Motion of Discovery Form

I was selected for a summer internship 2016.I tried to be very open while filling the preference form: I choose many products as my favorite products and I said I'm open about the team I want to join.I even was very open in the  location and start date to get host matching interviews (I negotiated the start date in the interview until both me and my host were happy.) You could ask your recruiter to review your form (there are very cool and could help you a lot since they have a bigger experience).Do a search on the potential team.Before the interviews,  try to find smart question that you are going to ask for the potential host (do a search on the team  to find nice and deep questions to impress your host). Prepare well your resume.You are very likely not going to get algorithm/data structure questions like in the first round. It's going to be just some friendly chat if you are lucky. If your potential team is working on something like machine learning, expect that  they are going to ask you questions about machine learning, courses related to machine learning you have and relevant experience (projects, internship). Of course you have to study that before the interview. Take as long time as you need if you feel rusty. It takes some time to get ready for the host matching (it's less than the technical interview)  but it's worth it of course.

There’s a fascinating and scientifically very signNow instance of Newton’s intellectual honesty that deserves to be more appreciated than it is, especially by the people who write intellectual and science history for a living. It concerns Newton’s understanding of gravity and of the meaning of his own law of universal gravitation.Descartes and his followers held that all of physics should be explained by the surfaces of hard bodies pushing on each other, i.e., by contact interactions. To invoke anything else would be to return to the obscurantism of Aristotle and the medieval Scholastics, according to whom a body falls to the ground because of the natural tendency of heavy matter to move towards the center of the world.For example, Descartes explained magnetism as resulting from streams of microscopic corkscrew-shaped particles passing through correspondingly grooved channels in matter. Magnetic attraction or repulsion could be accounted for by the two possible chiralities of the corkscrews (i.e., by whether they are left-handed or right-handed). This is what was going on in this rather remarkable page from Descartes’s Principia Philosophae of 1644:Similarly, gravity was supposed to result from the pushing upon ordinary matter of the flow of a subtle “aether” that filled all of space. According to Descartes, planets were carried around in their orbits by vortices (i.e., whirlpools) in this aether.Newton originally accepted that gravity required such a “mechanical” explanation in terms of contact interactions with an aether. For instance, he discussed his own ideas about what such an aether flow might look like in a long letter to Robert Boyle that he wrote in 1679.But his investigations soon led Newton to realize that Descartes’s scheme was at odds with astronomical observations. For example, in the picture below, the wandering path in blue is supposed to represent a comet moving in and out of the vortex around the Sun at S. Descartes drew this before the paths of comets had been observed with any precision and before it was clear that the same comet could orbit the Sun periodically. When the motion of comets was measured it became clear to Newton and others that their behavior was quite incompatible with Descartes’s vortices.Newton worked out that all of the observed phenomena of the solar system were explainable in terms of a single mathematical law, according to which two masses [math]m_1[/math] and [math]m_2[/math], a distance [math]r[/math] apart, attract each other with equal and opposite forces whose magnitude is[math]F = G \frac{m_1 m_2}{r^2}[/math]where [math]G[/math] is a universal constant. (Actually, Newton didn’t write down the equation in this form, but what he said in words and in terms of geometrical diagrams is equivalent to this equation.) This magnificent result was the centerpiece of his Principia Mathematica of 1687.Newton’s work faced opposition from many fronts. But perhaps the single most difficult thing for other “natural philosophers” (as the physicists of the time were called) to accept was that Newton didn’t offer any explanation of how gravity acted between distant bodies across empty space. Leibniz repeatedly denounced such action-at-a-distance as an “occult quality”. Huygens, otherwise a great admirer of Newton’s Principia, insisted that gravity had to be explained “mechanically”. As late as 1750, no less of an authority than Euler