Id10t 2002-2025 Form

Thanks for the question!My story is long, boring, and written about many, many times on here.I became homeless as my landlord illegally evicted me from my house. I was never behind in rent, always paid on time and made any necessary repairs out of my own pocket. He turned up one weekend with a “heavy” in tow and gave me an hour to get my stuff together and leave, or I would be forcibly ejected, and he wouldn't be gentle about it. That was his way of telling me to get out or get the shit kicked out of me.I spent months on the streets. I was cold, nearly starved to death and constantly had people jeering, spitting and yelling abuse at me.I would not wish that experience on my worst enemy.However, I learned where the local housing office was and made sure I turned up every single day. I was first in line when it opened and was the last one to leave at night, every day, without fail. You didn't need to do that. All you had to do was register for council housing, or for emergency accommodation, fill in a form and wait to be contacted when you were successful.I knew the chances of me being successful were less than zero. I had absolutely no chance, but I had nothing to lose. I made sure I put my name down for every single council house and flat available. I introduced myself to private landlords and applied for every one of those too (the council had a private renting programme whereby landlords could offer their homes to council tenants for a guaranteed rent, so many private landlords let their properties this way).Sometimes landlords would be rejected. It may be because they had previously failed inspections or because their properties were just too small (there was a minimum size for council properties at the time, not sure if there still is or not). Sometimes it was just because they were outside the catchment area for that council, so couldn't be accepted even if the property was suitable.I digress. One such landlady came in and I got talking to her while she was in the waiting room. This was the first time she had offered her flats and bedsits so she did t really know what to do. By this time, I had been there so long, I was an old hand and told her what she needed to do. I couldn't help as I didn't have access to any forms or suchlike, but could tell her which forms she needed to ask for.She filled out her paperwork and after a short while had an interview with one of the housing officers. She came out and said thanks to me, but her places were too small, but she wished me luck.I told her I didn't care what size they were, as long as they had 4 walls, a roof and a lockable door, I was more than interested. We went back to the desk, filled out some housing benefit forms and she took me to what was about to become my home for the next couple of years before I moved in somewhere even better.I've never looked back since.

I was a bit violent here, so I’ll not reveal my identity.But, some background first, I’m a buff male over 2 meters tall and back then I used to weight more than 100 kilograms. My weight is not composed of fat, it’s composed of muscle and generally I’m not someone you want to see yourself in a fight with, especially if you’re skinny/unarmed/not ready for a fight generally.I was with my mother in Paris, visiting her sister, or my aunt. We’re Irish and she lives there, because she’s married there.Unfortunately, we arrived far too early and my mother’s sister was not present just yet, we decided to eat in some Paris restaurant and I told my mother to go inside, order me whatever she orders for herself and I’ll be back, after I finish smoking my cigar.The waiter, a skinny dark-haired 19 year old boy refused to serve my Mom because she wanted to order in English, he refused service and when I entered the restaurant after my cigar, I heard him hurling insults at her, calling her a ‘Whore’, ‘English bitch’ and other insults. Unknown to him, and to everyone there, I am a certified French-English translator and I told him in English to serve the lady because she’s clearly not being impolite.He hurled insults at me too, calling me a ‘big fat ugly American’ (first time someone calls me an American). In that moment I grabbed him by his shirt and told him in French ‘I speak French too, maggot’. In that exact moment, he became pale and started sweating uncontrollably, he was not prepared for a fight and was afraid I could rip him apart, I simply told him in French ‘Call someone less of a bitch than you, and that can actually serve food’.It was my first time in Paris, and I would have never believed that Parisians would be so rude to foreigners. In other towns, the French were not only polite, but also helpful, but Parisiens (pardon my generalization) made me hate the city of Paris, and I hope I never visit that place again.

