Position Description Form

This practice bums me out about recruiters farming references for business development opportunities. All jobseekers should hold off on providing references until they are well into the interviewing process. If references are required to start the process provide outdated numbers and names.

I believe that the job requirements most companies post are for their ideal candidate, someone who would perform flawlessly for a year or two before they’d have to promote them or lose them.In reality, some of the requirements are definitely flexible. If a position requires strong Excel skills, someone can have those without being a total expert in creating macros via Visual Basic. If a candidate knows 80% of a specific software package, that’s probably good enough as they can learn the rest on the fly.Some requirements aren’t flexible though. If you are doing customer service with Central and Southern American countries, you sure as hell had better speak fluent Spanish!In reality, companies usually know they aren’t going to get their ideal candidate, but the hope to get someone most of the way there.

No. WOTC is for your employment with the employer (so even if you change positions within the same employer, WOTC does not need to be filled again).It’s the same case as - if you were to get promoted (which you hopefully will, several times in coming years), then it’s a new position with the same employer :)

You've already gotten some great advice, which I won't repeat (emphasizing transferrable skills, etc). And hopefully these ideas will be enough to get you a great entry level HR job.If not, though, you may need to start thinking about other ways to gain hands-on experience.  How To Gain ExperienceTry one or all of the following:Volunteer in an HR capacity. So many small non-profits are in desperate need of HR assistance because they are too tiny to have their own HR professional. As an HR volunteer, you could write a handbook, create an employment application, draft policies, conduct hiring, assist with FMLA or worker's comp, implement a performance management system, etc. Wow! Talk about a great way to add real HR experience to your resume.Work for a non-profit where employees in unrelated fields wear HR hats. This method worked for me. I had a position in administration, but as time went on, I got to take over more and more recruiting/backup HR functions, until I was offered a position doing recruiting and HR full time.Intern in an HR department while maintaining a job in another field. No, it's not fun to juggle both at once, but internships, as well all know, can be great gateways to full-time employment in the field of your choice."Owning" ProjectsOnce you've secured one of these positions, go out of your way to prove your worth (as a newbie, you will do this by being respectful, learning the company culture and the preferences of your teammates, and not necessarily rocking any boats for a while).Then try to find projects you can own. Do this by looking for unmet needs and problems to solve. Does the agency have a handbook? If not, ask for permission to write one. Is there a performance management system? No? Ask to implement one. Create a company intranet. Organize the disastrous personnel files. Write a company policy on document retention procedure. Create an applicant database. You see where I'm going with this: (1) You're really helping the company/agency/non-profit that hired you and, (2) you're gaining concrete, hands-on experience.One caveat: as you present and implement your ideas, be sure to tread carefully. Be prepared to take "no" for an answer, or have someone watching you at every step.And.. viola... directly related HR experience! Combine that with a winning personality, some fantastic networking, mean cover letter writing skills, and a little bit of luck (okay, a lot), and you just might end up with the HR job of your dreams.

The minimum that I know people got accepted is from 450 to 470 points.Usually when you fill up the information it tells you straight up if you are in the pool or not.By experience Canada’a express entry system is THE WORST THING EVER happened to the Canada’s immigration. It is literally a nightmare! The portal crashes, and sometimes only open between midnight and 3am. You literally need to be the luckiest person to have it work normally. What is worst about it: Is that the Canadian government keeps on saying they will fix issues, and in the same time calling it the best system ever, where it is the worst system I have ever seen. NO technical support whatsoever.Good luck in your application.My advice also, Canada is not as it advertises. It s quite hard out there, and people are racist (not to your face, but we a smile and in their mind, which is to the worst).I do not recommend Canada as a land for immigration, but I recommend Canada for studying. Schools there are pretty multicultural, and you do not feel the racism only when you go in the labour market or create your company.

In this context, “unusually” means “extremely”. Unusual is not a negative, so the concept of a double negative does not apply.Unusually messy = you cannot see your bedroom floor due to the things strewn all over it. There might be some unfinished food under there somewhere, too…Messy = yeah, there’s a bunch of stuff laying around, but you can see the floor and tell where the furniture is.Neat = pretty much everything is put where it belongsUnusually neat = absolutely everything has a place and you would find it annoying and distracting to share a space with someone who was not the same way.

Electrons are the source of an electric field, something extends far beyond the electron itself. This electric field has a direction, just as gravity has a direction.  The direction is such that it tends to pull a proton.  Our convention is that the direction of the electron's field is inward, towards the nucleus. Protons also emit an electric field.  This field surrounds the proton. It too has a direction, but the proton electric field points outward. Then why does it attract an electron? Because the electron has a negative charge, so an outward field actually pulls in the electron.  Put a proton nearby, and the outward field repels the proton.Now if you take a proton, and surround it symmetrical with an electron (and that is what happens for the lowest energy state of a hydrogen atom), then both produce fields that point out from the center. But the two fields are in opposite directions, so they cancel.  Put a proton nearby, and the field of the electron will attract it, but the field of the other proton will repel it, and the two forces will cancel. Because the forces cancel, we say the atom is "neutral", although if you get inside it, it certainly isn't; indeed it is the positive charge of the proton nucleus that holds the electron in the atom.