Signer/Reviewer Comments for SignNow
Award-winning eSignature solution
What signer and reviewer comments do
Signer/Reviewer comments are notes, questions, or approvals attached to a document during an eSignature workflow. They let signers, reviewers, and internal teams clarify terms, request changes, or document approval context before final execution. In signNow, comments can be added as part of the document review process, then preserved with the file history so the exchange is easier to track. For U.S. workflows, that record helps show intent, sequence, and participation without replacing the signature itself.
Why signer and reviewer comments matter
They reduce back-and-forth, speed approvals, and create a clearer record of document review. Under ESIGN and UETA, comments can support enforceability by helping show intent and process, although the signature and audit trail remain the legal core.
Common comment workflow issues
Comments can drift into informal edits, making it harder to tell what was approved and what still needs revision. Reviewers may leave feedback outside the document, which weakens the record and slows resolution. Multiple comment threads can create version confusion when teams do not lock the final draft before signing. Missing permissions can expose sensitive notes to the wrong audience, especially in regulated or client-facing workflows.
Where signer and reviewer comments fit
Internal teams
Legal, finance, healthcare, and real estate teams use comments to resolve document questions before signature.
External reviewers
Client-facing workflows use comments for approvals, corrections, and clarifications on contracts, forms, and disclosures.
People who rely on comments
A director of NetSuite operations at Xerox may use comments to route contract feedback, align approvals, and keep the final document tied to the right business context across integrated workflows. A founder at a property firm like Martin Properties may rely on comments to resolve lease questions, track revisions, and keep mobile signing organized for tenants, brokers, and internal reviewers.
Best ROI. Our customers achieve an average 7x ROI within the first six months.
Scales with your use cases. From SMBs to mid-market, airSlate SignNow delivers results for businesses of all sizes.
Intuitive UI and API. Sign and send documents from your apps in minutes.
Comment features that support review
Signer and reviewer comments help teams capture feedback, preserve context, and keep approvals organized inside one document flow.
Attached context
Comments stay attached to the document, so reviewers can follow the discussion without searching email threads or chat logs.
Faster review
Teams can resolve questions before signature, which reduces rework and prevents avoidable delays in approval cycles.
Clear record
A preserved comment history supports internal accountability and makes it easier to explain why a document changed.
Controlled access
Role-based access helps limit who can see or add comments during sensitive workflows.
Single workflow
Comments work alongside signing steps, so review and execution stay in one workflow instead of separate systems.
Review history
Document history keeps the review sequence visible, which helps teams confirm what happened and when.
How comment review flows
The review process follows a simple sequence from first note to final record retention.
Open document: A user opens the document and adds a comment or review note. Add comment: The note is attached to the file and visible to permitted reviewers. Review feedback: Reviewers respond, resolve, or request changes before signature. Save history: The final document keeps the comment history with the completed record.
Quick steps for using comments
Use a short review path to keep feedback organized and ready for signature.
Start review:
Open the document and identify the section that needs review. Add feedback:
Leave a clear note tied to the relevant clause or field. Respond clearly:
Reply only where a response is needed, and keep edits specific. Finalize draft:
Confirm the final version before sending it for signature.
Recommended comment workflow setup
Use a setup that supports review clarity, legal defensibility, and regulated recordkeeping in U.S. document workflows.
| Setting | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Authentication method | SMS OTP |
| Signature type | SES |
| Audit trail | Enable full event logging |
| Document retention | 6 years for HIPAA records |
| Encryption | TLS 1.2/1.3 and AES-256 |
Browser and device requirements
Signer and reviewer comments work in standard browser-based workflows and on mobile devices used for document review.
Desktop browsers Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and Safari Mobile devices iOS and Android mobile apps Operating systems Windows and macOS desktops
For enterprise use, managed Windows or macOS devices, current Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge browsers, and signNow mobile apps help keep review access consistent. Regulated teams should also confirm device policies, authentication controls, and retention settings before rollout.