declared before the Prussian Academy of Sciences thatit appears rather probable that all these [celestial] bodies, being surrounded unquestionably by a subtle matter, are also put in movement by it, although we do not know the manner of it. Yet that two bodies separated by a space entirely empty should attract each other mutually by some force, seems as strange to reason, as it is unproved by an experience. With the exception therefore of the forces by which spirits are perhaps capable of acting on bodies, which are undoubtedly of a quite different nature, I conclude that there are no other forces in the world than those which derive their origin from the impenetrability of bodies.Even today, various historians and philosophers of science argue that Newton’s acceptance of gravitational action-at-a-distance derived either from a magical tradition that came to him through his interest in alchemy, or else from a metaphysics according to which God filled all of space and served as the communicator of the gravitational attraction.What Newton actually said is that he had no idea what gravity really was or how it acted, but that his work provided a mathematical and predictive account of observed celestial and terrestrial phenomena. From this and from his general laws of motion he went on to account quantitatively for Kepler’s laws of planetary motion, the paths of comets, the tides, the shape of the Earth, the precession of the equinoxes, and even some of the irregularities in the motion of the Moon (which was the first instance of the famously difficult three-body problem, which occupies mathematicians and physicists even to this day).This was a profound and radical break with the intellectual framework in which Newton had been working, and also one of the clearest indications of his intellectual honesty. He openly declared that he had no access to the secret of the inner workings of gravity, that he was contenting himself with a mathematical account of its observed effects. In the second edition of the Principia, Newton famously added that he didn’t care to “feign hypotheses” about the true nature of gravity (in the original Latin he wrote hypotheses non fingo). Even to such a sympathetic and penetrating colleague as Huygens, this amounted to throwing in the towel on the main purpose of natural philosophy.Newton’s attitude appears even more remarkable in light of the fact that Nicolas Fatio de Duillier, who in the late 1680s and early 1690s was one of his closest associates and confidants, had proposed an ingenious way of explaining Newton’s universal law of gravitation “mechanically”. Fatio’s idea was that the aether is composed of a great many microscopic corpuscles traveling through space at high speeds and in all directions. If a body A is sitting in an otherwise empty space, then the aetherial corpuscles will strike it from all directions and the net force on A will be zero. But if another body B is sitting nearby, then B will cast a “shadow” in the flow of aetherial corpuscles that impinges on A, causing an imbalance that will push A towards B. Evidently, A will also cast a shadow on B, causing mutual attraction. With some simple assumptions, Fatio could get this force to fall as the square of the distance between A and B.Fatio’s “push-shadow” explanation of gravity: the shadows that two nearby bodies make in the omnidirectional stream of aetherial corpuscles cause an imbalance in the net forces that each body is subject to, leading to their mutual attraction. Source: WikipediaThough initially receptive to this proposal, Newton never invoked it in the new editions of the Principia (as Fatio had fervently hoped) or in other writings. Instead, in a letter of 1693 to Leibniz, Newton wrote thatsince all phenomena of the heavens and of the sea follow precisely, so far as I am aware, from nothing but gravity acting in accordance with the laws described by me; and since nature is very simple, I have myself concluded that all other causes are to be rejected and that the heavens are to be stripped as far as may be of all matter, lest the motions of planets and comets be hindered or rendered irregular. But if, meanwhile, someone explains gravity along with all its laws by the action of some subtle matter, and shows that the motion of planets and comets will not be disturbed by this matter, I shall be far from objecting.Why did Newton persist in this attitude in the face of such pressure from both friends and foes? I think that there are two reasons, both of which are indicative of his great insight and intellectual honesty.The first is that Newton came to see that all explanations must start somewhere, and that starting with contact interactions between impenetrable bodies was an arbitrary choice, imposed upon us only by an appeal to common