Secc Family Member Details Form

Head over to KFC's website and fill out the franchise application form. There is no other way of contacting them. That application is your only way to convince why they should let you in the family.If they accept your application, well and good. Otherwise you can resend the application again, stating your cause more vigorously. Estimated investment: Rs. 1,00,00,000For details, head over to: Starting KFC Franchise in India: Investments returning good profit Currently, McDonald's is not offering further new franchises in India. However, one may talk to the current franchise holders, Hardcastle Restaurants Pvt. Ltd. for West and South India and Connaught Plaza Restaurants Pvt. Ltd. for East and North India.For more details, head over to: How to start McDonald's franchise in India : Investment, initial cost, royalty fees, profitThe Domino's Pizza franchise in India is owned by Jubilant FoodWorks Ltd. Any future partnership is to be done with them only.Estimated investment: Rs. 30,00,000For more details, head over to: Starting Domino's Pizza Franchise: Cost & return on investments

I was actually roommates with someone in College whose parents decided to have him “off-grid”. Let me just say this: Stop even entertaining the idea of having a baby off-grid. It really makes your child’s life unnecessarily hard and your kid will forever resent you for putting that pain on them.I’ll get into the details in a moment, but first let me address the question proposed above. Yes, technically speaking it is not a crime to have your baby off-the-grid in the U.S.A. However, a lot of details surrounding the event would be illegal. First of all, any licensed midwife or doctor is required by law to file a birth certificate or they actually risk losing their license and getting a misdemeanor. If you forced them or threatened them to not file the birth certificate that would make you a likely accomplice and would not go over well with the authorities.But let’s ignore that for a moment and just assume you know how to birth a child on your own and can do it in your basement without any professional medical physician there to oversee you (which would be the only way you could pull this off). In this case you wouldn’t get thrown in jail for failing to get a birth certificate and no crime would have been committed. However you just set up a very difficult life for your child.These are some of the things I was told from by my roommate who didn’t have a social security number until he was 20 years old.No, he could not get a (legal) jobQuite literally he didn’t qualify to get even a job at McDonalds. If you remember the last job you got no matter how prestigious or demeaning it was, you had to fill out a bunch of paperwork. Most of these forms require you to have a SSN (social security number) to properly fill them out. However the important one is the form labeled I-9. This form is required to be submitted by every employer after hiring a new employee. This form serves only one purpose, to determine that you are eligible to work in the United States. Your child (and my roommate) would not be able to complete this form which every employer must get filled out before starting employment with a new employee. Your child will not be able to get a job because of this.Yes, he can evade paying taxes.Okay, so this sounds like a perk I guess. But my roommate did not have to pay taxes. The government basically didn’t know he existed, so they never knew he was not paying. But then again he didn’t have a job. So would you rather have a job and pay some taxes or not ever be able to work except under the table for below minimum wage? Given that choice, taxes sound pretty awesome! Keep in mind that this also means your child is not eligible for any tax benefits or credits such as those that students get while going to college.No, You as the parent can not claim him as a dependent on your taxesYou’re already dealing with a child, wouldn’t it be great to get that child tax credit? Every year you'll basically be paying out of pocket for deciding not to get them a SSN.Yes, he can attend public school through 12th gradeHe would be able to attend school through high school without a social security number.No, he can not attend collegeWhile high school and lower education is okay, your child will never be able to attend collegeYes, he can go to the doctorThe doctor will still see your child and provide him his shots. However…No, he will not be covered under your family insurance (or qualify for Medicare/Medicaid)So you’ll need to plan on paying for all doctor appointments out of pocket.No, he can not travel abroad (even to Canada)You’d best hope none of your child’s friends decide to go to Cancun for spring break. Your child will not be eligible to leave the country or return to the US if he manages to leave (unless he plans to climb Trump’s wall)No, he will not be able to drive a carOkay, well nothing is stopping him from physically driving a car, but he would not be able to get a driver’s license and thus, can not LEGALLY drive. Hope he doesn’t get pulled over.No, he will not be able to voteOnce old enough he will not be able to register to vote.Yes, he can avoid the draftWell the good news is that like taxes, he can skirt the requirement to join the draft