Get and Sign Household Budget Template Printable 2013-2022 Form

(street number) (street name) (street suffix)101 Main StreetYou can query the post office on your address, best as you know it, for the “standard” way of presenting your address. USPS.com® - ZIP Code™ Lookup or whatever service is offered in your country. That will tell you the standard way to fill out address lines.

I suspect the question is related to knowing whether someone can claim you as a dependent, because otherwise line 5 itself is pretty clear.General answer: if you are under 19, or a full-time student under the age of 24, your parents can probably claim you as a dependent. If you are living with someone to whom you are not married and who is providing you with more than half of your support, that person can probably claim you as a dependent. If you are married and filing jointly, your spouse needs to answer the same questions.Note that whether those individuals actually do claim you as a dependent doesn't matter; the question is whether they can. It is not a choice.

In a film/TV production, likewise as in theatre, the role of "project manager" would be broken down into several titles - typically line producer, unit production manager, production coordinator. However, in a smaller production they could be combined and one or two people assume the role of all three (often comically termed "a shit show", depending upon how well these functions are getting performed by one overwhelmed person).A film crew is divided into departments, e.g., Art Department, Camera Department, Wardrobe, Grip & Electric, etc.  The functions associated with your question would be performed by crew members within the Production Department.  So if you're looking to jump into film with a Project Manager background in other industries, you'd want to start there.Line Producers create the budget for the show and then are in charge of keeping each "line item" on budget. Line items are expense columns and are broken down in a specific way -  the topsheet of which is a summary of the costs by department and the subsequent sheets have specific expense columns (camera rentals, expendables, etc.).  Here is a piece of a topsheet from a currently released film:Here is an example of a detail page (for Camera Dept expenses):The UPM (which is sometimes simply called the PM or production manager - the "u" is a holdover from the past studio system) is more in charge of seeing that the tasks get completed.  And, like I said, a UPM can also be the Line Producer in many cases.The Production Coordinator, if affordable, handles the more office-like duties, as they manage a lot of the remaining paperwork*, fill out production insurance forms, etc. They rarely go to set, whereas the PM and line producer are on set once shooting commences.  They become  the main point of contact in the production office while everyone else is on set.These lines can blur.  And on a huge budget film, they add titles and functions (and even units) as they need them -- and everyone can have assistants.  But these few are the basics - just know that it can get very complicated :)  Film crews can be either union or non-union, as well, and these functions become very strictly delineated if you unionize a show.One aspect to note is that, in film, there are also what you call "above the line" and "below the line" crew people.  Primarily the "below the line" people deal with physical production and do not make decisions about creative.  Often you will see end credits with numerous "producers" listed. These are what we call "executive producers" and primarily make creative decisions.  They are not in line with what you would call a "project manager" in other industries.*except for callsheets - that function belongs to the ADs - for brevity, I won't go into that here.

What exactly do you think they did? Based on your previous questions/comments, it seems like you think the following happened: 1) Goldman Sachs underwrote the Twitter IPO2) A Goldman equity research analyst upgraded Twitter while many others downgraded 3) Goldman somehow profited from this 4) There were robots involved because the trading activity looked like there were robots involved. 5) You filed a complaint with the SEC, and they haven't done anything; potentially because "the SEC and the government work hand-in-hand" Let's get a couple things straight: first of all, there's nothing illegal whatsoever in this chain of events. If the equity researcher wrote the report and he/she or the firm stood to profit from a particular rating (in this case an upgrade you said) then this would be stated clearly in a section called "Disclosures of Interest" on the report. Banks, especially those the size of Goldman Sachs, spend huge amounts of money in compliance and would make sure that the statement was proper. If it wasn't, the SEC would be the first to crack down even without concerned individuals reporting it. Additionally, the analysts are often not even allowed to trade in the areas which they cover so that point is moot. You state that Goldman would profit from an upgraded rating because they underwrote the IPO, and this is "clearly a conflict of interest". That is incorrect. When they underwrite a stock, that means there is an initial equity stake which they bring to the market, which is sold to various investors. They don't own any of it once the underwriting is over, and if they do then it would be stated under "Disclosure of Interests" as I said previously. Trading robots, more commonly referred to as algorithms, are in fact the majority of market volume today so this is nothing out of the ordinary, and not illegal. These robots "quickly firing off trades" is completely normal. In terms of the SEC working with the government, it IS the government! Actually if they weren't working together  it would be quite a bit of a problem. You're drawing connections between this fact and Goldman donating large amounts of money to lobbying efforts; tons of companies that the SEC has investigated and the government has prosecuted in the past have been donors. If Goldman acted illegally in this case and the SEC had evidence, they would absolutely investigate and move to prosecute regardless of said donations.Given all of this information, if you still think an illegal act has been committed, you should be contacting law firms and requesting assistance - not continually posting on Quora and expecting them to signNow out to you. As other users have answered, you can't represent yourself in a class action lawsuit. Additionally, make sure you owned Twitter stock whenever you think this happened otherwise you don't even qualify to be a part of the class let alone represent it. I apologize if this post is callous, it's late at night and I sincerely believe that these questions is out of line with the purpose of Quora. If there is an issue, you've been given enough information to proceed with whatever you need to do. Soliciting legal representation and members for your class that may or may not exist isn't something for Quora. tl;dr: please stop