sense, based on our day-to-day perceptions. To Leibniz, Newton wrote that if gravitational attraction lacked a proper “mechanical explanation” then so did inertia, the hardness of solids, as well as “the extension, the duration, and the mobility of bodies, and yet no man ever attempted to explain these mechanically, or took them for miracles or supernatural things or fictions or occult qualities.” This was remarkably prescient, especially considering that nowadays we explain the contact interaction between two hard bodies in terms of an electromagnetic force, rather than the other way around.The second reason why Newton abandoned all “mechanical” explanations of gravity is that he understood that they were incompatible with what we now call energy conservation. This is particularly notable because, unlike Huygens and Leibniz, Newton didn’t believe that that the total energy of the Universe was conserved. Actually, he pointed out that friction, viscosity, and inelastic collisions are all seen to destroy what Leibniz called vis viva (“living force”) and which we now call kinetic energy (this was long before the realization that those processes turn mechanical energy into heat, which is also a form of energy). But Newton was also well aware that his universal law of gravitation conserved mechanical energy exactly and that all gravitational phenomena could be explained by that law, as far as available data went.In the case of Fatio’s theory, the trouble is that the collisions between the aetherial corpuscles and ordinary matter must be inelastic. It can be shown rigorously that otherwise the gravitational attraction would vanish. The reason is that if the collisions are perfectly elastic then the loss of force when a corpuscle doesn’t hit body A because it has been screened by body B is exactly compensated by a corpuscle that wouldn’t have hit A in the absence of B, but which rebounds off B and then hits A.If the collisions between ordinary matter and the aetherial corpuscles are inelastic, this means that there will also be a drag that tends to slow down a body moving through space. This is what Richard Feynman has to say about it in his famous 1964 lectures on the Character of Physical Law:If the earth is moving, more particles [i.e., aetherial corpuscles] will hit it from in front than from behind. (If you are running in the rain, more rain hits you in the front of the face than in the back of the head, because you are running into the rain.) So, if the earth is moving it is running into the particles coming towards it and way from the ones that are chasing it from behind. So more particles will hit it from the front than from the back, and there will be a force opposing any motion. This force would slow the earth up in its orbit, and it certainly would not have lasted the three or four billion years (at least) that it has been going around the sun.Actually, Fatio himself already understood that his aetherial corpuscles would cause a drag on a moving planet, but he argued (correctly in principle) that the ratio of the drag to the magnitude of the gravitational attraction could be made as small as needed by reducing the density and increasing the speed of the corpuscles. He continued to work on his theory until his death, and later it was independently re-discovered and published by Georges-Louis Le Sage (see Le Sage's theory of gravitation), a fellow Genevan.The Fatio-Le Sage theory of gravity attracted renewed attention in the 19th century, following the success of the kinetic theory in explaining the pressure exerted by a gas as the result of contact interactions between the gas molecules and the solid walls of the container. As late as 1908, Henri Poincaré was still writing about the Fatio-Le Sage theory, but his conclusion was that the average speed of the corpuscles required to explain gravity while producing a drag small enough to be compatible with the astronomical data was ridiculously huge, and that the energy deposited by the corpuscles as they hit the Earth would heat it up at an incredibly violent rate.The combination of insight and honesty that Newton demonstrated by abandoning all attempts to explain gravity “mechanically”, in the face of enormous opposition and controversy from all sides, has been commented upon by such eminent modern physicists as Mach, Einstein, Feynman, Chandrasekhar, and Weinberg, but I’ve found that many professional science historians and philosophers have little appreciation for it. In Feynman’s words,Modern science is exactly in the same tradition as the discoveries of the Law of Gravitation […] I do not feel at all bad about telling you about the Law of Gravitation because in describing its history and methods, the character of its discovery, its quality, I am being completely modern.