when he turns 18.No, he can’t get a loanThis means no credit cards, no car loan, no home, nothing. I’m sure plenty of people will claim these are all evil anyway, but these have powerful impacts on someone’s life. There might be times he needs it. (and when used properly none of these are bad things).No, he will not have a credit scoreThis goes with the above one, but he will not be able to work on this which affects your entire life/future. This also will disqualify him from renting most homes or apartments he is looking at.Basically your child will be treated as an illegal immigrant. Why put them through this when they are entitled to the benefits that the United States provides its citizens? There are people in other countries dying to get what your child is entitled to and you are (considering) denying your child those abilities? It just doesn’t make sense.Get them a SSN and if your child decides at 20 that he wants to live off-the-grid than he can burn his Social Security Card and go in the woods and hide from the government. But don’t be selfish enough to make that decision for them.My roommate resents his parents for not giving him a SSN. While all his friends in high school were driving, he couldn’t. While his friends go to Cancun for spring break, he had golden handcuffs in the U.S. and can’t leave. And worst of all he said was that while all his friends were earning money from jobs in high school, he couldn’t get a job.The job part was the hardest for him. He couldn’t leave the house or move out when he turned 18. He was stuck at home.Him working on getting a social security number was difficult and took him two years. He started when he turned 18 to get one once he realized he couldn’t go to college, he couldn’t get a job, he couldn’t rent an apartment, and thus will never really be able to be independent from his parents. It took two years and then at 20 he was able to get one and start working and going to school.He forever resented his parents. Don’t be those parents…

Oh yes almost always.Some official forms in Kerala are unfortunately sexist: they only request the name of the father and his details, none of the mother. I've been filling out forms for Kerala University for years and only once have I filled in my mother's details. I recently applied for postgraduate degree admission and it was the same story.So my father who has lost more jobs in two years than a normal person holds in twenty, who has no income and whose address isn't even known to me since he walked out on us is given primary status and my mother's name has to be shoehorned in as “local guardian”.People often tell me to get my dad to do stuff like pick me up from somewhere and there is a horrible moment of awkwardness where I debate whether to tell them he is no longer in my life or smile and just move on.Fathers are an important part of everyone else's life. So they take it for granted.Imagine how awkward it is for my mother.

First there is the Total Cost of attending MIT:Tuition, Fees, Room, Board, Books and Supplies, Miscellaneous expenses, Local travel, and one round-trip from your home to MIT each school year.Currently, that is anywhere from $65,000 to $70,000 depending upon where you live (which country) to account for the round-trip.MIT then Demands that You and All of your parents fill out a Daunting amount of paper work proving that you need financial aid. That paper work will be filled out each and every year that you attend MIT as an undergraduate. In addition, MIT will require that an independent agency in your country verify what you and All of your parents have stated, and that agency must be trusted by MIT. If any of that does not occur, you get No (zero) financial aid.The result of all of that verified paper work, is the Expected Family Contribution (EFC).That EFC includes what MIT believes that You and All of your parents can afford to contribute towards your education each year.That EFC includes the money that MIT Expects that you will earn each summer before attending MIT.Then MIT calculates: Total Cost - EFC is what you need.However, for many, MIT then subtracts $6,000 from what you need, and tells You, the student, to either earn that money During the school year, or Borrow the money from your country.You can get a feel for the types of questions that will be asked in that Daunting paper work (succinctly) by looking here: Financial Aid Calculator | MIT Admissions Read Everything on that MIT admissions web site, as it will answer most if not all of your questions, including questions you did not even know to ask.Typically, in detail, you and All of your parents will be asked to fill out the CSS Profile as an international applicant: Apply for College Financial Aid (that is the daunting form).Therefore, if you and your family are Dirt Poor, it will not cost you more than $6,000 per year in loans from your country to attend MIT, and depending on your situation, MIT may make that Zero. As long as you are very proficient in filling out daunting forms. NOTE: if any of your parents own a small business, then be prepared for even more daunting forms, as private colleges in the USA fully believe that small businesses are where families Hide their money to try and get more aid from the college.I am trying to be brutally honest.All the best.

