Qld Police Fraud Report 2009-2025 Form

For final year students or Ph.D. aspirants, working on a thesis or Dissertation is a real pain in the neck. The reasons for it to be considered as the most strenuous academic writing task are palpable. This lengthy task needs extensive research over the chosen topic along with keeping the given format and strict university guidelines in mind. Due to the shortage of time, improper English writing skills, and insufficient subject knowledge, students look for a reliable online dissertation writing services over the Internet, but it’s not that simple to find the right one.You may find several companies online but to find the best dissertation writing service, it’s important for you to keep certain things in mind. Let’s take a read through them one by one to get the clarity.For How Long is the Company Serving?First and foremost, all you need to do is read ‘About Us’ page of the company’s website. It’s important for you to know about the company’s year of establishment and in which countries and cities it is functioning. Do not completely rely on a dissertation writing service portal which has just now come into existence and a novice in the academic writing industry. Always go for the one that has made its mark by serving the students for many years.What are the Qualifications of the Dissertation Writers?The more you go through the company’s website content, the more you will get to know about the team associated with it. Make sure you read about the team of writers that the company has. Are they highly qualified? Do they have enough experience in writing dissertations? Keep in mind that the writer you’ve hired is a subject expert who can work on any given topic with utmost precision and ease. The dissertation is important, and it deserves to be written by a proficient writer or an expert.Do They Offer Free Unlimited Revisions?Many companies do not entertain the amendment requests that come from their clients, and if they do, then they charge a hefty amount of money to introduce even the slightest change in the final order. Make sure that whichever company you hire is offering you revisions without charging any extra cost.What About the Money-Back Policy?Be wise and always check for the return & refund policies of the company. Get enlightened of the terms and conditions on which they offer a money-back guarantee.Do They Deliver the Orders On-Time?When it comes to academic documents, you can’t just ignore this point. If you really care about your grades, then always hire a company that especially takes care of the delivery process and never delays in dispatching the orders.Are They Available Round-the-Clock?Choose a company contacting which doesn’t require much thinking and efforts. The customer support staff must be available at all hours to answer your queries promptly.What Do Customers Say About them?Always go through the testimonials and reviews that the clients have written for the services provided by the company. By doing so, you will get an idea about how do they treat their customers and is the customer satisfaction their priority or not.What About the Privacy and Confidentiality?Make sure that the company you’re hiring for your dissertation work takes your privacy into consideration and assures you not to share your personal details with any third party. Your details must remain confidential and should never be used for illicit activities.I feel by keeping the points mentioned above in mind; you will indeed be able to find the best dissertation writing service for yourself. I wish you good luck!!