Just register on the admission portal and during registration you will get an option for the entrance based course. Just register there. There is no separate form for DU CIC.

Years ago I worked at document management company.  There is cool software that can automate aspects of hand-written forms.  We had an airport as a customer - they scanned plenty and (as I said before) this was several years ago...On your airport customs forms, the "boxes" that you 'need' to write on - are basically invisible to the scanner - but are used because then us humans will tend to write neater and clearer which make sit easier to recognize with a computer.  Any characters with less than X% accuracy based on a recognition engine are flagged and shown as an image zoomed into the particular character so a human operator can then say "that is an "A".   This way, you can rapidly go through most forms and output it to say - an SQL database, complete with link to original image of the form you filled in.If you see "black boxes" at three corners of the document - it is likely set up for scanning (they help to identify and orient the page digitally).  If there is a unique barcode on the document somewhere I would theorize there is an even higher likelihood of it being scanned - the document is of enough value to be printed individually which costs more, which means it is likely going to be used on the capture side.   (I've noticed in the past in Bahamas and some other Caribbean islands they use these sorts of capture mechanisms, but they have far fewer people entering than the US does everyday)The real answer is: it depends.  Depending on each country and its policies and procedures.  Generally I would be surprised if they scanned and held onto the paper.   In the US, they proably file those for a set period of time then destroy them, perhaps mining them for some data about travellers. In the end,  I suspect the "paper-to-data capture" likelihood of customs forms ranges somewhere on a spectrum like this:Third world Customs Guy has paper to show he did his job, paper gets thrown out at end of shift. ------>  We keep all the papers! everything is scanned as you pass by customs and unique barcodes identify which flight/gate/area the form was handed out at, so we co-ordinate with cameras in the airport and have captured your image.  We also know exactly how much vodka you brought into the country. :)

