Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

Course Evaluation Survey Form

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Course Evaluation Survey & Evaluation Services Agreement

Institution Name:

Evaluator Name:

Recitals

WHEREAS, the Institution administers educational coursework and requires an independent evaluation of the quality, delivery, and learning outcomes of specified courses; and

WHEREAS, the Evaluator represents that they possess the experience, qualifications, and independence necessary to perform course evaluation services and to collect feedback from course participants in accordance with the terms set forth herein; and

WHEREAS, the parties wish to document both the evaluative survey instruments to be used for course participants and the commercial terms under which the Evaluator will provide evaluation services.

Scope of Work

Deliverables shall include a Participant Survey Instrument, anonymized aggregated results, an executive summary of findings, and recommendations for improvement unless otherwise agreed in writing.

Course Evaluation Survey (Participant-Facing)

Student Instructor Staff Other

1. Overall course quality (rate 1–5):

2. Clarity of learning objectives (rate 1–5):

3. Instructor effectiveness (rate 1–5):

4. Course materials and resources (rate 1–5):

Payment Terms (if service provided)

Late fee:

Term and Termination

Effective Start Date:

Anticipated End Date:

Either party may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon written notice to the other party delivered not less than days prior to the effective termination date. Termination for cause may be immediate where a material breach remains uncured after a reasonable cure period not to exceed 15 days.

Confidentiality

The parties acknowledge that in connection with performance of the Scope of Work, each may receive Confidential Information of the other. "Confidential Information" means information that is disclosed in writing and marked confidential or that by its nature would reasonably be considered confidential. The receiving party shall (a) use Confidential Information solely for the purposes of performing this Agreement, (b) restrict disclosure to those employees or agents who have a need to know and who are bound to protect confidentiality, and (c) return or destroy Confidential Information upon termination or request. Confidential Information does not include information that is publicly available through no breach by the receiving party, independently developed without use of the disclosing party's Confidential Information, or lawfully received from a third party.

Governing Law

This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the substantive laws of the state chosen by the Institution. The parties submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located within that state for resolution of disputes arising under this Agreement.

Entire Agreement

This Agreement, including the Scope of Work and any written attachments executed by the parties, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, proposals, and communications, whether written or oral. Any amendment or modification must be in writing and executed by authorized representatives of both parties.

Acknowledgment and Certification

By signing below, the parties certify that they are authorized to enter into this Agreement, that the information provided in the survey portion (if completed by a participant) is accurate to the best of the respondent's knowledge, and that the Evaluator will perform services in accordance with the terms set forth herein.

Institution Name:

By:

Date:

Evaluator Name:

By:

Date:

Enter text✕

What the Course Evaluation Survey Form Is

A Course Evaluation Survey Form is a structured questionnaire used at the end of a class or course to collect feedback on curriculum, instruction, and learning outcomes. Responses typically cover course content, instructor effectiveness, assessment clarity, and learning resources and may be anonymous or attributed. Institutions use aggregated results for curriculum improvement, instructor development, accreditation reporting, and quality assurance. Forms can be distributed on paper, via a learning management system, or electronically using eSignature and form platforms that preserve audit trails and data export options.

Why a Formal Course Evaluation Matters

Course evaluations provide standardized, documentable feedback that supports continuous improvement, accreditation evidence, and transparent performance review processes for faculty and programs.

Why a Formal Course Evaluation Matters

Who Typically Completes and Reviews These Forms

Course evaluations involve multiple campus roles from respondents to reviewers; clarity on responsibilities improves response quality.

  • Instructors and faculty — review aggregated feedback to refine teaching, adjust assessments, and document professional development needs.
  • Program administrators — collect and analyze results for curricular changes, accreditation files, and program-level reporting.
  • Institutional researchers — manage distribution, response-rate monitoring, and statistical reporting for compliance and planning.

Keep distribution lists and reviewer access current to ensure results reach the right stakeholders and are used appropriately.

Stepwise Process to Prepare and Collect Evaluations

Follow these sequential steps to prepare, distribute, collect, and analyze course evaluation responses efficiently.

  • 01
    Prepare Form: Draft questions, set scales, and approve with curriculum staff.
  • 02
    Configure Delivery: Choose distribution channel, authentication, and anonymity settings.
  • 03
    Collect Responses: Open the response window and send reminders per schedule.
  • 04
    Analyze Results: Export data, run basic statistics, and compile aggregated reports.

Essential Components of a Professional Course Evaluation

A robust form balances standardized rating items, targeted questions, and data handling controls so results are comparable and defensible for program decisions.

Course Details

Fields for course code, title, instructor, term, and delivery mode. Accurate metadata ensures correct grouping and historical comparisons.

Learning Outcomes

Items that ask whether stated course objectives were met. Outcomes-based questions align feedback with accreditation and assessment standards.

