos are the hypothesized dark energy, cannot be seen, have negative relativistic masses (m'γ' = – mγ), negative-imaginary rest masses (m' = – mγ/γ') and Lorentz factors (γ' = –i x >10^6), but positive energies [E' = c^2|mγ'|], and positive Newtonian predicted gravitational accelerations [a' = –m'γ' x (vector r/r)/(r^2)] because m'γ' is negative-real and the double negatives become positive.I discovered, “relativistic mass symmetry” when investigating negative relativistic mass (m'γ') as a candidate for dark energy and found that neutrinos had its predicted properties. Relativistic mass symmetry not only predicts neutrinos and their properties, but also new additional neutrino-like particles. Here is the precise predicting equation for the neutrinos’ and predicted neutrino-like particles’ rest masses, in terms of their ordinary corresponding namesake particles’ rest masses:m' = – mγ/γ',where m' is the negative-imaginary rest mass of the neutrinos; m is the rest mass of the neutrinos’ corresponding namesake ordinary particle; γ is the Lorentz factor of the neutrinos’ corresponding namesake ordinary particle, which is normally essentially equal to one γ ≈ 1.0; and γ' is the neutrinos’ negative-imaginary Lorentz factor, which is always γ' = –i x >10^6. The resulting precisely predicted neutrinos’ rest masses are:Electron neutrino’s rest mass = –i x <0.511 eV/c^2,Muon neutrino’s rest mass = –i x <105.7 eV/c^2,Tau neutrino’s rest mass = –i x <1,777 eV/c^2.Antineutrinos’ predicted rest masses are the same. These predicted values are all somewhat less than their published upper limit values, calculated from their measured negative (yes, negative) mass squared (m'^2) values. The square root of a negative number is ± an imaginary (yes, imaginary) number. Currently observed electron neutrino’s masses are less than 1 eV and their energies are at least 1 MeV, so their Lorentz factors (γ’) calculated from the ratio <1 eV/>1 MeV = > 10^6 are: γ' ≡ 1/√[1 – (v'/c)^2] = –i x >10^6. The speeds |v'| of currently observed neutrinos can be precisely calculated from these Lorentz factors. They are in the range of: c < |v'| < (1 + 0.5 x 10^–12) c. The latest CNGS2 (ICARUS) measured average speed differential was: (|v'| – c) = (0.04 ± 0.28stat. ± 0.98syst.) x 10–6 c, which is faster (yes, faster) than the speed of light in a vacuum. Special relativity’s first postulate, the principle of relativity, indicates that multiple properties of neutrinos require travel at greater than the speed of light in a vacuum. (1) Because neutrinos never stand still in any of our reference frames that travel at less than the speed of light, and they have mass so that they cannot travel at the speed of light, they must travel at greater than the speed of light in a vacuum, where they can stand still in their reference frame. (2) If neutrinos traveled at less than the speed of light in a vacuum there would be reference frames in which they changed helicity handedness. But neutrinos all have left-handed helicity, they never change helicity handedness. (3) For the principle of relativity and “relativistic mass symmetry” to work between both electrons and their namesake electron neutrinos, one of them must travel at greater than the speed of light in a vacuum. The laws of physics work in their reference frames and in our reference frames. In their reference frames, we are the ones always traveling at greater than the speed of light in a vacuum.Dark energy is composed of these relativistic mass symmetry particles. On the other hand, dark matter, I have proposed, is a deficiency of these dark energy neutrinos. Having no dark matter particles reduces the required dark energy by a factor of 6.5. Our new frugal universe now contains three different types of rest mass: negative-imaginary, zero and positive; proportioned as follows: 67.7% dark energy, 31.8% light photons and ordinary matter. My revolutionary predictions are all solidly based on Einstein’s special theory of relativity and observational data. Since many neutrinos are already in the standard model of quantum mechanics, dark energy and dark matter are no longer unknown dark particles. Physics, astronomy, and cosmology are now solidly based on known and predicted quantum mechanical particles.
