Can these views be signed electronically?

Yes. Electronic signatures are legally recognized under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA where adopted. Ensure signer intent, consent to e-records, attribution, and retention to meet the four-part ESIGN test.

When is notarization required?

Notarization depends on document substance and local rules. If a permitting authority or contract requires notarized attestations, follow state notary requirements or use Remote Online Notarization where permitted.

What file formats should I provide?

Provide a print-ready PDF for records, high-resolution images for presentations, and DWG/IFC/OBJ exports for contractors so recipients can access the format appropriate to their role.

How do I update a submitted package?

Issue a new revision with a higher revision number and effective date, track changes in the metadata, and circulate the updated file with a changelog to all prior approvers.

Is a simple image signature sufficient?

A drawn or image-based e-signature is acceptable under ESIGN/UETA when combined with an audit trail that demonstrates signer intent and attribution; use stronger authentication for high-risk approvals.

How do I protect sensitive project data?

Use TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit and AES-256 at rest, limit access by role, and require BAAs for health-related projects to meet HIPAA obligations when PHI is present.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Miscellaneous
Architectural 3D Views Template

Architectural 3D Views Template

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

ARCHITECTURAL 3D VIEWS AGREEMENT

This Agreement is entered into by and between Client Name: with address: and Service Provider Name: with address: .

Effective Date: Month Day Year

WHEREAS

WHEREAS, Client desires to obtain three-dimensional visualizations and related deliverables depicting architectural designs for the Project described herein; and

WHEREAS, Service Provider represents that it has the professional skills, expertise and technical resources to prepare 3D views, renderings, and related presentation materials in accordance with the terms of this Agreement; and

WHEREAS, the parties desire to set forth their respective responsibilities, deliverables, compensation and other terms governing the provision of Architectural 3D Views.

SCOPE OF WORK

Service Provider shall, in accordance with professional standards, prepare and deliver the following design visualization services for the Project: 3D exterior views, 3D interior perspectives, photorealistic renderings, plan-overlay views, basic animation flythroughs (if specified), and associated still image files.

Detailed Scope and Deliverables Deliverable File Formats (select applicable)

JPG PNG TIFF OBJ/FBX Native project files

SCHEDULE AND REVISIONS

Milestone 1 — Initial concept views due within days after Effective Date. Number of revision rounds included: . Additional revisions beyond included rounds will be billed as set forth below.

Additional Schedule Details

PAYMENT TERMS

Total Fee: $ . Client shall pay a non-refundable deposit of $ (representing ).

Payment Schedule / Milestones

Late Fee: Any undisputed invoice not paid within days shall incur interest of or the maximum permitted by law, whichever is lower.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; LICENSES

Ownership of Final Images: Upon full payment of all amounts due, Service Provider assigns to Client a non-exclusive, perpetual license to use final delivered images for the Project’s marketing, permitting, and construction purposes as identified in this Agreement. Service Provider retains copyright in original source files and reserves the right to reuse general techniques, workflows and non-identifying elements in other projects.

Third-Party Assets: Client warrants that it has the right to provide any third-party logos, proprietary materials or licensed content. Client indemnifies Service Provider against claims arising from Client-provided content.

CONFIDENTIALITY

Each party shall maintain in confidence Confidential Information disclosed by the other party and shall not disclose such information to third parties except as necessary to perform under this Agreement or as required by law. Confidential obligations shall continue for years from the Effective Date.

TERM AND TERMINATION

Term: The term of this Agreement begins on the Effective Date and continues until completion of the Deliverables unless earlier terminated in accordance with this section. Expected completion date: Month Day Year .

Either party may terminate this Agreement for material breach if the other party fails to cure the breach within days following written notice. Upon termination, Client shall pay Service Provider for work performed to the date of termination, including reasonable costs for work-in-progress and non-cancellable obligations.

WARRANTY; LIMITATION OF LIABILITY

Service Provider warrants that deliverables will materially conform to the Scope of Work. Except as set forth herein, deliverables are provided without other warranty, express or implied. In no event shall either party be liable for indirect, incidental, special or consequential damages. The total liability of Service Provider for direct damages arising from this Agreement shall not exceed the total fees paid by Client to Service Provider under this Agreement.

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR; SUBCONTRACTING

Service Provider is an independent contractor. Service Provider may engage subcontractors provided that Service Provider remains responsible for performance under this Agreement and for ensuring subcontractors adhere to confidentiality obligations.

GOVERNING LAW; DISPUTE RESOLUTION

This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of . Any dispute arising under this Agreement shall be resolved by good-faith negotiation between the parties. If unresolved, disputes shall be submitted to binding arbitration in the agreed jurisdiction unless otherwise mutually agreed in writing.

ENTIRE AGREEMENT

This Agreement, including any attachments or exhibits referenced herein, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous agreements, representations, and understandings, whether written or oral. Any amendment must be in writing and signed by both parties.