I give you, The World’s Fastest Stamper!That’s interesting, isn’t it?Like, she’s stamping those… things… really fast. It’s an efficiency unimaginable by normal means, right? A lot of Americans could learn a thing or two from her.But here’s the real question, what is she actually doing?Well, two things worth thinking about. One, while she’s amazing at what she does… a machine could have still done it faster, faster and more accurately. She missed 55–57. Not hating. Just saying. Two… she’s stamping. Stamps usually imply that a human has verified something with a firm and made a decision about it. That actually sort of explains why a machine isn’t doing it, but if she needs to place a stamp for some reason… why is it her job just to make stamps?I don’t know the true nature of what she’s doing, but it seems clear that she developed a unique level of mastery over a task that doesn’t actually need to be done.That’s the fundamental problem with bureaucracy… Creep.It forms as the simple pragmatic solution to some necessity of governance. Maybe it’s a need or a want, or just someone’s seemingly bright idea that people assume will help people.We need to make sure that people are _____ safely. Safety is important!That reasonable acknowledgement of a problem that may or may not exist, leads to someone coming up with a far less good way of solving the problem.So what about if, before people ever get the chance to ______, we make them have a _______ inspection, and we can decide if they are allowed to or not.But then a reasonably good idea always requires a little bit of extra hassle to make it work.So how do we know that had the ______ inspection? Have them fill out an ID-10T form. Then we’ll check the form and see what it says and they can do the thing they want.But if you make a task, then you create work for someone.Someone needs to look over these forms to verify that ______ has happened.Someone eventually realizes that there are so many forms that need to be inspected, that they start encouraging workers to move faster.We need to find ways to verify these forms faster.Then the bureaucracy begins to channel incentives to people based on the speed of processing the forms, rather than verifying whatever the forms are for.Alright everyone, we’ve brought an efficiency expert to give a special class on how to stamp forms faster! It should take your stamps per hour up 600%!At some point, it becomes clear that this isn’t an office to verify forms, or to make the world a safer place from the horrors of… whatever someone wanted to make more difficult to do… but an office whose entire purpose is stamping forms. That’s when the bureaucracy has broken down, because the purpose of the forms themselves have become lost.At that point, the bureaucracy is doing far more harm to the overall system then whatever good they gain from the “solution”. In the worst cases, whole functions are merely parasitical, taking far more resources to continue than good they bring about.We have to account for employee pay, who exactly are producing those forms, what losses are incurred by those who must fill them out, and even the costs to maintain the machine that prints out those inane forms in the first place.Sure, there is probably someone in charge of overseeing costs such as this, but that person too… is a bureaucrat.The problem is that bureaucracy itself isn’t wrong. There are pragmatic reasons for most jobs that have nothing to do with the actual purpose of the organization itself, far more valuable to the company than just pencil pushers. But, over time, every organization expands to the point that there are wasted processes too difficult to let go, but which people are afraid of what would happen without them. Other times, systems that make sense to absolutely no one, continue happening because of the power such a system puts in the hands of those that run it.Look, pretend there isn’t some times where people just want to make sure that you have to go through them with your ID-10T forms.Like the video example, however, bureaucracy has a way of making a failed system look like a productive one. You just can’t see that until it’s staring you in the face. Like a system that rewards and celebrates a person stamping forms at a few hundred a minute, there is a point where the people in charge have to take a step back and realize what they’ve created, a bloated monster that wastes people’s time, energy, and money, become the masters of a wasteful process, rather than a productive one. Worse, the more bureaucracy grows, the more corruption not only becomes likely, but the only way to get good work done.So the real answer of why bureaucracies are dirty words to some people, is that it is a process which always starts off well meaning, but requires constant supervision not to run away with itself. It’s a slippery slope, but when it finally falls off the cliff, it takes a lot of people with it. Eventually, it turns into a monster that prevents anything good from happening naturally. All that is because someone, usually someone with just a little bit too much self-righteousness themselves, thought it was a good idea to regulate something that no one else would, all in a way that put just a little bit too much power into their hands. When the best way to get things that most people would agree aren’t bad in and of themselves is to pay off bureaucrats or break the law, making decent people into criminals… that’s just a bad system.The problem with bureaucracy is that all organizations grow to eventually become those bad systems.To quote Oscar Wilde, “The bureaucracy is expanding to meet the expanding needs of the bureaucracy.”Relaxed. Researched. Respectful. - War Elephant

I was selected for a summer internship 2016.I tried to be very open while filling the preference form: I choose many products as my favorite products and I said I'm open about the team I want to join.I even was very open in the  location and start date to get host matching interviews (I negotiated the start date in the interview until both me and my host were happy.) You could ask your recruiter to review your form (there are very cool and could help you a lot since they have a bigger experience).Do a search on the potential team.Before the interviews,  try to find smart question that you are going to ask for the potential host (do a search on the team  to find nice and deep questions to impress your host). Prepare well your resume.You are very likely not going to get algorithm/data structure questions like in the first round. It's going to be just some friendly chat if you are lucky. If your potential team is working on something like machine learning, expect that  they are going to ask you questions about machine learning, courses related to machine learning you have and relevant experience (projects, internship). Of course you have to study that before the interview. Take as long time as you need if you feel rusty. It takes some time to get ready for the host matching (it's less than the technical interview)  but it's worth it of course.

