WorkHorse Rental Agreement Workhorse Oilfield Rental S Form

“How do you feel about landlords that require you to fill out an app prior to seeing the rental property? My daughter is a CO, has a perfect rental history, and a very high credit score. We ran into this while she looks for a rental.”I have a certain sympathy for landlords. It isn’t an easy way to make a living. You have huge capital tied up in immobile investments. One destructive tenant can wipe out the profits from 20 good ones.If you want a landlord who will show the property without asking questions until and unless you show an interest, you can probably find that. We had that when we rented our first apartment after retiring and selling our house (Liberty Lake Apts in Boise ID - great place BTW, we recommend them). The nice office lady showed us around the complex, and let us inside an empty unit just like the one we eventually rented. (That empty unit was already promised to someone else; the one we eventually rented was still occupied). Then we went back to the office and filled out applications.But anyways, it all comes down to supply and demand in a free market. If you want a landlord who asks no questions, you can find one. Probably a “slumlord” who doesn’t maintain the property and has lots of anti-social, destructive tenants who would make dangerous neighbors. If there is a glut of housing in your market, you can find landlords who bend over backwards to court you. If there is a housing shortage, you have to play by the landlords’ rules.

If you were both on the lease of the apartment then your roommate cannot do that. If your roommate is the leaseholder and then took you on as a roommate then she may ask you to leave But even that would be difficult once you have established residency. If there is no lease at all then your roommate has no more power than you do. So once again you don’t have a right to ask you to leave. The only way around this would be if one party was to get a restraining order from the court. Then the opposite party would have to leave otherwise they would be in violation of that restraining order. Which would result in jail. But even that would be difficult once you have established residency. If there is no lease at all then your roommate has no more power than you do. So once again you don’t have a right to ask you to leave. The only way around this would be if one party was to get a restraining order from the court. Then the opposite party would have to leave otherwise they would be in violation of that restraining order. Which would result in jail

In the US, a person living in your unit will often be a tenant. You can have different relationships with your tenants. A house catty-corner across from where I live rents spaces in a two-apartment house, and has an individual relationship with each tenant. Here in Indiana, a judge would have no problem with evicting JUST that tenant. Failure to pay rent when due is an almost insurmountable bsignNow of a tenant’s obligations in Indiana and much of the US, and in Indiana you would usually be able to get a tenant out in say three to five weeks. I would go into court right away.It’s also possible to have a collective agreement with a whole group of people. There, one person is responsible for ALL of the rent, OR all tenants have to pay it by chipping in: either/or. If this is a “joint tenancy” of that sort, then the one tenant’s failure to pay is the failure of all of them to pay, and your remedy is to evict all of the tenants. [Of course, you can probably - at least in Indiana, and possibly much of the rest of the US - simply fail to go through with the eviction for the two or three tenants you DO like, and only boot out the one who’s the trouble-maker. It’s not discrimination - treating ne’er-do’wells badly and nice people nicely is not invidious discrimination under American law.]Sadly, in the second scenario above - but not the first - the judge might determine that you’ve been taking partial payments. If you’ve done it long enough, you have reformulated the contract, and you might be stuck for that period of time. To be safe, what you should do is just send a Notice of Change in Terms of Tenancy to all tenants [possibly by registered letter, though an email without a bounce-back might do just fine in many places] indicating that, in the future, no partial payments will be accepted. If the ne’er-do-well then continues not to chip in, refuse the rent from all parties; move to evict everyone; tell the good tenants that the action against them is only a formality; get the ne’er-do-well out by sheriff’s action; and let the good tenants stay under a new agreement.As a side note, when I was a landlord, I never rented person-to-person. I made groups of roommates - in the rare cases I accepted tenancies from them - sign a joint agreement.

This really depends what sort of file it is, but generally:Save a local copy of the file from the email, using the ‘save as’ command.Open the local copy in an editor. For PDF files most PDF readers have a limited ability to add text, such as using the ‘form fill’ commands. For other document types, you can normally just click on them and edit it. If it’s an image, I’d suggest Paint.net as it’s free and you can add txt to images.One done, save the document and close it.Reply to the email, click add attachment and attach the saved document, then hit send.

Just petition using a I-130 yourself. Read the instructions very carefully. I am not sure but it’s possible that the affidavit of support will need to be filled by your husband since he is the citizen and he filled one for you - again, check the instructions very carefully. It should be a pretty clear, straightforward process.Your child is still well below the age limit and should be fine. If there are any problems, do the same thing you did with your own process - use the numbers you are given to check on the process and if you see it stuck call to make sure they have everything they need early.It is my understanding that the age limit of the child is based on the petition date, so go ahead and do it.You still have plenty of time at 16, just don’t delay.

Taxes can be viewed as having 4 uses (or purposes) in our (and most) governments:Revenue generation (to pay for public services).Fiscal policy control (e.g., If the government wishes to reduce the money supply in order to reduce the risk of inflation, they can raise interest rates, sell fewer bonds, burn money, or raise taxes. In the last case, this represents excess tax revenue over the actual spending needs of the government).Wealth re-distribution. One argument for this is that the earnings of a country can be perceived as belonging to all of its citizens since the we all have a stake in the resources of the country (natural resources, and intangibles such as culture, good citizenship, civic duties). Without some tax policy complexity, the free market alone does not re-distribute wealth according to this "shared" resources concept. However, this steps into the boundary of Purpose # 4...A way to implement Social Policy (and similar government mandated policies, such as environmental policy, health policy, savings and debt policy, etc.). As Government spending can be use to implement policies (e.g., spending money on public health care, environmental cleanup, education, etc.), it is equivalent to provide tax breaks (income deductions or tax credits) for the private sector to act in certain ways -- e.g., spend money on R&D, pay for their own education or health care, avoid spending money on polluting cars by having a higher sales tax on these cars or offering a credit for trade-ins [ref: Cash for Clunkers]).Uses # 1 & 2 are rather straight-forward, and do not require a complex tax code to implement. Flat income and/or consumption (sales) taxes can easily be manipulated up or down overall for these top 2 uses. Furthermore, there is clarity when these uses are invoked. For spending, we publish a budget. For fiscal policy manipulation, the official economic agency (The Fed) publishes their outlook and agenda.Use # 3 is controversial because there is no Constitutional definition for the appropriate level of wealth re-distribution, and the very concept of wealth re-distribution is considered by some to be inappropriate and unconstitutional. Thus, the goal of wealth re-distribution is pretty much hidden in with the actions and policies of Use #4 (social policy manipulation).Use # 4, however, is where the complexity enters the Taxation system. Policy implementation through taxation (or through spending) occurs via legislation. Legislation (law making) is inherently complex and subject to gross manipulation by special interests during formation and amendments. Legislation is subject to interpretation, is prone to errors (leading to loopholes) and both unintentional or intentional (criminal / fraudulent) avoidance.The record keeping and forms referred to in the question are partially due to the basic formula for calculating taxes (i.e., percentage of income, cost of property, amount of purchase for a sales tax, ...). However, it is the complexity (and associated opportunities for exploitation) of taxation legislation for Use # 4 (Social Policy implementation) that naturally leads to complexity in the reporting requirements for the tax system.