Sf 95 Fillable 2007-2024 Form

THere are a lot of scholarships for school students.few websites provide scholarships details.you may visit My Exam Circle (Scholarships and Admissions) for scholarships.

I think it is perfectly acceptable, if that is your choice.  I can see no potential issues.Practically speak, it just takes a few minutes and you're sitting on the plane with nothing to do.  I don't consider it a big deal one way or the other.  Your choice.

I would love to. Unfortunately the government prevents you from doing something like that.For instance, there are SEVERAL very large potholes on my neighborhood streets that I regularly throw my car out of alignment on, particularly in higher volume traffic times when I can’t swerve.We had a neighbor who finally got sick of the one in front of his house. He’d been trying to get the city to repair it for about 18 months. So he bought concrete, filled it in, smoothed it, and hand mixed asphalt, laid it over it, and rolled it level with a hand roller he’d rented. Frankly it was better than 95% of the repairs the city had done.And what happened? He got cited by the city, paid a fine, and the city came out and stripped out the repair work he had done. Evidently he was not permitted and the city has a contract for pothole repair.That pothole is still there — only worse than before because when they tore out the repair, they made it worse.I’ve seen this when neighbors get together to pave an alley. Want to plant trees or shrubs in the median? Or along the parkway? You can’t. There are rules against it. Sure you can fill out some forms, file a request with the city planning and zoning, set it for hearing in 60 days, notify everyone of the hearing, get planning and zoning to approve it, then set it before city council to be debated and voted on, typically another 60–90 days later, go and present, get a vote, and hope it passes. But that’s ridiculous.How about just paying people to pick up litter? Again, better have a permit for that, or you can get a host of different violations.There’s a reason why this isn’t being done all over already. Because not only do large city governments do a HORRIBLE job maintaining their cities, but they actively work to make sure they have a monopoly on doing so.

The law inside a gun show is exactly the same outside a gun show.Virtually all of the tables with guns on them for sale at a show are licensed dealers. They are FFLs. A gun show is simply a mobile storefront for them. But the same rules for sale at a show are the same as if you walked into a brick-and-mortar shop.There are private sellers at gun shows. It is legal to dispose of personal firearms in accordance with State and Federal law. This is where the whole “universal background checks” (UBC) conversation starts. UBCs are the so-called “gun show loophole” repackaged. It is the idea that a person selling their guns without government oversight is so offensive that must be stopped and monitored.But gun shows have nothing to do with it. It is up to the state to decide how to regulate private sales of guns. Some like California have UBCs. No private sales permitted. Others have a 50/50 rule with handguns being subject to UBCs but long guns are not. Many have no restriction as long as Federal law is followed.Some gun shows, in fact, don’t permit private sales either in the show or on the property where it is held. The big gun show I attend does not permit them. You can bring a gun for private sale into the show but either have to transfer it through a dealer or leave the property entirely to sell the gun. Basically not anywhere in sight of the front door or in the venue parking lot.But for 95%+ of all sales at a gun show you will be working with an FFL, filling out a form 4473 and passing a background check. Then, and only if the law allows, will you be leaving with your gun. The last gun I bought at a gun show I didn’t leave with as it was a handgun sale across State lines so, per Federal law, I had to have it shipped to a dealer in my state and transfer it there.So much for the so-called “gun show loophole”.

