Scope & Objectives
Define the business units, processes, transactions, and time period covered. State assessment objectives, such as detection improvements, control testing, or regulatory responses.
Conducting a Fraud Risk Assessment clarifies where control gaps and exposure points exist, informs targeted controls, reduces financial loss, and strengthens regulatory compliance reporting. It produces an auditable record for boards and examiners.
Teams that create and review fraud risk assessments are usually cross-functional and include compliance, internal audit, finance, and legal.
Completed assessments are circulated to senior management, the board, and retained for evidence of due diligence.
A compliance officer or fraud prevention lead usually owns the assessment process, coordinates interviews, consolidates evidence, and attests to accuracy. That individual certifies findings to senior management and regulators where required.
The CFO or delegated finance executive reviews financial exposure sections, approves remediation budgets, and signs off on control changes that affect financial reporting or tax positions.
Define the business units, processes, transactions, and time period covered. State assessment objectives, such as detection improvements, control testing, or regulatory responses.
List identified fraud schemes and failure modes with brief descriptions and mappings to process steps where they are most likely to occur.
Use a consistent rating scale (e.g., Low/Medium/High) to score each risk for probability and financial or reputational impact; document scoring rationale.
Document current prevention, detection, and response controls; include control owner, control frequency, and evidence location for testing.
Prioritize control weaknesses, estimate remediation complexity and cost, and assign owners with target completion dates.
Include signatures, timestamps, data provenance, and version history; retention instructions and the certifying signatory attest to accuracy.
| Field | Configuration |
|---|---|
| Signature Order | Sequential or parallel routing; choose sequential for attestations. |
| Authentication Method | Email + optional SMS or knowledge-based authentication for higher assurance. |
| Conditional Fields | Show remediation items only when a control gap is scored High. |
| Retention Policy | Attach retention duration and archival location to completed records. |
Choose a platform that supports secure storage, a detailed audit trail, and compliance needs such as HIPAA or 21 CFR Part 11 where applicable.
Ensure the chosen provider can export a tamper-evident signed PDF and maintain an access log and certificate of completion for compliance review.
Start within 2 weeks of project approval
Complete within 4–6 weeks depending on scope
Allow 1–2 weeks for stakeholder review cycles
Assign 30/60/90-day targets based on severity
Obtain final attestation upon remediation plan approval
Align scope, stakeholders, and data sources with the project team.
Confirm transaction samples, logs, and control evidence are available for review.
Record test results and exceptions for each control owner.
Deliver the written report, remediation plan, and signed certification to leadership.
| signNow | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | PandaDoc | HelloSign | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $8/user/mo | $15/user/mo | $14/user/mo | $19/user/mo | $15/user/mo |
| Free Trial | 7-day free trial | Varies by vendor | Varies by vendor | Varies by vendor | Varies by vendor |
| Bulk Send | Yes (Business Premium) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Varies |
| Audit Trail | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| HIPAA Compliant | Yes (BAA available) | Vendor option | Vendor option | Vendor option | Vendor option |
| Envelope Cap | No cap | 100 envelopes/user/year | Vendor limits | Vendor limits | Vendor limits |
A hospital compliance team performed a targeted assessment after unusual billing patterns were flagged
A regional bank conducted an enterprise fraud review focused on wire transfers