Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

Brent D. Goff vs. Victoria J. Goff

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Motion and Declaration for Default (MTDFL)

WPF DR 03.0100 (6/2006) - CR 55(a); RCW 26.09.030

Superior Court of Washington

County of

In re the Marriage of:

Petitioner, No.

and Respondent. Motion and Declaration for Default (MTDFL)

I. Motion

moves the court for an order of default. Venue of this action is proper as set forth in the Declaration below.

Dated:

Signature of Moving Party or Lawyer/WSBA No.

Print or Type Name

II. Declaration

2.1 Proper Jurisdiction and Venue

The court has proper jurisdiction and venue pursuant to the allegations of the petition at the time of filing.

The petitioner resides in [County and State].

The child(ren) reside(s) in [County and State].

Respondent resides in [County and State].

[ ] Other:

2.2 Jurisdiction Over Nonmoving Party

This court has jurisdiction over because:

the nonmoving party is presently residing in Washington.

the petitioner and respondent lived in Washington during their marriage and the petitioner continues to reside, or be a member of the armed forces stationed, in this state.

the petitioner and respondent may have conceived a child while within Washington.

[ ] Other:

2.3 Service on Nonmoving Party

The nonmoving party was served with on

in the state of Washington.

in . Service within the state of Washington could not be made for the following reasons:

2.4 Time Elapsed Since Service on the Nonmoving Party

The nonmoving party was served within the state of Washington and more than 20 days have elapsed since the date of service.

The nonmoving party was served outside the state of Washington and more than 60 days have elapsed since the date of service.

The nonmoving party was served by mail and more than 90 days have elapsed since the date of mailing.

The nonmoving party was served by publication and more than 60 days have passed since the date of first publication.

2.5 Appearance of the Nonmoving Party

The nonmoving party has failed to appear.

The nonmoving party has appeared, but has failed to respond.

2.6 Servicemembers Civil Relief Act Statement

The nonmoving is not a service member or a dependent of a service member.

2.6.2 The nonmoving party – service member:

is on active duty in the U.S. armed forces (excluding National Guard and reserves);

is on active duty and is a National Guard member or a Reservist residing in Washington;

is not on active duty in the U.S. armed forces (excluding National Guard and reserves);

is not on active duty and is a National Guard member or a Reservist residing in Washington;

I am unable to determine whether the nonmoving party is or is not on active duty in the U.S. armed forces;

I am unable to determine whether the nonmoving party is or is not on active duty as a National Guard member or a Reservist residing in Washington;

based upon the following facts:

The nonmoving party is represented by an attorney.

The court has appointed an attorney to represent the nonmoving party.

A stay of these proceedings has has not been entered by the court.

2.6.3 The nonmoving party – dependent of service member;

is a dependent of a resident of Washington who is on active duty and is a National Guard member or a Reservist;

is not a dependent of a resident of Washington who is on active duty and is a National Guard member or a Reservist;

I am unable to determine whether the nonmoving party is a dependent of a resident of Washington who is on active duty and is a National Guard member or a Reservist;

based upon the following facts:

The nonmoving party failed to respond to a notice to him or her as a dependent of a person in Military Service that was served on mailed by first class mail on , therefore he or she should be presumed not a dependent of a resident of Washington who is on active duty and is a National Guard member or a Reservist.

As indicated above, the nonmoving party is a dependent of a resident of Washington who is on active duty and is a National Guard member or a Reservist and (check all that apply):

The nonmoving party is represented by an attorney.

The court has appointed an attorney to represent the nonmoving party.

A stay of these proceedings has has not been entered by the court.

2.7 Other

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct.

Signed at , [City] [State] on [Date].

Signature of Moving Party

Print or Type Name

Enter text✕

What the Brent D. Goff vs. Victoria J. Goff filing is

The Brent D. Goff vs. Victoria J. Goff page describes a civil court filing and its associated signed documents, including pleadings, exhibits, affidavits, and proof of service. This guide explains the document components, required fields, typical timelines for filing and service, and how electronic signatures and e-filing affect validity and retention for U.S. jurisdictional practice.

Why accurate completion matters for this case file

Clear, complete filings reduce rejection risk, preserve evidentiary value, and support enforceability in court. Proper signatures, dates, and proof of service protect procedural rights and avoid delays in hearings or default judgments.

Why accurate completion matters for this case file

Who prepares and handles these court documents

Litigation teams, court clerks, and service providers commonly prepare and route these filings; accuracy and chain-of-custody are critical.

  • Plaintiff counsel prepares pleadings and proof of service and confirms signature blocks meet court requirements.
  • Defendant counsel reviews filings, prepares responses, and validates dates and exhibits before filing.
  • Court clerks accept e-filed documents, apply filing stamps, and manage docket entries per local rules.

Knowing each party's responsibilities — filing, service, signature, retention — helps maintain compliance with court rules and statutory time limits.

Primary signers and their authority

Brent D. Goff — Plaintiff

As the named plaintiff, Brent D. Goff signs affidavits and declarations attesting to facts and service. His signature attests to veracity under penalty of perjury and must match identification used for authentication.

Victoria J. Goff — Defendant

As the named defendant, Victoria J. Goff signs responses, declarations, and any stipulations. Signature attribution is required to show intent and consent where electronic methods are used.

Essential components found in the case filing

A professional filing contains a clear caption, a signed pleading or motion, supporting exhibits, declarations or affidavits, a certificate of service, and properly formatted signature blocks that meet court and authentication rules.

Case Caption

Includes court name, docket number, party names, and counsel contact information so the filing is assigned and indexed correctly by the clerk.

Pleading or Motion

The operative document that states claims or defenses with numbered paragraphs and citations; must be signed and dated by the filing party or counsel.

