Project summary
Brief description of the engagement, scope of work, and measurable outcomes so evaluators can match references to the selection criteria and verify claimed capabilities with concise context.
A clear questionnaire provides consistent, verifiable references that reduce procurement risk, speed vendor evaluation, and document consent for follow-up contacts. When kept as an electronic record it supports retention and reproducibility requirements under ESIGN (15 U.S.C. §7001) and UETA where applicable.
Multiple stakeholders prepare, submit, or review client reference questionnaires depending on context and industry.
Clear role separation—who fills, who approves, and who archives—reduces delays and ensures consistent, defensible records.
Brief description of the engagement, scope of work, and measurable outcomes so evaluators can match references to the selection criteria and verify claimed capabilities with concise context.
Clear start and end dates, or ongoing status, so reviewers can confirm timeline alignment with the proposal and assess the recency and relevance of the work performed.
List of deliverables, milestones, and the vendor’s role versus client responsibilities to clarify what was actually delivered and which outcomes were attributable to the vendor.
Name, job title, business email and phone, and best times to contact—include explicit consent to be contacted to avoid privacy and compliance issues.
Structured scoring or checkbox fields for timeliness, quality, budget adherence, and communication to enable quantitative comparisons across references.
Statement on permitted disclosures and a field for redaction requests so sensitive information is preserved and reviewers know what can be relied upon.
| Field | Configuration |
|---|---|
| Required Fields | Mark client name, dates, deliverables, and consent as required to prevent incomplete submissions. |
| Conditional Logic | Show redaction or NDA question only when confidentiality is flagged to shorten the form for most respondents. |
| Authentication | Use email verification or SMS codes for signer attribution; stronger auth for sensitive procurements. |
| Retention Policy | Set automatic export to secure storage and define retention per company policy and legal requirements. |
Choose delivery and authentication settings that match the sensitivity of the information collected and the buyer’s requirements.
Proper platform setup preserves signer attribution, creates an audit trail, and supports lawful retention under ESIGN and UETA.
| signNow | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | PandaDoc | HelloSign | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $8/user/mo | $15/user/mo | $14/user/mo | $19/user/mo | $15/user/mo |
| Free Trial | 7-day free trial | Varies | Varies | Varies | Varies |
| Bulk Send | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Audit Trail | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| HIPAA Compliant | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Request return within 7–14 calendar days for standard procurement reviews.
2–3 business days for urgent or timeboxed procurements.
Allow 3–5 business days for reference verification and follow-up.
Archive upon final contract award or rejection.
Late or missing responses can remove a vendor from consideration.
| Field | Configuration |
|---|---|
| Required Fields | Client name, dates, contact, consent |
| Conditional Fields | Show NDA/redaction only when needed |
| Authentication | Email + SMS or stronger |
| Storage | Encrypted archive with access controls |
Optica used a standardized questionnaire to summarize vendor deliverables and timelines for portfolio reviews.
Martin Properties collected tenant-implementation references during leasing platform selection.