There are three different type of German Student Visas:-Language Course Visa:- It is useful for those students who want to learn German language in the Germany.Student Applicant Visa:- Student still finding the right option for course and waiting for the confirmation regarding the admission in the German Universities.Student Visa:- In this particular visa, student has already been invited by the German Universities.It is very easy to fill out the German Student Visa Form, as it includes only the basic information related to the student, Germany and courses.Surname Family NameSurname at BirthDate of BirthPlace of BirthCountry of BirthCurrent NationalitySexMarital statusAddress with parents nationality and nameNational Identity NumberType of Travel DocumentNumber of Travel DocumentsDate of issueExpiry DateIssued byStudents home and email addressTelephone numberResidence in Nationality of another countryCurrent OccupationLast Employers or Last Education detailsMain purpose of the GermanyMember state of the destinationMember state of the entryNumber of entries requestedDuration of planned staySchengen visa issued earlier or notFingerprint used earlier or notEntry permit for final countryIntended date of arrivalIntended date of departure from Schengen countryName of inviting person or hotelTravelling or Living costFamily member address with EU, EEA or CU citizen.Place and DateSignature of the student

I was working as a Census taker for Statistics Canada during the national census of 1996 when one member of the public made a false complaint against me.To give the necessary background: Each census taker was assigned a different territory. We were each provided a detailed map of our own territory, clearly marking out its boundaries. Every residence within that territory was depicted on the map as a little square or rectangle. And for each street within our territory, it listed the relevant range of house numbers for each side of that street (e.g. one territory might end at numbers 49 and 50 Random Street, the next territory started across the intersection at numbers 51 and 52 Random Street.) If everyone got together in a huge field, they could potentially piece together a cool, giant detailed map of Canada.A big part of our job was physically delivering a census form to every separate lot within our territory with a residence on it. If the map showed a lot with a newly built home as empty, a form still needed to be delivered to that residence, and then we needed to mark the missing residence on the map of our territory. The maps were extremely accurate, and I had to mark maybe one new home on mine.The census was meant to be a snapshot of Canada on a particular day. If someone owned multiple residences, they needed to fill out the form for each property with information for that residence as of census day. So if the entire family stayed in one house on that date, the information for their second house would be that it didn’t have any residents as of census day — there was no need to fill out any of the additional data on that form. If someone’s son spent that date in the spare house? Then the form would reflect that the second home had one resident as of that date, and that son’s data would need to be entered on that form.People didn’t have to fill out the forms on the spot, but could mail it in (at no cost) by the deadline, some date following the “census date”. If they had any questions about filling out the form, I could try to answer their questions while I was at their door, or they could call the help line provided on the form itself.There was a different, and longer, census form for farms. It collected some agricultural data as well as data about the residence and its inhabitants. If someone groaned about having to fill out the longer form, I’d point out that they only needed to provide estimates for most of the extra questions (statistically, if someone slightly overestimated one figure, someone else would balance that out by underestimating). I’d also point out they could probably get all the information they required from their last income tax form. If someone hadn’t kept their income tax form and was concerned about providing any inconsistent data? I told them not to worry, because Revenue Canada is not allowed to see their census form, Stats Can is not allowed to see their income tax form (which is why they don’t just take the data from that), the data is all aggregated and, again, Estimates Are OK.This groaning was far from universal — strangely enough, I had to talk some people who had a hobby garden in their backyards out of trying to claim the longer agricultural form to fill out — but I quickly became used to having some people act reluctant about accepting the longer agricultural form.So, on with the story at hand: During one of my trips I came to one farm with clearly only one entrance to the residence, from a road well within my territory, to a home well within my territory. With agricultural form in hand, I knocked on the door and it was answered by a woman. I explained I was here to drop off a form for the census. She looked at the form then told me she will not fill it out. No explanation. She just said she would not fill it out.This wasn’t entirely unusual or unexpected (although up to that point I faced zero resistance — only, in a couple of cases, some antsy migrant workers hurriedly running off to hide in barns.Some people think they aren’t required to respond to the census and consider it to be the government being too “big brother”. So I politely explained to the woman that all the information she provides will be kept private, and won’t be shared with any other government authorities. I was about to explain there are benefits to the census, e.g., ensuring that the appropriate level of health services, police services, etc, are provided to different areas. But before I could, she again said “There is no requirement for me to fill out the form.”So I read to her from a paper we were provided politely explaining that a census form is required to be filled out by every residence in Canada.Then she says she was already given a form. I asked if someone came up to this property? (Because that would mean another census taker erroneously came into my territory). No.Finally, she explained that she had received special permission from someone in the government to not fill out the agricultural form. Taken aback, I asked her where she got that advice from, and she said she had spoken to someone from the census office, and she was told that she wouldn’t be required to fill out a form for this address because they already had a form for another part of their farm operating out of the neighbouring territory.So, I thought to myself “why the hell didn’t you tell me this to begin with instead of wasting everyone’s time?”, but instead I said to her something like “Okay, I was completely unaware of that. How about I leave a form with you, and you give my supervisor a call at this number. Then if you don’t need to complete the form, just throw it out. He can also let me know if I don’t need to get a form back from you.” She seemed very agreeable to this. So I apologized for taking up her time, and headed off.This was in the days before everyone had mobile phones. So instead of driving home, calling my supervisor, finding my way back to where I had left off (which wasn’t at a convenient intersection), and getting back to the job at hand, I decided to continue going door-to-door and following up the next morning.The next day, before I could call my supervisor, he called me.He was a former highschool principal whom I had the pleasure of working with on other contract jobs with the government (Elections Canada, specifically), so he knew me fairly well. He said to me “Hey, I got a complaint from a woman. Don’t worry about it. I know you, and I think this is completely out of character, but she complained that you were very rude and aggressive. She said you threatened to call in the police and get her fined if she didn’t take a form from you, and other things that strike me as very unlikely.” So I told him my side of the story. He said, “You did the right thing. We verified that part of her farm operation is in the next territory, she’s already received a form for it there, and Stats Can doesn’t need her to fill out a second form. The other operation doesn’t have a separate residence, so she can fill that data in on the one form. I told her she can dispose of the form you left with her, and we’ll follow up on her complaint. As far as I’m concerned, that’s the end of that. Keep up the good work.”

