Dma 5028 Form

It is the solemn duty of any worthwhile journalistic outfit to report after checking the facts. I wish so was the case here.The Statue of Unity is constructed in the river bed of Narmada. To approach the Statue requires travel by boat or traveling over a bridge. I am from a state where there is a large tribal population and I know of no tribe that lives in the river bed. So who is getting displaced. And if nobody is getting displaced then what is all the sound about? Who are protesting and why?Further, all through the construction period of the Statue, there was no report by L&T or any other sub contractors of protests, peaceful or otherwise, by the locals. There was no news of heavy deployment of police to curb any protests. It is for the first time I have come across protesters who patiently waited for the object of objection to be completed and then begin protesting. Isn't it time that The Wire stops treating it's readers as imbeciles.Thirdly, the quality of vested interests is declining substantially. If the protesters had bothered to find out the local culture then they would have flown black kites and not black balloons.Lastly, the protesting tribes lived upstream. They fought a very long battle against Sardar Sarovar and Narmada Sagar. They followed Medha Patkar, who despite all the sound bytes, lost each and every case right up to Supreme Court level. Why would these people protest against a Statue which does not change their jungles and land holding any?Still, if you want to believe The Wire then you are welcome.A special note - All those who see this answer and may or may not like it are encouraged to visit the link given by Sunny Dhoke in one of the comments. This link takes you to a special critic of my answer written by one Ganesh Kumar who calls this answer a false one and writes at length about why it is false. He has multiple news reports to quote.The purpose of this platform called Quora is to ensure that healthy and facts based discussion happens without calling each other names. And every person visiting this answer should read arguments for or against the subject matter. After all that is the demand of democracy and we are not living in some Communist dictatorship.My two bit is simple.Nobody stays in riverbed of Narmada.The court cases relating to Sardar Sarovar land acqusition and rehabilitation are over and that is why the dam is permitted to be filled up. At present special Tribunals are handling the cases of grievances of the people rehabilitated. Linking these cases to the Statue of Unity is wrong. For the land acquisition done for road works etc the social activist should go to court if they are serious. Running politically motivated campaigns, supported by favourable media wouldn't wash with common citizens of India.Linking the protest against the statue related to claimed overdue dues for sugarcane is surprising. More so when the matter, as per Wire, is sub-judice. If it is in the court then why the agitation?There has been some mention of veracity of Swarajya versus Wire and someone calling wire better than Swarajya. I rarely read Swarajya. And the Wire kept popping up on my feed till I found it packed with opinions devoid of facts and blocked it. So I wouldn't know where it stands as against Swarajya.Please also read my reply & comment of Rajani Santosh.

I think there are some misconceptions in the question. First is the 95% theory/design category. I don't know any school that has 95% of its delivery centred on design. All programs include history, theory, technology and professional practice elements. In the UK the Royal Institute of British Architects only allows 50% of credits to be design units. Second, is the idea that design is theoretical. In a typical design brief students must: analyse a site and its context (social, historical, political), examine the brief by testing its coherence, looking for opportunities to make it, the site or project as a whole better, establish design ideas and resolved them with reference to structural, material and human occupation concerns, and present these convincingly at a review or jury, which tests the students capability to verbally deliver and defend a project idea, and in a portfolio, which must be convincing without the student present to fill in any gaps or holes. These are things that practicing architects must do all the time, so in that sense there is very little that is theoretical about it - designing is a discipline in and of itself.Of course, the educational system doesn't cover everything. There often isn't much to do with managing budgets or costing projects; with managing staff or a small team; with learning to deal with clients and contractors. That is why most countries require some time spent in practice before a graduate is fully qualified.An architect is someone who generally designs and manages the construction of projects, not someone who builds buildings. That is one reason why some architecture programs do not include real building experience in their curricula. However, some programs do in fact include design-build, real projects, real clients, or other real-world engagement as part of their delivery. There is a great diversity of ways of teaching architecture out there.There is also such a variety of building types and construction methods that it would take an immense amount of time to teach architects how to design and build them all. In that sense, architectural education does have to be somewhat generalist and theoretical so that graduates understand enough of the principles to be able to design wood, concrete, steel structures as well as differently scaled designs from bathroom extensions to airports. And in the end, what an architect is able to do - in terms of their skill set and area of specialisation - is down to the kinds of practices they have worked for after graduation.Finally, about the 'dirty work' - is the implication that the architect walks away and the builder does the dirty work? It doesn't work like this. A contractor has several sub-contractors each of which are independent businesses - electricians, plumbers, masons, etc. These guys get a specific contract for 'x'; they come in, do their job and leave. Same with the contractor. Also involved are various engineers, lawyers and other bureaucrats. The first port of call for any mess-up, crisis or problem is the architect, whether it was their fault or not. Some architects are contracted to deal with these messes, others are not. But as the overall coordinator of all the various disciplines, making sure that there are no contradictions in any of the documents, instructions and so on, and having to trouble shoot problems that emerge as demolition, excavation and construction proceeds without holding up a project, this is where the 'dirty work' lives.No disrespect intended to any of the other professions involved.

