Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

Application for Assessment of Patient's Decision-Making Capacity

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Medical Report

Purpose

A person who you have assessed and/or treated in a professional capacity (your patient) is the subject of an application before the State Administrative Tribunal (the Tribunal).

The Tribunal is required to determine your patient’s capability to make financial and personal decisions.

Your patient is presumed to be capable of making their own decisions unless the Tribunal determines that they are unable to do so.

The purpose of this form is to enable you to provide your views about your patient’s capability to make decisions in advance of the hearing. This information is essential as it allows the Tribunal to determine the application and to make decisions in your patient’s best interests.

Confidentiality

The information you provide about your patient is part of the information relied upon by the Tribunal to determine the application. It may be necessary for the Tribunal to disclose the information you provide to your patient and other interested parties to the proceedings.

Parties may be authorised to inspect documents held on file by the Tribunal, however they are not entitled to receive copies of documents. Parties are obliged to refrain from disclosing the contents of such documents to anyone else.

Parties who attend the hearing will be informed that you have provided this information at the request of the Tribunal.

Medical Professional Details

Full name:

Qualifications:

Agency or practice:

Address:

Telephone number:

Fax number:

Email address:

Patient Information

Full name:

Gender:

Date of birth:

Date you last saw your patient:

Number of times you have seen your patient in the past 12 months:

Length of time you have known your patient:

Is your patient usually accompanied by someone else when you see them?

If yes, please provide details:

If the accompanying person actively participates in the appointment, please indicate whether they:

Provide support to your patient;

Assist in communication between you and your patient (interpretation or explanation);

Provide information to you on behalf of your patient; and/or

Act as a substitute decision maker, giving informed consent to proposed treatment.

Please provide details of any other health professional/s that may have assessed or treated your patient within the past 12 months:

Cognitive Capacity Information

Cognitive Capacity Assessments

Have any assessments of cognitive capacity been performed?

If yes, please attach a copy of the assessments.

The Tribunal is entitled to compel the production of documents relevant to determining an application. You are obliged to provide a copy of any document on which your opinion relies.

I have attached copies of all relevant documents in my possession.

Alternatively, if you do not have a copy please provide details of:

• the type of assessment conducted;

• when the assessment was carried out and by whom;

• the results of the assessment; and

• the implications or conclusions arising from these results.

Please provide details:

Mental Disability

In your opinion, does your patient have a mental disability?

This may include an intellectual disability, an acquired brain injury, a psychiatric condition or dementia.

Please provide details of the diagnosis including when this disability or condition was first recognised:

Please indicate whether this disability or condition is:

If your patient has a mental disability do they currently have the cognitive capacity to make reasonable decisions in relation to:

a) Simple financial matters (such as managing a budget, payment of accounts, purchasing essential items):

Please provide details:

b) Complex financial decisions (such as management of property or large sums of money, purchase or sale of significant assets, pursuing entitlements including income and superannuation, advocating for own interests with financial institutions):

Please provide details:

c) Legal matters (such as ability to commence, defend or settle proceedings, whether of a personal or financial nature):

Please provide details:

Personal Decision Making

Does your patient currently have the capability to make reasonable decisions in relation to:

d) Medical treatment and procedures:

Please provide details:

e) Accommodation (such as identifying and securing housing that is appropriate to their care and support needs):

Please provide details:

f) Services (such as identifying and securing appropriate support services):

Please provide details:

Enduring Power of Attorney

An Enduring Power of Attorney is a legal document a person can prepare which gives someone else the authority to make financial and property decisions on their behalf.

Does your patient currently have the cognitive capacity to execute an Enduring Power of Attorney?

To your knowledge, has your patient previously executed an Enduring Power of Attorney?

If Yes, please indicate whether you were involved in this process as a:

Witness:

Assessor of capacity:

Enduring Power of Guardianship

An Enduring Power of Guardianship is a legal document a person can prepare which gives someone else the power to make personal and health care decisions on their behalf.

Does your patient currently have the cognitive capacity to execute an Enduring Power of Guardianship?

To your knowledge, has your patient previously executed an Enduring Power of Guardianship?

If Yes, please indicate whether you were involved in this process as a:

Witness:

Assessor of capacity:

Advance Health Directive

An Advance Health Directive is a legal document a person can prepare to enable them to make decisions now about the treatment they would want, or not want to receive.

