Whither Patent Litigation in India? Iimahd Ernet Form

There are no special provisions for a director of a company. He should file the return on the basis of his income . If he is just earning salary ten ITR-1.~Sayantan Sen Gupta~

Thank you for asking me to answer your question.In India, the costs in a patent infringement suit typically depends on the complexity of the case including the subject matter claimed in the patent-in-dispute and duration of litigation.In India, a patent infringement suit can be filed before a District court in the appropriate jurisdiction by the plaintiff or before a High Court with original jurisdiction to try the suit. The suit is initiated by filing a plaint containing the facts of the underlying matter, grounds for alleged infringement, claims, arguments and relief sought. The plaint should be supported with documentary evidence. In case the defendant (alleged infringer) counterclaims revocation of the patent, the suit along with the counterclaim gets transferred to the High Court with jurisdiction to hear appeals from the district court. In addition to the filing of plaint alleging infringement of its patent, the patentee often files separately for interim injunctions against the alleged infringer.Thus, depending on complexity of matter in suit and duration of litigation, on an average cost of patent litigation in India can range from INR 5 million (approx. USD 68K) to INR 8 million ( approx. USD 108K ). Further, depending on the engagement of senior counsel to argue the matter, the cost may further increase.Just an additional information as to the remedies available to a patentee. The patentee may seek the following remedies in a patent infringement suit:the court can impose a temporary restraining order (temporary injunction) on the defendant until final disposal of the suit ;the court can issue a final restraining order (permanent injunction)on the defendant from carrying out activities constituting patent infringement in India;damages or account of profits;delivery up or destruction of infringing articles; orlegal costs.Hope you find the above information helpful.

Departments of education and school districts always have to make decisions about what to include in their curriculum.  There are a lot of life skills that people need that aren't taught in school.  The question is should those skills be taught in schools?I teach high school, so I'll talk about that.  The typical high school curriculum is supposed to give students a broad-based education that prepares them to be citizens in a democracy and to be able to think critically.  For a democracy to work, we need educated, discerning citizens with the ability to make good decisions based on evidence and objective thought.  In theory, people who are well informed about history, culture, science, mathematics, etc., and are capable of critical, unbiased thinking, will have the tools to participate in a democracy and make good decisions for themselves and for society at large.  In addition to that, they should be learning how to be learners, how to do effective, basic research, and collaborate with other people.  If that happens, figuring out how to do procedural tasks in real life should not provide much of a challenge.  We can't possibly teach every necessary life skill people need, but we can help students become better at knowing how to acquire the skills they need.  Should we teach them how to change a tire when they can easily consult a book or search the internet to find step by step instructions for that?  Should we teach them how to balance a check book or teach them how to think mathematically and make sense of problems so that the simple task of balancing a check book (which requires simple arithmetic and the ability to enter numbers and words in columns and rows in obvious ways) is easy for them to figure out.  If we teach them to be good at critical thinking and have some problem solving skills they will be able to apply those overarching skills to all sorts of every day tasks that shouldn't be difficult for someone with decent cognitive ability  to figure out.  It's analogous to asking why a culinary school didn't teach its students the steps and ingredients to a specific recipe.  The school taught them about more general food preparation and food science skills so that they can figure out how to make a lot of specific recipes without much trouble.  They're also able to create their own recipes.So, do we want citizens with very specific skill sets that they need to get through day to day life or do we want citizens with critical thinking, problem solving, and other overarching cognitive skills that will allow them to easily acquire ANY simple, procedural skill they may come to need at any point in their lives?

Obtain the forms. Read the forms. Add correct information.