Instructions for Responding to Form Interrogatories California Courts Courts Ca

You can represent yourself. Each form is different per state or county but generally an answer is simply a written document which presents a synopsis of your story to the court. The answer is not your defense, just written notice to the court that you intend to contest the suit. The blank forms are available at the court clerk’s office and are pretty much self explanatoryThere will be a space calling for the signature of an attorney. You should sign your name on the space and write the words “Pro se” after your signature. This lets the court know you are acting as your own attorney.

As asked of me specifically;The others are right, you will likely need a lawyer. But to answer your question, there is a response form to respond to a restraining order or order of protection. Worst case the form is available at the courthouse where your hearing is set to be heard in, typically at the appropriate clerk's window, which may vary, so ask any of the clerk's when you get there.You only have so many days to respond, and it will specify in the paperwork.You will also have to appear in court on the date your hearing is scheduled.Most courts have a department that will help you respond to forms at no cost. I figure you are asking because you can't afford an attorney which is completely understandable.The problem is that if you aren't represented and the other person is successful in getting a temporary restraining order made permanent in the hearing you will not be allowed at any of the places the petitioner goes, without risking arrest.I hope this helps.Not given as legal advice-

Your question confuses me a bit. What's missing is "WHY are the instructions displayed?" What makes them so important? More to the point, what makes them so important to the user?You say it's a simple form, but also say they must read the instructions before filling it out. If it's simple, what are all the instructions for? I haven't seen the form and already I'm confused.People will do things if they understand (and agree with) the purpose for doing them. If they don't understand the need for the instructions (e.g. because the form appears to be simple), you'll have a hard time getting users to read them (they won't see the need).My suggestion would be to take a step back from the design a bit and look at the form's purpose. If the instructions are to minimize data entry errors, look for ways in your design to do that and eliminate an instruction or two. For example, do real-time validation of things like zip codes, phone numbers, usernames, and anything else your web page can do.If the instructions are to educate the user on some specific process, look at the process to see if it can be made simpler or more obvious such that it doesn't need any explanation.Finally, don't forget user testing--ask some potential (or representative) users what they think works for them.

I will answer, even though I am not a California Lawyer, so there may be subtle differences and this is not legal advise, but in general in most jurisdictions, the advise to respond and appear in court is good advise, nor does it normally mean you cannot contest jurisdiction. The failure to respond normally brings far greater negative consequences.Someone has filed a notice for you to attend (either a criminal complaint or a civil one) and they say there is jurisdiction or they would not have filed. Since you did not respond, there is no one to contest the jurisdiction so the court will almost always take jurisdiction. Even if you appear by a lawyer, the court will not hear him unless he has filed some form of appearance. Appearing does not normally prejudice rights, rather it puts the court on notice that you want to be heard.2. Of course, if you do not appear, the court may be unaware if you are even aware of the process, and a process taken in your absence can be set aside. That is not an easy process as you need prove both a defense worthy of the courts time and that you did not deliberately ignore the court summons, and in your case you are saying it is wise to ignore and almost abuse of process to appear if you think there is no jurisdiction. Thinking that without the court agreeing is as one sided and since you did not appear the court has no idea of what you were thinking.3. If you were legally served and do not appear, a court can (and often does) enter judgment against you if a civil matter (so you lose automatically) and in a criminal matter issue a warrant for your arrest. So you have the same law services seeking you as if you had been convicted; and chances of bail are greatly reduced. If you have lost at trial by non appearance there is a judgment summons process to compel such defendant to come to court and disclose his assets and failure to appear for such summons can result in a warrant for arrest, even though them matter was civil.4. My limited experience in US courts shocked me as to how easily the court orders and accept alternative service. (It was not California) The ruling did not directly affect my client, as my client had appeared, and jurisdiction was an issue. A co defendant did not appear and if was revealed had not been served. That court ordered substitutional service (service by another method than hand delivery can be ordered, by courts but there is normally a lot of hoops to get such an order.) The other lawyer merely said we don’t know where he is and despite no efforts to serve that the defendant could possibly have become aware of, the court ordered service by regular mail to an address the defendant had last resided in, 2 years previously and gave a short time period to appear. (Perhaps the court thought the postal service could do a better job in forwarding the summons than the Plaintiffs lawyer) . In any event He did not appear and default judgment was given.5. You live in another jurisdiction so you think why appear and you can ignore the judgment. Be careful as if it was a criminal matter and you ever come into the jurisdiction you will be subject to arrest. If a civil matter, maybe you do not realize almost every country has treaties where they will recognize the judgment of that court, so you may well find your own court in your jurisdiction will enforce the judgment made against you in your absence, and this second order by your home court is is procedural so they will not normally look at a jurisdiction defense.6. I have had a client arrested and taken to jail and held there for week for failure to appear - all before I saw the client. The Judge had asked if the defendant had been served and the prosecutor said yes, so bench warrant arrest and jail. My investigation proved there had been so service and my client was totally unaware of the action, but the other side had verbally and without evidence or documentation told the prosecutor that there had been service and prosecutors are busy and did not bother to check. Yes the client was released when error was shown, but this was after the fact. Often and especially in civil matters, all the judge has to go in if the defendant does not present himself is a sworn statement claiming service, by someone who is paid by the opponent.So in summary and there may be exceptions so seek paid legal advise by a lawyer with knowledge of the facts in California (the jurisdiction you mention) , but you are far more likely to not get due process if you ignore the court and choose not to present yourself, than if you respond and appear in court.A caveat; You mentioned California USA, which has an advanced legal system, so even if you are anti american, follow their rules. There may well be countries in the world where the courts are so politicized or the legal system so unstable or corrupt where non appearance is a better option. All the better reason to get paid legal advise from a lawyer in that jurisdiction with full knowledge of the facts.

I consider the 9 years as a judgement or order by the lower court.According to the Supreme Court Rules, 1966A petition need to be filed within 30 days from the date of the order or judgement.So,No. You can't file a petition after 9 years.

I’ll tell you a secret - you can thank me later for this.If you want to make the form-filling experience easy for a user - make sure that you have a great UI to offer.Everything boils down to UI at the end.Axonator is one of the best mobile apps to collect data since it offers powerful features bundled with a simple UI.The problem with most of the mobile form apps is that they are overloaded with features that aren’t really necessary.The same doesn’t hold true for Axonator. It has useful features but it is very unlikely that the user will feel overwhelmed in using them.So, if you are inclined towards having greater form completion rates for your survey or any data collection projects, then Axonator is the way to go.Apart from that, there are other features that make the data collection process faster like offline data collection, rich data capture - audio, video, images, QR code & barcode data capture, live location & time capture, and more!Check all the features here!You will be able to complete more surveys - because productivity will certainly shoot up.Since you aren’t using paper forms, errors will drop signNowly.The cost of the paper & print will be saved - your office expenses will drop dramatically.No repeat work. No data entry. Time & money saved yet again.Analytics will empower you to make strategic decisions and explore new revenue opportunities.The app is dirt-cheap & you don’t any training to use the app. They come in with a smooth UI. Forget using, even creating forms for your apps is easy on the platform. Just drag & drop - and it’s ready for use. Anyone can build an app under hours.

I do not think you need to submit some other court document along with the signed form. While I got admitted to IISER K, I gave the signed form only.Note that even if you miss some document they will provide you approx 1 month of time to submit them after provisionally admitting to the institute.