Stanford Patient Form for Pre Gamma Knife Surgery

Nicholas: The topic of mind control—a.k.a. erase memory is elaborate, multifaceted, and multilayered. However, if the subject of mind control—i.e. erase a memory—breaks free of the milieu and constant dynamics of the elaborate, multifaceted, and multilayered reinforcements the memory will resurface.In fact, the memory of a horrific experience is often driven deep into the unconscious mind for short or long periods of time. In the meantime, however, fragments of the experience are pushed into the conscious mind. These fragments break to the conscious mind in such diagnosed behaviors as anxiety, stress, depression, nightmare dreams, typical dreams, panic attacks, bi-polar, migraine headaches, lupus, fibromyalgia, diabetes, cancer. PTSD, and the list goes on from A to Z and everything in between.Every diagnoses can be healed at the root cause—the experience that causes the emotional pain and distress at the Mind/Emotional, Body and Spiritual level. I developed a proprietary process to create Emotional, Physical, Spiritual Transformation. You will learn how to consciously access your innate power to transform symptoms, emotional blocks and to create success. I was a faculty member of the World Regression Congress in the Netherlands, India, Brazil, Turkey, and Greece.​Details of Mind Control—Erase memoryThe plans to create mind-controlled workers society have been in place for a long time. The current technology grew out of experiments that the Nazis started before World War II and intensified during the time of the Nazi concentration camps when an unlimited supply of children and adults were available for experimentation. We've heard about the inhumane medical experiments performed on concentration camp prisoners, but no word was ever mentioned by the media and the TV documentaries of the mind control experiments. That was not to be divulged to the American public. Mind control technologies can be broadly divided into two subsets: trauma-based or electronic-based.The first phase of government mind control development grew out of the old occult techniques which required the victim to be exposed to massive psychological and physical trauma, usually beginning in infancy, in order to cause the psyche to shatter into a thousand alter personalities which can then be separately programmed to perform any function (or job) that the programmer wishes to"install". Each alter personality created is separate and distinct from the front personality. The 'front personality' is unaware of the existence or activities of the alter personalities. Alter personalities can be brought to the surface by programmers or handlers using special codes, usually stored in a laptop computer. The victim of mind control can also be affected by specific sounds, words, or actions known as triggers.The second phase of mind control development was refined at an underground base below Fort Hero on Montauk, Long Island (New York) and is referred to as the Montauk Project. The earliest adolescent victims of Montauk style programming, so-called Montauk Boys, were programmed using trauma-based techniques, but that method was eventually abandoned in favor of an all-electronic induction process which could be "installed" in a matter of days (or even hours) instead of the many years that it took to complete trauma-based methods.Dr. Joseph Mengele of Auschwitz notoriety was the principle developer of the trauma-based Monarch Project and the CIA's MK Ultra mind control programs. Mengele and approximately 5, 000 other high ranking Nazis were secretly moved into the United States and South America in the aftermath of World War II in an Operation designated Paperclip. The Nazis continued their work in developing mind control and rocketry technologies in secret underground military bases. The only thing we were told about was the rocketry work with former Nazi star celebrities like Warner Von Braun. The killers, torturers, and mutilators of innocent human beings were kept discretely out of sight, but busy in U.S. underground military facilities which gradually became home to thousands upon thousands of kidnapped American children snatched off the streets (about one million per year) and placed into iron bar cages stacked from floor to ceiling as part of the 'training'. These children would be used to further refine and perfect Mengele's mind control technologies. Certain selected children (at least the ones who survived the 'training') would become future mind controlled slaves who could be used for thousands of different jobs ranging anywhere from sexual slavery to assassinations. A substantial portion of these children, who were considered expendable, were intentionally slaughtered in front of (and by) the other children in order to traumatize the selected trainee into total compliance and submission.Mind Control 'Programmed' IndividualsThe lone gunman that we hear about in assassinations, assassination attempts, school shootings, etc. are mind controlled individuals who had been 'programmed' to carry out those missions. Ted Bundy, the 'Son of Sam' serial killer David Berkowitz, Oswald, Timothy McVeigh, the Columbine shooters, Chapman, Sirhan Sirhan, etc. were mind controlled individuals who were programmed to perform these killings. Tens of thousands of young teenage boys were kidnapped and forced into the mind control training program called The Montauk Project starting around 1976. Al Bielek, under mind control, was involved in many areas of the secret Montauk Project. After slowly recovering his memories beginning in the late 1980s, he came to realize that there was at least 250,000 mind controlled "Montauk Boys' produced at 25 different facilities similar to the underground base at Montauk, Long Island. Many of these boys were to become 'sleepers' who are individuals who were programmed to go into action at a later date when properly "triggered" to engage in some sort of destructive or disruptive conduct. Other Montauk Boys were woven into the fabric of mainstream American life as journalists, radio & TV personalities, businessmen, lawyers, medical professionals, judges, prosecutors, law enforcement, military men, et al.'Concrete' Evidence from Brice Taylor (Aug. 16, 2008)Illuminati Sex Slaves Paint Horrifying Picture by Henry Makow (Nov. 4, 2007)Testimonial for Brice Taylor from Don Weeks (May 3, 2004)Brice Taylor CommentaryNeurofeedback and Other Interventions for Patients with Ritual Abuse, Mind Control, and Dissociative Disorders by Susan Ford (Brice Taylor) Jan. 9, 2005Neurofeedback and Other Interventions for Patients with Ritual Abuse, Mind Control, and Dissociative Disorders By Susan Ford (aka Brice Taylor Jan. 9, 2005)Psychotronic & Demonic Torment-Understanding the Attack and How to Thwart It by M.Topper (1991) Psychotronic & Demonic Torment-Understanding the Attack and How to Thwart ItNicholas: Thank you for inviting me to answer your question. If you have additional questions contact me. I am here only to truly be helpful.