Instructional Quality

Questions on clarity, organization, responsiveness, and use of instructional materials to evaluate teaching practices objectively.

Assessment and Feedback

Items addressing fairness and clarity of grading, timeliness of feedback, and alignment between assessments and learning goals.

Open Comments

Free-text areas for qualitative feedback; include moderation guidance and FERPA-aware handling instructions.

Reporting Controls

Settings for anonymity, aggregation thresholds, export formats, and access controls to protect privacy and ensure valid reporting.

Export Options and Supporting Documents

Provide multiple download formats and keep essential supporting documents with the evaluation record for audits and accreditation.

Export Formats

Offer CSV and Excel for quantitative analysis, and PDF for official records and archival. Include a timestamp and export metadata on each file.

Printable Version

Supply a clean, printable PDF layout for paper-based collection or institutional records that require a hard copy.

Companion Documents

Attach course syllabus, learning outcomes matrix, and grading rubric to provide context when reviewers analyze feedback.

Accessibility

Ensure exported files and the online survey meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA accessibility standards for inclusive participation.

Typical Online Configuration Settings

Common platform settings influence authentication, anonymity, reminders, and how results are exported for analysis.

Field Configuration
Delivery Method Email with LMS link or direct LMS posting
Authentication Email verification or LMS single sign-on
Anonymity Enable anonymous mode or collect identifiers
Export Options CSV, Excel, PDF with audit metadata

Where Completed Forms Are Routed

Define the delivery destinations and routing so results reach the appropriate offices and are stored correctly.

  • Course Administrator: Primary recipient for aggregated results and data exports.
  • Learning Management System: Upload summary reports or embed within course site for instructor access.
  • Institutional Repository: Store PDF records for accreditation and audit purposes.
  • Accreditation Office: Provide compiled evidence for program reviews and site visits.

Technical and Integration Considerations

Confirm platform compatibility with your LMS, authentication, and privacy requirements before deployment.

  • Integrations: Canvas, Blackboard, Google Workspace, and signNow-compatible APIs
  • Supported Formats: PDF, DOCX, CSV exports
  • Authentication: SSO, email verification, or LMS identity

Use integrations and export formats that align with institutional reporting tools to minimize manual data handling and preserve audit trails.

Scheduling and Timeframes to Observe

Set clear distribution and response windows to maximize participation while meeting reporting obligations and accreditation timelines.

End-of-Term Distribution:

Distribute surveys during the final two weeks of the course.

Response Window:

Allow 2–4 weeks with scheduled reminders to boost response rates.

Export and Archive:

Export finalized data and store records within 30 days of window close.

Accreditation Reporting:

Align reporting cycles with annual accreditation submission deadlines.

Follow-up Actions:

Publish aggregated results and improvement plans within one semester.

Key Milestones from Launch to Reporting

Sequence the major milestones so stakeholders know when inputs are required and when reports will be available.

01

Form Approval

Finalize questions and obtain academic-unit signoff.

02

Platform Setup

Configure survey, authentication, and export settings.

03

Response Collection

Open window, send reminders, and monitor response rates.

04

Reporting Delivery

Produce aggregated reports and distribute to stakeholders.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Using inconsistent course identifiers, which prevents accurate aggregation across sections and terms.
  • Failing to define anonymity clearly, leading to unreliable qualitative feedback or FERPA concerns for identifiable responses.
  • Omitting export metadata like timestamps and user roles, which complicates audits and accreditation evidence.
  • Relying on free-text analysis without moderation, which can introduce biased or sensitive material into published reports.

Risks and Consequences of Poorly Managed Evaluations

Accreditation Impact: Delayed evidence submission
FERPA Violation: Unauthorized disclosure risk
Data Breach: Privacy and compliance exposure
Reputational Harm: Public complaints or misinterpretation
Invalid Data: Low response bias
Legal Exposure: Contractual disputes over evaluation use

Security and Compliance Controls to Consider

Encryption: TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit; AES-256 at rest
Audit Trail: Signed document timestamps and action logs
Certifications: SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 available
HIPAA Support: BAA available where patient health data applies
eSignature Law: Compliant with ESIGN and UETA
Accessibility: WCAG 2.0 Level AA conformance options

eSignature Pricing and Plan Comparison

Comparison of common plan attributes and starting prices for widely used eSignature providers; signNow is shown first per table convention.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial 7-day free trial No No Yes, limited Yes, limited
Bulk Send Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes Yes Yes No No
Envelope Cap No cap 100 envelopes/user/year Varies by plan Varies by plan Varies by plan

Frequently Asked Questions About Course Evaluation Forms

Answers to common operational, legal, and technical questions encountered when deploying course evaluation surveys.


Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users