Can this form be signed electronically?

Yes. Electronic signatures are legally valid under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. §7001) and UETA in most states, provided intent, consent, attribution, and record retention requirements are met.

What if the form contains student information?

Limit student identifiers to anonymized IDs when possible. If protected health information or identifiable education records are present, comply with HIPAA and FERPA requirements and restrict access accordingly.

Do I need a notarized signature?

Not typically. Course evaluation forms rarely require notarization; if an institutional policy or accreditor demands notarization, follow state notary rules or use RON where permitted.

How do I correct a submitted form?

If the platform supports edits, mark revisions with date and reviewer name; otherwise submit an amended form and retain the original for audit purposes.

Who retains the official record?

Custodianship is usually with the academic department or assessment office; institutions should publish a retention schedule aligned with legal and accreditation requirements.

What audit data should be stored?

Store signer identity, timestamp, IP or authentication method, and an immutable copy of the completed form to meet audit and accreditation needs.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Miscellaneous
Course Evaluation Reviewer Form

Course Evaluation Reviewer Form

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Course Evaluation Reviewer Agreement and Review Form

RECITALS

WHEREAS, Institution Name: (the "Institution") seeks an independent review of the course listed below to verify academic quality, learning outcome alignment, assessment integrity, and accessibility; and

WHEREAS, Reviewer Name: (the "Reviewer") possesses the expertise and capacity to perform the evaluation described herein; and

WHEREAS, the parties desire to set forth the scope, deliverables, compensation, confidentiality obligations and other terms governing the review engagement.

PARTIES & CONTACT INFORMATION

Institution Representative Institution Address Reviewer Organization / Affiliation Reviewer Contact (email / phone)

COURSE INFORMATION

Course Title Course Code

Instructor Name: Term / Semester:

Delivery Mode: In-person Online Hybrid

SCOPE OF WORK

The Reviewer will perform a comprehensive evaluation of the course materials and delivery as described below. The scope includes review of syllabus, learning outcomes, assessments, instructional materials, accessibility measures, grading rubrics and sample student work if provided. The Reviewer shall prepare a written report identifying strengths, deficiencies, and recommended corrective actions.

EVALUATION CRITERIA (SELECT ONE PER ITEM)

1. Alignment of learning objectives with assessments:

Exemplary Satisfactory Needs improvement Not applicable

2. Accuracy and currency of course content:

Exemplary Satisfactory Needs improvement Not applicable

3. Assessment design and transparency of grading:

Exemplary Satisfactory Needs improvement Not applicable

4. Accessibility and accommodations:

Exemplary Satisfactory Needs improvement Not applicable

Reviewer Comments and Recommendations

PAYMENT TERMS

Compensation Amount (total): $

Payment Schedule

Late Payment Fee: Invoices to be submitted to:

TERM AND TERMINATION

Effective Date: End Date:

Either party may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon providing written notice to the other party not fewer than days. Termination for material breach shall be effective immediately upon written notice if the breaching party fails to cure within a commercially reasonable period as provided in written notice.

CONFIDENTIALITY

The Reviewer will have access to confidential academic records and proprietary instructional materials. The Reviewer agrees not to disclose any non-public information obtained in connection with this engagement to any third party without the prior written consent of the Institution, except as required by law. The Reviewer shall use confidential information solely for the purposes of performing the services under this Agreement and shall return or destroy all confidential materials upon completion of services or termination, as directed by the Institution.

Acknowledgement of Confidentiality: Reviewer acknowledges and accepts confidentiality obligations

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Reviewer represents that the Reviewer has disclosed any actual, potential, or perceived conflicts of interest. If any conflict exists, the Reviewer shall disclose it below and obtain written waiver from the Institution prior to performing services.

No known conflict: No known conflict to disclose

If conflict exists, describe below

GOVERNING LAW

This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of , without regard to its conflict of law rules. Any dispute arising under this Agreement shall be resolved in the state or federal courts located in that state unless the parties mutually agree otherwise in writing.

ENTIRE AGREEMENT

This Agreement, together with any attachments, exhibits and the written scope of work, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous oral or written agreements, representations or understandings. Any modification to this Agreement must be in writing and signed by authorized representatives of both parties.

Certification: By signing below, each signer represents and warrants that they are authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the party they represent, that the information provided in this form is true and complete to the best of their knowledge, and that they will comply with the terms and obligations set forth herein.

Institution Representative (Print Name):

By (Signature):

Date:

Reviewer (Print Name):

By (Signature):

Date:

What the Course Evaluation Reviewer Form Is

The Course Evaluation Reviewer Form is a standardized document used by departments, committees, or accreditation teams to record a structured assessment of a course. It captures reviewer identification, course metadata, curriculum alignment, teaching effectiveness, materials and assessment methods, and recommended actions. The form creates a consistent record for program improvement, faculty feedback, and compliance with institutional policies. It may be completed during scheduled reviews, after course delivery, or as part of accreditation and program assessment cycles.

Why a Structured Reviewer Form Matters

Using a course evaluation reviewer form ensures consistent, auditable feedback across reviewers and terms; it supports curriculum decisions, accreditation evidence, and transparent faculty development.

Who Typically Completes This Form

The collected forms inform decisions on course revisions, faculty development, and institutional reporting; custodianship typically rests with the academic department or assessment office.