The recipients name/company:Name (John, Smith)Adresss (1000 County Way, Unit 200)ZIP, City, State, Country (90254, Neverland, CA, USAIn Europe the addressing scheme is slightly different:AustriaHerr Franz HuberBeethovenstrasse 121010 WIENAUSTRIABelgiumMr Willy JanssensLange Stationsstraat 3523000 LEUVENBELGIUMM. Emile DuboisRue du Diamant 2154800 VERVIERSBELGIUMDenmarkMr Thor NielsenTietgensgade 1378800 VIBORGDENMARKMr Torben RaldorfPO Box 100COPENHAGEN1004 VIBORGDENMARKFinlandMr Asko TeirilaPO Box 51139140 AKDENMAAFINLANDFranceM. Robert MARINRue de l’EgliseDunes82340 AUVILLARFRANCEMme Marie PAGE23 Rue de Grenell75700 PARIS CEDEXFRANCEWhen addressing mail to France, write the addressee’s surname in CAPITAL letters.GermanyMrs F MeierWeberstr. 253113 BONN 1GERMANYMr P KundeLange Str. 1204103 LEIPZIGGERMANYGermany has strict rules about receiving mail, which, if ignored, may result in your mail being returned to you with no attempt at delivery. When addressing mail to Germany, always:• Use the new five-digit postcode (using an old four-digit postcode will cause delay)• Put the postcode before the town name• Put the house number after the street nameGreeceMr George LatsisAlkamenou 37117 80 ATHENSGREECEIcelandMr Jon JonssonEinimel 80107 REYKJAVIKICELANDIrelandFrom 15 July 2015, a new seven digit postcode system has been developed for Ireland and should be used in all addresses, other than those for PO Boxes.All mail for Ireland should now be addressed as illustrated below:Eason80 Abbey Street MiddleDUBLIN 1DO1 P8N3IRELANDThe introduction of the new codes will not in any way affect the existing address structure. The postcode will occupy a new line at the bottom of addresses for domestic mail and the penultimate line for international mail.ItalySig. Giovanni Mascivia Garibaldi 2747037 RIMINI RNITALYLuxembourgM. Jaques Muller71 route de Longway4750 PETANGELUXEMBOURGMonacoAs FranceThe NetherlandsMr J van DietenMorsstr 1112312 BK LEIDENTHE NETHERLANDS(There should be a double space between the postcode and the post town)NorwayHerr Hans HansenSvingen 229230 BEKKEHAUGNORWAYPortugalSenhor Carlos Manuel PereiraAv das A’Augsa LivresMonte Trigo7220 PORTELPORTUGALRosalina SilvaR Conde Redondo 801192 LISBOA CODEXPORTUGALSpainSra Ana JimenezMimbreras 403201 ELCHE (Alicante)SPAIN(The province should be included in brackets after the town)SwedenFru Inger LiljaVasavagen 3 4tr582 20 LINKOPINGSWEDENSwitzerlandM. Andre PerretSchanzenstrasse 73030 BERNESWITZERLAND

Easy to follow instructions can be found here Tax on shopping and servicesThe process works like this.Get a VAT 407 form from the retailer - they might ask for proof that you’re eligible, for example your passport.Show the goods, the completed form and your receipts to customs at the point when you leave the EU (this might not be in the UK).Customs will approve your form if everything is in order. You then take the approved form to get paid.The best place to get the form is from a retailer on the airport when leaving.

