Federal Standard Form SF 254 Procurement Services Home

There must be provision in the form for those who are taking 12 th board exam this year , so go through the form properly before filling it .

As long as your doctor prescribed this, it is tax deductible under the category for medical expenses. There is no IRS form for permission.

Spend less time using your blocked Internet to ask questions on Quora, andTravel back in time to when there was no curfew and you were playing Super Mario Kart, and instead, fill out your exam form.

I am going to get pretty literal here. Please forgive meHow likely are you to win a car from filling out a form at a mall? In the US, at least, this is usually spelled out somewhere on the form or on a website listed on the form. If it is not, you could ask (and may or may not get a truthful answer). If none of this works, you could probably be able to guess using a few factors: * How many people take the time to stop and enter (what percentage of passers-by, multiplied by amount of typical or expected foot-traffic)?* Are multiple entries allowed? * How long will entries be accepted before the drawing? As a rule of thumb, if the odds aren’t stated (and usually, even if they are) the odds are probably staggering. If you multiply the amount of time it takes to fill out the form by the amount of forms you would have to fill-out before you had an even 1% chance of winning the car, you would likely do better using that time to get a second job. Oh, and lastly, realize that the reason they are enticing you with the chance to win a car is that they are collecting your personal information on the form. It usually is quite a cheap way to generate a LOT of personal data, add you to mailing/dialing lists, etc. They folks running the drawing often gather another great bit of psychology about you: person who fills out form likes to enter “something for nothing” type contests (the drawing itself). This can be valuable to advertisers.Who drives the new car home? By definition of “home” the owner (presumably the winner) would drive the car “home”. If the car is driven to your house by an employee of the company running the lottery, they would just be driving the car to the winners residence…not their “home”.Frankly, I am not sure of what is meant by this question. I would assume that any winner of the drawing would either pick up the vehicle and drive it themselves away from the drawing or other site where the prize was moved to, possibly prepped for delivery tot he winner, or someone would deliver it to the winner’s home by driving it or trucking it there.What are your chances to win another car again? Your chances of winning the next drawing you entered would be EXACTLY the same as they would be had you lost the previous one, as specified in item number one. The odds of winning/losing do not change based on previous outcome. Think about it this way: If I just flipped a coin and it landed on “heads” 50 times in a row, what are the chances that it will be “heads” on the 51st attempt? EXACTLY (assuming there is nothing about the coin or flip that favors one side over the other) 1 in 2 or 50%, just as it was the first flip, just as it will be on the 51st millionth.Now the probability of winning 2 drawings, each with 1 million entries is staggeringly small. But they are two separate events, each governed independently by their own set of probabilities. Landing on heads 51 times in a row or winning 2 cars in consecutive drawings would be matters of remarkable coincidence: respectively 50 1 in 2 or 2 one in a million events happening to share the same outcome.Good luck

It appears that the company may be trying to reclassify you as an independent contractor rather than an employee.Based on the information provided, it appears that such reclassification (a) would be a violation of applicable law by the employer and (b) potentially could be disadvantageous for you (e.g., depriving you of unemployment compensation if you are fired without cause).The most prudent approach would be to retain a lawyer who represents employees in employment matters.In any event, it appears that you would be justified in refusing to complete and sign the W-9, telling the company that there is no business or legal reason for you to do so.Edit: After the foregoing answer was written, the OP added Q details concerning restricted stock repurchase being the reason for the W-9 request. As a result, the foregoing answer appears to be  irrelevant. However, I will leave it, for now, in case Q details are changed yet again in a way that reestablishes the answer's relevance.

Taxes can be viewed as having 4 uses (or purposes) in our (and most) governments:Revenue generation (to pay for public services).Fiscal policy control (e.g., If the government wishes to reduce the money supply in order to reduce the risk of inflation, they can raise interest rates, sell fewer bonds, burn money, or raise taxes. In the last case, this represents excess tax revenue over the actual spending needs of the government).Wealth re-distribution. One argument for this is that the earnings of a country can be perceived as belonging to all of its citizens since the we all have a stake in the resources of the country (natural resources, and intangibles such as culture, good citizenship, civic duties). Without some tax policy complexity, the free market alone does not re-distribute wealth according to this "shared" resources concept. However, this steps into the boundary of Purpose # 4...A way to implement Social Policy (and similar government mandated policies, such as environmental policy, health policy, savings and debt policy, etc.). As Government spending can be use to implement policies (e.g., spending money on public health care, environmental cleanup, education, etc.), it is equivalent to provide tax breaks (income deductions or tax credits) for the private sector to act in certain ways -- e.g., spend money on R&D, pay for their own education or health care, avoid spending money on polluting cars by having a higher sales tax on these cars or offering a credit for trade-ins [ref: Cash for Clunkers]).Uses # 1 & 2 are rather straight-forward, and do not require a complex tax code to implement. Flat income and/or consumption (sales) taxes can easily be manipulated up or down overall for these top 2 uses. Furthermore, there is clarity when these uses are invoked. For spending, we publish a budget. For fiscal policy manipulation, the official economic agency (The Fed) publishes their outlook and agenda.Use # 3 is controversial because there is no Constitutional definition for the appropriate level of wealth re-distribution, and the very concept of wealth re-distribution is considered by some to be inappropriate and unconstitutional. Thus, the goal of wealth re-distribution is pretty much hidden in with the actions and policies of Use #4 (social policy manipulation).Use # 4, however, is where the complexity enters the Taxation system. Policy implementation through taxation (or through spending) occurs via legislation. Legislation (law making) is inherently complex and subject to gross manipulation by special interests during formation and amendments. Legislation is subject to interpretation, is prone to errors (leading to loopholes) and both unintentional or intentional (criminal / fraudulent) avoidance.The record keeping and forms referred to in the question are partially due to the basic formula for calculating taxes (i.e., percentage of income, cost of property, amount of purchase for a sales tax, ...). However, it is the complexity (and associated opportunities for exploitation) of taxation legislation for Use # 4 (Social Policy implementation) that naturally leads to complexity in the reporting requirements for the tax system.