Departments of education and school districts always have to make decisions about what to include in their curriculum.  There are a lot of life skills that people need that aren't taught in school.  The question is should those skills be taught in schools?I teach high school, so I'll talk about that.  The typical high school curriculum is supposed to give students a broad-based education that prepares them to be citizens in a democracy and to be able to think critically.  For a democracy to work, we need educated, discerning citizens with the ability to make good decisions based on evidence and objective thought.  In theory, people who are well informed about history, culture, science, mathematics, etc., and are capable of critical, unbiased thinking, will have the tools to participate in a democracy and make good decisions for themselves and for society at large.  In addition to that, they should be learning how to be learners, how to do effective, basic research, and collaborate with other people.  If that happens, figuring out how to do procedural tasks in real life should not provide much of a challenge.  We can't possibly teach every necessary life skill people need, but we can help students become better at knowing how to acquire the skills they need.  Should we teach them how to change a tire when they can easily consult a book or search the internet to find step by step instructions for that?  Should we teach them how to balance a check book or teach them how to think mathematically and make sense of problems so that the simple task of balancing a check book (which requires simple arithmetic and the ability to enter numbers and words in columns and rows in obvious ways) is easy for them to figure out.  If we teach them to be good at critical thinking and have some problem solving skills they will be able to apply those overarching skills to all sorts of every day tasks that shouldn't be difficult for someone with decent cognitive ability  to figure out.  It's analogous to asking why a culinary school didn't teach its students the steps and ingredients to a specific recipe.  The school taught them about more general food preparation and food science skills so that they can figure out how to make a lot of specific recipes without much trouble.  They're also able to create their own recipes.So, do we want citizens with very specific skill sets that they need to get through day to day life or do we want citizens with critical thinking, problem solving, and other overarching cognitive skills that will allow them to easily acquire ANY simple, procedural skill they may come to need at any point in their lives?

When Portuguese explorers first signNowed Asia (the first Europeans to do so in the Age of Exploration) it was after spending decades exploring the west coast of Africa and eventually figuring out how to sail around to the other side. By then they had ships with multiple decks of cannons.When they signNowed Asia, they encountered a massive Arab fort with way bigger cannons than what they had, so they moved on. Then they signNowed India.They were ready to claim the whole of India for Portugal, but couldn’t get near the coast. That’s because India had way bigger cannons than what the Portuguese had, and nearly blew them out of the water. The Portuguese had to flee for their lives.Finally, they found a port further south where they were allowed to land, but only after customs officials came on board to inspect the ships and make sure there was no gunpowder in the cannons.After they arrived in port there was some language confusion, but only for about 45 minutes. By then port official had found a Portuguese interpreter who could explain what sort of port fees and taxes they had to pay, and what forms they had to fill out.Slowly it dawned on the Portuguese that Europeans were just “country bumpkins” compared with India.

Obtain the forms. Read the forms. Add correct information.

For example, if the law requires at least 30 days' notice on a month-to-month rental, but your contract stipulates 60, you must give the renter 60 days to move out.

Tenant Move Out Inspection \u2013 What To Know Before They Go. ... However, most tenants leave behind some damage to the rental property. A tenant move out inspection is a way for the landlord to evaluate how much damage has been done, so they can deduct that from the security deposit.

Move-In Inspection Upon move-in, most landlords require that tenants pay a security deposit, which is money that a landlord may use to account for damages to the property or other tenant failures.

Foundation. Roof. Attic space. Rain gutters and downspouts. Exterior stucco or paint. Electrical panel, light switches, and power outlets. Thermostats and heating, cooling, and ventilation (HVAC) system. Plumbing fixtures, faucets, and water heater.

Be Honest with Inspector. ... Check Roof and Foundation. ... Check Drainage. ... Remove Clutter Around the Home. ... Make Sure Floors are Even. Monitor the Exterior. ... Check Electricity.