NOOOOOOO. You are talking to a military romance scammer. I received an email from the US Army that directly answers your question that is pasted below please keep reading.I believe you are the victim of a military Romance Scam whereas the person you are talking to is a foreign national posing as an American Soldier claiming to be stationed overseas on a peacekeeping mission. That's the key to the scam they always claim to be on a peacekeeping mission.Part of their scam is saying that they have no access to their money that their mission is highly dangerous.If your boyfriend girlfriend/future husband/wife is asking you to do the following or has exhibited this behavior, it is a most likely a scam:Moves to private messaging site immediately after meeting you on Facebook or SnapChat or Instagram or some dating or social media site. Often times they delete the site you met them on right after they asked you to move to a more private messaging siteProfesses love to you very quickly & seems to quote poems and song lyrics along with using their own sort of broken language, as they profess their love and devotion quickly. They also showed concern for your health and love for your family.Promises marriage as soon as he/she gets to state for leave that they asked you to pay for.They Requests money (wire transfers) and Amazon, iTune ,Verizon, etc gift cards, for medicine, religious practices, and leaves to come home, internet access, complete job assignments, help sick friend, get him out of trouble, or anything that sounds fishy.The military does provide all the soldier needs including food medical Care and transportation for leave. Trust me, I lived it, you are probably being scammed. I am just trying to show you examples that you are most likely being connned.Below is an email response I received after I sent an inquiry to the US government when I discovered I was scammed. I received this wonderful response back with lots of useful links on how to find and report your scammer. And how to learn more about Romance Scams.Right now you can also copy the picture he gave you and do a google image search and you will hopefully see the pictures of the real person he is impersonating. this doesn't always work and take some digging. if you find the real person you can direct message them and alert them that their image is being used for scamming.Good Luck to you and I'm sorry this may be happening to you. please continue reading the government response I received below it's very informative.   You have contacted an email that is monitored by the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command. Unfortunately, this is a common concern. We assure you there is never any reason to send money to anyone claiming to be a Soldier online. If you have only spoken with this person online, it is likely they are not a U.S. Soldier at all. If this is a suspected imposter social media profile, we urge you to report it to that platform as soon as possible. Please continue reading for more resources and answers to other frequently asked questions:  How to report an imposter Facebook profile: Caution-https://www.facebook.com/help/16... < Caution-https://www.facebook.com/help/16... >   Answers to frequently asked questions:  - Soldiers and their loved ones are not charged money so that the Soldier can go on leave.  - Soldiers are not charged money for secure communications or leave.  - Soldiers do not need permission to get married.  - Soldiers emails are in this format: john.doe.mil@mail.mil < Caution-mailto: john.doe.mil@mail.mil > anything ending in .us or .com is not an official email account.  - Soldiers have medical insurance, which pays for their medical costs when treated at civilian health care facilities worldwide – family and friends do not need to pay their medical expenses.  - Military aircraft are not used to transport Privately Owned Vehicles.  - Army financial offices are not used to help Soldiers buy or sell items of any kind.  - Soldiers deployed to Combat Zones do not need to solicit money from the public to feed or house themselves or their troops.  - Deployed Soldiers do not find large unclaimed sums of money and need your help to get that money out of the country.  Anyone who tells you one of the above-listed conditions/circumstances is true is likely posing as a Soldier and trying to steal money from you.  We would urge you to immediately cease all contact with this individual.  For more information on avoiding online scams and to report this crime, please see the following sites and articles:   This article may help clarify some of the tricks social media scammers try to use to take advantage of people: Caution-https://www.army.mil/article/61432/< Caution-https://www.army.mil/article/61432/>   CID advises vigilance against 'romance scams,' scammers impersonating Soldiers  Caution-https://www.army.mil/article/180749 < Caution-https://www.army.mil/article/180749 >   FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center: Caution-http://www.ic3.gov/default.aspx< Caution-http://www.ic3.gov/default.aspx>   U.S. Army investigators warn public against romance scams: Caution-https://www.army.mil/article/130...< Caution-https://www.army.mil/article/130...>   DOD warns troops, families to be cybercrime smart -Caution-http://www.army.mil/article/1450...< Caution-http://www.army.mil/article/1450...>   Use caution with social networking  Caution-https://www.army.mil/article/146...< Caution-https://www.army.mil/article/146...>    Please see our frequently asked questions section under scams and legal issues. Caution-http://www.army.mil/faq/ < Caution-http://www.army.mil/faq/ > or visit Caution-http://www.cid.army.mil/ < Caution-http://www.cid.army.mil/ >.  The challenge with most scams is determining if an individual is a legitimate member of the US Army. Based on the Privacy Act of 1974, we cannot provide this information. If concerned about a scam you may contact the Better Business Bureau (if it involves a solicitation for money), or local law enforcement. If you're involved in a Facebook or dating site scam, you are free to contact us direct; (571) 305-4056.   If you have a social security number, you can find information about Soldiers online at Caution-https://www.dmdc.osd.mil/appj/sc... < Caution-https://www.dmdc.osd.mil/appj/sc... > . While this is a free search, it does not help you locate a retiree, but it can tell you if the Soldier is active duty or not.  If more information is needed such as current duty station or location, you can contact the Commander Soldier's Records Data Center (SRDC) by phone or mail and they will help you locate individuals on active duty only, not retirees. There is a fee of $3.50 for businesses to use this service. The check or money order must be made out to the U.S. Treasury. It is not refundable. The address is:  Commander Soldier's Records Data Center (SRDC) 8899 East 56th Street Indianapolis, IN 46249-5301 Phone: 1-866-771-6357  In addition, it is not possible to remove social networking site profiles without legitimate proof of identity theft or a scam. If you suspect fraud on this site, take a screenshot of any advances for money or impersonations and report the account on the social networking platform immediately.  Please submit all information you have on this incident to Caution-www.ic3.gov < Caution-http://www.ic3.gov > (FBI website, Internet Criminal Complaint Center), immediately stop contact with the scammer (you are potentially providing them more information which can be used to scam you), and learn how to protect yourself against these scams at Caution-http://www.ftc.gov < Caution-http://www.ftc.gov > (Federal Trade Commission's website)

