Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

IDPH Project Submission Form

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Project Submission Form for Hospitals

Project identifying information

All sections of this form must be completed.    Altered forms will not be accepted

IDPH Number

Facility name

Street address

City
IL
ZIP code

Project name

If this project changes the facility's licensed bed count by adding or reducing beds, it will be necessary to contact the Health Facilities Services and Review Board.

Is this a phased occupancy project?

If yes, attach an occupancy schedule describing the rooms to be occupied in each phase with a small scale graphic plan

Type of project

Type of submission

Certificate of Need

Submit a copy of the approved certificate of need (CON). A review by the Department WILL NOT begin until a CON or appropriate documentation is received. Written documentation from the Health Services and Review Board may be requested indicating a CON is not required.

CON project number
Date approved

Functional program narrative

Provide a functional program narrative for the project that describes the purpose of the project, departmental relationships, space requirements and other basic information relating to fulfillment of the facility's objectives. The functional program shall include a description of those services necessary for the complete operation of the facility.

Attach additional sheets if needed.

Systems program narrative

Provide a systems program narrative describing all special systems including, but not limited to, fire alarm, nurses call, special locking devices, security packages, electrical, plumbing, HVAC, medical gas and fire protection.

Attach additional sheets if needed.

Estimated project cost

1. Site preparation costs $

2. Demolition costs $

3. Construction contracts (including cost of materials) $

4. Change orders $

Subtotal - lines 1 thru 4 $

6. Fixed capital equipment* $

Add lines 5 and 6 $

If the fixed capital equipment is not more than 51 percent of the total cost, then use line 7 for the plan review fee calculation below.

8. If line 6 is 51 percent more than line 7, then multiply line 6 by .20 $

9. Add lines 5 and 8: this is your adjusted estimated project cost $

Plan review fee calculation

The plan review fee is due and payable upon submission of this form along with the drawings and required information. Using the figures in line 7 or line 9, whichever is applicable, calculate the plan review fee.

Estimated project cost Fee as listed below

Less than $500,000 No fee

$500,000 - $999,999 Project cost x .0096 = or $6,000, whichever is greater

$1,000,000 - $4,999,999 Project cost x .0022 = or $9,600, whichever is greater

Greater than $5,000,000 Project cost x .0011 = or $11,000, whichever is greater; maximum fee of $40,000

10. Plan review fee to be submitted $

11. Is the facility a disproportionate share hospital?

12. Is the facility a rural hospital with 75 beds or less?

13. If line 11 or line 12 is "yes", reduce line 10 by 50 percent. $

14. Total from line 10 or line 13 (whichever is applicable) $

Remittance should be made payable to the IDPH Plan Review Fund in the form of a check or money order

Mail completed submission to

Design and Construction Section, Illinois Department of Public Health
525 W. Jefferson Street., Fourth Floor, Springfield, IL 62761
217-785-4264

For questions, please call

Drawing submission Provide one set of signed/sealed drawings and outline specifications for review in accordance with Section 250.2430 of the Illinois Hospital Licensing Requirements. This includes design development drawings and outline specifications and working/construction drawings and specifications.

Important notice The state agency is requesting disclosure of information that is necessary to accomplish the statutory purpose as outlined under Public Act 90-0327. Disclosure of this information is mandatory.

Code analysis information for EXISTING BUILDING for a renovation/remodel project

Provide the NFPA 220 construction type for the existing building in which the renovation/remodel is occurring.

Construction type
Year built
Number of stories
Height in feet

Provide the following information to describe how the existing building meets the above noted construction type:

Existing structural component Existing assembly rating or new assembly rating due to alterations UL assembly number
Roof
Floor
Beams
Columns
Girders
Interior walls
Exterior walls

Sprinkler system

Fire pump capacity Water main size

Emergency power

Type

Generating set UPS Other Fuel storage in gallons

Fire alarm

Fire walls Through wall/floor penetrations
Rating UL assembly number Penetration type Rating UL assembly number
1-hr fire wall
1-hr fire/smoke curtain wall/slab
2-hr fire floor

Code analysis information for NEW CONSTRUCTION of a new building or addition to the existing building.

Provide the NFPA 220 construction type for the new construction. Complete the code analysis information on the existing building that the new construction is connected to or adjacent to on the previous page under EXISTING BUILDING.