Since I grew up in America, my answer is going to be centered on American school lunches.I think that they can be improved in two ways: Being more nutritionally dense, and having children be more involved with the school lunch process.A lot of current American school lunches while being filling, lack vital nutrients, and are instead very sodium laden.“A 2008 analysis of school lunches by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) concluded that American kids consume very few fruits and vegetables in their cafeterias—with potatoes accounting for a third of all vegetables consumed. IOM also found that kids were eating many refined grains and too much saturated fat and sodium. “How to Improve American School LunchesI would say this is a pretty accurate representation of a good to excellent American school lunch.Here's how school lunch in the US stacks up against what's served in the rest of the worldFrom my honest recollection, usually what would be served up regularly was square (never, circular, or triangular, mind you, this is very important, I can not emphasize this enough), square pizza. Some type of “different dish”, and chicken nuggets. Well actually, my memory is starting to fail me now, so I will link to what the current menu this month for my old elementary school is.Not too bad, but there could be room for improvement, a lot of pizza, chicken nuggets, which is all well and good, but these, these ghastly things.Okay, I am aware this is kind of a weird video, but it is an authentic representation of what I, and many other kids, ate in middle school and high school.Now, recently, I saw a video on the school lunch system “Kyushoku” in Japan.I thought the differences in nutrition were staggering. The Japanese lunch had rice, vegetables, and even fresh fish, which are very nutritionally dense.In addition, many of the ingredients are fresh, and students are more involved in the process of making the school lunch.8th grade students visiting a domestic farm where their school orders some of their produce from. For their work experience, they are separating edamame for tomorrow’s kyushoku.Which brings me to my next point; I believe we can improve American school lunches by having the children be more involved in the process of making their own lunches.Here, the students all take turns serving each other lunch. I think this is a very respectful and polite thing to do for others.In addition, these students are also required to clean up after themselves, and tidy up the area after they are done eating. I think this is a great lesson in discipline, responsibility, but also Home Economics. Learning how to properly clean a kitchen or living area is an often overlooked, yet fundamental skill that kids should learn early on.Another thing I appreciate is how varied the school lunches are. This school tries not to offer the same dish twice in a month. Although, kids being kids, often would request their favorites over and over again, in this case being curry. I don’t know if all schools in Japan offer such a diversity in options, but I think this is also a beneficial gift to the students in developing their taste palates, and helping to keep their bodies strong and healthy.The importance placed on school lunches comes from the view that school lunches are a part of the curriculum themselves."Japan's standpoint is that school lunches are a part of education," Masahiro Oji, a government director of school health education, told the Washington Post in 2013, "not a break from it."Japan's mouthwatering school lunch program is a model for the rest of the worldI can’t help agree, because eating healthy helps increase your learning skills, as well as mood. Fully integrating healthy meals can help with all other aspects of school life, including concentration, happiness levels, and even socialization.The average cost of these lunches are about 2 dollars a meal. With the school covering staff and kitchen costs, and parents covering ingredients. If the parents are low-income and cannot afford the everyday costs, they must apply for social welfare meal plans at the school. The child will still receive the exact same meals as other kids. The screenshots from the previous video is actually of an average public school, not an exceptionally rich one either. In fact, this school is in the poorest of Tokyo’s wards.From this, we can assume the lunches shown above are of the bare minimum requirements for a proper kyushoku, as more well-to-do families often have more time and money to spend on improving their children’s schooling experiences.All-in-all, without spending more money, we can still improve our school lunches in America bya) Including more fresh, domestically grown produce and poultry into every meal.b) Including our students more in the lunchtime process, from farm to lunch table.What’s also ironic is that the Kyushoku system got official after 1946, when G.H.Q recommended systematic health education, and the school lunch program in Japanese schools.The Japanese government took note, and starting providing school lunch to 250,000 children in the Tokyo metropolitan area. This later expanded to all over Japan.Much funding at the time came from relief aid provided by foreign governments and charities. When Japan later regained full independence in 1951, the funding stopped. The Minister of Finance wanted to get terminate school lunch subsidies. However, this was strongly opposed by many people in Japan, and in 1954, school lunch law was enacted, with school lunch being a part of the school curriculum.So I think it’s very cool that Japan once took America’s advice and greatly improved their school lunches. And now America can take advice from our friends over in Japan, and we can all improve our school lunches together!Thank you. :)Anmitsu at Hatsune (初音) - Kantaro: The Sweet Tooth Salaryman Episode 1Now please enjoy this refreshing photo of Anmitsu.