Yes, definitely, but the definition of memory needs to be expanded beyond what we generally think of as memory of simply the facts about what has happened in the past.The science says that it is definitely possible to erase memories, and many techniques have been developed over about the past 30 years that may do just that, though none have ever been absolutely proven in humans.But it is not quite so simple as saying ‘I want to erase this memory’, and poof, the memory is gone. Memories are complex entities, distributed throughout the brain and activated together and separately from each other.A traumatic memory, for instance, is far more than just the facts of what happened. Indeed the facts are the least of it. What causes it to be traumatic are the mental, emotional, biochemical and motor aspects of the memory, that together may have stamped our identity.Together, the difficult part of such memories is that they cause us to predict that what happened before will happen again, causing us to alter ourselves, or, in post-traumatic stress disorder, what happened before is, right now, happening again, though we may know that it is not.Therefore memories need to be disassembled, piece by piece, more than erased en mass as in the Jim Carey movie “Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.”I have been working with memory erasure methods since the mid 1980s to deal with emotional and physical problems. My own experience, combined with that of others that I know from reading and studying various methods, suggests that whatever the core memory is, we will often have formed layers of adaptation around it that need to be addressed first. Those adaptations themselves are memories, though we think of them more as behaviors, thought patterns, body tensions or feeling, or emotions. They are memories because they have become automatic, we experience them over and over. This might be described as what we have done to ourselves in an attempt to get over what happened to us.We must eliminate these adaptive memories first, and only then will the memory be directly available to work on. Even then, what is eliminated is not the facts - we still remember what happened. What is erased are the reactions to what happened; the self-demeaning thoughts and pain that may be known as feelings in the body are gone and cannot be conjured again. The recall of what happened may continue - but we easily move on, as it feels like nothing at all.The science behind memory erasure.In the late 1990s, it was discovered that every time a memory is activated (recalled) it becomes labile (unstable) and is subject to change, if new information is available that may add to or alter a current memory. (Hupbach, A., Gomez, R., Hardt, O., & Nadel, L. (2007)) (See References below)The destabilized memory is also subject to erasure if, shortly after the memory is recalled:chemicals that block memory formation are given, (Nader, K., Schafe, G. E., & Le Doux, J. E. (2000))other information is brought to awareness that contradicts the activated memory, (Ecker, B., Ticic, R., & Hulley, L. (2012)) oralternative sensory stimulation is provided (Solomon, R. M., & Shapiro, F. (2008))Best known for doing this is a psychological method called Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), which uses side-to-side eye movements or other shifting right-to-left sensory stimulation to erase (many assume) memories.Other methods that might accomplish the same thing through other approaches include NeuroEmotional Technique (NET), a self-help method called Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT), and Coherence Therapy. Some parts of Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP) may also have a similar effect.Here are a number of references on reconsolidation as therapy, and in generalEcker, B., Ticic, R., & Hulley, L. (2012)Unlocking the emotional brain eliminating symptoms at their roots using memory reconsolidation. New York; London: Routledge.Rodriguez, T. (n.d.). Can Eye Movements Treat Trauma? Retrieved May 1, 2016, from Can Eye Movements Treat Trauma?Solomon, R. M., & Shapiro, F. (2008). EMDR and the Adaptive Information Processing Model Potential Mechanisms of Change. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 2(4), 315–325Centonze, D., Siracusano, A., Calabresi, P., & Bernardi, G. (2005). Removing pathogenic memories: a neurobiology of psychotherapy. Molecular Neurobiology, 32(2), 123–132. Removing pathogenic memoriesJones, B., Bukoski, E., Nadel, L., & Fellous, J.-M. (2012). Remaking memories: Reconsolidation updates positively motivated spatial memory in rats. Learning & Memory, 19(3), 91–98. Remaking memories: Reconsolidation updates positively motivated spatial memory in ratsLane, R. D., Ryan, L., Nadel, L., & Greenberg, L. (2015). Memory reconsolidation, emotional arousal, and the process of change in psychotherapy: New insights from brain science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, e1.Nader, K. (2015). Reconsolidation and the Dynamic Nature of Memory. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. Reconsolidation and the Dynamic Nature of MemoryNader, K., & Hardt, O. (2009). A single standard for memory: the case for reconsolidation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(3), 224–234.Nader, K., Hardt, O., & Lanius, R. (2013). Memory as a new therapeutic target. Dialogues Clin Neurosci, 15, 475–486.Nader, K., Schafe, G. E., & Le Doux, J. E. (2000). Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval. Nature, 406(6797), 722–726.Hupbach, A., Gomez, R., Hardt, O., & Nadel, L. (2007). Reconsolidation of episodic memories: A subtle reminder triggers integration of new information. Learning & Memory, 14(1–2), 47–53. Reconsolidation of episodic memories: A subtle reminder triggers integration of new information