I don't want to use my “minority status" as an identifier. I really do not. But in the United States, I cannot refuse or ignore my Asian American “minority status". My minority status was forced upon me by American society, instead of my own choosing.Being born a minority isn't an issue. No. I was born as a minority in China. I was Manchu, one of the 56 ethnic minority groups in China, where the Han Chinese majority constitutes 95% of the population. I was never treated differently, me being a Manchu was never an issue with anyone. When I watch TV, people similar to me are properly represented with respect and diversity. There are plenty of TV shows specifically depicting Manchu court intrigues, that actually features my people in history. Manchu culture is integrated with Han Chinese culture. It's hard to determine where the Han Chinese culture ends and where Manchu culture begins. Our custom, clothing, food, are now part of mainstream culture. I was never made to feel unwelcome or not belong, because of my ethnicity. The only time I was reminded of my minority status was when filling out forms that asked about my ethnic background.For a Manchu ethnic minority person in China, my “minority status" really is just happenstance.But not in the US. No.Since I arrived in the US almost 2 decades ago, I was constantly reminded that I'm different.I look different. And that “difference in appearance” means a lot more than my height, weight, hair color, or being left or right handed… My skin color means something more than simple aesthetics. In American society, my skin color defines me as a person.Prejudice is everywhere. Everyone does it more or less. But racism isn't just prejudice.So in China, people look at me, my clothing, my manners, or even the place they saw me… they come up with an assumption, which probably isn't very exciting or anything out of ordinary. And the factors people use to make assumptions about me, my hair cut, my clothing, my behavior, all of these are my choice. I choose my own hairstyle, I choose what I wear that morning, I choose how to behave in a certain situation… My choices directly impact how people judge me.In the US, however, regardless of how I dress or behave, people make a snap judgment based on my race alone. I can't choose my skin color. I can't choose to not appear East-Asian. And yet before people know me based on my own choices as an individual, they had already identified me as “Asian". In American society, regardless of my own personal choices, people will start with a set of assumptions about me or any Asian-looking women: I can't speak English very well, I drive poorly, I’m born somewhere outside the US, I speak another language, I'm submissive and docile, I value traditional gender roles, I respect and obey my husband, I'm good at math, not sports… etc.Some of these assumptions are true, I was indeed born outside the US, I do indeed speak a second language other than English. But the problem isn't such stereotype has truth in it or not. The problem is regardless of our own personal experiences, every one of us “Asian-looking women" would be identified as such before anything else.Take a Chinese American girl born in the US, she might not speak Chinese, she might choose to study Spanish as her second language, she might be captain of the school soccer team, she might not care about math…And despite being two very different people, both of us would be given the same assumption when people first meet us.Our choices have no impact on how people see us. In fact, many of us struggle to break the stereotype people given to us, through extraordinary personal choices. We rebelled against our racial stereotypes because we're sick and tired of how people slap these “identifiers" on us.Despite being an American, we're constantly reminded of being different. We're constantly being asked, “but where are you really from?” Second generation natural born Chinese Americans were complimented for speaking English like a native speaker. We're often told to “go back to where you come from" when criticizing US government and policies. We're constantly required to justify taking space in society.A lot of people from privileged group don't understand this. They never experienced it themselves. So it seems we're the ones always talk about race. It seems as if we are the ones making racial conflicts worse by constantly bring it out. And racism would just go away on its own if we all stop talking about it. If we don't see color.We don't want to see color, dear white people. We would be just fine if you treat us the way you treat your own race. We'd be fine if the store clerks wouldn't follow a black customer around but don't give a damn about white customers. We'd be just fine if you stop asking us about where we really come from. We'd be just fine if you could stop calling the cops because black people living their lives.You're the ones who relentlessly pushing racial identity on us. Not the other way around.John repeatedly slaps James. James cried out and ask John to stop. John replied “well, I don't feel anything. I don't see the problem. Are you sure you're not being too sensitive? Surely if you stop crying about it, your imaginary pain will just go away.”No, it won't, John.

