Can the list be signed electronically?

Yes. Electronic signatures meet ESIGN and UETA standards when intent, consent, attribution, and retention are demonstrable. Use an audit trail and ensure consumer disclosure if the record is consumer‑facing.

Is notarization required?

Not typically required for routine performance evaluations. Notarization is only necessary if specific state law or contract requires it for a particular personnel action.

What if the employee refuses to sign?

Record the employee’s refusal in the list with the date and witness statement. Manager and HR should sign and retain the record; refusal notes preserve notice and reduce later disputes.

How to correct errors after signing?

Do not alter a signed record. Create an addendum describing the correction, dated and signed by the same parties, or reissue a corrected list with clear versioning and retention of the original.

Can an image of a handwritten signature be used?

Yes. An image overlay is acceptable if accompanied by an auditable signing event capturing signer identity, timestamp, and IP or authentication method to satisfy ESIGN criteria.

How long must I keep the record?

Follow applicable federal and state retention rules; commonly keep personnel evaluations for at least three years post‑employment, longer where HIPAA, tax, or industry rules apply.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Miscellaneous
Employee Evaluation List

Employee Evaluation List

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

EMPLOYEE EVALUATION LIST

WHEREAS the Employer: and the Employee: have agreed to document performance, goals, and any recommended compensation or corrective actions for the evaluation period beginning and ending .

Employee Information

Employee ID Job Title Department Supervisor Date of Hire

Scope of Work

Describe primary duties, responsibilities, and objectives for the role during the evaluation period:

Performance Ratings

Rating scale: 1 = Unsatisfactory; 2 = Needs Improvement; 3 = Meets Expectations; 4 = Exceeds Expectations; 5 = Outstanding.

Job Knowledge — Rating:

Work Quality — Rating:

Productivity & Timeliness — Rating:

Communication & Collaboration — Rating:

Initiative & Problem Solving — Rating:

Overall Assessment & Recommendations

Overall Rating:

Recommended Action (select all that apply)

Promotion Salary Increase Amount:

Training / Development Performance Improvement Plan Termination

Training / Development Needs Goals and Objectives for Next Period Supervisor Comments Employee Comments (optional)

Payment Terms (If Compensation Adjustment is Recommended)

Any recommended compensation adjustments documented above shall become effective on the Effective Date indicated below, subject to approval through normal payroll and budgetary procedures. Recommended adjustment amount:

Effective Date: Payment Schedule or Notes:

Late payment or retroactive payment handling (if applicable):

Term and Termination

This evaluation covers the period beginning and ending . Any corrective action or employment changes that arise from this evaluation are subject to the Employer's policies and applicable law. Notice period for implementation of recommended actions:

Confidentiality

All information contained in this evaluation is confidential and is intended for use by authorized representatives of the Employer and the Employee. Dissemination of the contents without written authorization is prohibited except where disclosure is required by law. The parties acknowledge that the evaluation may be relied upon for personnel decisions and that both Supervisor and Employee will take reasonable steps to protect confidential information.

Employee acknowledges confidentiality terms:

Governing Law; Entire Agreement

This evaluation and any actions arising from it shall be governed by the laws of the jurisdiction specified below. Governing jurisdiction:

This document constitutes the entire written record of the evaluation for the stated period and supersedes prior informal summaries or notes relating to the same period unless expressly incorporated by reference in writing.

Acknowledgment of Review

Employee signature below indicates that the contents of this evaluation were reviewed with the Employee. Employee signature does not necessarily indicate agreement with all findings but confirms receipt and discussion.

Employer (Printed Name):

By (Signature):

Date:

Employee (Printed Name):

By (Signature):

Date:

What the Employee Evaluation List is and how it’s used

An Employee Evaluation List is a structured record used by employers to assess performance, document goals, track corrective actions, and record training or promotion decisions. Typical uses include periodic performance reviews, probationary assessments, and pre-termination documentation. A well‑formatted list standardizes criteria, reduces bias, and creates an auditable history for HR, payroll, and compliance teams. When combined with a consistent review cycle it also supports professional development plans and helps demonstrate nondiscriminatory employment decisions in disputes or audits.

Why a clear Employee Evaluation List matters

A consistent Employee Evaluation List improves transparency, supports defensible HR decisions, and preserves a searchable record for audits and legal reviews. It organizes observable performance metrics, dates, and signatures in one place to reduce disputes and administrative overhead.

Who completes and reviews the Employee Evaluation List

Role clarity ensures the list documents both appraisal and acknowledgement, which supports training, promotions, or legal defensibility.

Direct manager completes performance ratings and objective assessments following policy and evidence.
Employee reviews and adds comments or self‑assessment, then signs to acknowledge receipt.
Human Resources files the signed record and ensures consistency with company policy and retention rules.

Stepwise process to complete the Employee Evaluation List

Follow these ordered steps to complete the list accurately and consistently.

01

Prepare: Gather job description, prior reviews, and performance evidence.
02

Assess: Rate each criterion objectively with supporting examples.
03

Discuss: Hold a review meeting to cover strengths, gaps, and goals.
04

Record: Finalize comments, sign entries, and file per policy.

Essential elements that a professional Employee Evaluation List should include

A complete list combines identity fields, objective criteria, documented examples, development actions, approvals, and signature evidence.

Identity

Name, employee ID, department, manager, and job title for unambiguous linkage to HR records.

Review Period

Exact start and end dates for the evaluation interval to support comparisons and appeals.