Letters of support are critical.  You should consider them as required.  As the SBIR program is becoming more competitive, you have to assume you are competing against applications that include them - therefore you must as well. As some of the other other answers indicate, these need to be more than just lip service, they should be signNow commitments of dollars, resources or expertise to your project in the R&D or commercialization phase.  They can also augment any weak areas of your proposal (for example a larger manufacturing partner who will have the machining necessary to construct prototypes or final products).  To the extent possible, you should have more than 1 letter of support, a triumvirate is not a terrible idea:Academia - a university with a research program to provide additional input and complementary research if neededBeta Sites/Customer Prospects - organizations or customers that will be able to test the results in a real-world environment and would be customers if the technology comes to market Manufacturing/Distribution - Who can you work with to scale manufacturing and distribute the technology once it is proven?There are a variety of ways to identify partners for letters of support.  If you need help you can signNow out to state SBDCs or find an SBIR consultant to help connect you with some potential partners:SBIR Resources - SBIR Source

Thanks for asking.If you are asking how to report your income as an independent contractor, then you do not fill out a W-2. You will report your income on your federal tax return on Schedule C which will have on which you list all of your non-employee income and associated expenses. The resulting net income, transferred to Schedule A is what you will pay self-employment and federal income tax on. If this too confusing, either get some good tax reporting software or get a tax professional to help you with it.If you are asking how to fill out a W-2 for someone that worked for you, either get some good tax reporting software or get a tax professional to help you with it.This is not tax advice, it is only my opinion on how to answer this question.

You did not “fill out a 1099.” The businesses that paid you may be required to provide you with a Form 1099-MISC documenting how much you were paid. A copy of that goes to the IRS and possibly your state Department of Revenue and they will be looking for that income on your tax return.The law requires you to keep accurate business records and to use those records to prepare and file your tax returns. Use any 1099s as a sanity check that the numbers are correct and get them corrected if they are not.As a self-employed business, you file a Form 1040 return and attach Schedule C to report the business revenue and expenses. If the net profit is $400 or more, you attach Schedule SE to figure the 15.3% self-employment tax.From the way that your question is worded, you need professional assistance and you need it now. Find a CPA or EA who can get you on track.

If you were simply filing employment income I would entirely agree with Ms. King’s response. Congratulations you are officially an entrepreneur! Considering only 5% of taxpayers are successful in venturing out on their own on the first try, you have a steep learning curve ahead. As you have been operating as a contractor your tax situation is now more complex.If you have access to a professional for advice, you might try doing it yourself via TurboTax. But I would counsel against that as, in all probability, you are not intimately familiar with the ins-and-outs of what you may or may not deduct as legitimate expenses, and how to compile your information in a manner that meets the reporting and organizational requirements of record keeping (as well as how to store and keep those records according to the Income Tax Act.It might cost a bit more initially to find a compatible tax preparer, I think it worth it the long run. I highly recommend it, especially if you find someone who will represent you for the year not just to prepare your taxes for that year. Build a relationship, just as you should do with your bank, its essential to your success.

