Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

18 USC 2314 - U.S. Code Title 18 Crimes and Criminal

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

68.1 Interstate Transportation Of Stolen Property 18 USC § 2314

Title 18, United States Code, Section 2314, makes it a Federal crime or offense for anyone to transport, or to cause to be transported in interstate commerce, property which has been stolen [converted] and has a value of $5,000 or more.

The Defendant can be found guilty of that offense only if all of the following facts are proved beyond a reasonable doubt:

First: That the Defendant transported or caused to be transported [transmitted] [transferred], in interstate commerce, items of stolen [converted] property as described in the indictment;

Second: That such items had a value of $5,000 or more;

Third: That the Defendant transported the items willfully and with knowledge that the property had been stolen. The word "stolen" includes any wrongful and dishonest taking of property with the intent to deprive the owner of the rights and benefits of ownership. [The word "converted" means the unauthorized exercise of control over the property of another inconsistent with the owner's rights.]

The word "value" means the face, par, or market value, or cost price, either wholesale or retail, whichever is greater.

It does not matter whether the Defendant stole the property or someone else did, but to find the Defendant guilty, you must find that the Defendant knew it had been stolen.

The term "interstate commerce" includes any movement or transportation of goods, wares, merchandise, securities or money from one state into another state, the District of Columbia, and any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States.

ANNOTATIONS AND COMMENTS

18 USC § 2314 (first paragraph) provides:

Whoever transports, transmits, or transfers in interstate or foreign commerce any goods, wares, merchandise, securities or money, of the value of $5,000 or more, knowing the same to have been stolen, converted or taken by fraud [shall be guilty of an offense against the United States].

Maximum Penalty: Ten (10) years imprisonment and applicable fine.

The language "or caused to be transported," although not found in the first paragraph of the statute, has been expressly allowed by United States v. Block, 755 F.2d 770 (11th Cir. 1985).

In United States v. LaSpesa, 956 F.2d 1027, 1035 (11th Cir. 1992), the Eleventh Circuit held that 18 USC § 2314 prohibits interstate wire transfers of stolen money. In United States v. Baker, 19 F.3d 605, 614 (11th Cir. 1994), the Eleventh Circuit held that the substitution of "stolen or taken by fraud" for "stolen" in the jury instructions was allowable under the statute, where the property in question was taken by fraud.

The definition of State taken from 18 USC § 2313(b), also referred to in definition of interstate commerce 18 USC § 10.

Prepared By:

Date:

Signature:

Printed Name:

Enter text✕

What 18 USC 2314 Covers and why it matters

18 U.S.C. §2314 makes it a federal offense to transport, transmit, or transfer in interstate or foreign commerce any goods, wares, merchandise, securities or money valued at $5,000 or more when the defendant knows the property was stolen, converted, or taken by fraud. Prosecutors rely on the statute where interstate movement creates federal jurisdiction; defenses commonly target value, knowledge, or the interstate nexus. The statute supports both indictments and information-based prosecutions in federal court and can trigger forfeiture and restitution claims in related proceedings.

Why understanding 18 USC 2314 matters for cases and compliance

18 U.S.C. §2314 creates federal exposure whenever criminally obtained property crosses state lines and meets the statutory value threshold; that jurisdictional hook can elevate local theft matters to federal prosecution and affect corporate loss response and evidence preservation.

Why understanding 18 USC 2314 matters for cases and compliance

Who consults this statute and when

Federal prosecutors, defense counsel, compliance officers, and investigators commonly reference 18 U.S.C. §2314 when interstate transport or shipper involvement is present.

  • Federal prosecutors assessing interstate jurisdiction and evidence sufficiency
  • Defense attorneys evaluating value, knowledge, and interstate nexus defenses
  • Corporate compliance and loss-prevention teams documenting shipments and chain of custody

Understanding the statute guides charging decisions, preservation priorities, and corporate incident response when property might cross state or international lines.

Step-by-step checklist to evaluate a potential §2314 matter

Follow these core steps to assess whether federal transportation-of-stolen-property charges are appropriate and what evidence to preserve.

  • 01
    Confirm value: Verify item(s) meet $5,000 threshold.
  • 02
    Document interstate nexus: Collect carrier, shipment, and tracking records.
  • 03
    Establish knowledge: Preserve emails, messages, and admissions indicating awareness.
  • 04
    Coordinate with AUSAs: Contact the U.S. Attorney's Office early for charging guidance.

Frequently asked questions about 18 USC 2314

Answers to common legal and practical questions about charging elements, evidence, jurisdiction, and defenses under 18 U.S.C. §2314.


Need help? Contact support

Penalties, collateral consequences, and litigation risks

Imprisonment: Up to 10 years' imprisonment.
Fines: Potential substantial federal fines.
Restitution: Court-ordered restitution to victims.
Forfeiture: Forfeiture of proceeds and instrumentalities.
Civil exposure: Related civil suits for conversion or fraud.
Professional impact: Licensing or employment consequences possible.

Common evidence and charging pitfalls to avoid

  • Failing to document the shipment origin, destination, or carrier undermines the interstate element.
  • Relying on approximate or unsupported valuations can defeat the $5,000 threshold.
  • Neglecting to preserve communications or chain-of-custody records weakens proof of the defendant's knowledge.
  • Charging without AUSA consultation can overlook related forfeiture or jurisdictional considerations.

Critical factual elements investigators must secure

Property Type: Goods, money, securities
Monetary Value: $5,000 or more
Interstate Nexus: Proof of cross-state movement
Knowledge: Evidence of awareness of theft
Date/Time: Shipment and transfer dates
Chain of Custody: Detailed handling log

Typical investigative and charging flow for transportation offenses

This sequence summarizes how evidence and procedural steps move from discovery to federal charging for interstate stolen-property matters.