NOOOOOOO. You are talking to a military romance scammer. I received an email from the US Army that directly answers your question that is pasted below please keep reading.I believe you are the victim of a military Romance Scam whereas the person you are talking to is a foreign national posing as an American Soldier claiming to be stationed overseas on a peacekeeping mission. That's the key to the scam they always claim to be on a peacekeeping mission.Part of their scam is saying that they have no access to their money that their mission is highly dangerous.If your boyfriend girlfriend/future husband/wife is asking you to do the following or has exhibited this behavior, it is a most likely a scam:Moves to private messaging site immediately after meeting you on Facebook or SnapChat or Instagram or some dating or social media site. Often times they delete the site you met them on right after they asked you to move to a more private messaging siteProfesses love to you very quickly & seems to quote poems and song lyrics along with using their own sort of broken language, as they profess their love and devotion quickly. They also showed concern for your health and love for your family.Promises marriage as soon as he/she gets to state for leave that they asked you to pay for.They Requests money (wire transfers) and Amazon, iTune ,Verizon, etc gift cards, for medicine, religious practices, and leaves to come home, internet access, complete job assignments, help sick friend, get him out of trouble, or anything that sounds fishy.The military does provide all the soldier needs including food medical Care and transportation for leave. Trust me, I lived it, you are probably being scammed. I am just trying to show you examples that you are most likely being connned.Below is an email response I received after I sent an inquiry to the US government when I discovered I was scammed. I received this wonderful response back with lots of useful links on how to find and report your scammer. And how to learn more about Romance Scams.Right now you can also copy the picture he gave you and do a google image search and you will hopefully see the pictures of the real person he is impersonating. this doesn't always work and take some digging. if you find the real person you can direct message them and alert them that their image is being used for scamming.Good Luck to you and I'm sorry this may be happening to you. please continue reading the government response I received below it's very informative.   You have contacted an email that is monitored by the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command. Unfortunately, this is a common concern. We assure you there is never any reason to send money to anyone claiming to be a Soldier online. If you have only spoken with this person online, it is likely they are not a U.S. Soldier at all. If this is a suspected imposter social media profile, we urge you to report it to that platform as soon as possible. Please continue reading for more resources and answers to other frequently asked questions:  How to report an imposter Facebook profile: Caution-https://www.facebook.com/help/16... < Caution-https://www.facebook.com/help/16... >   Answers to frequently asked questions:  - Soldiers and their loved ones are not charged money so that the Soldier can go on leave.  - Soldiers are not charged money for secure communications or leave.  - Soldiers do not need permission to get married.  - Soldiers emails are in this format: john.doe.mil@mail.mil < Caution-mailto: john.doe.mil@mail.mil > anything ending in .us or .com is not an official email account.  - Soldiers have medical insurance, which pays for their medical costs when treated at civilian health care facilities worldwide – family and friends do not need to pay their medical expenses.  - Military aircraft are not used to transport Privately Owned Vehicles.  - Army financial offices are not used to help Soldiers buy or sell items of any kind.  - Soldiers deployed to Combat Zones do not need to solicit money from the public to feed or house themselves or their troops.  - Deployed Soldiers do not find large unclaimed sums of money and need your help to get that money out of the country.  Anyone who tells you one of the above-listed conditions/circumstances is true is likely posing as a Soldier and trying to steal money from you.  We would urge you to immediately cease all contact with this individual.  For more information on avoiding online scams and to report this crime, please see the following sites and articles:   This article may help clarify some of the tricks social media scammers try to use to take advantage of people: Caution-https://www.army.mil/article/61432/< Caution-https://www.army.mil/article/61432/>   CID advises vigilance against 'romance scams,' scammers impersonating Soldiers  Caution-https://www.army.mil/article/180749 < Caution-https://www.army.mil/article/180749 >   FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center: Caution-http://www.ic3.gov/default.aspx< Caution-http://www.ic3.gov/default.aspx>   U.S. Army investigators warn public against romance scams: Caution-https://www.army.mil/article/130...< Caution-https://www.army.mil/article/130...>   DOD warns troops, families to be cybercrime smart -Caution-http://www.army.mil/article/1450...< Caution-http://www.army.mil/article/1450...>   Use caution with social networking  Caution-https://www.army.mil/article/146...< Caution-https://www.army.mil/article/146...>    Please see our frequently asked questions section under scams and legal issues. Caution-http://www.army.mil/faq/ < Caution-http://www.army.mil/faq/ > or visit Caution-http://www.cid.army.mil/ < Caution-http://www.cid.army.mil/ >.  The challenge with most scams is determining if an individual is a legitimate member of the US Army. Based on the Privacy Act of 1974, we cannot provide this information. If concerned about a scam you may contact the Better Business Bureau (if it involves a solicitation for money), or local law enforcement. If you're involved in a Facebook or dating site scam, you are free to contact us direct; (571) 305-4056.   If you have a social security number, you can find information about Soldiers online at Caution-https://www.dmdc.osd.mil/appj/sc... < Caution-https://www.dmdc.osd.mil/appj/sc... > . While this is a free search, it does not help you locate a retiree, but it can tell you if the Soldier is active duty or not.  If more information is needed such as current duty station or location, you can contact the Commander Soldier's Records Data Center (SRDC) by phone or mail and they will help you locate individuals on active duty only, not retirees. There is a fee of $3.50 for businesses to use this service. The check or money order must be made out to the U.S. Treasury. It is not refundable. The address is:  Commander Soldier's Records Data Center (SRDC) 8899 East 56th Street Indianapolis, IN 46249-5301 Phone: 1-866-771-6357  In addition, it is not possible to remove social networking site profiles without legitimate proof of identity theft or a scam. If you suspect fraud on this site, take a screenshot of any advances for money or impersonations and report the account on the social networking platform immediately.  Please submit all information you have on this incident to Caution-www.ic3.gov < Caution-http://www.ic3.gov > (FBI website, Internet Criminal Complaint Center), immediately stop contact with the scammer (you are potentially providing them more information which can be used to scam you), and learn how to protect yourself against these scams at Caution-http://www.ftc.gov < Caution-http://www.ftc.gov > (Federal Trade Commission's website)

