Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

Campbell v. General Motors Corp 19 F. Supp. 2d 1260

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ALABAMA

Plaintiff,

VS.

Defendant.

CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV-

COMES NOW Plaintiff , by and through undersigned counsel, and states as follows:

1. Plaintiff is a resident citizen of the County of State of Alabama, and is over the age of twenty-one (21) years.

2. Defendant is a resident citizen of the County of State of Alabama, and is over the age of twenty-one (21) years.

3. On or about the , the Defendant unlawfully entered upon the lands of the Plaintiff in County, Alabama.

4. As a proximate result of said trespass by the Defendant, the Plaintiff's real estate was damaged and defaced [describe any other damages].

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant in excess of the jurisdictional limits of this court for compensatory and punitive damages, interest, and costs.

(Attorney for Plaintiff)

PLAINTIFF RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS A TRIAL BY JURY AS TO ALL COUNTS HEREIN

(Attorney for Plaintiff)

PLEASE SERVE DEFENDANT AS FOLLOWS:

Enter text

At-a-glance: What Campbell v. General Motors Corp 19 F. Supp. 2d 1260 is

Campbell v. General Motors Corp, reported at 19 F. Supp. 2d 1260, is a published federal court opinion cited by practitioners for issues arising in civil litigation. This page summarizes the decision's role in research and pleading, explains practical citation and filing considerations, identifies who routinely references the case, and provides stepwise guidance for incorporating the citation into briefs, motions, and legal research files without asserting or paraphrasing the court's holding.

Why this citation matters for practitioners and researchers

A reported opinion like Campbell v. General Motors Corp serves as primary authority for legal argument, helps establish precedent or persuasive authority, and guides factual development and evidentiary strategy in related matters.

Why this citation matters for practitioners and researchers

Who typically consults and relies on this decision

The case is used across litigation and academic contexts by attorneys and researchers preparing court filings or secondary analysis.

  • Civil trial attorneys preparing motions and supporting authorities in related fact patterns.
  • In-house counsel and compliance teams reviewing precedent relevant to corporate exposure or product issues.
  • Legal researchers, law clerks, and academic authors citing reported opinions in memoranda.

Use this page to align citation format, confirm jurisdictional weight, and avoid common research and citation errors when relying on the decision.

Key parts of the reported opinion to capture when you cite it

When drafting or filing documents that rely on Campbell v. General Motors Corp, capture the essential citation elements and the opinion's procedural posture to support precise, defensible references.

Case Name

Exact party names as reported to ensure accurate search results and avoid misidentification in pleadings or tables of authorities.

Reporter Citation

Recorder citation 19 F. Supp. 2d 1260 and any parallel citations for authoritative pinpoint referencing in briefs and filings.

Court & Year

Identifies the issuing court and year to establish binding or persuasive value for the jurisdiction where you are proceeding.

Procedural Posture

Note whether the opinion is on summary judgment, motion to dismiss, trial, or other procedural posture that affects its applicability.

Key Holdings

Summarize the controlling legal principle in your own words while avoiding mischaracterization of the court's language.

Pinpoint Pages

Record specific page or paragraph citations for the proposition you rely on to streamline opposing counsel and court review.

Essential citation and file metadata to record

Case Name: Exact caption
Reporter: 19 F. Supp. 2d 1260
Court: Issuing court
Decision Date: Month Day, Year
Docket Number: Court docket ID
Pinpoint: Page/paragraph

Step-by-step: How to use Campbell v. General Motors Corp in a brief

Follow a concise sequence to verify authority, extract the relevant holding, and present the citation correctly in motion practice or appellate filings.

  • 01
    Confirm the opinion: Locate the full opinion to verify wording and procedural posture.
  • 02
    Extract the holding: Identify the specific rule or standard that supports your argument.
  • 03
    Format the citation: Use the reporter citation and court to format per local rules.
  • 04
    Add context: Explain applicability and distinguish adverse facts if necessary.

How to prepare and store the opinion in your document workflow

Configure your research and document management workflow so the opinion is searchable, citable, and preserved with supporting notes and extracts.

Field Configuration
File Format PDF/A for long-term archival
Metadata Tags Case name | court | year
Storage Location Document management system or secure shared drive
Access Controls Role-based permissions for privileged materials

Where and how to submit or cite the opinion in filings

Understand appropriate destinations for the opinion: internal memos, court filings, appellate briefs, or research repositories, and maintain version control.