Does your patient currently have the cognitive capacity to execute an Advance Health Directive?

To your knowledge, has your patient previously executed an Advance Health Directive?

If Yes, please indicate whether you were involved in this process as a:

Witness:

Assessor of capacity:

Capacity to Vote

Is your patient capable of making judgments for the purpose of complying with the provisions of the Electoral Act 1907 relating to compulsory voting?

Attendance at Tribunal Hearings

The Tribunal is required to seek and obtain your patient’s view at the hearing and they are expected to attend.

Please indicate whether attending would be adverse to your patient’s health and well-being:

If yes, please provide details:

Communication

Your patient:

speaks English

speaks another language (please specify):

uses sign language/other (please specify):

has difficulty in communicating (please specify):

is unable to communicate.

Declaration

I declare that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge and belief and the opinions expressed are within my area of expertise.

Name

Signature

Date

Enter text✕

What this application is and when it’s used

Application for Assessment of Patient's Decision-Making Capacity is a standardized clinical and legal document used to request, record, and report a formal evaluation of an individual's ability to understand, appreciate, reason about, and communicate decisions regarding medical care, finances, or personal affairs. The form captures identifying details, presenting concerns, cognitive and functional testing results, clinician observations, collateral interviews, and an explicit capacity determination with rationale. It supports clinical decision-making, informs consent processes, and may be used as evidence in legal or administrative proceedings when competence is in question.

Why a formal capacity assessment matters

A documented assessment provides a reproducible clinical opinion that links objective testing and observations to specific decision-making tasks, reducing ambiguity in clinical care and legal proceedings.

Why a formal capacity assessment matters

Primary users and signers

Primary users and signers for this application include clinicians, authorized representatives, legal counsel, and care managers.

  • Clinicians and examiners: physicians, psychiatrists, neuropsychologists conducting the capacity evaluation and documenting findings.
  • Authorized health care agents or proxies: provide consent when patients lack capacity per state law.
  • Legal representatives and courts: use reports for guardianship, conservatorship, or incapacity hearings and filings.

Ensure role-based access and document routing align with institutional policy to protect privacy and preserve chain-of-custody.

Sequential steps to complete the application

Follow these sequential steps to complete the Application for Assessment of Patient's Decision-Making Capacity accurately and consistently.

  • 01
    Request: Document the referral reason and the requesting party's legal authority.
  • 02
    Consent: Obtain patient consent or document inability and legal proxy consent.
  • 03
    Assessment: Perform standardized cognitive and functional tests; record results and observations.
  • 04
    Report: Summarize findings, state capacity conclusion, and sign with credentials.

Typical routing and submission flow

Typical routing and submission steps for delivering the completed application to clinical teams, legal counsel, and the records repository.

  • Upload: Attach completed assessment and supporting records to patient chart.
  • Route to Clinician: Send for secondary review and signature by attending provider.
  • Legal Copy: Provide a certified copy for counsel when requested or for probate filings.
  • Archive: Store signed PDF with audit trail in secure records system.

Platform and security considerations for eSubmission

Choose an eSignature platform that supports HIPAA, audit trails, templatized fields, and secure role-based access for clinical workflows.

  • Integrations: EHR, NetSuite, Salesforce supported.
  • Authentication: SSO, MFA, and advanced signer ID.
  • Encryption: TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit; AES-256 at rest.

Timelines and expected turnaround

Timelines for requesting, conducting, and finalizing capacity assessments vary by urgency and legal process; set expectations with the requesting party and document timestamps.

Submit referral and authorization documents:

Provide clinical reason, contact, and any consent or proxy documentation upon submission.

Standard scheduling for non-urgent assessments:

Aim to schedule within three business days for routine cases; urgency may require earlier appointments.

Urgent assessments scheduled within 24–48 hours:

For emergencies, complete bedside evaluation and document findings within 24 to 48 hours; note reasons for expedited process.

Final report completion and distribution:

Finalize and sign the written report promptly; distribute to treating team, legal representatives, and medical record per institution policy.

Retention of assessment records per law:

Retain signed assessments according to HIPAA 6-year baseline and local record retention policies; consult retention timeline for specifics.

