Lpc Hours Log Template Excel 2008-2025 Form

What is relevant, is that you need a lawyer to do this successfully. Civil rights is an area of law that for practical purposes cannot be understood without training. The police officer will have several experts defending if you sue. Unless you have a lawyer you will be out of luck. If you post details on line, the LEO's lawyers will be able to use this for their purpose. You need a lawyer who knows civil rights in your jurisdiction.Don't try this by yourself.Get a lawyer. Most of the time initial consultations are free.

Work done by 1st person = 100 forms per hourWork done by 2nd person = 90 forms per hourSo, total work in 1 hour would be = 190 forms per hourWork done in 5hours = 190* 5 = 950Now, remaining work is only 50 formsIn 1 hour or 60minutes, 190 forms are filled and 50 forms will be filled in = 60/190 * 50 = 15.7minutes or 16minutes (approximaty)Total time = 5hours 16minutes

While the posted question is poorly worded, and perhaps lacks a deeper understanding of a larger problem, and puts the blame not on the politicians who control the system but rather on the foot soldiers sent to bring order to chaos, there is a history of mass incarceration in the US, that affects brown, black, poor and mentally ill people far more than white, middle class and non mentally ill individuals. But the problem is far more societal, and in need for far more solutions than just to blame the police.I work in a prison, and I practice psychiatry. I routinely see homeless mentally ill arrested for “Being crazy in public.” It goes like this, they are walking down the street, in front of businesses, talking loudly, perhaps even yelling. They get stopped by the police, and they get paranoid, they start yelling at the officer. Then they are arrested for bsignNow of police, and because they yell when being arrested they are charged with “interfering.” They are then brought to me, (because all the public psychiatric hospitals that existed for the treatment and care of the mentally ill are now closed). I medicate them (under Washington vs Harper the US Supreme Court has given fairly broad powers to the correctional system to force medicate mentally ill prisoners- the fact that this even exists tells you how crazy the system really is) and get them somewhat stable. They go back and forth to court until the judge thinks they look good, and then they discharge to the streets. And the cycle goes on and on and on.Until we as a nation decide to invest in people instead of weapons, to house people instead of incarcerating them, to realize that it is simply UNACCEPTABLE to have the mentally ill simply drift between the streets and the prisons- until then this problem will remain.How is it acceptable to criminalize mental illness??? Can you imagine if we treated diabetes that way? “Well, you ate a candy bar and your sugar is out of control so we are putting you in jail until you get better.” Can you imagine that??!!! OF course not- but that is how mental illness is treated in America! Want to find the largest psychiatric hospital in the US???? Look inside of LA County Jail! Want to find the largest provider of mental health services in Chicago??? Look at Cook County Jail- its run by a psychologist!Sorry for the rant, and I realize the original question puts the blame on the foot soldiers of this system and not on the politicians who are making these decisions- but we as a people elect these politicians. We implicitly support the mass incarceration and the criminalization of behavior that characterizes mental illness and allows this cycle to continue. Their is plenty of blame to go around, and some day people will look back with unbelief at how we as a society treated the most vulnerable of our population.Edit: As someone commented, the police are called to situations caused by untreated mental illness- often the only resource a family has is “911.” And once they get there, the only options the police have is to arrest or not arrest. They can call an ambulance, and in this state the police can actually write a emergency certificate that forces the person to be evaluated in an ER - but the only long term treatment available is often via the prison system. The very fact that the police are now writing emergency commitment certificates - a power previously only given to medical doctors, is again a sign that the system is broken.Edit #2- In another answer someone mentions Donaldson vs O’Connor, which set the stage for the massive deinstitutionalization in the US. Donaldson was a pretty normal guy, had a wife and 3 kids and a job. Born in 1910, he had been hospitalized in around 1934 for a “nervous breakdown” and gotten ECT. He then returned to his life. One day when he was in his forties, he visited his elderly parents in Florida (mistake number one) and mentioned to his father that he thought people back home in Philly were poisoning his food (mistake number 2) His father, thinking he was mentally ill, petitioned to have him civilly committed, and after a brief hearing with no representation he was thrown into a medieval hellhole where the only doctor for 1000 people was an OB-GYN. He was there for fourteen years. He steadfastly proclaimed his sanity, and as he was a Christian Scientist, refused to take medications. His friends tried to take responsibility for his care and sign him out, but O’Connor (the head of the hospital) refused to discharge him. Donaldson eventually won a court case to be released, and he then sued O’Connor for damages. It went to the US Supreme court, and he won, with the finding that his constitutional right to liberty had been violated. The court ruled that mental illness alone was not a sufficient reason to deprive someone- who could provide for themselves and keep themselves safe, or who had family or friends who could provide for them- of their liberty. This was then interpreted by the ACLU to mean that if they were not an IMMINENT danger to themselves or others they could not be held against their will, and the floodgates opened, especially as O’Connor was found to be personally liable for violating Donaldson’s civil rights.However, the court was talking about a very sane man- Donaldson- who had a family, a house and a job, and was literally imprisoned, without treatment (and the lack of treatment was actually a separate lower court issue) - and not a psychotic individual going through garbage cans to find something to eat and laying in their own waste on the streets of the US.You can't tell me that just because Nakesha Williams did not want treatment it is OK that she died on the streets of New York City, mentally ill, living in her own waste- Nakesha Williams, a brilliant mind, whose disease rendered her unable to realize she needed treatment. This is wrong. This is not what the Supreme Court intended when it stated that a sane man could not be imprisoned for 14 years without any need when he had a home he wanted to go to, the resources to care for himself and family and friends who wanted him released.At her regular spot on East 46th Street and Park Avenue, Nakesha Williams could often be seen surrounded by her belongings, including books that she was reading. CreditLuis Alfredo GarciaThis was Nakesha at Williams College- an award winning dancer, a lover of books, a great mind, a great women, now dead, from untreated mental illness.At Williams College, Nakesha, participating in a dance workshop in 1992, spent much of her final two years on her senior project, a panoramic performance of black dance.CreditKatherine Adzima, via Williams College Dance Department