I can’t possibly give a complete answer, but I can give what I believe are two of the greatest Senate speeches we’ve seen, both from the late 20th century:The Senate of the Roman Republic, Sen. Robert ByrdIn 1993, Members of Congress were debating giving the president a line-item veto, which allows the president to veto specific items of spending in a budget, instead of signing or vetoing the budget wholesale. This wasn’t a new idea, but this time, it was gaining signNow support.Sen. Robert Byrd, one of the Senate’s longest-serving members, strenuously opposed the idea of the line-item veto. This wasn’t only borne of his experience in the Senate, or of purely political considerations. It came from his extensive research into the Roman Senate.You see, for years Byrd had been studying the traditions and practices of this ancient republic. This was because in the Roman Senate, Byrd saw many lessons to be learned and remembered for any republic, even the 1990s United States. More specifically, Byrd remembered how the Roman Senate gave up its power—by gradually giving it to a burgeoning executive. In Byrd’s view, the line-item veto would give the president outsized influence in the budgeting process and cast the Senate into irrelevance, upsetting the careful balance set by the Framers in 1787.So, on May 5, 1993, Senator Byrd took to the floor:Mr. President, twelve years of trickle-down, supply-side Reaganomics, Laffer curves, and a borrow-and-spend national credit card binge have left the country with a deteriorating infrastructure, a stagnant economy, high unemployment, triple-digit billion-dollar deficits, a $4 trillion debt, and a $200 billion annual interest payment on that debt.In search of antidotes for this fast-spreading fiscal melanoma of suffocating deficits and debt, the budget medicine men have once again begun their annual pilgrimage to the shrine of Saint Line-Item Veto, to worship at the altar of fool’s gold, quack remedies—such as enhanced rescission, line-item veto, and other graven images—which, if adopted, would give rise to unwarranted expectations and possibly raise serious constitutional questions involving separation of powers, checks and balances, and control of the national purse.Over the next hour, and in thirteen additional addresses, Byrd swept his audience along through an equivalent of a semester-long course on the history of the Roman Senate. He spoke entirely from memory, with no notes or aids. It was just one man before “the world’s greatest deliberative body”, bringing to life events from before anyone in his audience had been born—and arguing that the line-item veto placed the very sanctity of the democratic process under threat.Perhaps Senator Byrd’s speeches didn’t quite have their full desired effect—the Line Item Veto Act of 1996 still passed the Senate 69–31. However, Byrd had the last laugh when the Supreme Court struck it down two years later in Clinton v. City of New York. Eventually, Senator Byrd’s addresses were officially printed as a Senate document. You can see them in a book with a red cover in the Congressional Documents section of any federal depository library. They serve as a relic of a time when one of the foremost guardians of Senate tradition spoke to his colleagues with intellect and conviction—giving them, and all of us, a much-needed history lesson.Robert Bork’s America, Sen. Edward KennedyDuring his first six years in office, President Ronald Reagan had three opportunities to fill Supreme Court seats (appointing Justices O’Connor, Rehnquist, and Scalia). In his seventh year, when Justice Lewis Powell retired, Reagan got his fourth.Powell was seen as a swing vote on the Court (sound familiar?), and the 54 Democrats in the Senate were determined to tame Reagan’s nomination. Senate Majority Whip Alan Cranston urged his colleagues to form a “solid phalanx” of opposition if the nominee was an “ideological extremist”—precisely the type of man he believed Reagan’s eventual nominee, Robert Bork, to be.Democratic Sen. Edward Kennedy knew that despite his party’s numerical advantage, he had to do whatever it took to keep Bork off the court, lest Republican senators woo enough centrist Democrats to the majority. On July 1, 1997, less than 45 minutes after Reagan announced his selection, Kennedy took his place on the floor of the Senate:Mr. President, I oppose the nomination of Robert Bork to the Supreme Court, and I urge the Senate to reject it.[…]Robert Bork’s America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens’ doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists would be censored at the whim of government, and the doors of the federal courts would be shut on the fingers of millions of citizens for whom the judiciary is often the only protector of the individual rights that are the heart of our democracy.(Have a look at a transcript of Kennedy’s full speech. No excerpt can do it justice.)Kennedy’s televised speech drew national attention and sparked a firestorm on Capitol Hill. The NAACP and ACLU spoke out against Bork’s nomination, and television ads helped sway public opinion. Bork’s nomination failed in the Senate 42–58, with two Democrats voting in favor and six Republicans voting against. Reagan would go on to nominate Douglas Ginsburg, unsuccessfully, and then Anthony Kennedy, who served on the Court until 2018. To this day, if you’ve been blocked from public office after being demonized for radical views, you’re said to have been borked.Perhaps Kennedy’s intervention wasn’t necessary—after all, the Democrats held the majority. But Kennedy’s speech still serves as a textbook example of how to swiftly react to such a momentous event as a Supreme Court nomination. With Justice Kennedy’s resignation giving President Trump a vacancy of his own to fill, perhaps the modern-day Democratic Party will find the story of the original borking instructive.

Depending on the feasibility of these estimates, budgets are of three types -- balanced budget, surplus budget and deficit budget. Depending on the feasibility of these estimates, budgets are of three types -- balanced budget, surplus budget and deficit budget.

A low-budget film or low-budget movie is a motion picture shot with little to no funding from a major film studio or private investor. Many independent films are made on low budgets, but films made on the mainstream circuit with inexperienced or unknown filmmakers can also have low budgets.

In answer to the question \u201cIn your opinion, what is the maximum budget for a film to still be classified as low budget?\u201d the average answer was $2.12 million (£1.38 million).

In general, the budget includes all costs relating to the development, production, and post-production of a film. Thus, the budget includes, for example, costs of acquiring the script, payments to talent, and production costs.

BUDGETARY CONTROL TECHNIQUES. The various types of budgets are as follows. i) Revenue and Expense Budgets: The most common budgets spell out plans for revenues and operating expenses in rupee terms.