Can I accept e-signed attestations?

Yes. Electronic signatures are generally enforceable under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96, 2000) and UETA in adopting states; ensure intent, consent, attribution, and retention are documented to meet legal validity tests.

Do I need notarization for company attestations?

Not usually for a published list. Notarization or RON may be advisable for high-stakes attestations or where statutory verification is required; check state notary rules if a notarized affidavit is requested.

How do I correct an error after publication?

Maintain a documented corrections process: require evidence, log the request, adjudicate within the stated correction window, and publish an errata or revised list with audit notes for transparency.

What privacy rules apply to published company contacts?

Personal data of contacts may implicate state privacy laws such as California's CCPA; limit published personal identifiers and obtain consent where required by law or platform policy.

Which file formats should I archive?

Archive a signed PDF for human-readable records and a CSV for machine processing. Include an audit trail export and original source documents for verification and compliance.

Who should approve the final list?

Define an approval matrix that includes editorial, legal, and a senior sponsor. Assign signatory authority to named officers and capture their signature events and timestamps for accountability.

Business Top 50 List

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

BUSINESS TOP 50 LIST AGREEMENT

This Business Top 50 List Agreement (the Agreement) is entered into by and between Organizer Name: and Client Name: , effective as of Effective Date: .

WHEREAS

WHEREAS, Organizer is engaged in the business of researching, compiling, and publishing ranked lists of companies for distribution to the business community and for promotional activities; and

WHEREAS, Client desires Organizer to research, evaluate and include certain businesses in a titled publication identified as the Business Top 50 List (the List), subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement; and

WHEREAS, the parties intend that this Agreement govern the scope, deliverables, payment, confidentiality, and the allocation of rights and responsibilities relating to the preparation and publication of the List.

SCOPE OF WORK

Organizer shall perform the services described in this Section (Services). Organizer will research, verify, rank and prepare written entries for up to fifty (50) businesses to comprise the Business Top 50 List. The Services shall include data collection, verification of facts, editorial write-ups, and production-ready copy suitable for publication.

Detailed Scope Notes

TOP 50 ENTRIES

The parties acknowledge that Organizer will prepare individual entries for up to fifty (50) ranked businesses. For each entry, provide the company name and a brief descriptive summary. Organizer retains editorial control over final placement and wording subject to reasonable factual corrections proposed by Client.

Entries 1–10

Rank 1 — Company Name Rank 1 — Company Description Rank 2 — Company Name Rank 2 — Company Description Rank 3 — Company Name Rank 3 — Company Description Rank 4 — Company Name Rank 4 — Company Description Rank 5 — Company Name Rank 5 — Company Description Rank 6 — Company Name Rank 6 — Company Description Rank 7 — Company Name Rank 7 — Company Description Rank 8 — Company Name Rank 8 — Company Description Rank 9 — Company Name Rank 9 — Company Description Rank 10 — Company Name Rank 10 — Company Description

Entries 11–20

Rank 11 — Company Name Rank 11 — Company Description Rank 12 — Company Name Rank 12 — Company Description Rank 13 — Company Name Rank 13 — Company Description Rank 14 — Company Name Rank 14 — Company Description Rank 15 — Company Name Rank 15 — Company Description Rank 16 — Company Name Rank 16 — Company Description Rank 17 — Company Name Rank 17 — Company Description Rank 18 — Company Name Rank 18 — Company Description Rank 19 — Company Name Rank 19 — Company Description Rank 20 — Company Name Rank 20 — Company Description

Entries 21–30

Rank 21 — Company Name Rank 21 — Company Description Rank 22 — Company Name Rank 22 — Company Description Rank 23 — Company Name Rank 23 — Company Description Rank 24 — Company Name Rank 24 — Company Description Rank 25 — Company Name Rank 25 — Company Description Rank 26 — Company Name Rank 26 — Company Description Rank 27 — Company Name Rank 27 — Company Description Rank 28 — Company Name Rank 28 — Company Description Rank 29 — Company Name Rank 29 — Company Description Rank 30 — Company Name Rank 30 — Company Description

Entries 31–40

Rank 31 — Company Name Rank 31 — Company Description Rank 32 — Company Name Rank 32 — Company Description Rank 33 — Company Name Rank 33 — Company Description Rank 34 — Company Name Rank 34 — Company Description Rank 35 — Company Name Rank 35 — Company Description Rank 36 — Company Name Rank 36 — Company Description Rank 37 — Company Name Rank 37 — Company Description Rank 38 — Company Name Rank 38 — Company Description Rank 39 — Company Name Rank 39 — Company Description Rank 40 — Company Name Rank 40 — Company Description

Entries 41–50

Rank 41 — Company Name Rank 41 — Company Description Rank 42 — Company Name Rank 42 — Company Description Rank 43 — Company Name Rank 43 — Company Description Rank 44 — Company Name Rank 44 — Company Description Rank 45 — Company Name Rank 45 — Company Description Rank 46 — Company Name Rank 46 — Company Description Rank 47 — Company Name Rank 47 — Company Description Rank 48 — Company Name Rank 48 — Company Description Rank 49 — Company Name Rank 49 — Company Description Rank 50 — Company Name Rank 50 — Company Description

PAYMENT TERMS

Client shall pay Organizer the fees set forth below in consideration for the Services. Fees do not include taxes, third-party costs, or additional production expenses unless specified.