Are you sure that the NRA is the problem?Oh, I know that the media and the talking heads are all making them out to be some 500 lb gorilla and the reason psychos shoot up school yards, but have you ever bothered to look into the matter beyond the headlines?I’ll give you an example. In 2017, the push was for a “Universal Background Check”. The idea was to be sure that people buying guns were not criminals. Believe it or not, the NRA wholly supports this and in fact was involved with creating the current NICS (National Instant Check System) that is used.But the bill that was proposed was not what you heard in the media. First, it would not plug any “Gunshow Loophole” because there is no such thing. The only sales at a gun show that the bill covered was private sales. Of course, private sales can occur anywhere, not just gun shows.But the bill didn’t make the NICS easier for private sales. They just required all private sales to be conducted through a licensed dealer. Had this actually passed, a gun show would be an ideal location for such sales as there would be access to many dealer. In effect, you would greatly increase the number of private sales at a gun show by this law.So, what is involved with a sale through a dealer? Well, the dealer would have to do the following:1) Record the transfer in their bound book. This is a book where all the transactions of a firearm is recorded via that dealer. The book is auditable by the BATF and many dealers have faced fines for poorly kept records, so many dealers go to great pains to keep their book neat and accurate.2) Fill out the federal form 4473. This is required by all dealer sales of both new and used guns. It asks for the buyer’s name, address, the make and model of the gun, serial number, and then asks a bunch of questions. The dealer can get fined if the person fills out the form wrong. For example, answering a question with “Y” or “N” instead of “Yes” or “No” is a BATF violation. So the dealer has to carefully examine the form for errors and have the person fill out another if errors are found.3) The dealer then calls into the NICS. NICS can come back with a “Proceed”, “Denied” or “Delay”. A delay can take up to 3 days. Typically this is a name that appears similar to a Prohibited Person and requires some research. If this happens, the transfer is on hold. The dealer has no idea when the result of the research is likely to finish. If you are at a gun show, the show could be over before the approval is made.4) All this paperwork, verification, etc takes time. Time is money. So dealers charge for this service. It is typical for a dealer to charge $25-$40 per gun, but sometimes multiple guns get a discount because the dealer can process up to 4 on a single form, but when more than one gun is transferred, the dealer has to fill out Form 3310 which is supposed to help with gun trafficking.All of this is well and good if you are buying a gun from someone you don’t know and many people will require sales be conducted at a dealer for the piece of mind such protections provide. But friends and family typically do not bother with the hassle and expense.One thing you need to realize is that to get a gun dealer license is not an easy process. Since the federal government cracked down on so called “kitchen table” dealers back in the 1980’s, you now must show a commercially zoned storefront with posted business hours to qualify. Many communities don’t want gun shops, and use zoning laws to make them difficult or unattractive. For example the city of Boston does not have any dealers. In fact, the nearest dealer is 3 towns away. Many rural areas don’t have the traffic to keep a dealer in business and you’ll find they are typically only open in the evening or on a Saturday as they work another full time job. Keep this in mind as we get into the next issue.But the bill didn’t stop at sales. It stated that ALL transfers had to be done in this manner. No exceptions. So, two friends out on a hunt would need to go through the whole process listed above just to swap guns for the afternoon. Oh, and they would have to do it all again to give the gun back. It is very common on a range to try out other people’s guns - such a thing would also require the full transfer and back process. Demo guns at a national event by manufacturers? Same thing.Basically any time a gun were to swap hands, the law would apply. There are private shooting clubs where guns are treated like library books and members take whatever they want. Families regularly swap guns. Heck, some shooting courses provide guns for students to use. All of these events would have been impacted by these new transfer requirements.The NRA balked at this. Essentially the rule would curtail many of the traditions and practices that are very common and virtually never result in any kind of criminal activity. In essence it would criminalize things that simply are not crimes.Not only would it create criminals where no criminal intent existed, but the cost to manage the volume of temporary transfers, the staffing needed to take the calls and do the checks would have cost millions each year. All money that would not go toward actually dealing with criminals.When the issue was brought up, many members of Congress agreed the requirements were too restrictive and the whole bill failed to pass. The supporters of the bill did not even attempt to listen to the complaints and work out a manageable fix.Did you hear any of that in the media?But what about catching criminals?Well, the bill didn’t change anything in regards to enforcing the rules to make sure the people who should not own guns were properly entered into NICS. In fact, other than maybe getting fired, there is NO PENALTY for