-
Why do many CEOs or business owners systematically dismiss the opinions of their low level employees as "immature" or "non-sense
I like to tell stories on the journey to answering business questions, so I will meander about, but your question will be answered. I’m going to start at the end of my first year of college in and about a psychology class I had to take to satisfy one of those mandatory categories of a degree plan. I was a creating writing major; had not yet figured out I’d never make a dime writing and switched to finance. I already had an A in the class, but we were given the opportunity to do an extra credit project; I didn’t need extra credit — that’s just the kind of student I was.The task was to set up a research protocol using psychological methods to gather experimental data to test hypotheses and then conclude by analyzing and deciding if the data were sufficient to find correlations, confirm or disprove the hypotheses, or if it just didn’t find anything at all. — I faked my experimental data, but I did the research in the library to support my findings.It caught the attention of the teaching assistant (TA) of the professor, who happened to be the chair of the psychology department; she was a master’s candidate, and she approached me after reading my project to see if I’d be interested in being a research assistant (RA) for her advisor. It was a health and psychophysiology lab (HAPPY); we recruited athletes, obese people, moderately in-shape people — and had them take (mostly) written “exams” — not like the exams you have to study for — we called them schedules, likely because the questions asked the subject to rate how much he or she agreed with certain statements based on Likert scales, and the “exam” was a schedule of Likert scales. Heck, I even remember that lists in creative writing are called schedules!The subjects didn’t know it, but what was being researched was if being a well-built athlete affected your self-confidence, happiness, self-actualization, etc., and how the same were affected by different levels of perceived healthiness by each individual.Now, this RA position was normally one offered to graduating (senior) psychology major. I didn’t get paid, but I did get credit for a fancy named course called SPECIAL PROBLEMS, which was 4000-level credit (at a time when I was still mostly in the 2000s), which was graded, but I didn’t have to pay tuition for the credit hours. — That was the tradeoff.After telling the TA that I was, indeed, interested, next I got a call from a professor asking if I’d like to meet her at Starbucks for an informal interview for the position. — Undergrads rarely socialize with professors, especially research professors. You know, there are your teaching professors who keep office hours, and then there are the research professors, who perhaps have graduate students in their role as advisors for master’s theses and doctoral dissertations. — It certainly was new to me.I got the “job,” which for my sophomore semesters put me into contact with upperclassman undergrads, master’s students, a doctoral candidate, and the professor herself. — On my own time, I also continued to formalize my research for my extra-credit project, and probably it was during the spring when I popped into the professor’s office and asked her what the chances were that I could run my experiment on live subjects. — You know, do it for real.She listened to me and seemed interested, or at least feigned it, but she knew something I didn’t know. — You have to get high-level university ethics committees to sign off on your experimentation on live human beings. — I didn’t know that!I mean, what I was proposing to do consisted only of having subjects do (memory) recall tests and other proficiency tests while listening to sounds or music monaurally, left or right, or binaurally. Not a big deal, right? — Well, it’s still experimentation on humans, and — at that — on students of the university.My desire to move forward was not nonsense, but I was immature. Later, I realized that it was only the doctoral student and the professor, of course, who had permission to do those sorts of things. — I volunteered, at night, to aid the doctoral student (who was like the “office manager” for the lab) in her experimental research, which involved investigating how medical students [it’s Houston, of course; no shortages of hospitals, MDs, and medical students] might form biases, during their initial examinations of test subjects, based on their perceptions of the health status of their patients due to the patients’ athletic build, normal build, obesity, etc.So let’s apply some of that here. Who is perceiving the nonsense reception of a low-run person’s ideas? Who decides that these employees are immature, or have immature ideas? Who perceives the employee is sincere and serious (whatever that last one means)?I’m now putting my business cap on, and I’ll tell you that managers/executives make such perceptions of their employees, and employees make perceptions of their managers, and employees make perceptions of themselves. All of these percepts turn into concepts!Your managers have no a priori reason to assume that you are worth more than what you were originally hired for, and you accepted that job. It would be misguided to assume that you have novel ideas just because you have ideas.I had an office assistant, once, who was twenty years my senior (age-wise), and she’d claimed she had a lifetime’s worth of office assistant (admin.) experience. At her immediately previous job, she had the title of Payroll Director.She was with me for over a year, and I never let her do payroll on her own. I let her enter in the basics, and then I’d look over her work and print the checks. Until, one day, I was too busy wearing one of my other hats that I told her to just go ahead with payroll. I mean, by then, she should have it down.When I finally got back to the main office, it was almost 5pm (30 mins before the banks close). She left at 4pm on Fridays, so she was gone. I get a call from one of my main employees.He’s in the drive-thru “motor center” of one of the local banks, and he’s been unable to cash his paycheck because she didn’t stamp the signature line. — Many people will know this, but many signatures, in business, are affixed electronically; or, by facsimile signature. — These carry the same weight as an authorized signer signing the check (so long as the bank has these on your signature card), but they are affixed or inked on by other people — almost by definition, not by the people whose signature is the one that’s being affixed.She had computed his paycheck correctly (I checked), but she put it in an envelope and gave it to the guy without even “signing” it.Luckily, I was working late (as was often the case on Fridays, or any other day), and I got a frantic phone call from my guy, mad as Hell, and rightfully so. I told him to drive around, sign my name on the bottom of the check, and re-present it to the teller. Of course, this set off alarm bells.I’ll tell