Total Fee (USD) Deposit Amount (if any) Payment Schedule / Milestones Late Fee

TERM AND TERMINATION

This Agreement commences on Start Date: and continues until Completion Date: , unless earlier terminated in accordance with this Section.

Notice Period for Termination Termination Rights / Conditions

CONFIDENTIALITY

Each party shall keep confidential all non-public information disclosed by the other party that is designated as confidential or that reasonably should be understood to be confidential given the nature of the information and the circumstances of disclosure (Confidential Information). Confidential Information shall not include information that: (a) is or becomes publicly known other than through a breach of this Agreement; (b) is rightfully received from a third party without restriction; (c) is independently developed without use of the disclosing party’s Confidential Information; or (d) is required to be disclosed by law, provided that the receiving party gives prompt written notice to the disclosing party and limits disclosure to the extent legally required.

The obligations of confidentiality shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement for a period of three (3) years, except that trade secrets shall remain protected for as long as they meet applicable legal standards for trade secret protection. Monetary damages may be inadequate to remedy a breach of this Section; the disclosing party shall be entitled to seek injunctive relief in addition to other remedies.

GOVERNING LAW

This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of without regard to conflict of laws principles. The parties submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in that State for disputes arising under this Agreement.

ENTIRE AGREEMENT

This Agreement, including all exhibits, schedules, and the written Ordering Documents signed by the parties, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, understandings, negotiations and discussions, whether oral or written. Any amendment to this Agreement must be in writing and signed by authorized representatives of both parties.

MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

The parties represent and warrant that they have the full power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to perform their obligations hereunder. Except as expressly provided herein, no party may assign its rights or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party.

Additional Provisions / Notes

Organizer:

By:

Date:

Client:

By:

Date:

What the Business Top 50 List Is and when it’s used

The Business Top 50 List is a curated ranking of fifty companies organized by a defined metric such as revenue, growth rate, market share, or innovation score. It is used by media outlets, industry analysts, trade associations, and internal business development teams to benchmark performance, surface leaders, and inform stakeholder communications.

Why maintaining a clear, defensible Top 50 List matters

A professional Top 50 List increases transparency around selection criteria, reduces dispute risk by documenting sources and methodology, and supports consistent annual updates. Clear records also help defend rankings against inaccuracies while enabling repeatable processes for future editions.

Who typically creates and relies on a Top 50 List

Audiences include executives, investors, journalists, and procurement teams who rely on documented methods and verifiable source data.

Real Estate — brokerages and regional media compile rankings to compare transaction volume and portfolio size.
Healthcare — provider networks and trade groups rank hospitals and clinics by patient volume and outcomes.
Financial Services — banks and fintech firms use lists to benchmark assets under management or growth.

Essential elements of a professional Business Top 50 List

A rigorous list combines transparent criteria, verified data sources, consistent calculations, and a reproducible publication workflow to ensure defensibility and year-over-year comparability.

Ranking Criteria

Define the primary metric (revenue, growth, market share) and secondary filters. Explain weighting and tie-break rules for full transparency.

Data Fields

Standardize company name, legal entity, revenue period, headcount, and headquarters to avoid mismatches and enable accurate sorting and comparisons.

Verification Process

Document source checks such as audited financials, SEC filings, or vendor-verified submissions and note date stamped evidence for each entry.

Methodology Statement

Publish a concise methodology page that explains inclusion rules, data cleaning steps, and how outliers are treated to reduce disputes.

Publication Format

Decide on a reproducible export format (PDF and CSV) and include a timestamped cover page with methodology and contact information.

Correction Workflow

Provide a defined corrections window, evidence requirements for changes, and an audit trail for accepted revisions to maintain credibility.

Required data elements for each Top 50 entry

Company Name: Legal name

Primary Contact: Name and title

Industry: NAICS or vertical

Ranking Metric: Revenue / growth

Headquarters: City, state

Source: Filed report or link

Step-by-step process to compile and publish the Top 50 List

Follow a consistent sequence to collect, validate, and publish to reduce errors and speed review cycles.

01

Collect Data: Gather candidate data from public filings and submissions.
02

Verify Sources: Confirm figures against audited reports or regulatory filings.
03

Rank Entries: Apply criteria and weighting to generate the ordered list.
04

Publish: Export final PDF/CSV and archive original sources.