They do not actively recruit like other Government agencies. When I made the decision to leave the Military I was looking for another job in the same field and had actually been offered a couple positions by several Contractors when I received a call from a former team member. I flew to Virginia to meet with him and he told me about his job with State and it sounded perfect for me. I applied and had an interview within 2 days and at the interview they had a file on me that was 2 inches thick and offered me the position with an hour. Years later I found out that my friend had been told to contact me and I had been vetted before I had even applied.When we had an opening on any of our teams we all had people in mind to fill the spot and submitted them. They were vetted and then you were asked to contact them and get them to apply. It sounds pretty clandestine but 99% of our teams came from a SF background and it is a pretty tight group. It is not hard to convince somebody to join when you get twice the pay and our deployments usually lasted a week or two and you are based out of our embassies when you are deployed. It was hands down the best job I ever had but the average Operator is in the field for 8 years and I lasted 11 years and was totally burned out and was ready to leave.The best advice I can give you is to spend a lot of time networking, you never know who you will meet. Apply and follow up on it.Good Luck!

Getting a job with any company is much the same. You must fill out an employment application and/or send them a resume’ along with a “cover letter” that states your intentions. Many oil companies are global and have their headquarters in other places around the world. Most of these companies have a web site that includes information on how to apply for any position in the company and many have listings on which positions are available. Most of these companies also use sub contractors that are smaller subsidiary companies and you must apply to these separately. There are also companies like Haliburton or Slumberger that work in the oil fields.

First, the LLC operates as tax partnership (“TP”) as the default tax status if no election has been made as noted in Treasury Regulation Section 301.7701-3(b)(i). For legal purposes, we have a LLC. For tax purposes we have a tax partnership. Since we are discussing a tax issue here, we will discuss the issue from the perspective of a TP.A partner cannot under any circumstances be an employee of the TP as Revenue Ruling 69-184 dictated such. And, the 2016 preamble to Temporary Treasury Regulation Section 301.7701-2T notes the Treasury still supports this revenue ruling.Though a partner can engage in a transaction with the TP in a non partner capacity (Section 707a(a)).A partner receiving a 707(a) payment from the partnership receives the payment as any stranger receives a payment from the TP for services rendered. This partner gets treated for this transaction as if he/she were not a member of the TP (Treasury Regulation Section 1.707-1(a).As an example, a partner owns and operates a law firm specializing in contract law. The TP requires advice on terms and creation for new contracts the TP uses in its business with clients. This partner provides a bid for this unique job and the TP accepts it. Here, the partner bills the TP as it would any other client, and the partner reports the income from the TP client job as he/she would for any other client. The TP records the job as an expense and pays the partner as it would any other vendor. Here, I am assuming the law contract job represents an expense versus a capital item. Of course, the partner may have a law corporation though the same principle applies.Further, a TP can make fixed payments to a partner for services or capital — called guaranteed payments as noted in subsection (c).A 707(c) guaranteed payment shows up in the membership agreement drawn up by the business attorney. This payment provides a service partner with a guaranteed payment regardless of the TP’s income for the year as noted in Treasury Regulation Section 1.707-1(c).As an example, the TP operates an exclusive restaurant. Several partners contribute capital for the venture. The TP’s key service partner is the chef for the restaurant. And, the whole restaurant concept centers on this chef’s experience and creativity. The TP’s operating agreement provides the chef receives a certain % profit interest but as a minimum receives yearly a fixed $X guaranteed payment regardless of TP’s income level. In the first year of operations the TP has low profits as expected. The chef receives the guaranteed $X payment as provided in the membership agreement.The TP allocates the guaranteed payment to the capital interest partners on their TP k-1s as business expense. And, the TP includes the full $X guaranteed payment as income on the chef’s K-1. Here, the membership agreement demonstrates the chef only shares in profits not losses. So, the TP only allocates the guaranteed expense to those partners responsible for making up losses (the capital partners) as noted in Treasury Regulation Section 707-1(c) Example 3. The chef gets no allocation for the guaranteed expense as he/she does not participate in losses.If we change the situation slightly, we may change the tax results. If the membership agreement says the chef shares in losses, we then allocate a portion of the guaranteed expense back to the chef following the above treasury regulation.As a final note, a TP return requires knowledge of primary tax law if the TP desires filing a completed an accurate partnership tax return.I have completed the above tax analysis based on primary partnership tax law. If the situation changes in any manner, the tax outcome may change considerably. www.rst.tax