As others have and will advise your best bet would be to:Retain an experienced traffic attorney (yes, that is a specialized area of practice!) who can consolidate the various tickets that pertain to the same court. ( You can find this out by reading each respective citation.) This would be the easiest way to go because he/she will then, more or less, do the following. Which you could also do on your own. Clearing warrants for minor offenses is not rocket science and the local SWAT team is not likely to surround your home to arrest you. You should then find out if warrants have been issued for any of the various offenses for your failing to have appeared o the original date. You can do this by going to the respective court data bases or those of the local sheriff’s department of the county and see if warrants have been issued.Because the underlying matters are minor traffic matters it’s likely that the court will permit you to respond entirely through your retained attorney. The court, if it really is upset with you may recall the warrants to a date certain when you must personally appear or have the warrants re-issued. Keep in mind traffic matters are money makers for the court and they are more interested in your money (revenue) than they are in seeing you grace their courtroom.Your attorney if she/he knows their trade, will negotiate a disposition of all your matters which may include a sizable fine and/or dismissal of some of the charges. It may be necessary to set some of the cases for trial but these are matters to be discussed with your counsel and depends on the circumstances of each case.Good luck.

Generally, you should apply for your emergency relief in County 1, assuming that emergency relief is in fact justified, which it might not be. “Finances and housing” might not be the type of immediate danger to the child that’s usually addressed by emergency custody orders. The fact that there is an existing custody case makes it fundamentally appropriate that the court where the case is presently pending retain jurisdiction.If a party’s new residence is out of state, this is a definite “no”. The Uniform Child-Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (which exists in substantially identical form in every state) requires that proceedings be undertaken in the “home state”:The state in which a child lived with a parent or a person acting as a parent for at least six consecutive months immediately before the commencement of a child custody proceeding. In the case of a child six months of age or younger, the term means the state in which the child lived from birth with any of the persons mentioned. A period of temporary absence of any of the mentioned persons is part of the period.UCCJEA § 2.If both courts are in the same state, they technically aren’t constrained by the UCCJEA, and the case will be determined based on state procedural rules. As far as I know, though, this is a sufficiently common problem that most states have “home county” rules that define “home county” in terms substantially identical to the “home state”—for instance, in Pennsylvania:“home county” means the county in which the child immediately preceding the time involved lived with the child's parents, a parent, or a person acting as parent, or in an institution, for at least six consecutive months, and in the case of a child less than six months old, the county in which the child lived from birth with any of the persons mentioned. A period of temporary absence of the child from the physical custody of the parent, institution, or person acting as parent shall not affect the six-month or other period.Pa. R.C.P. No. 1915.1. [The comment to Rule 1915.2 indicates that “the provisions of the act ‘allocating jurisdiction and functions between and among courts of different states shall also allocate jurisdiction and functions between and among courts of common pleas of this Commonwealth’.”; cf. 23 Pa.C.S. § 5471.] Venue is proper in the home county, but not necessarily so in the new county.“Emergency” proceedings may be temporarily exempted—A court of this Commonwealth has temporary emergency jurisdiction if the child is present in this Commonwealth and the child has been abandoned or it is necessary in an emergency to protect the child because the child or a sibling or parent of the child is subjected to or threatened with mistreatment or abuse[,]UCCJEA § 204(a), but the fact that there’s already an open action pending for custody of this child would be generally grounds for the court in County 2 to dismiss your petition; only under the rarest of circumstances is it ever appropriate for there to be more than one custody case going on for the same child at the same time. At the very least it would need to communicate with the other court. Id. subdivision (d).Since venue is not as strict a concept as jurisdiction, the court may choose to bend the rules for compelling cause. So if this is an intrastate case you could ask the court in County 1 for discretionary change of venue.