There are many (many) reasons - so I'll list a few of the ones that I can think of off-hand.Here in the U.S. - we have a multi-party system: Provider-Payer-Patient (unlike other countries that have either a single payer - or universal coverage - or both). Given all the competing interests - at various times - incentives are often mis-aligned around the sharing of actual patient dataThose mis-aligned incentives have not, historically, focused on patient-centered solutions.  That's starting to change - but slowly - and only fairly recently.Small practices are the proverbial "last mile" in healthcare - so many are still paper basedThere are still tens/hundreds of thousands of small practices (1-9 docs) - and a lot of healthcare is still delivered through the small practice demographicThere are many types of specialties - and practice types - and they have different needs around patient data (an optometrist's needs are different from a dentist - which is different from a cardiologist)Both sides of the equation - doctors and patients - are very mobile (we move, change employers - doctors move, change practices) - and there is no "centralized" data store with each persons digitized health information.As we move and age - and unless we have a chronic condition - our health data can become relatively obsolete - fairly quickly (lab results from a year ago are of limited use today)Most of us (in terms of the population as a whole) are only infrequent users of the healthcare system more broadly (cold, flu, stomach, UTI etc....). In other words, we're pretty healthy, so issues around healthcare (and it's use) is a lower priorityThere is a signNow loss of productivity when a practice moves from paper to electronic health records (thus the government "stimulus" funding - which is working - but still a long way to go)The penalties for PHI data bsignNow under HIPAA are signNow - so there has been a reluctance/fear to rely on electronic data.  This is also why the vast majority of data bsignNowes are paper-based (typically USPS)This is why solutions like Google Health - and Revolution Health before them - failed - and closed completely (as in please remove your data - the service will no longer be available)All of which are contributing factors to why the U.S. Healthcare System looks like this:===============Chart Source: Mary Meeker - USA, Inc. (2011) - link here:http://www.kpcb.com/insights/usa...

Medicaid patients would never be expected to pay their own bills. That defeats the purpose of providing this program as a resource to the aid of those who are below the poverty level. Legally, if you signed paperwork to the effect that you agree to pay whatever your insurance won't, there may be an issue.The larger question aside, technically, the professionally can set his fees at whatever level the market will allow. His time spent to complete your form would have been otherwise spent productively. The fact that he is the gatekeeper to your disability benefits should amount to some value with which you are able to accept rewarding him (or her).The doctor’s office needs to find a billable reason to submit (or re-submit) the claim as part of your medical treatment to Medicaid. It is absolutely a normal responsibility of their billing office to find a way to get insurance to reimburse. The failure is theirs, and turning the bill over to you would be ridiculous.If they accept Medicaid to begin with, they have to deal with the government’s complex processes to get paid. Generally, when a claim is denied a new reason to justify the doctor patient interaction will be necessary. I would guess “encounter for administrative reason” was sent. It is often too vague to justify payment. They may need to include the diagnosis behind your medical disability. If they have seen you before, and medical claims have bern accepted on those visits, then a resubmission for timely follow-up on those conditions could be justifued as reason for payment. The fact is, Medicaid is in a huge free-fall and payments are coming much more slowly since the new year. $800 billion is planned to be cut and possibly $600 billion on top of that. When we call their phone line for assistance, wait times are over two hours, if any one even answers. Expect less offices to accept new Medicaid, and many will be dismissing their Medicaid clients. If the office closes due to poor financial decisions, they can be of no service to anyone.Sister, things are rough all over.