Where to route lists for review, approval, and storage

A clear routing path speeds approvals and documents accountability for each publication stage.

Internal Review: Editorial team checks methodology and flags disputes.
Legal Review: Legal confirms citations, releases, and defamation risks.
Distribution: Communications schedules publishing channels and embargoes.
Archive: Store sources and final files in a secure repository.

Typical workflow settings for an online Top 50 publishing system

Configure these fields when setting up an online template or content management workflow to automate routine checks.

Field	Configuration
Ranking Criteria	Primary metric and weight (e.g., revenue 70% \| growth 30%)
Verification Mode	Manual review required \| Auto-flag mismatches
Export Formats	PDF and CSV with embedded metadata
Access Control	Role-based editors and read-only viewers

Technical considerations for digital publishing and eSubmission

Ensure the selected tools meet privacy and retention policies and can produce an audit trail for every change or signature.

File formats: PDF, CSV, DOCX supported
Integrations: CRM, Google Workspace, NetSuite
Authentication: Email, SMS code, or single sign-on

Typical timelines and deadlines for an annual Top 50 publication

Set clear internal deadlines to allow for data collection, verification, and stakeholder review before the public release.

Submission Window:

Open for entries for 30 days prior to review

Verification Period:

Allow 14–30 days for source checks

Publication Date:

Fixed date after approvals and embargo clearance

Correction Window:

7–14 days post-publication for evidence-based edits

Annual Update Cycle:

Repeat process yearly on the same cycle

Key milestones from data intake to publication

Map these milestones to responsible teams to maintain accountability and visibility across the timeline.

01

Intake Complete

All nominations and source documents collected

02

Verification Complete

All figures confirmed or disputed

03

Editorial Approval

Editors finalize rankings and notes

04

Publication Live

Final files exported and archived

Common mistakes to avoid when preparing the list

Using inconsistent reporting periods across companies leads to misleading comparisons and disputes.
Failing to document sources prevents efficient verification and increases reputational risk for inaccuracies.
Relying on unvetted submissions without cross-checking audited statements produces erroneous rankings.
Neglecting an established corrections process creates friction and escalates public disputes after publication.

Key risks and potential consequences of errors

Reputational Harm: Corrective notices and public retractions

Legal Claims: Potential defamation or misrepresentation suits

Privacy Violations: Noncompliant use of personal data

Contractual Penalties: Breach of vendor or sponsor agreements

Data Integrity Failure: Inaccurate or corrupted exports

Lost Credibility: Reduced stakeholder trust

eSignature vendor comparison for list approvals and attestations

Compare typical plan-level features and starting prices for common eSignature vendors used to collect approvals and publish attestations. signNow is listed first per table rules.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	Varies by vendor	Varies by vendor	Varies by vendor	Varies by vendor
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Envelope Cap	No cap	100 envelopes/user/year	Varies	Varies	Varies

Real-world examples of organizations managing public lists

Two representative customer experiences illustrate practical benefits and common implementation patterns.

Optica Ventures LLC

The interface is simple and easy-to-use for our team; more importantly, it is just as easy for our customers.

Streamlined submissions and approvals accelerated publication.
Optica combined standardized intake forms with documented sources to reduce verification time and increase stakeholder confidence in the published list.

Martin Properties

I can process and execute all of these documents online with 100% compliance and built-in security.

Mobile and offline signing supported field verification.
The team used mobile-enabled workflows and preserved audit trails to complete on-site confirmations and publish an accurate regional Top 50 property list.

Frequently asked questions about creating and publishing a Top 50 List

Answers address common legal, technical, and procedural issues encountered when compiling and circulating ranked lists.

Need help? Contact support

Can I accept e-signed attestations?
Yes. Electronic signatures are generally enforceable under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96, 2000) and UETA in adopting states; ensure intent, consent, attribution, and retention are documented to meet legal validity tests.
Do I need notarization for company attestations?
Not usually for a published list. Notarization or RON may be advisable for high-stakes attestations or where statutory verification is required; check state notary rules if a notarized affidavit is requested.
How do I correct an error after publication?
Maintain a documented corrections process: require evidence, log the request, adjudicate within the stated correction window, and publish an errata or revised list with audit notes for transparency.
What privacy rules apply to published company contacts?
Personal data of contacts may implicate state privacy laws such as California's CCPA; limit published personal identifiers and obtain consent where required by law or platform policy.
Which file formats should I archive?
Archive a signed PDF for human-readable records and a CSV for machine processing. Include an audit trail export and original source documents for verification and compliance.
Who should approve the final list?
Define an approval matrix that includes editorial, legal, and a senior sponsor. Assign signatory authority to named officers and capture their signature events and timestamps for accountability.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now