2017-2024 Form

For disability a deduction of ₹75,000/- is available u/s 80U.Rebate u/s87AFor AY 17–18, rebate was ₹5,000/- or income tax which ever is lower for person with income less than ₹5,00,000/-For AY 18–19, rebate is ₹2,500/- or income tax whichever is lower for person with income less than 3,50,000/-So, for an income of 2.8 lakhs, taxable income after deduction u/s 80U will remain ₹2,05,000/- which is below the slab rate and hence will not be taxable for any of the above said AY.For ITR,If doctor is practicing himself i.e. He has a professional income than ITR 4 should be filedIf doctor is getting any salary than ITR 1 should be filed.:)

The incidence of income tax in India is dependent upon the residential status of the person concerned ( the assessee ). Residential status is determined every financial year which is based on the number of days that individual has been present in India during the said financial year. To determine the residential status of an individual, section 6(1) prescribes two tests. An individual who fulfills any one of the following two tests is called Resident under the provisions of this Act. These tests are :(a) If he is in India during the relevant financial year for a period amounting in all to 182 days or more.(b) If he was in India for a period or periods amounting in all to 365 days or more during the four years preceding the relevant financial year and he was in India for a period or periods amounting in all to 60 days or more in that relevant previous year. The period of 60 days in this clause is extended to 182 days in the case of a seafarers or person leaving India for employment abroad and also in case of an individual being a citizen of India, or a person of Indian origin who being outside India, comes on a visit to India in any financial year. The determination of residential status is relevant because if a person is resident in India in any financial year as per above rule, his global income during that year becomes taxable in India. The period of 182 days need not be at a stretch. But physical presence for an aggregate of 182 days in the relevant previous year is enough.There is one more test to be applied if he is Resident in India during any financial year that is of `ordinarily resident’. To become an ordinary resident of India an individual has to fulfill both the following two conditions :(1) He has been resident of India (fulfilling at least one test given above) in at least 2 previous years out of 10 previous years immediately prior to the previous year in question.(2) He has stayed in India for at least 730 days in 7 previous years immediately preceding the previous year in question.If by the above test, a person is a Resident and Ordinarily resident in India during any financial year than his global income of that year becomes taxable in India. If a person is Resident but not Ordinarily resident in India in any financial year than his income which accrues or arises outside India will be liable to tax in India ONLY if it is derived from a business controlled in or a profession set up in India. Otherwise not.Coming back to question if the NRI returns to India and in the financial year of his return his stay in India during that financial year is more than 60 days and in the preceding four financial year his total stay in India is for 365 days or more or he is present in India during that financial year for 182 days or more than he is caught in the mischief of clause (a) or (b) above and his status will be Resident in India during that year making his global income earned during that particular year liable to tax in India. As far as his accumulated savings from his income earned during earlier years is concerned, it will not be liable to tax in India simply because it has been repatriated to India.The DTAA with other countries provides for relief to a taxpayer if an income becomes taxable in two jurisdictions, one on the basis of residence and the other on the basis of source or for any other reason. The relief would depend upon the nature of income, the country of source or residence and the provisions of DTAA. If the provisions of DTAA are more favourable to the assessee than the normal law than the provisions of DTAA which are more favourable to the assessee will be adopted.

If you are on International Building Code I believe the onus is on the city for maintaining CO records. They should have one for when the structure was built or replace it free of charge. If it didn’t have a CO how did the water get turned on?If you are talking a CO for a short term rental as opposed to a house then yes you are probably going to have to do code work for it. Biggest differences are going to be fire code. You also probably don’t have zoning for short term rentals. They have Airbnb just like everyone else.