  • Report and intake: Victim or company reports theft; complaint recorded.
  • Evidence collection: Preserve shipment records and communications.
  • AUSA review: U.S. Attorney evaluates federal elements.
  • Charge or referral: Indictment, information, or declination issued.

How agencies and counsel typically structure evidence and filings

Organize investigative artifacts and legal workstreams to support federal charging and preserve admissibility for trial.

Document Location | Purpose
Investigation Law enforcement | Collects physical and digital evidence
Forensic Review Forensics lab | Validates serial numbers and timestamps
Prosecutor Review U.S. Attorney | Determines federal charging viability
Court Filing Federal clerk | Indictment or information processing

Digital evidence formats and technical considerations

Preserve native files, carrier logs, and metadata in tamper-evident formats to support interstate transport proofs and chain of custody.

  • Accepted formats: PDF, DOCX, native images
  • Metadata: Retain original timestamps
  • Integrations: Support for leading storage providers

Timing rules and preservation deadlines to observe

Key federal timing rules and preservation triggers relevant to prosecution, discovery, and statute of limitations.

Statute of limitations:

Five years for most non-capital federal offenses (18 U.S.C. §3282)

Evidence preservation:

Preserve until case resolution and appeal exhaustion

Discovery response:

Follow Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure deadlines

Forfeiture filings:

May follow separate civil filing timelines

Administrative holds:

Initiate immediately on learning of potential federal interest

Sequential milestones from investigation to federal disposition

Typical milestones in a federal transportation-of-stolen-property matter, listed in the order they commonly occur.

01

Initial Report

Victim or company reports theft; law enforcement opens file.

02

Evidence Lockdown

Carrier logs, tracking, and communications are preserved.

03

AUSA Assessment

U.S. Attorney evaluates elements and federal interest.

04

Charging and Resolution

Indictment/information, plea, trial, or declination completes case.

Essential components of a strong charging or investigative packet for §2314

Assemble a packet that clearly shows each statutory element with corroborating documents and a clear chain of custody.

Count language

A clear charging count citing 18 U.S.C. §2314 with the specific statutory language and statutory value threshold articulated for the court record.

Itemized property list

A detailed inventory of each item seized or traced, including serial numbers, descriptions, and any unique identifiers linking property to victims.

Valuation evidence

Invoices, market valuations, receipts, or expert appraisal documentation demonstrating the $5,000 or greater value threshold necessary for federal jurisdiction.

Interstate nexus records

Carrier bills of lading, tracking logs, shipping manifests, and origin/destination records establishing movement across state or international borders.

Knowledge documentation

Communications, transaction irregularities, or admissions that tend to show the defendant knew the property was stolen, converted, or fraudulently obtained.

Custody chain

Logs and receipts showing each handler, time, and location for the property from seizure through trial to support admissibility.

How 18 U.S.C. §2314 compares with related federal offenses

A concise comparison highlighting key differences between §2314 and a closely related federal provision to aid charging analysis.

Criteria 18 U.S.C. §2314 18 U.S.C. §2315
Offense focus transport stolen property possession of stolen property
Value threshold $5,000 or more $5,000 or more
Interstate element required (transport) not required (possession)
Typical context shipping/transport cases receiving, storing, or selling cases

eSignature vendor comparison for preparing and sharing case documents

Common eSignature plan features and starting prices ranked with signNow first; use this for selecting a platform to collect, authenticate, and archive investigative or administrative documents.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial 7-day free trial Varies by vendor Varies by vendor Varies by vendor Varies by vendor
Bulk Send Yes (Business Premium) Varies by vendor Varies by vendor Yes Varies by vendor
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Envelope Cap No cap 100 envelopes/user/year Varies Varies Varies

Typical professionals who prepare or rely on §2314 materials

U.S. Attorney — Prosecutor

Federal prosecutors assemble evidentiary packets, evaluate interstate nexus and valuation, and decide whether to present charges to a grand jury or file an information in federal court.

Defense Counsel — Criminal Lawyer

Defense attorneys analyze value calculations, question chain-of-custody or knowledge evidence, and negotiate pleas or pursue pretrial motions to suppress weakly documented interstate elements.

Real-world scenarios — how courts and practitioners approach §2314 issues

Two concise scenario examples that show the statute's practical application and common evidentiary focuses.

Scenario 1

A retailer reports missing high-value electronics traced to an out-of-state shipping manifest

  • Carrier tracking links packages across state lines
  • Prosecutors build a case using tracking records, purchase invoices, and text messages suggesting the defendant knew the goods were stolen, supporting a §2314 charge.

Scenario 2

A reseller purchases bulk goods later identified as stolen without clear provenance

  • Records show interstate carriage from the original location
  • Defense argues lack of knowledge; prosecution relies on suspicious pricing and inconsistent invoices to prove knowledge and meet the $5,000 threshold.

Best practices for investigators, counsel, and compliance teams

Practical recommendations to strengthen evidence for federal transportation-of-stolen-property matters and minimize procedural risks.

Preserve original records
Secure carrier manifests, bills of lading, and native digital files immediately; preserve metadata and avoid converting originals to lossy formats to maintain admissibility.
Document valuation rigorously
Support dollar values with invoices, appraisals, or market data; document methodology to preempt challenges to the $5,000 threshold.
Record communications
Collect texts, emails, and transaction logs that tend to show knowledge or intent; contemporaneous records carry higher evidentiary weight.
Coordinate early with prosecutors
Engage the U.S. Attorney's Office early to confirm federal interest, identify necessary evidence, and align preservation and disclosure practices.
be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users