Recently I have come across a possible scam about counterfeit/fake products in India. Counterfeit/fake products are nothing new to Indian Society. These products are easily available in markets like Pallika Bazar (Delhi), Fashion street (Mumbai) etc. You can get first copy products of many branded companies included Puma, Nike, Adidas, Reebok (shoes, t-shirts etc), Micheal Kors, Guess (hand bags, Purse). There are markets where you can easily get copies of branded wrist watches and even perfumes. But people who buy products from these markets are aware of the fact that these are duplicate products.No, No… This is not the scam I am talking about. The scam starts from next level. It involves giant e-commerce websites including Snapdeal. The people who lives in India are pretty much aware of this e-commerce website and the discounts which it offers on multiple products including clothing, electronics and many other things.Recently, I was surfing on Facebook, then there was an advertisement regarding sales on Nike Shoes. It obviously got my attraction. I was amazed to see the discounts on shoes. Some discounts were close to 60% of the market value. It was a great deal. I thought of giving it a try because I did not want to miss the deal. And I am sure many people like me might have got attracted to same deals and bought the shoes from the website. I received the product within 3 days. When I opened the package, I was shocked to see that the shoes were duplicate (I am a regular user). I showed it to one of my friends, he told that “Shi to hai yaar, tujhe aise hi lag rha h” - (It is good bro, you are having false doubts). But still I wanted to get it tested from official Nike store to confirm. I visited the Nike store and they confirmed my doubt. The shoes were fake. I contacted Snapdeal regarding this problem. They told me that I can return the product and they would be refunding my money. But then I asked, what are you going to do to seller who is sending fake products using your website. He replied with standard answer - “We will look into this matter. We take extreme care before onboarding any seller. Blah Blah…..!!!” He even told me that the seller was Authorised Nike Dealer.Then, I understood the whole concept behind the huge discounts on branded materials. These websites are full of such kind of sellers. The sellers provide huge discounts on branded products (though they are cheap fake products which are easily available in market at no more than Rs. 500–700). They sell these products at Rs. 2000–3000 by showing the original price equivalent to Rs. 6000–10000 (Equivalent to original prices in showrooms). This is how these sellers are looting people by selling them fake products. It it hard to notice if the products received are fake or original for new users as they look exactly the same in every manner. Since they are coming from a trusted channel (like Snapdeal), nobody sheds a doubt and may take them as original.Now, you must be thinking why these website allow such sellers on their websites. The reason is simple, it increases the number of sales on their websites and WHO DOES NOT WANT THAT. After all, the investors are looking for these sales figures.I hope you understood the scam. Beware when you buy such items from e-commerce websites. You might be their next victim.Here are few tricks to avoid buying fake products:When you are buying from these website, look at the original price on which discount is being applied and the visit the official website of that brand. If the price is same, then it may or may not be original but if the price is different, I would suggest you to stay away from that product.Whenever you buy expensive branded products, just get it confirmed from an official store (if you can). It is completely useless to throw away your money on fake products unknowingly.Here some photographs related to this incident:Link to the product on Website: Nike Air Max 2017 Running ShoesLink to the Product on Nike Website: Look what I found at Nike online.

Garry Taylor's answer to this question demonstrates the biggest problem that exists when it comes to solving this problem.For some stupid reason, whenever feminists see a proposal to give men the same autonomy over their reproductive choices as women, they automatically think it means that we’re going to take women’s bodily autonomy away from them.Wrong!In general, an awareness of men's issues is rising. The unique problems faced by men and boys are being, at the very least, talked about more and more often in the public square without having someone start shouting about how men don't have issues and the only real issues are with women.In addition, more and more people are realizing that there is something seriously wrong with modern feminism and that its time to try a different direction than what has been tried (and what has been failing) for the past 30 years or so.This growth in awareness of men's issues isn't really surprising when you realize that there is a clear and logical basis for complaint about most of these issues, that "men's rights" isn't just code-word slang for "misogyny" no matter what the Tumblr feminists want you to believe, and that something really, really should be done about these problems.But... unfortunately... that's just about as far as it goes when it comes to actually doing anything about these issues. Acknowledging that they exist.When you stop talking about how these issues are problems, and start asking people what they are willing to do to correct these issues, a silence arises that is almost chilling. Such discussions are invariably met with disappointing evasiveness from the rank and file.You see, after that initial, vocal show of support, things get a little... problematic.Nobody can argue with the logic that shows, clearly, that a particular men's issue is a problem. Even those people who don't normally even consider that a campaign for men's rights is needed will agree, once the problem is explained, that yes, something definitely needs to be done about it. People agree with this even if only so they don't look as foolish as someone who denies evolution or climate change.So instead of openly disagreeing, these problem-deniers begin tacking on clauses and conditions to their agreement. These pseudo-supporters will begin to add buts and ifs to their agreement. Sure, they'll say, something needs to be done, but only in very specific ways. In very specific, pro-feminist ways.Take is idea of a “Paper abortion”, for example.A paper abortion would give a man the same right to knowingly terminate parental rights and responsibilities as women currently enjoy. It would allow a man to disavow anything to do with an undesired child, just like the right to abortion does for a woman. That's all. It gives men the same freedom of choice in regards to becoming a parent that is currently enjoyed by all women in America.That’s all it would do. It wouldn’t remove any woman’s right to choose, whether she’s choosing to keep or abort. All it does is prevent her for forcing the consequences of her choice on a man who does not want those consequences. Such a law would prevent men from being forced to pay child support for children who are not even genetically related to them, and prevent female rapists from demanding support from their male victims, for children fathered by such rapes.When this issue is raised, most fair-minded people will agree that men shouldn't be forced into parenthood against their will. What inevitably follows, though, is usually some variation of "... as long as it wouldn't allow men to duck out on their responsibilities."And at that point, all meaningful conversation about the issue ends. Reasonable discussion stops on a dime.Most people, especially self-identified feminists, will politely agree that, yes, something needs to be done, and then will shut down the conversation with a tagged on condition that serves only to throw the issue into confusion and require finer and finer parsing of the legal details of just how such reform will be implemented. Its a stalling tactic used solely to derail anything actually being done about an issue into an endless side argument on how something should be done.Its fear-mongering, and that's all. But then, fear-mongering is the traditional defense feminism uses against men's rights. They don't provide actual counter-arguments. Just boogeymen hiding under the bed. As in:"If you change this law, which everyone knows is unfair and discriminatory, the boogeyman will get you!"If this is the best counter-argument to reform that organized feminism can come up with, then organized feminism's position is obviously paper thin. There is no viable counter-argument, and so organized feminism has to resort to stalling tactics, and shaming tactics, and to slowing down progress with needless objections. Its little more than the social reform version of filibustering.Would a poorly written Paper Abortion law occasionally allow deadbeats to abuse the system? It is possible.My question in response is this: So what?The existence of the occasional asshole is no reason to refuse to install a Paper Abortion law that would assist those millions of men who aren't deadbeats. Repeatedly raising these false concerns does nothing but harm men who have done nothing to earn being harmed other than being born male.Blocking social reform with cries of concern over the fallout of that reform is the traditional weapon of those too entrenched in their own privilege. People who raise such quibbles may not openly oppose men’s rights, but they are not true supporters and will continue to drag their feet every step of the way.