Security controls for review records
Encryption:
Storage protection:
Security report:
Information security:
Healthcare compliance:
Privacy and trust:
Real-world comment workflow examples
These examples reflect how signNow customers use document review, approvals, and signing in practical business settings.
NetSuite operations
A NetSuite operations leader needed cleaner approval routing across document versions and business systems.
- Flexibility for the right signatures
- Integration with NetSuite reduced rework
At Xerox, signNow helped keep signatures aligned with the right documents and formats, which supported faster internal coordination and fewer handoff errors across integrated workflows.
Real estate founder
A property founder needed mobile execution, compliance, and a clearer way to manage document feedback.
- Mobile review and signing
- Built-in security and compliance
At Martin Properties, comments and signing worked together to keep lease and transaction documents moving while preserving a clear record for review, approval, and completion.
Best practices for cleaner reviews
A disciplined comment process keeps approvals clear, reduces disputes, and supports stronger records for U.S. business workflows.
Keep notes specific
Close review first
Restrict visibility
Retain the full record
FAQ about comment review issues
These answers focus on signNow features, plan tiers, and U.S. compliance rules that affect comment-based review workflows.
If comments are missing from the final file, check whether the document was completed before the review thread was saved. In signNow, the audit trail and document history should show the sequence of actions, and paid plans support retained records for later review.
If a reviewer cannot add notes, confirm that the user has permission to access the document and that the workflow is not locked for signature only. signNow plan controls and role settings determine who can review, comment, or only sign.
If HIPAA records are involved, use a signNow setup with a signed BAA and keep signed documents for 6 years under 45 CFR §164.530(j)(2). The platform’s audit trail and encryption controls support this workflow, but the covered entity still owns retention policy.
If you need stronger evidence for regulated records, use the audit trail, timestamps, and document history together. For FDA-regulated workflows, 21 CFR Part 11 expects secure, time-stamped audit trails and validated controls, not just a visible comment thread.
If a team wants more control over who sees feedback, use role-based access and document sharing rules. signNow supports controlled review workflows, and enterprise plans add advanced authentication options that help separate signers from reviewers.
If you need a lower-cost plan for basic review and signing, the Business plan starts at $8/user/mo billed annually. For bulk send, advanced authentication, or HIPAA add-ons, the Business Premium, Enterprise, or Site License tiers may fit better.
Comment workflow comparison
Major vendors support legally binding eSignatures in the U.S., but limits, pricing, and workflow controls differ by plan.
| signNow | DocuSign | Adobe Acrobat Sign | PandaDoc |
|---|---|---|---|
| Audit trail | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| HIPAA support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Bulk send | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Envelope limit | No cap | 100/year | Varies |
Rollout and retention timeline
This timeline combines rollout steps with retention facts that matter for regulated U.S. document workflows.
Day 0:
Day 1:
Week 1:
7-day trial:
HIPAA retention:
Part 11 records:
UETA adoption:
Annual review:
Risks of mishandled comments
Poor audit trail
Attribution failure
Missing BAA
Invalid records
Unclear approvals
What the audit trail captures
The audit trail records the technical evidence behind signer and reviewer activity, not just the visible comments.
Signer authentication:
Timestamp capture:
Document hashing:
Tamper seal:
Audit record:
Retrieval and export:
Pricing and core plan differences
Pricing below reflects verified entry-level plan data and published feature notes from the provided ground truth.
| Plan / Feature | signNow | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | PandaDoc | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $8/user/mo | $15/user/mo | $14/user/mo | $19/user/mo | $15/user/mo |
| Free trial | 7 days | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified |
| Bulk send | Yes | Yes | Not verified | Yes | Not verified |
| Audit trail | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| HIPAA compliance | BAA required | BAA available | BAA available | Not verified | Not verified |
Key performance indicators that demonstrate SignNow's proven track record.