How To Implement Sign in PaperWise

When a client enters information (such as a password) into the online form on , the information is encrypted so the client cannot see it. An authorized representative for the client, called a "Doe Representative," must enter the information into the "Signature" field to complete the signature.

That you have the signature of an actual person that signed it. And, of course, I do. Because that's the thing about an electronic signature. If you can't prove with something else that you were the actual person who actually signed it or that your physical signature is there, it becomes a fraud. That is, unless you could get a court to sign off on it, where the court would basically rule this electronic signature is a real signature, even if the electronic signature looks real to you. You can't be sure. It's like the difference between a hologram and a hologram. It doesn't matter who put it there. They don't have to show a real hand to make it work. So, if you sign an electronic signature, if that person can't provide proof that the signature is theirs, it becomes fake. It becomes fraud. So, in the case of electronic signatures, and there's an entire case that's been pending in the court for about ten years about, what to do about them, the judge actually said there was enough evidence in that case, which is sort of an interesting precedent for a lot of these kinds of cases. If you can show a court that an electronic signature can be faked, you could get a court ruling to allow you to make a copy of that signature and prove that the signature is fake. So that would solve that particular problem. It's not a complete fix by any stretch of the imagination, but it would solve that particular issue. So that would really solve one of the two problems, because then you could us...

This was a problem in 2011, when the Internet service provider Comcast began blocking access to the web site for a handful of users. The company claimed to be blocking "child pornography and other illegal material," and even though it's unclear how this blocking came to be (it's possible the company just decided to block it due to other, more benign content), a small number of users were suddenly unable to access the site — a move widely seen as a violation of the user's basic right to free speech. And though the company eventually gave in, it's still not the first time that ISPs have tried to shut people off from the web. If you think all Internet service providers are trying to censor the web, then we have a little problem. In fact, the truth is just the opposite: The vast majority of ISPs are working to protect their customers' online security and privacy. For example, in January 2010, Verizon was found guilty of illegally collecting customer data on millions of customers by the government, and it paid $182 million in penalties. But in 2011, the company announced that it would begin encrypting all traffic that flows through its network, making it impossible for the Federal Trade Commission to get information about how the company handles customer data. This move, the company said, would help "protect against government overreach in privacy policy enforcement." So which companies are blocking the web? When we asked each company which government agency was blocking t...