Jim Jones (pictured with one of his victims)There are simply no words to describe how evil this man was. Most, I trust, already know the tragic story. He was truly the personification of “evil genius”. I think that term needs to be unpacked a little in this case. It wasn’t just that Jones was a highly intelligent individual who happened to also be evil. It was more that he had a genius for evil—that’s exclusively where all of his formidable powers of intellect were directed.In my view, he was the most evil man who has ever lived, and I establish this claim by observing: It’s one thing to kill someone. Another, to get someone to kill someone else. But if you set a protracted program of psychological warfare lasting over a decade against thousands of people, and the end result is that mothers kill their own babies right before killing themselves—something unprecedented in human history that I know of—you deserve the title of most evil human who has ever lived.These people were not abstractions to Jones as Jews and Gypsies were to Hitler. He personally knew all of his victims, lived with them, ate with them regularly, etc. I would venture to say that he knew almost all of them by name. Those who died at Jonestown were not declared enemies of Jim Jones. They were the people he professed to love. Jones figured out a way to use love, not hate, to produce a body count in excess of 900 people. That takes a special talent. That takes a nonpareil evil genius.

We started getting repeated calls from the “US Grant Department” claiming that they would give us a grant of $6240(?) dollars, if we paid enrollment into the program or something. I’m sure there was some legal reason for the dollar amount, like it was a dollar under the felony fraud amount or something. After a couple of these, asking where the grant department was headquartered, why their phone number showed a different area code, legal questions, etc, I finally found a way that actually tripped up these scumsuckers… I answered that I was REALLY excited about their program, how I REALLY needed the money and was so glad that I was gonna get a grant… but that there was just one problem. I NEEDED MORE MONEY. I started asking about how to get a grant for $11,500, could they hook me up? I asked if there was a manager I could speak to to request a larger amount, form to fill out for a waiver for more, another grant program, whether my minor children could apply, how long it would take to get the money, and whether I could go again afterwards, how about $11,200? When they started to flounder and get rude with me I threatened to report them to their manager! That finally got them to quit the call.