Program directors and chairs responsible for curriculum oversight and reporting.
Peer reviewers or faculty assigned to evaluate course content and delivery.
Assessment or accreditation staff compiling evidence for external review.

Core Sections to Include in a Professional Form

A complete Course Evaluation Reviewer Form groups information to support clear findings and follow-up actions across six essential areas.

Course Details

Include course code, title, term, delivery mode, and credit hours so reviewers can unambiguously identify the offering under review.

Reviewer Information

Record reviewer name, role, affiliation, and review date to attribute findings and maintain an audit trail for program records.

Learning Outcomes

List stated outcomes and assess their alignment with assessments and activities, noting gaps or exemplary alignment found during review.

Instruction & Delivery

Evaluate teaching methods, pacing, accessibility, and use of materials including whether delivery supported diverse learner needs.

Assessment & Grading

Examine assessment types, rubric use, grading consistency, and whether assessments validly measure stated learning outcomes.

Recommendations

Provide specific, actionable recommendations for course improvement, required follow-up, and responsible parties with suggested timelines.

Essential Fields to Capture

Student Identifier: Optional anonymized ID

Course Code: Dept + number

Term / Year: Season and year

Reviewer Name: Full legal name

Review Date: MM/DD/YYYY

Recommendation: Action summary

Step-by-Step: Completing the Reviewer Form

Follow these steps to complete the Course Evaluation Reviewer Form accurately and ensure your feedback is actionable and auditable.

01

Gather materials: Collect syllabus, assessments, and student feedback before starting.
02

Confirm course details: Verify course code, term, and instructor information.
03

Assess alignment: Compare outcomes, activities, and assessments systematically.
04

Record recommendations: Provide clear actions with responsible party and deadline.

Customizing an Online Review Workflow

Configure an electronic workflow that enforces required fields, routes the form, and captures an audit trail for compliance and reporting.

Field	Configuration
Required Fields	Make Reviewer Name, Course Code, and Review Date mandatory
Routing Rules	Auto-route to program director after submission
Notifications	Email alerts on assignment and completion
Attachments	Allow syllabus and sample assessments uploads

Where Completed Forms Should Be Sent

Identify official destinations and custodians to maintain records and support institutional reporting requirements.

Department Office: Primary custodian for program-level records
Assessment Office: For aggregation and accreditation evidence
Faculty Personnel File: Instructor-facing copy if used for development
Institutional Repository: Archived version for long-term retention

Digital Delivery and Technical Considerations

Confirm that the chosen platform meets institutional security policies and legal requirements (ESIGN/UETA); retain signed copies and metadata for reporting and compliance.

File Formats: PDF, DOCX accepted
Integrations: Works with LMS and cloud storage
Authentication: Email or SSO options

Key Timing and Processing Expectations

Establish clear internal deadlines for review completion, routing, and archival to align with assessment cycles and accreditation reporting.

Review Completion Window:

Typically within 2–4 weeks after course end

Program Aggregation Deadline:

Set a department cutoff before accreditation reporting

Faculty Notification:

Share findings within 30 days of finalizing review

Record Archival:

Archive signed forms per retention schedule

Correction Period:

Allow 7–14 days for clerical corrections

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Incomplete identification data that prevents matching the review to the correct course or term, delaying action.
Vague recommendations lacking measurable steps or responsible parties, which makes follow-up ineffective.
Uploading inconsistent syllabus versions; reviewers should reference the exact syllabus used during the course.
Failing to capture the audit trail or reviewer attribution, which undermines accreditation and quality assurance evidence.

Risks of Incorrect or Incomplete Forms

Accreditation Risk: Incomplete records can weaken program accreditation submissions

FERPA Concerns: Improper student data disclosure risks FERPA violations

Action Delays: Missing fields impede remediation and curricular updates

Audit Failures: Lack of audit trail undermines compliance reviews

Data Integrity: Version confusion leads to incorrect reporting

Reputational Harm: Public accreditation issues can affect institutional standing

eSignature Vendor Pricing Snapshot for This Form

Comparing basic vendor pricing and selected features helps institutions choose a platform that supports secure, auditable course evaluation workflows.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	Varies	Varies	Varies	Varies
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No

Frequently Asked Questions

Answers to common questions about completing, signing, and storing the Course Evaluation Reviewer Form.

Need help? Contact support

Can this form be signed electronically?
Yes. Electronic signatures are legally valid under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. §7001) and UETA in most states, provided intent, consent, attribution, and record retention requirements are met.
What if the form contains student information?
Limit student identifiers to anonymized IDs when possible. If protected health information or identifiable education records are present, comply with HIPAA and FERPA requirements and restrict access accordingly.
Do I need a notarized signature?
Not typically. Course evaluation forms rarely require notarization; if an institutional policy or accreditor demands notarization, follow state notary rules or use RON where permitted.
How do I correct a submitted form?
If the platform supports edits, mark revisions with date and reviewer name; otherwise submit an amended form and retain the original for audit purposes.
Who retains the official record?
Custodianship is usually with the academic department or assessment office; institutions should publish a retention schedule aligned with legal and accreditation requirements.
What audit data should be stored?
Store signer identity, timestamp, IP or authentication method, and an immutable copy of the completed form to meet audit and accreditation needs.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now