“Why is it so hard for the UK to get out of Europe and keep everyone happy? I voted to leave and deal or no deal. I just want out. Why is it being made so difficult?”It is not “being made”so difficult. It actually is so difficult.You want to Leave. Lots of other people voted to Leave. Some voted because of fishing rights. Some voted to protest about how the UK central government neglects the area they live in. Some voted because they didn’t realise the UK government could *already* restrict immigration from the rest of the EU much more tightly - but the Conservatives just didn’t bother to do that. Some feel that there are huge commercial opportunities out there for British exporting firms. Some voted Leave because they didn’t realise that we both the USA and the EU are required to enforce the Good Friday Agreement, no matter what the UK decides. Some people voted to Leave because they don’t realise that the bus money was a desperately bad lie (It claimed we pay £13 billion a year. We only pay £9billion a year. If we stay in the EEA, it would still be £5billion. If we leave the EU and the EEA, it’ll balloon to about £13 billion. And we’ll lose about £200billion of trade. Some voted because they were told the negotiations would be quick, easy, and take us somewhere better. Some people voted Leave because we were all told the trade opportunities were more plentiful outside the EU. Some people voted Leave because they were promised greater sovereignty. Some people even voted Leave because they were told VAT would be abolished if we left the EU. (I’d love it if you would comment, and say what your reason for wanting Leave was).So there were lots of reasons people had to vote Leave. Which means there are lots of possible versions of Leave.Instant or gradual.Agreed with our fellow EU members, or we just make a Unilateral Declaration of Independence, like Zimbabwe did from the UK, and make our own way.Like Norway orLike Switzerland orLike Monaco orLike Turkey orLike Ukraine orLike Russia orLike Azerbaijan orLike Japan or Like the USA.All of these are different Leaves. By the time you add all the permutations and combinations, there are easily 40 different kinds of Leave.And then there is the fact that for 40 years, we have been pooling a lot of our processes and sovereignty with many other nations. It took a long time to get all these entanglements set up. It takes time to do the untangling.And finally, only 51 point something % of voters wanted Leave. Only 37% of the electorate voted for Leave. Only a quarter of the population voted for Leave. The opinions and needs of the 75% who did not vote for LEave also have to be taken into account, and their rights protected.The last time we had a referendum which was won by 51 point something %, nothing was done*. The winners were left to go back to square one, and build a clearer case, and a more organised alliance for specifically what they wanted.It’s difficult. Difficult means time-consuming. And once we are out, there are going to be years more of this as we’ll have to start negotiating to get into the WTO. We’ll have to start negotiating with all the countries in the WTO. And countries outside it. And with the EU. Again.So even if there is a No Deal Brexit happens soon, the whole show is going to drag on for about 10 to 12 more years. And we’ll be on austerity+ throughout that time.* The Referendum on Devolution in 1979. The People got Devolution in the end. But via forming a broad coalition between all the pro-devolution parties, and groups and societies and organisations.)