I came across a loophole in the library where I studied by pure accident. I used to go there to study and to also print out the lecture notes which were on average 40 pages long and the print was .10$ for each page. So basically i paid 4$ for each lecture i printed. This was a costly exercise for me and i spent on average 30$ each week for printing.The way it worked was, I had a library card and I recharged it as needed using the recharge machine. The recharge machine was about 5 feet tall and 2 feet wide. You had to insert the card, it would read it and then prompt you to insert the cash you wanted to recharge. Once that was done, you went to the print station, swiped your card on the card reader and then selected your file to print. Pretty basic stuff.One day I gave a few print jobs to the printer and went to the print station and swiped my card. I had to print 2 files of around 30 pages each. I had a credit of 3.70$ on my card. So I decided to print one file and then proceeded to the signNowarge machine to recharge the card while my file was printing. Keep in mind that the recharge machine and the print station were next to each other. Since my file was printing, I inserted my card into the recharge machine, it read my card and gave an error saying that the card is locked. I realized immediately that my card is currently being used by the printer and thus I am unable to use the card at 2 places at once. So I waited for the print to complete and then recharged my card to a value of 5$. So keep in mind I had 3.70$ initially, I printed 30 Pages, My credit should have dropped to .70$ and then recharged 5$ bringing the total to 5.70$. I did all the maths myself before proceeding to the print station and swiping my card. As I swiped my card, it showed me the current balance as 8.70$ instead of 5.70$ meaning I was not charged for the 30 pages i just printed. I quickly noticed and realized the error i got on the recharge machine while printing. I had another job to print, I gave the command to print and again inserted my card into the recharge machine and got the same error as card is currently blocked. I checked and was not charged again. And thats how I have been printing for a while now and my current balance is still 8.70$.I will notify the library eventually of the error and donate a certain amount. But for now, I am a student and its hard to make ends meet.

It is instructive to ask how we voted before there were photo ids…which didn’t really come into play for driver’s licences until 1970s. The Voting Rights Act (VAR) of 1965 was a response to the pattern of restriction on voting applied in certain states (mostly those that at one time had slavery); those states had to submit for federal review changes to their vote-related processes to ensure they didn’t propagate unfair restrictions or illegal practices such as literacy tests and poll taxes.Then, in 2013, a lawsuit (Shelby vs. Holder) effectively “deactivated” two provisions of the VAR. Immediately, some states started with laws that put aggressive voter id laws in place and other provisions that made it more difficult for certain people to vote by restricting the nature and types of ids that would be accepted. All of these laws are being challenged in court, and at least two have had major reversals, North Carolina and Texas. The states that have been pursuing the most regressive laws have universally been “red states.”It is hard for people who have mobility and income and flexibility in their job to understand the impact of these restrictions; be aware that the impacts are (intentionally) directed at poor, minority, and less mobile parts of our population (which tend to vote Democratic). Here’s one of several articles about the impact: https://www.washingtonpost.com/p...Furthermore, the justification for more aggressive voter id laws is usually given as protection from voter fraud (e.g., a person impersonating another voter). The evidence that voter fraud is signNow is quite rare, occuring something like .0001 of all votes cast (by the latest count from Heritage Foundation). I think the story of Ken Kobach of Kansas who has spent millions of dollars pursuing what he told the legislature was “thousands” of cases of voter fraud is instructive; after something like two years, he obtained NINE (9) convictions (Editorial: Kobach proves how prevalent voter fraud is).The Brennan Center for Justice studies voting issues and does a good job of providing summaries of research. There may be other issues that concern the integrity of our elections (including voter disenfranchisement, restrictions on voting periods, moving and consolidating precincts even as populations are growing, etc.), in-person voter fraud — the kind that a voter id can combat — is vanishingly rare and we must be very careful to make sure that thousands and thousands of people who should be able to vote can’t because of laws designed to protect against a rare occurrence; their rights are being impinged.*** Edited to fix a mistyping.

To file a complaint, just go to ftc.gov/complaint, and answer the questions. Or call That's all there is to it. If you've been ripped off or scammed, complain to the Federal Trade Commission. It can help put the bad guys out of business.

Remember that telemarketers change caller ID information easily and often. So it might not be worth paying a fee to block a number that will change. Finally, contact the FTC to report your experience. You can do that online at FTC.gov or by calling 1-877-FTC-HELP.

Report any suspected fraud to your bank immediately. Bank staff are experts in spotting fraudulent checks. If you think someone is trying to pull a fake check scam, don't deposit it\u2014report it. Contact your bank and report it to the Federal Trade Commission or The Better Business Bureau's Scam Tracker.

Hang up and report it to the Federal Trade Commission at complaints.football.gov or 1-888-382-1222.

#6 \u2013 FILE A POLICE REPORT File a police report both locally and in the jurisdiction where the fraud took place. You might also consider filing a report with your state police, since many states have passed tough new laws to crack down on identity theft. Filing the report in person is the most effective method.