Ridepartment of Business Regulation Division of Commercial Licensing and Regulation Form

I doubt it. Many people who talk abou this seem to be unware of DB’s continuing large presence in Germany. If you want a German universal bank bank with national coverage, there are two, Commerz and Deutsche. There are internet banks (DKB), here are retail banks and there are regional banks but just the two universal banks now. A merger remains possible but is unlikely as it would reduce the choice.Deutsche remains a large retail bank (where the traditional strength came from). The investment banking side grew out of a takeover of Banker’s Trust, a US bank with a number of issues. Effectively the bank started of with its base in Frankfurt but with major offices in London and New York but also smaller offices in South America and Asia. Such distribution does not make the bank easy to manage. In recent times that has become more of a challenge because of regulation.Some say it needs a Tsar rather than a CEO such are the challenges of trying to keep the bank compliant. The previous CEO, John Cryan with a strong background in risk attempted to do so but it highlighted the fact that the bank was not as profitable as it liked people to think it was, hence his rapid departure and replacement with Sewing, a DB insider from the retail side.The point is that there is nothing intrinsically wrong with bank, despite its high cost base. If a new CEO could get those costs under control, then the company’s future would be very secure. So the bank is unlikely to dissappear.As mentioned before mergers are on the table but COmmerz and Deutsche would probably not be a good fite (despite this being discussed before. I can see the government preferring to keep two universal banks in Germany. On that subject, it appears that the government is also taking an interest in who can own a German entity. Possibly there is a view to Qatar and China, both of whom are major investors in the bank.It should also be remembered that the bank continues to have some enemies in the US, despite the remanents of Bankers Trust being very American both in origin and ongoing management. There are many parts of the bank that understand the risk in not being compliant and who are actually against those that are seeking to take inordinate risks. The recent raid in Frankfurt was apparnetly triggered by a self-reported infraction.

The Reserve or Central Banks constantly keep the trading banks under the microscope, they have to abide by the regulations that are laid down to maintain their position in banking. The Central Banks analyze the reserves on a quarterly basis, along with the banks having to provide a statement of reserves being held. Some countries are putting more pressure on the banks to increase their reserves due to the uncertainty of the global situation.

Most natural monopolies are unsustainable. Show libertarians a natural monopoly that:A) Came to power without signNowly helping all people, andB) Was able to efficiently manage and oversee its vast operations while throttling smaller competition in all corners of the market— And libertarians will show you 50x instances of powerful monopolies sustained by another, far more sinister monopoly: centralized government force with little understanding of freedom.Natural monopolies simply do not sustain their power holds. If the various great historical empires of this Earth eventually crumbled due to over-diversification and mismanagement, then what makes you think a natural monopoly in this current age of massive technological disruption (and one with zero access to force) would do even half as good a job in their conquests?So while natural monopolies can be detrimental, arguing that we need a bigger government because of such monopolies is like arguing that we need to bring a tiger into a house with a rodent infestation.(TL;DR: Libertarians would rather stifle the government's far-greater capacity to produce malevolent and permanent monopolies than stifle the free market in fear of some theoretical unicorn.)

Hi Travis,I don’t know off the top of my head but did some research.Here is a link to the official customs website for Germany: Customs online - Import (from a German perspective you are importing goods).This is the link to the US website about exporting to Germany:Trade Regulations, Customs and StandardsMy suggestion would be to read through these in a detailed manner and set up a checklist / Excel so you have everything clearly listed out.

I do not think you have a lawsuit just because someone did not file a change of address with USPS. As per the previous answer, you would have to had suffered financial loss or injury due to the situation.As information, it is illegal to file a forwarding request on behalf of another person unless you have a power of attorney or are otherwise authorized to do so.To help stop receiving mail for previous residents write “Not at this address” on any first class mail and place it with outgoing mail. and write the names of those who should be receiving mail at your address on the mailbox (you may place it inside the flap where it is only visible to the carrier).Please note that any mail which has “or current resident”, or similar phrasing, will still be delivered to you even though it may also have the previous residents name. If you don’t want it, toss it into recycling.