Notice of Trial Form

It's best to ask homeschoolers in your state. Every state has different laws. What works in one may not work in another.This looks like the information you need: Notice of Intent (NOI)

While I don’t disagree with most of the other answers, they trouble me, so I’m going to give another lawyer’s view.You should absolutely, positively observe an appellate argument if you have the time and any casual or career-oriented interest in the Law. Before television in the 1960’s, middle class folks in DC used to get all dressed up in Sunday best and observe the (then) Court of General Sessions as daytime drama entertainment. It is not boring, though watching an arraignment docket or a session of traffic court could make you decide to go to med school instead. As we can see from the cases movie producers turn into TV dramas, appeals cases are often accessible entertainment.Pick carefully. Lawyers often debate this, but I agree with those who argue that the vast majority of appellate cases are decided before argument on the briefs. So, if you haven’t read the briefs, you might find the information inaccessible. But, federal briefs are often available on-line, and, if you call both sides’ lawyers and tell them you are a budding student, they might just email you a copy. Once filed, it isn’t privileged, and most lawyers have a special place in their hearts for inquisitive students. They haven’t the time to do that for trial-level cases, but preparing an appeal takes time, and sharing a brief in pdf form is cost-free and not a violation of privilege. The lawyer is probably proud of that brief, and he might even think re-publication will earn him a future client or associate. If you are interested in the substantive issue, read the briefs before the argument. If, OTOH, you are interested in argument form and semantics, just go watch. If you are really cute and you get a loose-lipped clerk, you might even ask if they know if one is coming up with someone who is really good.I recall once, a while back, I was retained after trial for an appeal of a matter heading to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond. The client was on a budget, as always, and he agreed that he’d be paying me for a drive down to Richmond, overnight in a hotel, argument in the morning, and a return drive that afternoon. The mail comes in, and I learn that my case has been moved to Raleigh-Durham, where there is no seat for the U.S. Court of Appeals. I call, because my client has not agreed to fund a round trip flight and what will probably mean an extra day out of the office. When I ask the clerk why my case is being moved, I am told that it is to be one of three cases that the court has chosen to be heard in the Moot Courtroom of Duke Law School. The clerk offers to ask the court to move mine back to Richmond, but he tells me that the court picked the three cases for the advocates and the issues to best illustrate appellate argument. I was, of course, quite excited, and I got the client to authorize the trip. We eventually took that case to the U.S. Supreme Court on an issue that is far more exciting to law students than it would be to an undergraduate student. But, there is much to learn about a career at Law, about practice of semantics, and about our judicial system by observing argument.Get there early and get one of the 60 seats.

What is relevant, is that you need a lawyer to do this successfully. Civil rights is an area of law that for practical purposes cannot be understood without training. The police officer will have several experts defending if you sue. Unless you have a lawyer you will be out of luck. If you post details on line, the LEO's lawyers will be able to use this for their purpose. You need a lawyer who knows civil rights in your jurisdiction.Don't try this by yourself.Get a lawyer. Most of the time initial consultations are free.

Don't know the answer to this question. I assume you are referring to New York City. I would assume that anybody moving to New York City now would have a lot of money. Either they are independently wealthy or they have been offered a very high-paying job in New York City. Or they are a young person and they have a come to live with their parents or another family member.

INQUEST: An inquest is a trial at which only the petitioner and, possibly, the child's attorney present evidence. An inquest occurs when a respondent defaults or if a respondent chooses to not participate in the hearing. ... All Family Court Judges in New York City were attorneys before becoming judges.

A reconquest review (AIR) is a hearing before the coroner where the interested persons and the coroner seek to plan for the final inquest. Whilst the majority of inquest hearings can be heard in less than a day (when dEvaling with uncomplicated or uncontroversial circumstances), some can be much more complex.

The inquest hearing itself often represents the culmination of many months of work in collating relevant documents, statements and reports. During the inquest hearing the coroner will call witnesses to give evidence. ... If there is a jury then it is the jury who will determine the conclusion at the end of the inquest.

An inquest is a hearing for the purpose of determining the amount of damages due on a claim. At an inquest, only the plaintiff is present because the defendant has failed to answer or appear in the action. At the inquest, the plaintiff must prove the allegations made in the complaint to the satisfaction of the Judge.

A legal inquiry into a death is held when its cause is unknown, violent or 'unnatural'. This 'coroner's inquest' is held in public and the coroner determines the cause of death. He or she does not have to establish why the death occurred, but only who the deceased was, how, when and where death occurred.