failing to report a person. We have laws that will jail a teacher or coach that fail to report bullies. We have laws that put priests in prison who fail to report potential inappropriate behaviors in other clergy. But we do not have any laws that punish law enforcement agents that fail to do their job and make sure that dangerous people are reported to the background system. And this bill made no effort to change that.NICS is not open to anyone but federally licensed gun dealers. The left are so worried that the system might be used to check people for things other than guns that they refuse to create a means to allow people to verify someone they are selling a gun to. It would be easy to create an app that takes a photo of the buyer and seller’s ID (or just their faces and type in some data) and then return a simple “Proceed” or “Deny” with no other details. You’d have plenty of information to audit for illegal use. And if someone didn’t have an ID, they could then use a dealer. Heck, you can’t file taxes on-line without submitting some kind of ID, so this isn’t anything unique.And yet, the bill did nothing to address the issue of accessing the NICS for easier private sales.Here is the thing. We have 20,000 gun laws in this country. On the federal side, a prohibited person touching a gun could see them in prison for a minimum of 5 years. And yet, we still see cities with high violent crime rates that have virtually no federal cases. Why isn’t law enforcement using those stiff federal laws to get the violent people off the streets? Such a program called “Project Exile” worked wonders in Richmond, VA to reduce violent crime dramatically.OK, back to the “Universal Background Check” bill.I spent a lot of words above explaining what the bill would have required of people and why the situation would have been a nightmare. You never saw any of this in the news and the media pretty much ignored the issue.When the bill was defeated, it was never reported that a “terrible bill that would have cost millions and made criminals out of the innocent was defeated”, instead, all you ever heard was“The NRA used its influence to defeat the Universal Background Check bill that would have closed the gunshow loophole”Almost everything about that statement is false.So, be careful what you want to “Fight Against”. I suspect that most of what you think about the NRA is highly biased due to the way the organization is treated in the media. When you look at the actual facts, many times their concerns are quite valid. And, they have a lot of rank and file law enforcement on their side which helps them represent real world situations. I’ve found their positions in many cases very well presented. Most of the arguments you get on TV news are highly edited and taken out of context to promote an agenda, not facilitate a debate.Make sure you know what you are fighting for. You might be surprised.

It is not a secret if more than one person knows about it.I am a naturally private person, yet I worked in an office once where one supervisor befriended another just to get her betray confidences to the director, in hopes of being the one on top. It backfired, but it was humiliating for the other supervisor.Even though you may become very close friends with your co-workers, too much fraternizing and cozying-up can lead to upper management percieving a lack of professionalism at the very least. And, of course, the "friend" may stab you in the back when both of you are competing for a promotion.Topics which should be off limits:My crazy college days: Even if it was over 20 years ago, acts of drunken hedonism, vandalism or even worshiping the porcelain god call into question your judgment and work ethicCheating or stealing: A rags to riches story, even if you had to steal food or pawn a computer to survive, will call into question your integrity.Being on welfare: Kudos to anyone who made it through that hardship, got an education and now has a responsible position. Unfortunately, you may have a lot of co-workers who never had to struggle in life like you did. Some may judge you harshly from a narrow lens, especially a supervisor.Recovered alcoholic or drug addict: Again, some may judge you harshly from a narrow lens and feel you cannot be trusted.Marital/relationship problems: This will lead to another perception you cannot handle responsibility. Many years ago, I worked with several gals in a retail store. One would come in every day and complain about having to get high to sleep with her husband. She was in a miserable marriage and needed to vent, but it got her fired.Workman's compensation: Never brag about receiving benefits, calling OSHA on a previous employer, filing grievances, serving as an expert witness against a previous employer or talk about anyone else who has done those things. Do not even speak favorably about anyone who has been a whistleblower. I know someone who has been permanently blacklisted at a large state agency because he or she talked about being an expert witness against a large telecommunication corporation 15 years ago.HR is not your friend: HR exists to protect the best interests of the company. They might appear to be your friend because once they got rid of a bad supervisor. The truth is, if it was easier to scapegoat the victim, they will. It is all about what will cost the company the most dollars, never about justice.This may sound cynical, and there are exceptions to every rule, but in the working world, you are going to be up against the best and the worst of human nature. People need their paychecks to feed their families and maintain their lifestyle. The majority will not risk their jobs to take the higher ground in the support or defense of a co-worker.