NOTICES

Notices shall be in writing and delivered to the addresses set forth above or to such other address as either party designates in writing. Notice is effective upon personal delivery, certified mail, or confirmed electronic delivery if acknowledged by recipient.

Client Name:

By:

Date:

Service Provider Name:

By:

Date:

What the Architectural 3D Views Template Is and When It’s Used

The Architectural 3D Views Template is a reusable document and file package used to present rendered, dimensioned, and annotated three-dimensional visuals of a building, space, or component. It typically combines high-resolution renderings, orthographic views, material schedules, scale indicators, and metadata so reviewers, clients, and permitting authorities can evaluate design intent, materials, and spatial relationships without opening native modeling files. The template is formatted for review cycles, permitting submissions, client approvals, and archival so teams can maintain version control and a clear audit trail of design decisions and sign-offs.

Why a Standardized Template Matters for Design Reviews

A consistent 3D views template reduces miscommunication between architects, clients, and contractors, speeds review cycles, and creates a clear record of approvals and revisions for project governance.

Who Typically Creates and Signs 3D View Packages

Use the template to standardize handoffs and ensure each stakeholder reviews the same annotated views, reducing rounds of rework and clarifying who signs off at each stage.

Design firms and architects preparing presentation-grade views for client approval and permit submission.
Developers and real estate owners reviewing massing, material choices, and marketing visuals.
Contractors and engineers verifying constructability and coordinating dimensions with shop drawings.

Who Has Authority to Sign

Lead Architect

The licensed architect of record or their authorized signatory signs to confirm design intent and compliance with applicable codes; this signature is a professional attestation and may carry legal responsibility under contract and state practice acts.

Project Owner

The owner or authorized representative signs approvals and change orders to authorize budget, scope, and release-to-construction actions; owner signature typically triggers downstream procurement and permitting activities.

Essential Components to Include in a Professional 3D Views Template

A thorough template balances visual clarity, technical metadata, and version control so reviewers can assess aesthetics and compliance without ambiguity.

Rendered Perspectives

High-resolution perspective images showing materiality, context, and lighting with camera notes (focal length, exposure) so reviewers understand visual conditions and can reproduce or adjust views reliably.

Orthographic Views

Scaled plan, elevation, and section views extracted from the model with dimension callouts and grid references to support contractor measurements and permit review.

Material Schedule

A concise table listing finishes, product codes, manufacturer, color references, and sample board links so procurement and permitting teams can verify compliance and lifecycle attributes.

Annotations & Callouts

Clear labels for critical assemblies, tolerances, and interfaces with references to drawing numbers or detail sheets; use consistent leader styles and legends for readability.

Metadata & Versioning

File naming, model version, creation date, and author information embedded in the template to ensure traceability and prevent use of outdated views on site.

Export Options

Standardized export presets for PDF, raster images, and model exchange formats so recipients can open views without proprietary software; include print-ready and web-optimized variants.

Step-by-step: Complete and Issue the 3D Views Package

Follow a repeatable sequence to prepare, verify, and send 3D views for review or approval.

01

Prepare Views: Export required perspectives and orthographics from the model and assemble into the template.
02

Populate Metadata: Fill project name, revision, author, and effective date fields before circulation.
03

Internal QA: Run a checklist review for dimensions, annotations, and material callouts to catch errors.
04

Distribute for Approval: Send to stakeholders with clear reviewer deadlines and versioned filenames to prevent confusion.

Where to Send or File the Completed Template

Decide target recipients and storage locations before issuing the package to maintain compliance and a clear audit trail.

Client Review: Email or share via project workspace for client feedback and sign-off.
Contractor Coordination: Provide to lead contractor and subteams to verify constructability and prefabrication needs.
Permit Submission: Package required views and metadata for municipal permit portals or plan examiners.
Project Archive: Store final signed package in the official project document repository for recordkeeping.

Typical Digital Workflow Settings for Online Review

Configure your review platform with authentication, templates, and notification rules to streamline reviews and approvals.

Field	Configuration
Signature Field	Visible signature block with signer name and date required
Authentication	Email link by default; use SMS code or ID check for higher assurance
Conditional Fields	Show additional checkboxes when scope changes to capture approvals
Automated Reminders	Enable 3 reminders at set intervals to keep reviewers on schedule

Distribution Channels and Integration Considerations

Use platforms that preserve metadata, provide versioning, and integrate with document repositories to reduce manual filing errors.

File Formats: Support for PDF, DOCX, DWG, OBJ
Integrations: Connectors for NetSuite, Salesforce, Microsoft 365
Security: TLS in transit; AES-256 at rest

Export and Save Options to Include with Each Package

Provide multiple export variants so recipients can view prints, high-res images, or native model extracts as needed.

Print-Ready PDF

Assemble annotated views into a single, print-ready PDF with embedded metadata and page numbering for permit sets and client distribution.

High-Resolution Images

Export perspective renders at 300 DPI for marketing and presentation boards where visual fidelity is critical.

