National Endowment for the Arts Annual Report 1966 Arts Endow Form
Quick guide on how to complete national endowment for the arts annual report 1966 arts endow
signNow's web-based application is specifically developed to simplify the organization of workflow and optimize the entire process of competent document management. Use this step-by-step instruction to complete the Get And Sign National Endowment For The Arts Annual Report 1966 — Arts Endow Form quickly and with perfect precision.
How to fill out the Get And Sign National Endowment For The Arts Annual Report 1966 — Arts Endow Form online:
- To get started on the form, use the Fill camp; Sign Online button or tick the preview image of the blank.
- The advanced tools of the editor will lead you through the editable PDF template.
- Enter your official contact and identification details.
- Apply a check mark to indicate the answer where required.
- Double check all the fillable fields to ensure complete accuracy.
- Make use of the Sign Tool to add and create your electronic signature to signNow the Get And Sign National Endowment For The Arts Annual Report 1966 — Arts Endow Form.
- Press Done after you finish the blank.
- Now you may print, download, or share the form.
- Refer to the Support section or contact our Support group in the event that you have any concerns.
By making use of signNow's comprehensive platform, you're able to complete any needed edits to Get And Sign National Endowment For The Arts Annual Report 1966 — Arts Endow Form, make your customized electronic signature within a few quick actions, and streamline your workflow without the need of leaving your browser.
Create this form in 5 minutes or less
Video instructions and help with filling out and completing National Endowment For The Arts Annual Report 1966 Arts Endow Form
Why does Trump want to eliminate the National Endowment for the Arts?It is easy to cut. The lobby for art is small and doesn’t have big supporters in the media. Contemporary Art is mostly a thing of the elites and the middle class and of the bigger cities which are more liberal in general. The lower class and many people in the countryside wouldn’t miss contemporary art at all if it was gone (and some Quorans neither, if you read some comments on contemporary art)Art is often critical of authority and the status quo, thus conservatives are more often in the cross hairs of artists than liberalsArt is often about breaking rules and working against taboos. Especially depicting sexuality in a aggressive way has brought and brings the religious right on the barricades. In the 1980 and the 1990s the conservatives had already plans to abolish the NEA. Social conservatives like the vice president Pence and others in the GOP will be very happy to destroy the NEA, and it will be very well received by a large part of the GOP electorate.In the end it isn’t about a lot of money, but eleminating the NEA has a highly symbolic value for the GOP in regard to reducing the government.Some additional information: Trump Team Plans to Eliminate National Endowments for the Arts and HumanitiesPS: I don’t think that Trump cares if the NEA exists or not, it’s all about the message.PS/PS: Critics who see art as literally worthless and a waste of money forget that art is an important factor in tourism and extremely important in regard to the image of travel destinations. In cities like New York, London or Paris art is an important economic factor. Just try to think of these cities without the museums, opera houses, theatres, exhibitions and art fairs. Art tourism (often by high spending people) would be gone and the travel industry, hotels, restaurants as well as the retail industry would lose millions.
Do you support Donald Trump's desire to cut funding to the National Endowment for the Arts? If so, why?I have wondered for decades why we use taxpayer money for the NEA. It has nothing to do with Trump. The NEA has at times been its own worst enemy, intentionally funding projects that are meant to inflame the public that pays for them. They paid for people to photograph a crucifix in urine, and desecrated American flags. It’s no wonder people (like me) think we don’t want to have our tax money confiscated from us to pay people to offend us.And then there’s the quality of art. I’m no art scholar, but I did see a group of videos produced with NEA grants, and they seemed silly and amateurish. It was nuts the government, again, confiscated our money to fund crap.And there is the principle that, if the art was really any good, someone would buy it. They wouldn’t need a government subsidy … if it was any good.And don’t forget the Cowboy Poetry Festival. I can’t for the life of me see why I, a resident of some state that isn’t Nevada, need to pay taxes to support some local festival in a different state; a festival I have never been to and couldn’t care less about, and I wonder how many other little events like that I pay for nationwide. Personally, I think the attendees should pay for tickets, participants should pay for their fees, etc. If the local community thinks the festival is important to their community, they can use their tax money for it. I think they can pay for their Cowboy Poetry festival, and my local community can pay for its festivals without making Nevada residents pay for ours.
Does Donald Trump have the power to end the National Endowment for the Arts? Why would he do it?I don’t think he directly has the power to end it but he could convince Congress to do so and stop funding for it.Why would he do it? Because he may not think the NEA is important or there more important ways to spend the public’s money.