Criteria and Ratings

Standardized competency areas with numeric or descriptive ratings and space for examples.

Development Plan

Documented objectives, training, owners, and target dates for follow‑up.

Manager Comments

Clear, factual observations tied to evidence and outcomes.

Signatures

Employee, manager, and HR signatures with dates to confirm receipt and review.

Key administrative and security fields to include

Record Owner: HR department

Access Level: Manager/HR only

Confidentiality: Private personnel file

Audit Trail: Capture timestamps

Encryption: AES-256 at rest

Transport: TLS 1.2/1.3

Typical routing workflow for an Employee Evaluation List

A reliable workflow reduces delays and ensures each signer completes the required step in order.

Draft: Manager completes assessment fields.
Review: Manager and employee meet to discuss and adjust.
Approve: HR reviews for policy compliance.
Store: Signed record filed in HRIS or secure repository.

Configuring an online workflow for the Employee Evaluation List

Map each field and signer role to an automated workflow step to maintain order and reduce manual errors.

Field	Configuration
Manager Section	Editable until manager signs
Employee Section	Editable after manager review
HR Approval	Conditional release upon HR sign-off
Retention Flag	Auto-archive after sign-off

Delivery and technical requirements for digital evaluation lists

Choose integrations that match your HR systems (for example, HRIS, payroll, or document management) and confirm platform compliance with relevant standards.

Formats: PDF, DOCX supported
Integrations: HRIS and cloud storage
Auth options: Email, SMS, SSO

Typical timing and review deadlines to set for Employee Evaluation Lists

Define cadence and submission deadlines to ensure consistent recordkeeping and timely performance conversations.

Annual Review Deadline:

Date by which yearly reviews must be completed

Probation Review:

Typically 30, 60, or 90 days after hire

Corrective Action Follow-up:

Set a 30- or 60-day check-in

Appeal Window:

Employee may submit written rebuttal within 14 days

Document Retention Trigger:

Retention counting starts from final signature date

Key milestones in the evaluation cycle

Track distinct milestones to keep the evaluation process auditable and on schedule.

01

Goal Setting

Establish objectives at start of review period.

02

Midpoint Check

Conduct interim performance discussion and record notes.

03

Final Review Meeting

Hold formal discussion and adjust ratings as needed.

04

Signatures and Filing

Complete signatures and archive in HRIS.

Common preparation mistakes to avoid

Vague language: using impressions instead of concrete examples increases dispute risk during grievance review.
Missing dates or signatures: undated or unsigned records may be rejected in internal or external investigations.
Inconsistent scoring: applying different rating scales across teams creates fairness concerns and compliance exposure.
Poor storage: keeping evaluation lists in unsecured email or shared drives risks unauthorized access or data loss.

Risks and potential consequences of incorrect records

Discrimination Claims: Incomplete records weaken employer defense

Payroll Errors: Incorrect title or dates affect pay

Regulatory Scrutiny: HIPAA/EEO audits risk penalties

Litigation Costs: Discovery costs increase if records are missing

Contractual Breach: Claims if review tied to bonuses

Reputational Harm: Public disputes can harm employer brand

Typical eSignature vendor pricing and capability comparison for this use case

Compare baseline pricing and key capabilities when selecting an eSignature provider for Employee Evaluation Lists. Pricing shown reflects standard per-seat plans and common capability indicators.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	Varies by vendor	Varies by vendor	Varies by vendor	Varies by vendor
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No

Real-world examples of Employee Evaluation List use

Practical examples show how evaluation lists support HR operations across organizations.

Optica Ventures — COO

Manager standardized ratings across teams to reduce variance

Resulted in clearer promotion decisions
The consistent template simplified audits and helped HR defend staffing choices during a compliance review.

Fertility Centers — Founder

Adopted mobile-ready forms for clinicians to record performance during shifts

Used secure platform with audit trail
This change cut turnaround time for signed reviews and stored them in the clinical personnel file for regulatory access.

Typical signatories and approvers

Manager — Performance Owner

The direct manager completes ratings, supplies examples, recommends development, and signs to confirm the assessment. Manager input anchors the record and triggers HR processing.

Human Resources — Custodian

HR reviews for policy compliance, adds administrative notes, finalizes retention tagging, and stores the signed record in the personnel system or secure archive.

Frequently asked questions about completing and signing the Employee Evaluation List

Answers to common issues encountered during completion, signing, and archiving of Employee Evaluation Lists.

Need help? Contact support

Can the list be signed electronically?
Yes. Electronic signatures meet ESIGN and UETA standards when intent, consent, attribution, and retention are demonstrable. Use an audit trail and ensure consumer disclosure if the record is consumer‑facing.
Is notarization required?
Not typically required for routine performance evaluations. Notarization is only necessary if specific state law or contract requires it for a particular personnel action.
What if the employee refuses to sign?
Record the employee’s refusal in the list with the date and witness statement. Manager and HR should sign and retain the record; refusal notes preserve notice and reduce later disputes.
How to correct errors after signing?
Do not alter a signed record. Create an addendum describing the correction, dated and signed by the same parties, or reissue a corrected list with clear versioning and retention of the original.
Can an image of a handwritten signature be used?
Yes. An image overlay is acceptable if accompanied by an auditable signing event capturing signer identity, timestamp, and IP or authentication method to satisfy ESIGN criteria.
How long must I keep the record?
Follow applicable federal and state retention rules; commonly keep personnel evaluations for at least three years post‑employment, longer where HIPAA, tax, or industry rules apply.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now