Lausd Approved Bus List 2013-2024 Form

Start here: District InformationThen here: Los Angeles Unified School District - WikipediaThen ask a specific question.

If this goes the usual way — here is what will happen.Not all teachers will strike. It will be around 5% on the job. They cannot afford to lose the money. Not all students will go to school causing a loss of revenue.The strike will last long enough to “fund” this year’s raise and maybe some of next year’s. That should be about 13 days for this year if they are looking for 6%. (Understand there likely was an increase of a smaller percentage from the state — so that creates a small buffer for the district for the next year with an expected small increase from the state again).The strike will end and a “victory” will be signaled by the union. Year 3 of the agreement will be an economic cluster bomb. Nobody is left unscathed.Tying in an increase of salary with an additional number of teachers is counter-intuitive as a business model. I don’t have precise details, but history is often a great way of giving a template for the present.Update: I am very off (for now). If it was settled this quickly there apparently were some funds. Funding from the state will not be that huge. But the entire set of “agreements” aren’t clear yet.

“completely eliminate the LA Unified School District…..”An Ohio class submarine can carry 24 of these: UGM-133 Trident II - WikipediaEach with eight 475 kT nuclear warheads.Six of those missiles, appropriately deployed over the LAUSD should eliminate the district and everything inside of the district.I certainly hope you don’t have the keys for an Ohio class submarine….

All I can see about her is that she is a career LAUSD employee, and imagine the District decided to go with someone intimately familiar with the District and its issues. Her professional credentials appear adequate.

Departments of education and school districts always have to make decisions about what to include in their curriculum.  There are a lot of life skills that people need that aren't taught in school.  The question is should those skills be taught in schools?I teach high school, so I'll talk about that.  The typical high school curriculum is supposed to give students a broad-based education that prepares them to be citizens in a democracy and to be able to think critically.  For a democracy to work, we need educated, discerning citizens with the ability to make good decisions based on evidence and objective thought.  In theory, people who are well informed about history, culture, science, mathematics, etc., and are capable of critical, unbiased thinking, will have the tools to participate in a democracy and make good decisions for themselves and for society at large.  In addition to that, they should be learning how to be learners, how to do effective, basic research, and collaborate with other people.  If that happens, figuring out how to do procedural tasks in real life should not provide much of a challenge.  We can't possibly teach every necessary life skill people need, but we can help students become better at knowing how to acquire the skills they need.  Should we teach them how to change a tire when they can easily consult a book or search the internet to find step by step instructions for that?  Should we teach them how to balance a check book or teach them how to think mathematically and make sense of problems so that the simple task of balancing a check book (which requires simple arithmetic and the ability to enter numbers and words in columns and rows in obvious ways) is easy for them to figure out.  If we teach them to be good at critical thinking and have some problem solving skills they will be able to apply those overarching skills to all sorts of every day tasks that shouldn't be difficult for someone with decent cognitive ability  to figure out.  It's analogous to asking why a culinary school didn't teach its students the steps and ingredients to a specific recipe.  The school taught them about more general food preparation and food science skills so that they can figure out how to make a lot of specific recipes without much trouble.  They're also able to create their own recipes.So, do we want citizens with very specific skill sets that they need to get through day to day life or do we want citizens with critical thinking, problem solving, and other overarching cognitive skills that will allow them to easily acquire ANY simple, procedural skill they may come to need at any point in their lives?

As asked of me specifically;The others are right, you will likely need a lawyer. But to answer your question, there is a response form to respond to a restraining order or order of protection. Worst case the form is available at the courthouse where your hearing is set to be heard in, typically at the appropriate clerk's window, which may vary, so ask any of the clerk's when you get there.You only have so many days to respond, and it will specify in the paperwork.You will also have to appear in court on the date your hearing is scheduled.Most courts have a department that will help you respond to forms at no cost. I figure you are asking because you can't afford an attorney which is completely understandable.The problem is that if you aren't represented and the other person is successful in getting a temporary restraining order made permanent in the hearing you will not be allowed at any of the places the petitioner goes, without risking arrest.I hope this helps.Not given as legal advice-