you that what the teller did next was not appropriate per the bank’s policies. I would know, because a few years before I worked at that bank, at that location, in a position that was not at officer-level but superior to a teller and in the deposit operations arena; tellers who had questions would come to me for approval when they had questions. — And, in fact, I knew the teller.She picked up the phone and called the phone number listed on the check, which got her to me, in the main office, after-hours, and she explained what was going on. — I responded that I was the Chief Financial Officer of XYZ Corp., and that my assistant had made a mistake. I told her that the man trying to cash the check was my employee; that the paycheck was valid; that I had told him to write my name on the signature line, and that it would be, in fact, illegal for me not to pay him on time. She remembered me (if only by voice recognition/statements of identity by phone) and allowed the check to be cashed.Now, remember: it was the office assistant’s suggestion that she could make payroll run easier if she was allowed to finalize paychecks and distribute them without my supervision.One of the construction foremen had asked her, once, joking, “Why doesn’t Jared let you do this?”She laughed, flirted, and said, “I said I would, but he won’t let me!”Per the résumé she submitted, was her ability to do payroll obviously bogus? — No.Have I ever had an office assistant I trusted with payroll? — Darn tootin’. — For whatever it’s worth, she was over 10 years younger than I was, and had no prior business/office experience. She moved over from a fast-food drive-thru. — But, she could do it.When I started out working at this corporation, I had no assistants in the main office, which would be the proverbial back office, but my actions, elsewhere, in operations caused the company to grow. Eventually, the President agreed that I needed to decouple a bit from the day-to-day office duties and focus on maintenance and growth of profit-centers, and that we could hire someone to help me at the cost-center (i.e., the main office).My suggestion was that I hire someone who, perhaps, just graduated with an associate’s in accounting from a local junior college. That way, I could train him/her in my own image, tailored to our unique set of competencies and needs, and that’d be great. — The President, my boss, said all I would do is train him/her up, and then he’d leave. — I acquiesced and hired the 50+ yo person with purported experience.She ended up basically doing nothing more than a receptionist would do, with light bookkeeping, and I had to check her work. — She made careless, but meaningful, errors. She also spent a lot of time looking at “sexy sundresses.”After a year and a half, and me sending her home one day for insubordination, she found a higher paying job in the area, and I gave her a basic recommendation and was not sorry to see her leave. — She wasn’t a bad person. She just thought she knew more than did, and she had no interest in going beyond where she was in her business acumen and diligence.It may seem bonkers that your job actually could be to fight with your boss. Perhaps I should say deliberate. — It’s more of a game.When you are of chief financial value, shared operational value, and other hats not important to list here, sometimes you will find yourself in a position to counter what your boss says. — You are an executive. You are entrusted to run the business when the absolute head of the business is not there. So, it’s not uncommon audibly to disagree with each other — boss and you — President and CFO — and, this is what a CEO/President/Owner needs sometimes.Someone on the inside needs to tell you not to drink your own whiskey.Considering his previous thought process to have been flawed — and yeh, you can say stuff like to your boss — I proceeded to take applications and hired a 19yo. These characteristics had nothing to do with the hiring process, but they’re worth noting. She had not wanted to go to college. She was devoted to her marriage and building a family. She had zero business experience, and her competency was assembling fast food.She was smart, though, in a way that it takes a keen interest to notice. — Sure, this job paid more than a local burger joint, but her family-building interests would motivate her to learn. — That’s just something managers should look for in potential new hires. — She had zip competency to question anything I told her about how things should be done. She would have to learn, and learn from me.It would be a year and a half, as history holds, before I let her do payroll on her own, but less and less of what I previously had to review (e.g., reports for accountants) could be rubber-stamped on her word, before I checked them, because she did them right, consistently, or if she had doubts, she would ask me.She had no presumption, in the beginning, that she knew what was right. — By the time she had that presumption, she was right, and I could focus on the higher level stuff that I really needed to do myself.Kind of like a paycheck can be authorized by a facsimile signature stamp, some other duties can be delegated to others in your name. — Except for the ones that can’t be.Unless you find yourself very close, and often exposed, to the workings and thinking of the main people in charge, you may not understand why they make certain decisions that affect you. You may not know why your thoughts are shot down.In a concrete plant example, your job may be to maintain one truck, keep it fueled, wash it, and ensure it’s going to operate normally.My job, as plant manager & CFO of the corporation, may be — primarily — to turn potentially immediate cash flows into actual immediate cash flows.That doesn’t mean I’m talking about increasing profits. — It could mean that I’m needing something to happen in order to make payroll this week.If you think you know, then I’ll rebut by saying — I can’t always tell you the truth. That doesn’t mean I’m lying to you; it just means that what I’m doing may be none of your business.When you come up with a novel notion about a new truck wash chemical, I may be working on what’s needed to keep us in business. — I may be slow —— verrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrry slow — to get around to hearing your full argument about something you think is important that, very well, may be in the best interest of the company.What I’m working on often has to do with the continuity of the company (i.e., keeping it a going concern).Now, I can’t usually tell you that kind of stuff. For that, there are many reasons.Someone may not be listening to you, in that sense; he or she may be not hearing you, because we triage.You may have a great idea concerning something. I may be confused about how to keep you on the payroll.That doesn’t mean I think your efforts are immature or nonsense. It means — I care about you — and, in order to keep you, I need to ignore you.For the moment, I hope. — Unless, you really have a stupid idea!
