Identification
Project name, physical address, parcel number, and project ID. Clear identification prevents administrative mismatches and is required for file linking across departments and systems.
Submitting a clear, complete Plan Check Request speeds permit processing, reduces rework, and establishes an official record of the submission. Accurate requests allow reviewers to assign the right specialty reviewers, identify missing documentation early, and provide precise correction lists to the applicant.
Roles vary by jurisdiction; larger projects often add specialty consultants (structural, fire protection, energy) and third-party reviewers to expedite clearance.
| Field | Configuration |
|---|---|
| File Format | PDF/A preferred for plans; include separate PDFs for specs and calculations |
| Reviewer Groups | Assign disciplines (structural, MEP, fire) to ensure parallel review where allowed |
| Notifications | Enable email alerts for intake, corrections, and approval milestones |
| Versioning | Keep a revision history for each resubmittal with clear version tags |
Project name, physical address, parcel number, and project ID. Clear identification prevents administrative mismatches and is required for file linking across departments and systems.
Concise description of the proposed construction, occupancy type, and square footage. This guides which code sections and occupancy classifications apply to the review.
Names, company, contact emails, and license numbers for the architect, engineer, and responsible parties. Accurate contact info speeds clarification and review callbacks.
List the applicable code editions (e.g., IBC year, local amendments) and a brief statement of compliance approaches such as alternate methods or equivalencies.
Complete plan set PDFs, structural calculations, life-safety analysis, energy compliance reports, geotechnical reports, and fire protection drawings attached and clearly labeled.
Payment confirmation, signed owner authorization or agent letter, and any third-party review agreements required by the jurisdiction.
Within 1–5 business days in many jurisdictions
Typically 5–15 business days depending on staff workload
First technical comments commonly issued within 15–45 business days
Revisions typically returned within 10–30 business days
After corrections cleared; total time highly variable by project size
Complete intake with required documents and payment recorded.
Clerk confirms required materials before routing to reviewers.
Discipline reviewers issue consolidated correction list.
Applicant resubmits revisions; reviewers clear items for permit release.
| Criteria | Plan Check Request | Permit Application |
|---|---|---|
| Intent | technical review only | request to obtain permit |
| Timing | pre-permit or parallel | post-plan acceptance; permit issuance |
| Required attachments | full plan set and calculations | plan set plus permits, fees, certifications |
| Outcome | corrections list or approval for permit | issued permit to commence work |
| signNow | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | PandaDoc | HelloSign | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $8/user/mo | $15/user/mo | $14/user/mo | $19/user/mo | $15/user/mo |
| Free Trial | 7-day free trial | Contact vendor for trial terms | Contact vendor for trial terms | Contact vendor for trial terms | Contact vendor for trial terms |
| Audit Trail | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| HIPAA Compliant | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Envelope Cap | No cap | 100 envelopes/user/year | Varies by vendor and plan; verify with provider | Varies by vendor and plan; verify with provider | Varies by vendor and plan; verify with provider |
Tim's firm shifted to online submissions for permitting to eliminate paper bottlenecks and centralize records.
The company standardized plan check packets and used electronic signatures to speed approvals.