Construction type
Number of stories
Height in feet

Provide the following information for the new building construction and/or addition(s):

New structural component New assembly rating UL assembly number
Roof
Floor
Beams
Columns
Girders
Interior walls
Exterior walls

Sprinkler system

Fire pump capacity Water main size

Emergency power

Type

Generating set UPS Other Fuel storage capacity

Fire alarm

Fire walls Through wall/floor penetrations
Rating UL assembly number Penetration type Rating UL assembly number
1-hr fire wall
1-hr fire/smoke curtain wall/slab
2-hr fire floor

Contact Information

Facility representative's name
Title

Address

City
State
ZIP code

Phone number
Fax number

E-mail address

Architectural firm name

Project architect

Address

City
State
ZIP code

Phone number
Fax number

E-mail address

HVAC design company

Contact name

Address

City
State
ZIP code

Phone number
Fax number

E-mail address

Electrical system design company

Contact name

Address

City
State
ZIP code

Phone number
Fax number

E-mail address

Signature: Date:
Enter text✕

What the IDPH Project Submission Form Is and when it's used

The IDPH Project Submission Form is a standardized application used to propose, document, and request approval for projects submitted to a state or local Department of Public Health (IDPH). It captures project details such as scope, objectives, timelines, budget estimates, responsible parties, and required approvals so health authorities can review compliance with public health regulations, funding rules, or program-specific criteria. Agencies use the form to triage requests, schedule reviews, and record decisions; applicants use it to provide consistent technical, fiscal, and contact information necessary for processing and audit trails.

Why a well-prepared IDPH Project Submission matters

A complete, accurate submission reduces review delays, minimizes follow-up requests, and establishes a clear record for compliance and funding decisions. Properly formatted forms improve the likelihood of timely approval and ensure the IDPH can evaluate public health impacts, budget alignment, and regulatory conformity without additional documentation requests.

Why a well-prepared IDPH Project Submission matters

Who typically completes and reviews this form

The IDPH Project Submission Form is completed by project sponsors and reviewed by agency staff across operational and compliance teams.

  • Project Sponsors and Managers: Prepare technical scope, milestones, and contacts for review and implementation.
  • Finance or Grant Officers: Provide budget lines, funding sources, and budget justification for fiscal review.
  • IDPH Reviewers and Program Staff: Assess regulatory compliance, public health impact, and grant eligibility.

Use the form to record responsible parties, contact points, and signatures so reviewers can route and approve the project without seeking missing information.

Step-by-step: Completing the IDPH Project Submission Form

Follow these steps in order to produce a complete submission that supports timely IDPH review and approval.

  • 01
    Prepare: Collect scope, budget, timeline, and supporting documents before starting the form.
  • 02
    Complete: Enter requested fields accurately using required formats and signature blocks.
  • 03
    Attach: Include supporting exhibits: budgets, letters of support, and technical attachments.
  • 04
    Submit: Route to the designated IDPH intake address or eSubmission portal.

How to configure an online submission workflow

Set up an electronic workflow that mirrors the IDPH routing sequence so reviews and approvals occur without manual re-routing.

Field Configuration
Routing Order Assign sequential reviewers by role and email address.
Required Fields Mark critical fields as mandatory to prevent incomplete submissions.
Attachments Require specific file types (PDF, DOCX) and size limits for exhibits.
Notifications Enable email alerts for reviewers and the submitter at each stage.

Typical submission and review flow

This sequence shows the common routing for an IDPH project packet from submission to final decision.

  • Submit: Send form to IDPH intake or upload portal.
  • Triage: Intake staff confirm completeness and assign reviewers.
  • Technical Review: Program staff assess public health and regulatory issues.
  • Final Decision: Agency records approval, conditions, or denial with rationale.

Technical considerations for eSubmission and signing

Confirm the platform supports the file formats, field types, and authentication methods required by IDPH before submitting electronically.

  • File Formats: PDF and DOCX supported
  • Authentication: Email or SMS verification
  • Audit Trail: IP, timestamp, and activity logs

Essential elements of a professional submission package

Include these features to ensure the submission is complete, auditable, and aligned with agency requirements.

Clear Scope

A concise project description with objectives, measurable outcomes, and defined deliverables so reviewers evaluate impact quickly.

Detailed Budget

Line-item costs, funding sources, and justification that allow fiscal reviewers to verify eligibility and adequacy.

Schedule

A reasonable timeline with milestones and responsible parties to support implementation and monitoring plans.