Model Exchange

Provide DWG/IFC or OBJ exports for contractors and fabricators needing dimensional data for shop drawings.

Web Viewer Package

Include a web-optimized folder or viewer link with lightweight imagery and embedded annotations for easy stakeholder review.

Common Mistakes to Avoid When Preparing 3D Views

Missing version metadata leads to multiple teams working from different sets and increases rework and RFIs.
Low-resolution exports obscure material details, causing approval delays or incorrect procurement orders.
Omitting scale or dimension callouts forces contractors to estimate sizes and risks costly site corrections.
Using inconsistent annotation styles confuses reviewers and slows the QA process during permitting or client sign-off.

Risks of Incomplete or Incorrect 3D View Submissions

Permit Rejection: Incomplete or inconsistent drawings can cause municipal plan examiners to reject permit submissions, delaying construction.

Contractual Delay: Missing approvals can halt work and trigger schedule penalties under contract terms.

Cost Overruns: Incorrect dimensions or materials lead to rework and increased procurement costs.

Liability Exposure: Professional attestations without accurate data can create legal risk for the licensed architect.

Data Breach: Unsecured transfers of files expose IP and client data, potentially triggering privacy obligations.

HIPAA Concern: If healthcare facility plans include PHI, HIPAA compliance and a BAA may be required.

Typical Timelines and Expected Turnaround for Review Cycles

Set clear deadlines for each review stage to align stakeholders and reduce iteration time.

Client Review Window:

5–10 business days is typical for initial feedback depending on scope.

Internal QA Time:

2–3 business days to complete an internal checklist before circulation.

Permit Processing:

30–90 days depending on municipality workload and scope of review.

Revision Turnaround:

7–14 days for moderate changes; larger revisions may take longer.

Archival Deadline:

Store the signed package within 30 days of final approval for recordkeeping.

Key Project Milestones from Draft to Signed Package

A sequential milestone list clarifies responsibilities and when approvals must occur during the design cycle.

01

Draft Preparation

Model exports and initial render set assembled for QA checks.

02

Internal QA

Technical review for dimensions, callouts, and materials before external sharing.

03

External Review

Client, contractor, and authority reviews with documented comments and deadlines.

04

Final Sign-off

Authorized signatures gathered and final package archived with version metadata.

Configure Signoff Workflow Settings for Electronic Approval

Define roles, authentication, and routing so approvals are captured consistently and stored with an audit trail.

Field	Configuration
Signer Order	Set sequential or parallel signing depending on contractual flow
Authentication Method	Choose email link, SMS code, or ID verification as required
Reminder Rules	Enable automated reminders with configurable intervals
Storage Location	Select project repository and retention policy

Comparison: eSignature Vendors for Approving 3D View Packages

Vendor pricing and features vary; the table summarizes common buying criteria useful when selecting an eSignature provider for document approvals.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	Varies by vendor	Varies by vendor	Varies by vendor	Varies by vendor
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No
Envelope Cap	No cap	100 envelopes/user/year	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan

Practical Examples from Firms That Use Digital Approval Workflows

Real-world users report faster turnaround and clearer audit trails when combining templates with eSignature-enabled distribution.

Martin Properties — Founder

Tim Martin needed remote approvals for off-site deals and marketing assets.

The team processed presentations online and captured sign-offs.
"I can process and execute all of these documents online with 100% compliance and built-in security. Whether on mobile or working offline, I can get forms back to their necessary parties efficiently."

Optica Ventures — COO

A small development firm standardized view packages for investor review.

Designers and investors reviewed the same version online.
"The interface is simple and easy-to-use for our team; more importantly, it is just as easy for our customers."

FAQs and Troubleshooting for the Architectural 3D Views Template

Answers to common questions about signing, notarization, file formats, and version control for 3D view packages.

Need help? Contact support

Can these views be signed electronically?
Yes. Electronic signatures are legally recognized under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA where adopted. Ensure signer intent, consent to e-records, attribution, and retention to meet the four-part ESIGN test.
When is notarization required?
Notarization depends on document substance and local rules. If a permitting authority or contract requires notarized attestations, follow state notary requirements or use Remote Online Notarization where permitted.
What file formats should I provide?
Provide a print-ready PDF for records, high-resolution images for presentations, and DWG/IFC/OBJ exports for contractors so recipients can access the format appropriate to their role.
How do I update a submitted package?
Issue a new revision with a higher revision number and effective date, track changes in the metadata, and circulate the updated file with a changelog to all prior approvers.
Is a simple image signature sufficient?
A drawn or image-based e-signature is acceptable under ESIGN/UETA when combined with an audit trail that demonstrates signer intent and attribution; use stronger authentication for high-risk approvals.
How do I protect sensitive project data?
Use TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit and AES-256 at rest, limit access by role, and require BAAs for health-related projects to meet HIPAA obligations when PHI is present.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now