Parties
Full legal names and business addresses for buyer and vendor, including authorized signatory names and titles to ensure signatures bind the correct legal entities.
A targeted agreement reduces ambiguity about test procedures, acceptance thresholds, responsibilities, and payment triggers, helping avoid billing disputes and service interruptions. It also documents data handling, liability limits, and dispute paths while aligning parties on measurable acceptance criteria under ESIGN and UETA legal frameworks.
Aligning these stakeholders early reduces review cycles and accelerates acceptance and payment once testing is complete.
Typically signs on behalf of the buyer entity to confirm scope, acceptance criteria, and purchase order linkage. Responsibilities include coordinating test schedules, approving deliverables, and confirming payment triggers in accordance with internal procurement controls and audit requirements.
Signs for the service provider to attest to completed FATs, warranty obligations, and corrective actions. The vendor role usually includes certification of test results, commitment to remedial work if tests fail, and acceptance of liability caps where negotiated.
Full legal names and business addresses for buyer and vendor, including authorized signatory names and titles to ensure signatures bind the correct legal entities.
Detailed description of TEM services, systems under test, specific test cases, performance metrics, and deliverables required to consider FATs complete and acceptable.
Objective metrics and pass/fail thresholds for each test case, reporting format, and the sign-off process for final acceptance or required rework.
Define payment triggers tied to acceptance events, invoicing requirements, net payment terms, withholding for failed FATs, and dispute resolution procedures.
Specify handling of account data, confidentiality obligations, encryption requirements, breach notification timelines, and any HIPAA or privacy addenda if protected health information is involved.
Conditions for termination, cure periods, warranty obligations, liability caps, and credits or refunds for failed acceptance or prolonged remediation efforts.
| Field | Configuration |
|---|---|
| Signature Type | eSign with audit trail |
| Authentication | Email plus optional SMS code |
| Bulk Send | Enable on plans with bulk-send capability |
| Archival Format | PDF/A archival with audit certificate |
Ensure the platform produces an audit trail and exportable signed files for long-term retention and regulatory review.
| signNow | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | PandaDoc | HelloSign | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $8/user/mo | $15/user/mo | $14/user/mo | $19/user/mo | $15/user/mo |
| Free Trial | 7-day free trial | No trial listed | No trial listed | Yes, limited | Yes, limited |
| Bulk Send | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Audit Trail | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| HIPAA Compliant | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Envelope Cap | No cap | 100 envelopes/user/year | Varies by plan | Varies by plan | Varies by plan |
Optica defined standardized acceptance exhibits for recurring FATs to eliminate ad hoc disputes.
Tech Data integrated acceptance certificates with their billing system to auto-trigger invoices.
Specify a defined period (e.g., 30 days) during which buyer performs FATs and submits results.
Allow a fixed cure period (e.g., 15 days) for vendor fixes after failed tests.
Require signed acceptance certificate within a set period after tests (e.g., 5 business days).
Vendor to submit invoice within X days of signed acceptance (e.g., 10 business days).
Define warranty claim timeframe (e.g., 90 days) for latent defects discovered post-acceptance.