A major reason: identity politics and political correctness gone too far.At least here in deep-blue Seattle, a city I love, the amount of guilt-penance being dished out by schools and in media is starting to overflow beyond the bounds of common sense. And I think educators are largely unaware that with a heavyhanded approach to discussing inclusion and diversity, they risk unintentionally minting new conservatives. Of the teens I know, many are starting to question the dogma.What’s the dogma? It’s that “Oppression and/or access-denied-by-others explains all observed social outcome discrepancies.”And this dogma, mind you, cannot be openly challenged without risking major social and academic repercussion. Teens who might want to introduce or explore additional discrepancy-explainers, such as personal responsibility, culture and agency will feel silenced. To diversity directors and administrators I want to shout that it need not be mutually exclusive: discrepancies can and nearly always do have multiple explainers. But some of these possible explainers are uncomfortable to voice and explore, certainly for young preteens and teens.This “silencing” not being simpatico with the typical teen desire to process thoughts and express and assert independence, “the rest of the story” gets sublimated, and many once-liberal students retreat to online venues to process what they feel intuitively must be the “rest of the story.”Very unfortunately, and not just for the student but for those of us who want to mint more allies in seeing social progress — the conservative blogosphere is also teeming with an ample share of racist, xenophobic, homophobic, hateful memes, and conspiracy-theory-promoting jerks. So by silencing the second half of the conversation about personal agency — whether it’s #MeToo or women in STEM or disparities in academic achievement between the races, it’s actually pushing the discussion and exploration elsewhere, and that elsewhere has equally little nuance, but in the other direction.Writ large in America — and not just as schools — across politics, news, media, social media and entertainment — we are allowed to digitally opt into the worldviews we agree with and opt out of the ones that challenge our worldview. I wish I could express just how counter-productive and misguided I think these last ten years or so of confrontational, guilt-oriented discussion has been to the very important and vital goals of an inclusive, socially aware civil society, while shutting down discussion about agency and choice, as though that undermines the argument about lack of access and oppression.We have eradicated nuance, but we tell ourselves we’re open to all viewpoints and datapoints. We way overemphasize inalterable identity attributes. Too often, “Speaking as a…” is given far more validity than the overall data itself. It erects an unassailable defense, where any challenge is interpreted as an insult.I really wish we could return to the days of Martin Luther King’s urging us all to judge not people by the color of their skin but the content of their character, but the progressive left will only allow one’s inalterable identity attributes (gender, race, sexual preference) to be front and foremost.Further, since teens aren’t generally socially permitted to say out loud some very uncomfortable, messy notions they might still want to process (examples below*), there’s zero open challenge to these messy thoughts being aired, and very little truly sincere discussion actually exists about controversial issues, though administrators will assure you sincere debate exists. To many of them, this means a heavy emphasis on oppression/lack-of-access-based-explainers, but very little consideration of volition-based explainers for any inequities in society.Worse, kids who are wearing the invisible “oppressor” t-shirt look around and see all kinds of other kids getting celebrated for bringing their whole person to school, and lots of extra-mile work being done to open doors. But generally, a “you’ll be just fine, believe me” attitude is what you’ll receive if you dare raise any of your own offense or hurt feelings, leading immediately to a feeling of unfairness.For example, let’s say we observe a social injustice — a discrepancy of some kind (e.g., female/male pay gap, female representation in STEM, income inequality between races, academic achievement gap between races or sexes, etc.) I can assure you that schools will rightly devote extensive, ample exploration about what kinds of oppression and/or lack of access contributed to the problem, and how students can help work in their communities to right it. OK, that’s fantastic, it’s important, and needed.But notably absent from these discussions are any exploration of factors involving personal volition, personal responsibility, work, choice, and cultural values which might also help explain, and which also take just a little of the burden off the “oppressors” in the room.The furor over the Damore memo (“Google’s Ideological Echo Chamber”) is a case in point — if you actually read it, it’s saying women too have agency, and several psychological studies do actually show that women and men do differ biologically on several dimensions, including personal interest. It is also repeatedly stating that “on average” does not mean “all” and that differences abound. But he was summarily fired, and the memo mischaracterized. It is worth asking whether this type of atmosphere for ideas which challenge is equally welcoming.Though I’ve only had second-hand observation, in speaking with some teens in an open-ended way, I’d have to say that the “Oppression explains virtually all observed discrepancies in outcomes” is a fairly consistent lens through which all social issues are explored at school (or at least the sentiment outcome desired), and anyone who raises other points which may in any way challenge the