Common preparation and submission pitfalls

  • Failing to document specific decision-related reasoning, relying on conclusory statements without test data or examples undermines legal defensibility.
  • Incomplete patient identification or inconsistent names and dates of birth can prevent linkage to medical records and delay legal proceedings or insurance claims.
  • Omitting collateral information, medication reviews, or recent imaging reduces assessment accuracy and may lead to unnecessary guardianship or inappropriate treatment decisions.
  • Using non-HIPAA-compliant e-signature workflows or failing to obtain a Business Associate Agreement when PHI is present creates privacy and regulatory exposure.

Risks and potential consequences of errors

Invalid Consent: May render decisions void.
Delayed Care: Treatment postponed pending evaluation.
Guardianship Risk: May trigger court conservatorship.
Billing Disputes: Insurer denial possible.
HIPAA Exposure: PHI mishandling fines risk.
Malpractice Claims: Document gaps increase liability.

Core sections of a professional assessment

A professional Application for Assessment of Patient's Decision-Making Capacity organizes clinical data, testing, analysis, and legal conclusions into clearly labeled sections for reliable review and potential legal use.

Patient Identification

Includes full legal name, aliases, date of birth, medical record number, contact information, and the identity of the person providing history. Accurate identification is crucial for legal validity and chart linkage.

Presenting Concerns

Summarize the observed behaviors, clinical triggers, or sentinel events that prompted the referral, including onset, course, and any recent medication or medical changes relevant to cognition.

Cognitive and Functional Testing

Document standardized test names, administration dates, raw scores, cutoffs, interpretation, and note testing limitations and language or sensory barriers to support reproducibility.

Collateral Information

List interviews with family, caretakers, or providers, pharmacy records, prior cognitive testing, and recent clinical notes; corroborative data strengthen the assessment and legal defensibility, including timelines of events.

Clinical Impression

Provide a reasoned analysis tying test results to decision-specific abilities: understanding, appreciation, reasoning, and expression; include differential diagnoses and reversible contributors such as delirium or medication effects.

Signatures and Legal Notes

Clinician signature, printed name, credentials, license number, date, and contact. Note limits of the opinion, capacity scope (which decisions assessed), and recommended follow-up or protective steps.

How to configure the online assessment workflow

Configure the online assessment workflow to collect required fields, route to clinicians, and store signed records securely with audit trails.

Field Configuration
Access Control Require authentication, SSO, and role-based permissions for signatures.
Signature Type Allow typed, drawn, or cryptographic signatures; enable audit trail.
Document Storage Encrypt at rest (AES-256), retain per HIPAA and state rules.
Notifications Automate email and SMS alerts for pending signatures and completed reports.

How this assessment differs from related legal documents

Key distinctions between a clinical capacity assessment and related legal documents clarify purpose, signatures, and formalities for practitioners and counsel.

Criteria Capacity Assessment Advance Directive Power of Attorney
Purpose clinical opinion end-of-life preferences decision-making authority
Required Signatures clinician signature principal signature principal signature
Notarization/Witness often no often yes often yes
Legal Role evidence of capacity directive for care authorizes agent

eSignature vendor pricing and capability snapshot for clinical forms

Platform pricing and core capabilities relevant to signing clinical assessments. signNow appears first per vendor comparison guidelines.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial Yes, 7-day trial Varies by vendor Varies by vendor Varies by vendor Varies by vendor
Bulk Send Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes Yes Yes No No
Envelope Cap No cap 100 envelopes/user/year Varies by plan Varies by plan Varies by plan

Who is authorized to sign or validate the assessment

Attending Clinician

The clinician who conducts the assessment—typically an MD, DO, psychiatrist, or neuropsychologist—signs and records professional credentials and license number. Their signature attests to methods used and forms the central evidentiary basis for capacity conclusions in clinical and legal contexts.

Legally Authorized Representative

When the patient lacks capacity, a legally authorized representative such as a health care proxy, durable healthcare power of attorney, or court-appointed guardian may authorize or sign related decisions; document the statutory authority, scope, and any temporal limits.

Key milestones from referral to final report

Key milestones from referral through legal use provide a numbered view of the assessment process and expected handoffs among clinical and legal teams.

01

Referral Received

Record date, source, and authorization status.

02

Assessment Scheduled

Set appointment and document urgency and logistics.

03

Evaluation Completed

Clinician documents tests, observations, and provisional conclusions.

04

Report Filed

Finalize signed report and distribute to stakeholders.

Frequently asked questions and common issues

Common questions and issues when preparing or submitting an Application for Assessment of Patient's Decision-Making Capacity, plus practical remedies and compliance notes.


Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users