There are already some good answers, and I have so far avoided answering due to the qualifier "most", but since I practiced "martial arts" for 45 years, and have been leading a group for 3 years devoted directly and almost strictly to SELF-DEFENSE there are a few ideas I can offer.Our goal at Austin Combatives & Self-Defense is to learn to "GO HOME SAFE".  Everything else is secondary.To do this we have adopted first a specific and explicit practice of "Avoiding Criminal Assaults" (most of this is detailed on our meetup discussion page ( Austin Combatives & Self-Defense Discussion)  so read that in addition to this post; also check my and other's posts on http://www.CombativesTrainingGro... Avoiding the assault all together is the VERY BEST self-defense technique -- just don't be there using such ideas as the "4 S rule":Avoid doing Stupid Things with Stupid People in Stupid Places at Stupid Times.(Seriously!)Next comes recognizing the threat in order to convince the criminal to pick another target while improving your tactical position should he continue his approach and attack.So many martial arts psignNow the previous ideas but few offer specific methods or actual drills so here is one idea with a drill:Learn this ditty:  Hands, Eyes; Shirt, Shoes;Hat, Tats.Then over the next week or so, everywhere you are go, RUN the ditty against EVERYONE you see -- in the grocery store look -- really SEE -- each person's hands then the eyes.  Look at their shirt and clothes all the way down to their shoes, and then look back to the top of their head (hat) and at all exposed skin for both actual tattoos and other signs.Most importantly in observing the 'skin' you are looking for SIGNS, such as not wearing a shirt in the dead of winter, wearing an overcoat in summer, flush or pallid skin that might indicate an altered state of mind, drugs, etc.And of course, people with actual tattoos are NOT automatically bad people any more than people of a particular race, color or whatever, but if someone has a "HATE" tattoo on their forehead then at least SOME TIME IN THEIR LIFE they had some pretty anti-social attitudes and you might not wish to stand next to that person until you get to know him better.Why do we start with HANDS? Generally the hands are the most dangerous thing and while a hand holding a weapon is obviously a potential threat, a hand hidden behind a leg or in a pocket (otherwise out of site) MIGHT represent an unknown threat, and it is something to which we will NEED to PAY ATTENTION.Do the drill on everyone -- store clerks and babies in carriages, old ladies, and anyone you see.  Obviously something who strikes you immediately as a potential threat or those that are 'too close' should get precedence, but in the DRILL PHASE we are EXPLICITLY NOT trying to decide who is a threat.We are TEACHING our unconscious to run the evaluation on everyone that we meet -- do it explicitly and consciously in the beginning and from time to time to improve the skill and enable the skill to be automated..Next comes exiting the area, or RUNNING if that is the appropriate response.We train this explicitly.  Don't give it lip service, but actually practice it.Someone grabs your shopping bags, purse, or other 'stuff' and almost everyone has a natural urge to hold on, pull back, and fight for 'stuff' without evaluating the threat or if there are additional accomplices behind your back.  (At a minimum, move OFFLINE, in a circle as described below) but consider throwing your 'stuff' down and running to safety.Our "Avoiding Criminal Assaults" material is given in some detail on the meetup discussion but here are the highlights:Raise your handsCircle at LEAST 90 degrees AROUND the threat (if possible)Use "Back OFF!"Using "Back Off" means that given time and space we will escalate our response in three steps (collapse these if the attacker is already too close) by saying:Please back off (can be entirely friendly or more stern depending on context)Back OFF! (Given like a military COMMAND -- as if you want a platoon of 40 your men to PAY ATTENTION.  It's LOUD but not a yell YET.)BACK OFF!!! (As loudly as you can yell with force and will - anyone within SIGHT SHOULD TURN AND LOOK of you didn't yell loudly enough.)What do we mean by "circle"?  We want to be at least as far away as we start from the threat, but at 90 degrees to his right or left and still facing him.  Imagine a big circle on the ground and move AROUND THE CIRCLE at least 1/4 of a full circle -- 90 degrees.Why?  We can see what is ahead and mostly to the sides of us.  We can't see initially what is behind us.Many criminals will work in pairs and his accomplice may be trailing you  while he (or she) merely causes you to stop and talk, help, or chat --  i.e, FIX YOU IN PLACE for an attack from behind.By circling you both avoid this surprise attack and you are able to see what was previously behind you.  There are quite a few other benefits as well, including getting offline of an immediate attack, making it clear to witnesses or video cams that we are NOT aggressing, forcing the threat to DECLARE intentions by tracking us and re-orienting, forcing the threat to kill his momentum as he turns to track, etc.We raise our hands so that at least IF there is an attack immediately we will have SOMETHING between the attackers weapons and our vulnerable body and head.If the threat continues to approach THROUGH our VERY BEST "Back OFF!" sequence we know KNOW that this is not just a potential problem but something that must be dealt with in order to GO HOME SAFE.We can now do one of a few basic actions including:RUN!Throw down our 'stuff' -- and RUN!Eye gouge, strike AND RUN!Deploy our own defensive tools (firearm, knife, pepper spray, etc.)You can likely eliminate 95+ percent of criminal attacks by doing just the techniques above.  It's not sexy or fun, but AVOIDANCE is the most effective technique.  ESCAPE comes next.After that, we are JUST BEGINNING to talk combat arts and self-defense techniques.  Notice we aren't yet fighting, shooting, cutting or doing any signNow combat techniques.Ok?  So now what?Find a group that wants to practice all of the above plus what to do when none of this works and the threat is still coming or you screwed up and never saw it in the first place.What do you look for in such a group beside the common goal of learning how to "GO HOME SAFE"?First and foremost, supportive people who will all take responsibility for sending everyone HOME SAFE FROM PRACTICE -- it does little good to sustain signNow injury in practice while trying to learn how to avoid injury.  