  • Internal Memoranda: Attach full opinion and short summary for litigation teams.
  • Court Filings: Cite via reporter and include relevant excerpts in exhibits.
  • Briefs and Appendices: Provide pinpoint cites and copy of opinion in the appendix when required.
  • Research Repositories: Index in precedent libraries for reuse and citation tracking.

Digital handling and eSubmission considerations for case documents

When working with the opinion digitally, prefer archival PDF formats, searchable text, and secure storage to preserve admissibility and accessibility.

  • File Formats: PDF, PDF/A, and text-searchable OCR
  • Integrations: Link to DMS and research tools like Westlaw or Lexis
  • Access Controls: Role-based permissions and audit logs

For e-filing and e-submission, follow court-specific rules for electronic exhibits and preserve integrity via tamper-evident formats and retained metadata.

Timing notes and practical deadlines to watch when relying on an opinion

There are no universal citation deadlines, but timely reliance, preservation of appellate issues, and awareness of any motions period are essential when using precedent.

Appellate Preservation:

Raise issues at trial to preserve for appeal

Citation Currency:

Confirm no subsequent history that undermines the opinion

Filing Windows:

Observe court rules for brief and appendix submission

Internal Deadlines:

Set internal review dates to meet filing schedules

Record Retention:

Retain research files per retention policy

Common mistakes to avoid when citing or relying on the decision

  • Mis-citing reporter pages or court identification leading to search failure or clerk correction.
  • Relying on dicta as controlling authority without noting persuasive rather than binding weight.
  • Failing to check subsequent history or negative treatment before filing.
  • Omitting necessary procedural context that affects the opinion's applicability.

Risks and adverse consequences of incorrect citation or misuse

Court Rejection: Improper citation may prompt clerk rejection or corrective filing
Evidentiary Harm: Overstating authority can undermine credibility with the court
Sanctions Risk: Repeated careless citations risk sanctions under local rules
Precedent Misuse: Applying the opinion outside its factual scope may be ineffective
Missed Deadlines: Late incorporation into briefs can forfeit appellate issues
Client Impact: Strategic missteps can increase litigation exposure or costs

How a reported opinion compares to secondary legal sources

Compare primary case authority against treatises and secondary materials to determine direct authority versus interpretive support when building argumentation.

Source Type Published Opinion Legal Treatise
Authority primary law persuasive commentary
Timeliness immediate periodic updates
Depth narrow factual ruling broader doctrinal analysis
Use in Briefs cited for rule cited for background

eSignature vendor comparison for handling legal documents and opinions

When choosing an eSignature or document platform for storing, sharing, or obtaining signatures on legal papers related to this case, consider pricing, compliance, and envelope limits across vendors.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial 7-day free trial Varies Varies Varies Varies
Bulk Send Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes Yes Yes No No

Practical examples of how the opinion is applied in practice

Below are two scenario-based examples showing how the opinion might be used in litigation and research — each highlights application, focus, and expected outcome of relying on the citation.

Litigation Use

A trial team cites Campbell for a procedural standard relevant to a dispositive motion

  • The team extracts precise language and pinpoints pages
  • The brief includes the reporter citation, explains applicability, and anticipates opposing distinctions to preserve credibility.

Research Use

A law clerk summarizes Campbell for a memorandum on precedent trends

  • The clerk logs docket number and subsequent history
  • The memorandum cross-references related opinions and flags whether Campbell remains good law for the asserted propositions.

Practical tips for accurate and efficient use of the citation

Follow these best practices to reduce errors, speed drafting, and increase the persuasive value of your citation.

Verify Subsequent History
Always check for appeals, overruling, or negative treatment before relying on the opinion.
Use Pinpoint Citations
Provide exact page or paragraph references to the text relied upon.
Preserve Procedural Context
Note whether the ruling was interlocutory, final, or part of settlement-related orders.
Maintain Source Files
Store the full opinion, cover page, and any appendices in a searchable archive.

Frequently asked questions about using Campbell v. General Motors Corp 19 F. Supp. 2d 1260

Answers to common questions about citation format, precedential value, and document handling when relying on a reported federal opinion.


Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users