hegemony of this worldview can be quickly be portrayed as racist, misogynistic, insensitive or otherwise hateful, with little adult intervention, defense or scaffolding.Particularly for the millions of white male kids coming of age after around 9/11, it can grow tiring — and it is far different from the aspirational, we-can-all-win, we’re all on the same team style-vision of instilled in those of us raised with Martin Luther King style “content of their character” mores, vision and goals when I came of age in the 70’s and 80’s. What would you do after years of this type of discussion? Try to keep your chin up. Remember that you’ve got integrity and will do the right thing anyway. In discussions, you’ll play along. You’ll sit on those uncomfortable ideas which round out the story, and perhaps not bring your full self and very valid opinions to school discussion.Sadly, in today’s world, you’re either the oppressed or the oppressor, and worse, you don’t even get to choose the side; the t-shirts have already been printed and handed out, the very moment the discussion was framed through an inalterable-identity way.Speaking of diversity, doesn’t political diversity make us stronger too?It’d be very surprising to me if any of my kids’ schools (fine schools academically, but each handling social justice with very different degrees of nuance and resultant quality) have ever had a single right-of-center general assembly speaker who might actually introduce ideas from a conservative lens. But I do know they’ve each had several left-of-center speakers which explore racism, misogyny and other victim-centric approaches, which make it amply clear where the problem lies, even if it’s couched in terms of “we all need to work on this oppression”.If you’re a white male, especially one of privilege, there’s no question who’s got the target on their back, even if you have been (and would have continued to be) a solid would-be ally. In the current academic paradigm, you’re generally made to feel as either the oppressed or the oppressor, and that’s a shame — this heavy-handed approach is alienating potential allies.If you know in your heart that you’re not an oppressor, after a few years of this in junior high and high school, it’d be natural for many teens to hop off the rails of ostensibly “open” dialogue into their respective online echo chambers, and technology is only too happy to oblige with a simple “follow” or “unfollow.”It all starts out well enough.For the first several grades, childhood can be full of optimism, celebration of individuality and largely well-executed “you can do anything” opportunity messaging. Of course we ought to treat people the way we wish to be treated. Of course we ought to give those who haven’t had as much opportunity a leg-up. Of course it’s offensive and inaccurate to make broad-brush statements about a person simply because of their race, gender, religion, sexual preference, physical traits or what-have-you. These common-sense principles all line up with the Golden Rule. It is an upbeat, inspirational message that lets people know that they can be the sum of their actions and choices. Awesome. We’re all on the same page.But for kids born in the late 90’s through today, the messaging they’ve heard beginning around ten started to change dramatically. If you’re a white kid of privilege, especially if you’re male, you hear all kinds of reasons why you’re in the doghouse. After years of being raised with the common sense guidelines of treating others the way you wish to be treated, you start hearing the clear and often oddly proud proclamations treating your identity group and therefore you with negative prejudgment. (Hey, heard or read many good things about “white males” or “whiteness” lately? You’re ten. Eleven. Twelve. Thirteen. How are you hearing that? When you run across Buzzfeed’s “37 Things White People Ruined in 2017,” or any one of dozens of such articles from The Root, Salon, or Vox what’s your reaction likely to be?)The implicit message devolves to “Hey sure, it’s very important for you to continue to treat people solely based on their actions and words and never their unalterable attributes because that would be unfair and offensive, but when others don’t do the same for you, well, they’re doing the right thing for them, and that’s OK because you’re in this particular identity group, even though you too didn’t choose it for yourself. Look. You’ll be fine; I’ll get my tiny violin.”Believe me, that screaming hypocrisy is not lost on many young teens.Eventually, as kids grow into adolescence, many kids who are breezily lumped into identity groups to say something negative or claim currency or name as historical oppressors or abusers-in-waiting might rationally begin to consider the notion that maybe they don’t actually bear personal responsibility for slavery, that maybe they’re not all born Harvey Weinstein wannbe’s, that maybe the burritos they enjoy aren’t harmful “cultural appropriation”, and that maybe Martin Luther King Jr. was right after all when he said that we should not judge people by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. The heavy-handed approach of an overly progressive left is alienating potential allies.Related, the progressive left has become a real downer, hasn’t it? Who wants to indulge in that all day? We’re ruining our planet, we’re oppressing everyone, we’re to blame for everything. It’s simply loaded on too thick for many budding teens. It decidedly lacks a positive vision of equal or greater weight to counterbalance the many negative themes. Why? Because perhaps unification is not the goal — only a little more thought will reveal that unification is in fact not possible with identity politics. These concepts — unification and identity politics — are antithetical.Quick, who are today’s heroes? Are they socialist? Do they argue about victimhood, real or perceived