-
If matter could travel faster than light, would we be able to measure it as traveling faster than light?
If matter could travel faster than light, would we be able to measure it as traveling faster than light?First of all, neutrinos must travel (at least infinitesimally) “faster than light,” because they have negative-imaginary rest mass. But the positive matter we are familiar with cannot, “be made to go faster than the speed of light.” We cannot see neutrinos coming or going (as depicted in some tachyon cartoons), because light cannot travel that fast. But even though we cannot see them traveling, we can accurately measure their speed, by measuring their departure and arrival times, and it is (at least infinitesimally) faster than the speed of light.For proof that neutrinos travel (at least infinitesimally) faster than the speed of light in a vacuum, please see the below link, questions, and answers that follow:Can neutrinos travel faster than the speed of light?Can neutrinos travel faster than the speed of light?Yes! And here’s the proof:A new observation proves that a neutrino was traveling at infinitesimally greater than the speed of light. It was published July 13, 2018, and calculated the speed of a single ultra-high-energy neutrino (E > 200 TeV, dubbed IceCube -170922A) captured by the South Pole IceCube neutrino detector, on September 22, 2017, to be precisely infinitesimally faster than the speed of light;”https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.05155...The neutrino was emitted by a blazar (TXS 0506+056), ~ 4 x 10^9 light-years distant. The neutrino arrived about 10 days ahead of the light signatures, from the same event, arriving at telescopes around our planet Earth. Because of the phenomenally long baseline of “~ 4 x 10^9 ly” (light-years, over half the radius of our observable universe), the precision of this observation is unrivaled. It has “many orders of magnitude” greater precision and many orders of magnitude less probable error than any previous observations. This marks a milestone in the history of physics and astronomy. And you heard it first on Quora.I had previously compiled an answer to this question, but did not submit it, because of the hostility of the physics community to, “faster than the speed of light,” Now that my prediction has been confirmed, I submit it below:Yes! In fact, neutrinos must travel (infinitesimally) faster than the speed of light. I will prove this from their properties below. But first a word about the false conclusions of the CNGS2 (ICARUS) experiment. The purpose of that experiment was to prove the previous CNGS1 (OPERA) results wrong. This experiment failed to achieve this. The average speed measured by ICARUS was greater than the speed of light. These factswere meticulously covered up in the conclusions. The press was not even aware. They probably didn’t even read the paper, only the conclusions. When the average measured speed is greater than the speed of light, this cannot prove that it was less! Nothing was proved by this experiment, except that the speed was even closer to the speed of light. And being infinitesimally over is strong evidence that it cannot travel at less. The slight indication that it was greater than the speed of light was unfortunately overwhelmed by the probable errors. They were then totally overblown in the media as proving that it was less! This has convinced almost everybody, as demonstrated by the former 34 “No” answers on Quora. Almost all are based on that single experiment’s false conclusion. It is critically important for the progress of physics that the truth is brought to light. Now the damage is done. I am going to try to correct it. And hopefully, restore progress to physics. Why is this important? Because unexplained dark energy, dark matter, and recessional redshift energy, the dominant energies in our universe, among other things; cannot be satisfactorily explained without faster than c, negative gravity, negative relativistic mass, invisible, symmetric to positive mass neutrinos, that only interact through their gravity. Now for the proofs.Proof no. 1. Neutrinos never stand still (rest). According to the principle of relativity, if neutrinos traveled at less than c, there must be a reference frame, traveling at less than c, in which they stand still (rest). Since this never happens, neutrinos must travel at greater than c.Proof no. 2. Helicity is a state of particles that is referred to as right-handed helicity if the direction of its spin is the same as the direction of its motion; and left-handed helicity if the direction of its spin is opposite to the direction of its motion. The direction of spin is in the direction of the right thumb