You need a group of people who are NOT working for ego to 'see who is best' but rather to IMPROVE EVERYONE'S ABILITY to GO HOME SAFE.After that, the BIG SECRET is:You want a group that focuses on combatives skills and techniques that work:At full speedAgainst a fully resisting opponentAgainst an opponent who is TRYING TO WIN (within in the limits of everyone goes home safe from practiceThis is  and is an explicit part of Tom Sotis' AMOK! (rooted in knife work) and Scott Sonnon's 3D Performance Pyramid.Note also: this is not a contradiction with the idea that everyone is supportive -- you support you friends and training partners by helping them LEARN the techniques and then by honestly attacking once they are ready for oppositional testing.Only techniques that work at full speed under 'oppositional testing' can be expected to work in real combat.If your techniques don't work for YOU -- and not just the instructor or senior students -- then they are CRAP and must be either:Trained furtherModified to work for youDiscarded (possibly revisited when you improve your physical attributes)Where do you find such a group?My best advice is a group practicing either AMOK!, since they should be following the oppositional testing methodology or one of the groups on http://www.CombativesTrainingGro...  This is a free forum that is very non-commercial.  It's more or less a loosely organized "Group of Groups" that share the above philosophy of avoiding trouble and training using the OPPOSITIONAL TESTING methodology.It started in Central Texas but there are associated groups all over the US and even internationally.Many of these groups are using at least SOME of the AMOK! techniques for both empty hand defense against knives (or other weapons) and for using a knife to defend yourself.Note:  Statistically the BEST active defense against a criminal assault is with a firearm (and we train that as well), but not everyone is able or willing to carry a firearm and many are able to carry a knife or locate one in the environment (imagine being attacked by a criminal who breaks in while you are working in your kitchen.)This also brings up the point that "accessing is accessing" whether it means drawing a pistol, deploying a knife, using your pepper spray or even RUN FOREST RUN!I consider all of these to be forms of "accessing" since they all have similar requirements:  You must gain TIME and/or SPACE from the criminal in order to be successful.Many "gun folks" think that they can draw and shoot the attacker before he can damage or kill them, but OPPOSITIONAL TESTING (aka "Force on Force) with safety knives and Airsoft pistols disproves this myth time and time again:Against sudden and close criminal attack you must FIRST DEAL WITH THE IMMEDIATE THREAT before you try taking one of your hands out of the fray to signNow for a pistol.  Otherwise you might even kill the attacker but only as he cuts your throat or puts the knife in your liver.  For us, SUCCESS IS "GOING HOME SAFE" and not "winning a fight".  If you are in the next bed or morgue table from the criminal that is probably not really successful self-defense.What do you do if there is no existing training group in your area?Post a request for training partners and start one locally.Many of the groups use signNow portions of Systema, BJJ, Tony Blauer's methods, Scott Sonnon's etc.Personally, I have only two rules for what we use in Austin:It must work at full speed under oppositional testingYour partners much not be injured (pain is sometimes acceptable, injury is not)So what are so well known martial arts that typically approach this idea?Brazilian Jiu-Jutsu (BJJ) has the RIGHT IDEA in their reliance on "rolling" and "full speed" practice but they do have some issues in that little attention is payed to multiple opponents or to weapons.It's very hard to deal with either once you are on the ground grappling with an attacker.Krav Maga tries to offer some realism, but they have difficulty with true oppositional testing and many of the techniques require signNow time to learn and continuous practice to maintain -- but note, they are generally ahead of the typically McDojo Karate or Tai Kwon Do school.  ( Hey I started in TKD 45 years ago so it taught me a lot even so.)Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) has much of the desired methodology, but for all but enthusiasts it is going to be too damaging and doesn't typically deal with the defense against weapons issue - e.g., throw a knife into the Octagon and things change.Boxing at least teaches one to "take a hit" and "keep fighting" even though the rules and limited techniques are not the full spectrum we want to use for self-defense.  Remember: in a criminal attack where your life or your loved one's life is on the line, you cannot quit just because it hurts or you get a bloody nose.Boxing (and MMA) does help with this part of the training.A lot of the 'reality based' methods or knife disciplines are pretty good (cf. Tony Blauer or even Target Focused Training) but you pretty much have to take a paid seminar and then won't have a practice partner unless and until you start your own group.  I probably should include Haganah, either here or with Krav Maga but it too suffers from a lack of oppositional testing.Most of these have this issue:  Practitioners believe their techniques are GOING TO WORK and are shocked to find that REAL HUMAN BEINGS (i.e., the criminals) don't always go down when you hit them or cooperate when you try to joint lock them or take them down.Watch any boxing match to see just how hard it is, even for a professional boxer, to KNOCK SOMEONE OUT.Even when you strike to vulnerable targets (eyes, throat, etc.) you must DELIVER a QUALITY STRIKE.Most martial artists have not got a clue how to strike the eyes effectively even.  (It is simple to teach, but almost no arts ACTUALLY do that.)[The secret to teaching and learning such strikes is what I call "Proxy Targets".  We practice these strikes HARD and FAST against nearby relatively safe locations such as the forehead, chest/pectoral muscle.  Try hitting me with an 'eye' or 'throat' strike but aim for my upper chest to learn the distance, force, and most importantly the EFFECT of the strike.  When you do it correctly, I may feel pain, but will not be signNowly injured -- but you WILL SEE my structure affected and my balanced MOVED.]Should you learn to shoot and carry a firearm?  Yes, if:It's legal for you You are willing to take the responsibility for safetyYou will actually CARRY (or be able to access) the darn thingYou will train -- not just in "target shooting" or even in "defensive shooting" but also the AWARENESS, AVOIDANCE, and COMBATIVES to increase the odds that you can deploy the firearm effectively when it is needed.Note: over half the people that train empty hand and knife defense with me, also have a concealed carry/handgun permit/license (CCP, CHL etc.).Should you carry a knife?  Pretty much the same answers as above for a firearm except it is more likely to be legal and easier to KEEP on your person or nearby.What about pepper spray? Sure, but only if you realize it is NOT a fully effective defense but merely PART of the tools you might use.Pepper spraying a vicious dog will work far better than merely threatening the animal with a firearm, and who really wants to kill someone's dog just because it was not kept safely restrained?The firearm however is the most reliably defense, the knife second -- and much more so IF YOU TRAIN PROPERLY and will actually CARRY THEM.There is lots more so come practice and visit the forums to ask questions, or start your own group....-- HerbMYou don't pick your mugger; your mugger picks you.