slights, or penance owed? When you think of young visionaries like Elon Musk and building rockets and electric cars and changing the world, do you immediately think of the progressive left, socialism and redress politics? Or do you think about individual responsibility, the benefits of capitalism, can-do optimism and a potentially bright future? Futuristic companies — those planning for the 2030’s — need to have some big picture optimism and big, hairy, audacious goals. So too do teens. Young boys, especially, are constantly told in the larger social awareness movement what not to do and how not to behave and other groups are visibly celebrated and encouraged, but the positive role models are being gradually chipped away from their lives.Sadly, an optimistic, expansive and hopeful message isn’t really being delivered by the progressive left these days. It used to be, but those days are gone for now. It’s all too often a guilt-driven, schoolmarmish, you’re-to-blame because-of-your-identity-group-but-only-for-certain-groups, the-pie-is-fixed, everything-sucks kind of redress-oriented message.The right is now generally more likely to defend freedom of expression, open debate, and accountability on an individual level, and the progressive left is arguably in some cases more authoritarian and too quick to focus on inalterable attributes of an individual, broadly their “identity group”, to assign collective judgment and/or demand action.Schools like to feel they are embracing a healthy dialogue on touchy subjects like sexual assault, misogyny and sexism, racism, income inequality and many more topics, but the discussion tends to only allow for an oppression-style explainer. That is, the debate rarely allows for challenging data or perspectives from the right — e.g., the rapid rise of fatherless homes, cultural norms which “define success down” or chide high achievers for “acting white,” the data that suggests that some of the pay-gap between women and men is driven by which fields are typically chosen by individuals, etc. Since the social and sometimes academic cost are just too high for raising it, most perspectives which might challenge the “oppression/racism/sexism/etc is the only explainer for discrepancies” (and guess who’s the perpetrator in all cases) model are left to online chat rooms, rarely the school itself. The in-class discussion is incomplete, and only able to process the oppression part of the model — meaning: oppressor: bad, and don’t try to inject any notion of personal responsibility, or you’ll be shredded.And so, for many young teens coming of age, the “victimhood as currency” approach is a turnoff. Queue another Ben Shapiro follower.I hope the pendulum may someday swing back to the beautiful, optimistic and inclusive dream of MLK, and there’s some hope that it will.Even the erudite and often thoughtful left-leaning opinion sites are starting to question the value of identity politics:Also see: Why are there so many people now openly hostile toward “Social Justice Warriors”?Recommended: Mark Lilla’s The Once and Future LiberalIf any of the above rings true for you or a teen in your life, I’d be honored with an upvote; there are far too many intelligent and well-meaning friends on the left who don’t think this is an issue.[EDIT: 1,000+ upvotes. Thank you to the many students who have chimed in on the comments section, voicing agreement. You hearten me. Do not turn away from social progress and judging people by the content of their character. Keep hope alive.]—*Examples of such uncomfortable notions that cannot and must not be expressed or explored at school, lest you be a social or even academic pariah: “Doesn’t level of parental involvement radically effect student outcome, and isn’t the unmarried rate in certain communities much lower than other communities? By that logic, is racism really the only explainer for why black citizens are incarcerated at such a higher rate than other ethnic groups, or is there anything cultural that may also be at foot which holds back achievement?” “What’s behind the fatherless crisis in some minority communities?” “Does personal choice enter into the reason why there’s an 80/20 ratio of EE/CS majors, or is it all oppression or lack of access? I look around and see plenty of access that my female peers have to technology, just as I do.”The irony is that many educators go to conferences with seminars which cogently and deeply tackle these and other topics more honestly, openly and completely, but in the school environment, there is an overemphasis on the “oppression explains this discrepancy” model compared to those explainers which involve personal volition, choice, responsibility and culture.

Suggested clip ESI Dispensary Change Process || How To Change ERIC ... — YouTubeYouTubeStart of suggested client of suggested clip ESI Dispensary Change Process || How To Change ERIC ... — YouTube

In such cases, the Aadhaar details must first be changed before the basic changes can be made on the portal. The process to update the details must be done by the employee and employer.

Contributions paid against one insurance number cannot be transferred to another number. Because, every insurance number is unique and issued to a particular person. Its like PAN which cannot be transferred. ERIC always advice to continue same number even if person is changing employment or state.

As per provision of Section 58 (1) of the ESI Act, the State Government may, with the approval of the Corporation, arrange for outpatient medical care to IPs and their families at the clinics of approved Registered Medical Practitioners who are appointed and designated as Imps (Insurance Medical Practitioners-Panel ...

Suggested clip ESI Dispensary Change Process || How To Change ERIC ... — YouTubeYouTubeStart of suggested client of suggested clip ESI Dispensary Change Process || How To Change ERIC ... — YouTube