when the right fingers point in the direction of rotational motion. It is not Lorentz invariant. All observed neutrinos have left-handed helicity and all observed antineutrinos have right-handed helicity. All other particles (which travel at less than the speed of light in a vacuum, c) can have right or left-handed helicity. If a particle had one handedness helicity in one reference frame it would have the other handedness helicity in a reference frame exceeding the velocity of the particle in that direction. This is because in the latter frame the velocity of the particle would be reversed but the spin would not so that it would take on the other handedness helicity. Neutrinos in all reference frame velocities that we can travel at, always remain with left-handed helicity and antineutrinos always remain with right-handed helicity. If neutrinos traveled at less than the speed of light in a vacuum, c; there would have to be a reference frame with a velocity between that of the neutrino and the speed of light in a vacuum, c; in which neutrinos would have reversed velocity and therefore helicity. By the principle of relativity, the laws of physics are the same for all inertial frames of reference. Thus there can be no such frame.Einstein’s special theory of relativity does not predict that nothing can go faster than the speed of light in a vacuum, or that negative-imaginary rest mass is impossible, or that information cannot be transmitted faster than light, or that time cannot be viewed as traveling backward. These are some of the common misconceptions alluded to for dismissing theories and experiments on negative mass neutrinos.Now for the details on faster than c, negative gravity, negative relativistic mass, negative energy, invisible, symmetric to positive mass neutrinos, that only interact through their gravity;The postulates of Einstein’s special theory of relativity are: (1) The laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference. (2) The speed of light in a vacuum has the same value c in all inertial frames of reference. These postulates lead to the Lorentz transformation and the Lorentz factor, γ ≡ 1/√[1 – (v/c)^2]. The Lorentz transformation, in turn, leads to all of the special relativity predictions. They predict: (1) Positive-real rest mass particles (ordinary matter) must travel at less than the speed of light in a vacuum. (2) Zero rest mass particles (light photons) must travel at the speed of light in a vacuum. (3) Particles that travel at greater than the speed of light in a vacuum (neutrinos) must have mathematically negative-imaginary rest mass. These latter particles, like light, can't rest. Because their Lorentz factor is also negative-imaginary, γ' = –i x >10^6, their product relativistic mass (m'γ'), is negative-real, as is their gravity. Due to their extreme velocity, negative-real relativistic mass neutrino particles are almost all energy. There is symmetry between ordinary particles that travel at less than the speed of light and neutrinos that travel at greater than the speed of light in a vacuum. I call it, “relativistic mass symmetry.”Relativistic mass symmetry is symmetry between positive matter and negative (yes, negative) matter. It is highly improbable that it could exist between positive masses. Ordinary matter, which we see, has positive-real relativistic masses (mγ), rest masses (m), Lorentz factors (γ), but negative Newtonian predicted gravitational accelerations [a = –mγ x (vector r/r)/(r^2)] because mγ is positive-real. Relativistic mass symmetry neutrinos are the hypothesized dark energy, cannot be seen, have negative relativistic masses (m'γ' = – mγ), negative-imaginary rest masses (m' = – mγ/γ') and Lorentz factors (γ' = –i x >10^6), but positive energies [E' = c^2|mγ'|], and positive Newtonian predicted gravitational accelerations [a' = –m'γ' x (vector r/r)/(r^2)] because m'γ' is negative-real and the double negatives become positive.I discovered, “relativistic mass symmetry” when investigating negative relativistic mass (m'γ') as a candidate for dark energy and found that neutrinos had its predicted properties. Relativistic mass symmetry not only predicts neutrinos and their properties, but also new additional neutrino-like particles. Here is the precise predicting equation for the neutrinos’ and predicted neutrino-like particles’ rest masses, in terms of their ordinary corresponding namesake particles’ rest masses:m' = – mγ/γ',where m' is the negative-imaginary rest mass of the neutrinos; m is the rest mass of the neutrinos’ corresponding namesake ordinary particle; γ is the Lorentz factor of the neutrinos’ corresponding namesake ordinary particle, which is normally essentially equal to one γ ≈ 1.0; and