Compliance Statements

Evidence of necessary licenses, approvals, and regulatory compliance materials required for public health review.

Attachments

Support documents such as maps, protocols, letters of support, and technical appendices referenced in the main form.

Signed Approvals

Authorized signatures from the lead organization and any co-applicants, dated and clearly identifying authority to bind.

Supporting documents commonly required

Attach these companion documents per IDPH instructions to avoid incomplete submission findings and processing delays.

Budget Worksheet

Detailed cost breakdown that reconciles with the summary in the main form and identifies indirect cost rates if relevant.

Project Timeline

Gantt or milestone table showing key deliverables, start and end dates, and responsible staff.

Letters of Support

Signed statements from partners or stakeholders confirming commitments or contributions to the project.

Regulatory Certificates

Licenses, IRB approvals, or other certifications demonstrating compliance with applicable laws and policies.

Common timelines and processing expectations

IDPH processing times vary by program and workload; the following are typical internal timelines and submission expectations.

Pre-submission:

Submit at least 30 days before planned start for routine review and scheduling.

Completeness Check:

Intake will confirm required fields and attachments within 5–10 business days of receipt.

Program Review:

Technical review commonly takes 20–60 calendar days depending on complexity and agency queue.

Decision Notice:

Approval or conditional approval usually issued within 30 days of completed technical review.

Amendments:

Substantial changes may restart review timelines; notify IDPH as soon as revisions are planned.

Key milestones from submission to archive

Track these numbered stages so your team meets prerequisites and knows when to expect agency actions.

01

1. Submission Received

Intake logs the packet and issues a confirmation number to the submitter.

02

2. Completeness Review

Staff verify required fields and attachments; missing items are requested immediately.

03

3. Technical Assessment

Program reviewers evaluate compliance, public health impact, and fiscal feasibility.

04

4. Final Determination

IDPH issues approval, conditional approval with tasks, or denial with reasons documented.

Common problems that cause delays

  • Incomplete budgets or mismatched totals between the summary and detailed worksheets cause routine re-submission requests and delay funding decisions.
  • Missing signatures, incorrect signatory authority, or unsigned attachments often require a notarized or re-signed package which prolongs review.
  • Nonstandard file formats, oversized attachments, or documents with tracked changes can prevent intake systems from processing files.
  • Vague project scopes or missing milestones limit reviewers’ ability to assess feasibility and may lead to conditional approvals or denials.

Data and security items to include

Encryption in transit: TLS 1.2/1.3
Encryption at rest: AES-256
Audit Trail: IP and timestamp
HIPAA (if applicable): BAA required
Access Controls: Role-based permissions
File Formats: PDF/A recommended

Consequences of incorrect or late submissions

Funding Delay: Start dates postponed
Denial: Project rejected
Repayment Risk: Funds may be clawed back
Compliance Exposure: Regulatory violations
Costs: Higher attorney or remediation fees
Audit Findings: Increased oversight

Real-world examples illustrating typical use

These brief case summaries show how organizations used electronic submission and signing to streamline project approvals and recordkeeping.

Optica Ventures (COO, Brian Fitzgibbons)

Optica standardized submission packets across projects to reduce review time and inconsistencies.

  • The interface is simple and easy-to-use for our team; more importantly, it is just as easy for our customers.
  • As a result, Optica reduced back-and-forth questions during intake, shortened review cycles, and retained a consistent audit trail for each funded project.

Martin Properties (Founder, Tim Martin)

A property-focused public health project used eSubmission to gather multiple signatures from remote stakeholders.

  • I can process and execute all of these documents online with 100% compliance and built-in security. Whether on mobile or working offline, I can get forms back to their necessary parties efficiently.
  • The approach enabled faster approvals on time-sensitive remediation and kept all stakeholders aligned with dated, signed records.

Representative eSignature vendor comparison for IDPH submissions

Compare basic pricing and key capabilities to evaluate eSignature platforms suitable for IDPH Project Submission Form workflows. Pricing shown reflects common entry plans and feature availability.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial 7-day free trial Varies by plan Varies by plan Varies by plan Varies by plan
Bulk Send Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes Yes Yes No No
Envelope Cap No cap 100 envelopes/user/year Varies by plan Varies by plan Varies by plan

Frequently asked questions about the IDPH Project Submission Form

Answers to common questions about format, signatures, attachments, and electronic submission practices for IDPH project packets.


Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users