Hey! Full disclosure: I work at Dashlane... But I really, really believe in our product. In fact, while Chrome is supposed to be the best browser-based form-filler, its accuracy rate is only about 50-60%. Dashlane fills online forms accurately at about 95%. We're free and can manage all your passwords (generate super-secure ones too), automate login, and store all your receipts when you buy. Plus, I really like the UX around our commerce form-filling: you can choose your credit card by how it looks when you fill in that information. Super-easy.

“Are shooting ranges and gun stores prone to cases of discrimination or prejudicial treatment of minorities?”I have never seen prejudicial treatment of minorities.The reverse, if anything. We are well aware that the OFWG stereotype hurts us politically, so anyone young, female, non-white will be actively encouraged to participate.Once upon a time, my NRA instructor group in the Seattle area tried to signNow out to the gay community. There had been some high-profile hate crimes and my chief instructor thought the outsignNow might be well received. We put on a few courses, and they seemed to go well, but eventually they developed their own instructor cadre (trained by us) and went their own way. This was about the time Pink Pistols was getting started; we may have had a small hand in it. Anyway, none of us OFWG had any problem with it - we all thought it was a good deed as well as clever politics.The only time we ever ejected a student for political reasons, he was a White Supremacist. He was an attentive student and seemed ordinary enough, until over lunch he told us about his compound in Idaho and how much we would enjoy the clean air and lack of diversity - plus they needed instructors to build up their militia arm. We ejected him and called the FBI - never heard if anything came of it.The only incident I can recall that could even be construed as bias was as follows: I was talking to a gun store owner in South-Central Virginia, an area with a high crime rate and a high racial disparity in crime rates (translated to plain language: lots of young black men shooting each other, dealing drugs, and committing robberies). He said that when any other sort of customer came in, he would be polite to him and let him handle the merchandise, but for a young black male customer, he would ask him to fill out Form 4473 before he even talked to him. 95% of them walked out at that point, with or without calling him a racist first. Those were the ones who couldn’t pass a background check, and lying on the form is a 10-year Federal felony. The ones that could pass the background check, he treated like royalty. You could call that bias, or you could call that acknowledging statistical reality. There is no point in wasting time with a customer who is 95% likely to be disqualified.

Generally, a claim against the National Archives must be filed by the person who suffered the damage, loss, or injury (or that person's representative). A claim based on death may be presented by the executor or administrator of the decedent's estate or other person legally entitled to assert such a claim.

Sovereign immunity has carried over to modern times in the form of a general rule that you cannot sue the government -- unless the government says you can. Fortunately, the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA") allows certain kinds of lawsuits against federal employees who are acting within the scope of their employment.

You must file within two years. You have two years from the time your claim arises to file your administrative claim with the appropriate federal agency.

How Long Do I Have to File a Governmental Tort Claim? A government tort claim in Michigan must be filed within the time limits set by law, which are: 120 days to file a formal claim regarding defects in a highway or public building. 6 months to file a formal claim against the state.

Standard Form 95. Standard Form 95 is used to present claims against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) for property damage, personal injury, or death allegedly caused by a federal employee's negligence or wrongful act or omission occurring within the scope of the employee's federal employment.