γ' is the neutrinos’ negative-imaginary Lorentz factor, which is always γ' = –i x >10^6. The resulting precisely predicted neutrinos’ rest masses are:Electron neutrino’s rest mass = –i x <0.511 eV/c^2,Muon neutrino’s rest mass = –i x <105.7 eV/c^2,Tau neutrino’s rest mass = –i x <1,777 eV/c^2.Antineutrinos’ predicted rest masses are the same. These predicted values are all somewhat less than their published upper limit values, calculated from their measured negative (yes, negative) mass squared (m'^2) values. The square root of a negative number is ± an imaginary (yes, imaginary) number. Currently observed electron neutrino’s masses are less than 1 eV and their energies are at least 1 MeV, so their Lorentz factors (γ’) calculated from the ratio <1 eV/>1 MeV = > 10^6 are: γ' ≡ 1/√[1 – (v'/c)^2] = –i x >10^6. The speeds |v'| of currently observed neutrinos can be precisely calculated from these Lorentz factors. They are in the range of: c < |v'| < (1 + 0.5 x 10^–12) c. The latest CNGS2 (ICARUS) measured average speed differential was: (|v'| – c) = (0.04 ± 0.28stat. ± 0.98syst.) x 10–6 c, which is faster (yes, faster) than the speed of light in a vacuum. Special relativity’s first postulate, the principle of relativity, indicates that multiple properties of neutrinos require travel at greater than the speed of light in a vacuum. (1) Because neutrinos never stand still in any of our reference frames that travel at less than the speed of light, and they have mass so that they cannot travel at the speed of light, they must travel at greater than the speed of light in a vacuum, where they can stand still in their reference frame. (2) If neutrinos traveled at less than the speed of light in a vacuum there would be reference frames in which they changed helicity handedness. But neutrinos all have left-handed helicity, they never change helicity handedness. (3) For the principle of relativity and “relativistic mass symmetry” to work between both electrons and their namesake electron neutrinos, one of them must travel at greater than the speed of light in a vacuum. The laws of physics work in their reference frames and in our reference frames. In their reference frames, we are the ones always traveling at greater than the speed of light in a vacuum.Dark energy is composed of these relativistic mass symmetry particles. On the other hand, dark matter, I have proposed, is a deficiency of these dark energy neutrinos. Having no dark matter particles reduces the required dark energy by a factor of 6.5. Our new frugal universe now contains three different types of rest mass: negative-imaginary, zero and positive; proportioned as follows: 67.7% dark energy, 31.8% light photons and ordinary matter. My revolutionary predictions are all solidly based on Einstein’s special theory of relativity and observational data. Since many neutrinos are already in the standard model of quantum mechanics, dark energy and dark matter are no longer unknown dark particles. Physics, astronomy, and cosmology are now solidly based on known and predicted quantum mechanical particles.
Trusted esignature solution— what our customers are saying
Get legally-binding signatures now!
Related searches to Submit Electronic signature Word Fast
Frequently asked questions
How do i add an electronic signature to a word document?
How to scan electronic signature?
How do you save your sign in for e-mails?
Get more for Submit Electronic signature Word Fast
- How Can I Electronic signature New Hampshire Police Presentation
- How Can I Electronic signature New Hampshire Police Presentation
- Can I Electronic signature New Hampshire Police Presentation
- Can I Electronic signature New Hampshire Police Presentation
- How To Electronic signature New Hampshire Police Presentation
- How Do I Electronic signature New Hampshire Police Presentation
- How To Electronic signature New Hampshire Police Presentation
- Help Me With Electronic signature New Hampshire Police Presentation
Find out other Submit Electronic signature Word Fast
- Team dual match tennis score sheet form
- Crown castle direct deposit enrollment form
- Physically disabled renewal form oklahoma
- Dfs do 866 form
- Taxi manifest form
- Ssu form
- Declaration of domicile alachua county form
- Lompec primary school mamelodi fees form
- Obh certification louisiana form
- Cease and desist letter south africa form
- Massachusetts form m 3 fillable
- Murdoch clarke mortgage fund form
- Dip form 2 51662647
- Aviva termination form
- Temporary obligator coupon form
- Dog license application benzie county government form
- Parent consent form visa pakistan los angeles
- Bryce resort mountain bike park release 2docx form
- The sons of the dragon pdf form
- Nc w 2 form