Patient Data
Full legal name, date of birth, medical record number, patient contact information, and imaging accession numbers to ensure precise chart matching and follow-up.
A standardized Healthcare Image Critiques form improves clarity of image interpretation, reduces variation between reviewers, documents technical quality issues, and creates an auditable record for clinical governance and legal review. It supports care continuity by summarizing findings and recommended next steps.
This form is used across clinical teams to standardize imaging reviews and record outcomes consistently.
Completed critiques facilitate peer review, quality metrics, and integration into the patient record for downstream care.
Full legal name, date of birth, medical record number, patient contact information, and imaging accession numbers to ensure precise chart matching and follow-up.
Exam date/time, imaging modality (CT, MR, XR, US, PET), protocol and series descriptions, accession number, referring provider, and comparison studies with dates.
Assessment of motion artifacts, exposure parameters, contrast timing, incomplete views, and any limitations that reduce diagnostic confidence or require repeat imaging.
Concise, structured description of positive and negative findings organized by anatomic region with measurements, lesion descriptors, and comparison to prior exams.
One- to three-line impression prioritizing critical findings, followed by actionable recommendations for clinical correlation, additional imaging, biopsy, or timed follow-up and urgency level.
Reviewer's name, professional degree, board certifications, contact details, electronic signature, date/time of critique, and any second-review or peer consultation notes.
| Field | Configuration |
|---|---|
| Required Fields | Patient IDs, Exam date, Impression required |
| Routing | Auto-route to referring clinician and QA team |
| Attachments | DICOM or PDF required; auto-attach prior study |
| Authentication | Email, SMS code, or SSO with MFA |
The e-submission and signing platform should meet HIPAA security, integrate with EHR/PACS, and support authenticated signer workflows.
Complete critique within 24–72 hours of study for routine exams.
Immediate verbal notification plus documented critique within 1 business day.
QA reviews scheduled monthly or per institutional policy.
Upload signed critique to EHR and link to imaging study.
Retention period begins on document creation date.
Images ingested into PACS; critique draft created.
Urgent results communicated verbally to care team.
Reviewer signs and timestamps final critique.
QA team reviews periodically; archive with audit trail.
A tertiary hospital standardized its imaging critiques to ensure clear handoff between radiology and surgical teams for complex postoperative patients and trauma imaging.
An independent imaging center documents technical quality issues and follow-up recommendations in each critique to reduce repeat exams and clarify billing justification for payers.
| signNow | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | PandaDoc | HelloSign | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $8/user/mo | $15/user/mo | $14/user/mo | $19/user/mo | $15/user/mo |
| Free Trial | 7-day free trial | Varies by plan | Varies by plan | Varies by plan | Varies by plan |
| Bulk Send | Yes (Business Premium) | Varies by plan | Varies by plan | Varies by plan | Varies by plan |
| Audit Trail | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| HIPAA Compliant | Yes | Varies by plan | Varies by plan | Varies by plan | Varies by plan |