Exhibits

Supporting evidence such as contracts or photographs labeled as Exhibit A, Exhibit B, etc., referenced in the pleading and attached in order.

Affidavit / Declaration

Sworn statements or declarations under penalty of perjury that corroborate facts; include notarization where required by local rules.

Certificate of Service

Documents the method and date of service to opposing parties; required to prove proper notice under court rules.

Signature Block

Printed name, title, signature, date, and counsel contact details; for electronic signing, show method of attribution and audit trail.

Step-by-step: prepare and file the document

Follow these sequential steps to prepare, sign, service, and file a court submission to reduce rejections and ensure enforceability.

  • 01
    Assemble Documents: Collect pleadings, exhibits, affidavits, and certificates of service in order.
  • 02
    Complete Fields: Enter court name, case number, party names, and dates accurately.
  • 03
    Sign and Authenticate: Apply handwritten or electronic signatures with proper attribution and, if required, notarization.
  • 04
    File and Serve: E-file with the court and serve opposing parties per local rules; retain proof of filing and service.

How e-signing and e-filing work together

Electronic signing attaches a signed record and audit trail; e-filing submits those records to the court system. Understand authentication and retention implications for admissibility.

  • Upload Document: Prepare a single PDF containing all attachments in the required order.
  • Place Signature Fields: Add signature, initial, and date fields for each signer and witness.
  • Authenticate Signer: Confirm identity via email link, SMS code, or higher assurance method if required.
  • E-file Package: Submit the signed PDF to court e-file system and keep confirmation and audit trail.

Typical online workflow settings for court filings

Set up your e-sign and e-file workflow to match court sequence and signer roles for streamlined submission and tracking.

Field Configuration
Signer Order Sequential or parallel ordering to match required signatures.
Authentication Email link by default; use SMS/KBA or advanced auth for higher assurance.
Audit Trail Enable full event logging (IP, timestamp, action) for evidentiary support.
Certificate Attach completion certificate and embed with final PDF.

Systems and file types commonly required

Confirm compatibility with court e-file requirements and signer devices before starting the workflow.

  • Browser: Modern browser (Chrome, Edge, Safari) recommended
  • Integrations: Works with major systems like NetSuite and Salesforce
  • File Formats: PDF is required by most courts

Download, export, and supporting documents to include

Create a single PDF package for filing and maintain editable copies for internal records. Include supporting documents that courts typically expect.

Export Formats

Save the signed record as a PDF/A for long-term preservation; also keep a DOCX master for edits and internal audits.

Proof of Service

Attach a signed certificate of service documenting the date, method, and recipient addresses used for service.

Notary Records

If a notary was used, save the notarial certificate and journal entry as part of the package.

Exhibit Index

Include a numbered exhibit index that maps each attachment to a referenced exhibit label in the pleading.

Common timing considerations and response windows

Track service and filing dates carefully; response periods and hearing deadlines depend on local rules and the service method used.

Service Date:

Service date starts response deadlines for opposing parties.

Response Window:

Typical response periods are 20–30 days depending on jurisdiction and method.

Hearing Notice:

Courts often require hearing notices 7–14 days before a hearing.

Filing Confirmation:

Retain e-file confirmation as proof of timely submission.

Appeal Period:

Appeal timelines vary; check local rules immediately after judgment.

Common pitfalls to avoid when preparing the case filing

  • Leaving the case number blank or incorrect can cause clerks to reject or misfile the submission, delaying proceedings.
  • Failing to include a certificate of service or incorrect service dates often results in missing or waived deadlines.
  • Using inconsistent party names across exhibits may create authentication disputes during evidentiary hearings.
  • Relying on screenshot signatures without an audit trail can weaken admissibility and attribution in court.

Consequences of incorrect or incomplete filings

Rejection: Clerk may refuse filing
Default Risk: Failure to serve can lead to default judgment
Sanctions: Court may impose monetary sanctions
Delay: Hearings or relief may be postponed
Evidence Loss: Authentication gaps reduce admissibility
Extra Cost: Additional filing and attorney fees

Typical eSignature vendor pricing and capability comparison

Price and features vary across providers; the table compares common starting prices, trial availability, bulk send, audit trail, HIPAA support, and envelope caps for evaluation.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial 7-day free trial, no credit card No No Yes, limited Yes, limited
Bulk Send Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes Yes Yes No No
Envelope Cap No cap 100 envelopes/user/year Plan dependent Plan dependent Plan dependent

Real-world examples of digital signing in similar contexts

These examples show how organizations used e-signature workflows for legal and transaction documents with measurable benefits.

Optica Ventures

Optica improved turnaround for investor agreements using online signing

  • The system reduced back-and-forth by centralizing signatures
  • As COO Brian Fitzgibbons noted, the interface was simple for staff and customers while maintaining required records.

Martin Properties

A real estate operator shifted leases and notices online

  • On-site and remote signing eliminated paper delays
  • Founder Tim Martin observed that processing and executing documents online preserved compliance and sped transactions across devices.

Electronic signature versus digital (cryptographic) signature

Key distinctions affect technical assurance and non-repudiation; choose the method that matches legal and regulatory needs for the filing.

Criteria Electronic Signature Digital Signature
Definition any electronic mark pki-based cryptographic seal
Legal Basis esign/ueta acceptance used where cryptographic proof required
Technology image/typed/audit trail x.509 certificate/pki
Non-repudiation audit trail evidence strong cryptographic non-repudiation

Frequently asked questions about the Brent D. Goff vs. Victoria J. Goff documents

Answers to common questions about signatures, filing, notarization, evidence, and retention to help reduce errors and clarify legal implications.


Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users