Here are 33 mind-blowing facts.I also added credible sources next to facts that seem unbelievable.1. Each person’s tongue print is unique. [1]2. Despite what most people believe. The tongue is not the strongest muscle in the human body. [2]3. Sarcasm increases creativity. [3]4. Scientists claim most internet trolls are narcissistic, sadistic and psychopathic in nature. [4]5. In 1897, Bayer, who is the maker of Aspirin, once marketed the drug heroin. [5], (Why I’m not surprised!)6. Carbon monoxide can kill a person in less than 15 minutes. [6]If someone has to sleep in the car, he/she should leave one of the car windows open 2–3 cm. The reason is that the air can be heavier, and oxygen levels will be lower. Consequently, they might faint and then the oxygen will gradually be reduced enough to kill that person.7. David Atchison was the president of US for one day. [7]8. Former U.S. president Ronald Reagan worked as a lifeguard in his youth at a beach near Dixon, Illinois and saved over 77 lives. [8]9. Roy Sullivan was struck by lightning 7 times and survived. [9]10. Tsutomu Yamaguchi was a survivor of both Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings during WW2. [10]11. The Longest word in English is 1909 letters, and it refers to a distinct part of DNA. [11]12. The search engine Google got its name from the word “googol,” which refers to the number one with a hundred zeros after it.At first, the founders wanted to call the search engine “BackRub” but they changed their mind. (A very good decision)13. The sound made by the Victoria Falls in Zimbabwe is so loud that it can be heard 40 kilometers away. [12]14. An earthquake on Dec. 16, 1811, caused the Mississippi River to flow backwards. [13]15. Lake Nyos in Cameroon belches carbon dioxide. Its poisonous burps killed 1,800 people in one night in August 1986. [14]In the evening of August 21, farmers living near the lake heard rumbling.At the same time, a white cloud collected over the water. It grew to 100 m tall and flowed across the land. Before villagers could understand what happened, they were all unconscious.The cloud had killed the people 25 km from the lake. Few people survived.16. Medical research has found substances in mistletoe that can slow down tumor growth. [15]17. The largest living organism on earth is a giant fungus. It covers 10 square kilometres in Oregon, USA. It is thought to be around 2,400-8650 years old. [16]18. There are no two zebras who have stripes that are exactly the same.19. A chicken with red earlobes tend to produce brown eggs, and a chicken with white earlobes tend to produce white eggs. [17]20. The fastest land animal is Cheetah. It has a recorded speed of 109–120 km/h. [18] (Damn! That’s faster than my Volkswagen Golf 3)21. Since the early 18th century, St. Bernard dogs were kept by monks in Switzerland to save people trapped into the snow.For about 200 years, these heroic dogs have saved more than 2000 lives. [19]22. The first planet to be discovered with a telescope was Uranus by William Herschel on 13 March 1781.23. Neptune was the only planet to be discovered by mathematics. [20]The mathematician Alexis Bouvard published a series of astronomical tables detailing the orbit of Uranus.In 1821 Astronomers observed that Uranus wobble from its predicted orbit from time to time. The theory was that another “planet” was causing this.So, two astronomers John Adams, and Urbain Le Verrier made the calculations to predict the Neptune’s position.In 1846 they confirmed the Neptune presence.24. The astronomers above were not the first to observe Neptune. That honour goes to Galileo Galilei. [21]While sketching the moons of Jupiter, he drew Neptune, which happened to be in conjunction with Jupiter in late 1612.The sketch is from Dec. 27, 1612By using Starry Night Software, observers re-created what Galileo saw in 1612.It is said he mistook Neptune for a star because of its slow movement.25. The Great Pyramids used to be as white as snow because they were encased in a bright limestone. [22]Image from Mark Millmore26. Robert Walpole of England borrowed a book from the Sydney Sussex college in 1668.The book was returned 288 years later. (And the librarian in my city complains when I delay one day.)27. The IRS employees tax manual has instructions for collecting taxes after a nuclear war. [23] (The world might be destroyed, but you’ll still pay taxes…)28. In most advertisements, the time displayed on a watch is 10:10. The reason is that it’s a time where brand and logo are positioned nicely. [24]29. The story of Mulan had been told in China for almost 1,400 years before Disney decided to make it into an animated movie.Her story was originally described in a poem known as Ballad of Mulan. But, there isn’t enough proof she was a real person.30. Most lipstick contains fish scales. Check at the ingredients list for “Guanine”. [25]31. Coca-Cola was created in 1886 by Pharmacist John Pemberton. It was made by mixing the coca-leaf extract with Bordeaux wine.To avoid liquor regulations, he chose to mix his coca-leaf extract with sugar syrup instead of wine. He also added kola-nut extract. [26]32. Coca-Cola didn’t become cocaine-free till 1929.33. “Stepan” is the only company in the US that is allowed to import coca leaves, mostly from Peru.Learn more facts:130 Amazing Facts that will blow your mind85 Amazing psychological facts

It is a normal procedural motion where one party requests the other side provide the information in the case. They are filed in every single felony case. Failure to file a motion for discovery would be considered malpractice.

Discovery is the process through which defendants find out about the prosecution's case. For example, through standard discovery procedure, they can: get copies of the arresting officers' reports and statements made by prosecution witnesses, and. Examine evidence that the prosecution proposes to introduce at trial.

After discovery has concluded, if the case does not settle and is not resolved by a motion for summary disposition or judgment, the case will go to trial. ... At trial, attorneys will present arguments, witnesses, and evidence. Once the trial has concluded, the parties may sometimes submit post-trial motions or briefs.

Discovery is the general process of a defendant obtaining information possessed by a prosecutor regarding the defendant's case. In addition, prosecutors may be allowed to obtain all information a defendant holds regarding a case as well.

Discovery is the formal process of exchanging information between the parties about the witnesses and evidence to be presented at trial. The purpose of discovery is to make the parties aware of the evidence that may be presented at trial.