Study Protocol
Describe objectives, design, inclusion/exclusion criteria, sample size rationale, study timeline, interventions, and procedures so reviewers can assess risk versus benefit.
A complete, accurate IRB submission reduces review cycles, clarifies consent, and demonstrates regulatory compliance. Proper documentation supports human subject protections, helps secure funding, and limits administrative delays under 45 CFR 46 and FDA oversight where applicable.
Institutional teams and researchers coordinate IRB submissions; each role has specific responsibilities during preparation and review.
Clear role separation helps ensure timely review and reduces the chance of noncompliance or protocol amendments after approval.
Describe objectives, design, inclusion/exclusion criteria, sample size rationale, study timeline, interventions, and procedures so reviewers can assess risk versus benefit.
Provide plain-language consent text, risk/benefit disclosures, alternatives, confidentiality provisions, contact information, and signature blocks for subjects or legally authorized representatives.
Explain data collection, storage, de-identification, encryption, access controls, and plans for sharing or destruction of identifiable data.
Include all scripts, advertisements, flyers, and electronic outreach showing how subjects are identified and contacted to ensure non-coercive language.
Provide adverse event reporting plans, DSMB details if applicable, stopping rules, and contact info for timely safety notifications.
Attach investigator CVs, HIPAA authorizations, training certificates (e.g., human subjects protection), and any sponsor agreements or clinical trial registration info.
| Field | Configuration |
|---|---|
| Signers & routing | Specify PI, co-investigators, and required administrative reviewers |
| Authentication | Use institutional SSO or two-factor for identity verification |
| Conditional fields | Reveal HIPAA or minors sections when applicable |
| Audit settings | Capture timestamps, IP, and signer attribution |
Use a platform that preserves an audit trail, supports PDF and DOCX, and meets HIPAA and institutional IT security requirements.
Ensure the chosen workflow supports export of a signed package and secure archival consistent with institutional records retention policies.
Typically 2–8 weeks depending on board schedule and completeness
Often completed in 1–2 weeks for minimal-risk studies
Annual or at intervals specified by the IRB
Allow 1–4 weeks for minor amendments; longer for substantive changes
Report immediately per IRB and FDA requirements
Submit full package and receive confirmation of receipt
Receive approval, conditional approval, or request for changes
Address queries and submit revised materials
Begin recruitment once final approval and site activation are complete
The PI signs to certify the accuracy of the submission, confirm training, and accept responsibility for protocol conduct. The PI must ensure all delegated personnel are qualified and that consent is obtained correctly.
An authorized IRB official signs approval letters and conditions; their signature documents institutional oversight and is required for study activation and sponsor compliance.
Intro: A university team submitted a blank survey protocol with clear consent text and a data de-identification plan.
Intro: A clinical investigation included a detailed adverse event plan and DSMB charter at initial submission.
| signNow | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | PandaDoc | HelloSign | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $8/user/mo | $15/user/mo | $14/user/mo | $19/user/mo | $15/user/mo |
| Free Trial | 7-day trial | Varies | Varies | Varies | Varies |
| Bulk Send | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Audit Trail | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| HIPAA Compliant | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Envelope Cap | No cap | 100 envelopes/user/year | Varies | Varies | Varies |