Definitions
Define ‘‘coordination,’’ ‘‘competitor,’’ and other core terms with examples to avoid interpretation disputes in investigations and audits.
A written policy reduces legal risk, clarifies acceptable conduct, and creates an audit trail demonstrating the company’s commitment to independent commercial decision-making under antitrust law.
This policy is used by legal, compliance, and business-unit leaders to manage interactions with competitors and third parties.
Effective use requires regular training, clear reporting channels, and consistent enforcement across departments and geographies.
| Field | Configuration |
|---|---|
| Document Owner | Assign legal or compliance role for ownership |
| Approval Sequence | Set role-based order for reviewers and approvers |
| Signer Authentication | Select email or stronger MFA for signers |
| Retention Policy | Automate archival and version retention rules |
Select platforms that preserve audit trails, enforce signer authentication, and support secure storage.
Maintain an access-controlled central archive and ensure exportable audit metadata is retained alongside signed documents.
Annual review recommended to address legal or operational changes.
Allow 5–10 business days for multi-stage legal and management approvals.
Require employee sign-off within 30 days of policy issuance.
Deliver refreshed training at least annually.
Signed copies should be accessible for audits within 48 hours.
| Criteria | Business Anti-Coordination | Antitrust Compliance |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Purpose | prevent coordination | broad risk management |
| Typical Scope | contact rules only | pricing and contracts |
| Enforcement Focus | internal discipline | regulatory reporting |
| Common Signatories | legal and business leads | legal and executive team |
Define ‘‘coordination,’’ ‘‘competitor,’’ and other core terms with examples to avoid interpretation disputes in investigations and audits.
List specific banned activities such as price discussions, customer allocation, bid rigging, and exchanging sensitive competitive data with non‑authorized parties.
Describe mandatory pre-approval for meetings with competitors, including the approver role, documentation, and neutral objectives for permitted contacts.
Establish confidential reporting channels, timelines for acknowledgement, and steps for a documented, impartial investigation of alleged breaches.
Set progressive disciplinary measures, remediation plans, and conditions for reinstatement or contractual rescission if coordination occurred.
Specify retention periods, secure storage location, and audit trails required to demonstrate compliance during internal or external reviews.
Export final executed copies as PDF/A to preserve content, fonts, and embedded signatures in an archival format compatible with legal review.
Retain an editable DOCX or original source copy for internal version control while storing signed PDF as the authoritative record.
Preserve the signing audit log (timestamps, IPs, authentication method) alongside the document for evidentiary support.
Tag executed versions with policy version numbers, effective dates, and approver metadata for reliable retrieval.
Typically reviews, approves, and signs policies on behalf of the company; maintains authority to interpret policy terms and direct investigations.
Coordinates implementation, enforces reporting procedures, and signs to acknowledge compliance ownership and oversight responsibilities.
Legal prepares initial draft and risk assessment documentation.
Business units and HR provide feedback and compliance input.
Senior leadership and legal sign off on the final policy text.
Policy is published, training delivered, and employee acknowledgments collected.