51 105f3a Form

U need to fill the ipcc exam form here : http://www.icaiexam.icai.orgAbout the photo and signature.. if u find ur photo and signature already present in the form.. no need to upload again..If u haven't find ur photo and signature in the form, fill the form ,and pay the fees online, and download the form , and attach ur photo and do ur signature and get it attested by Chartered Accountant and post it to Delhi ICAI BHAWAN through speed post or Registered post not through courierIf u find ur photo n signature online already, you No need to get attested and post it

Could be many reasons.Most common is that you are a new patient and after all that paperwork filling out you want to see the doctor as soon as possible. After all you came to see the doc, not fill out paperwork, right?So after you fill out the paperwork your answers are still in the papers and not in your electronic health record (EHR). Most of the answers aren’t even for the doctor: they are for insurance, billing and legal purposes. All that information will have to be scanned or entered by the nurse or medical tech, but he’s already on to another patient. He’ll have to do it later.The doc has just seen another patient. She’s only had time to fill out a skeletal note in the EHR for that patient that she will have to finish after she’s done seeing patients and before she goes home. If she doesn’t complete that not in 48 hours she could face fines and in some cases, dismissal depending on state or health system.Now she picks up your folder. There is a sheaf of forms and a blank health record with likely only your name and insurance number in it. Would you rather she spent 15 minutes reviewing what you wrote or actually meeting with you and asking some of those same questions?Most patients will likely choose the latter. Again, you’re there to see the doctor, not to fill out forms.And guess what? It’s only going to get worse as health care becomes more bureaucratic.

A woman walks past a sign showing a Powerball prize of $999 million, the largest jackpot winnings that the Powerball sign can display, with the actual Powerball jackpot estimated at $1.3 billion, outside a deli in Washington, DC, January 11, 2016.SACRAMENTO — In the California lottery handbook for winners, officials offer a few suggestions to newly minted millionaires. Change your number. Stop answering your phone. And find a reputable financial adviser.That’s because along with the money comes 15 minutes of fame as the names of winners are required to be made public in California and many other states.All eyes are on the Los Angeles suburb of Chino Hills, where one of three tickets in Wednesday night’s record-breaking $1.6 billion Powerball drawing was purchased. No one has come forward to claim the prize in California.“We’re waiting for who this person is,” said Alex Traverso, a spokesman for the California Lottery.Traverso said large jackpots like the one in Wednesday’s drawing drive debate over whether the names of lottery winners should be made public. Past winners have complained of being besieged by con artists and swindled by friends.Millionaire slainCritics of the disclosure laws often point to the case of Abraham Shakespeare, who won $30 million in the Florida lottery in 2006, and three years later, was killed by a woman who managed his winnings.Andrew Stoltmann, an Illinois attorney who has represented winners, told the Associated Press that making winners’ names public is like “throwing meat into a shark-infested ocean.”But lottery officials say it’s important public information to ensure the drawings are transparent and to deter would-be cheaters.“We want people to know we have winners every day,” Traverso said. “If people don’t see people winning the lottery, then they won’t buy tickets. … The only time we hear talk of changing the regulations to allow anonymity is when we have jackpots like (Wednesday’s).”Besides Chino Hills, the two other winning Powerball tickets were purchased in Munford, Tenn., and Melbourne Beach, Fla. A Tennessee couple, John and Lisa Robinson, announced on the “Today“ show on Friday that they were the winners from their state.Tennessee lottery officials later confirmed the couple were the winners in an afternoon news conference. The family plans to take a lump sum payout of $327 million.Showed ticket on TVJohn Robinson, who pulled the winning ticket from his shirt pocket on the “Today“ show, said he realized he was losing his anonymity after the announcement.“Now I'll be nervous because everybody knows,” he said on the broadcast.All three states with winning Powerball tickets have laws requiring the identity of the winner to be made public. In Tennessee and Florida, the states’ lottery policy is to identify a person’s name and city of residence.California requires that a person’s name be made public, but not their city. Lottery officials include the person’s name, where the ticket was purchased and how much was won in press releases.“You aren’t compelled to do a press conference or have your picture taken, but we are going to release your name because it’s public information,” Traverso said. “We want people to know the lottery is creating winners, and we want to be sensitive to our winners that they may not want their details thrown out there to the world.”California has required that the names of winners be made public since voters first passed Proposition 37, also known as the California State Lottery Act, in 1984. Changing the antianonymity law would require a two-thirds vote of the Legislature and approval of the governor.Only six states allow lottery winners to remain anonymous — Delaware, Kansas, Maryland, North Dakota, Ohio and South Carolina. Some states allow winners to shield their identity by claiming their winnings through a trust or a limited liability company.No anonymity in stateIn recent years, several states have considered changing their laws to allow for winners to protect their identity. California lawmakers have not taken up the issue — and with good reason, said Assemblyman Phil Ting, D-San Francisco.“Winners need to be public so the public has faith in the lottery,” Ting said. “Beneficiary anonymity cannot overshadow governmental accountability to the public.”