Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

Complaint for Breach of Warranty

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY,

NAME OF PLAINTIFF

 

 

V.

 

 

NAME OF DEFENDANT

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO.

COMES NOW, Plaintiff, by and through counsel of record and files this his Complaint and in support hereof would represent and show unto this Court the facts following, to-wit:

1. Plaintiff, is an adult resident citizen of County,

2. Defendant, hereinafter to as "", is a corporation doing business in the organized and existing under the laws of the state of and may be served with process of this serving its Registered Agent for Service of Process:

"" referred to as "", is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of and may be served with process of this Court by serving its Registered Agent for Service of Process:

3. Defendant, hereinafter referred to as "" is a corporation doing business in the State of and organized under the laws of the State of Delaware and upon whom process may be served by serving its registered agent,

4. at all herein mentioned times, was in the automobile manufacturing business producing motor vehicles and for purposes herein, particularly a that is the subject matter of Plaintiff's complaint herein.

5. at all times herein mentioned, was engaged in the business of selling and servicing automobiles in as an authorized agent and dealer for

6. On or about 20 Plaintiff purchased the said Chevrolet bearing VIN: manufactured by . A copy of said purchase agreement is attached hereto and marked as Exhibit "A" and is made a part hereof by reference. Said automobile was purchased to be used for business and general transportation purposes.

7. Shortly after taking delivery of said vehicle on Plaintiff discovered defects in the truck, some of which but not necessarily all, are as follows:

1) Noise in front while driving; repaired the day following delivery ( day)

2) a. Makes loud grind or bump when put into gear,

b. Driver's seat back loose,

c. When under load or slight acceleration has slight shudder, ( day)

3) a. Transmission shudders and replaced torque convertor, flushed cooler,

b. Driver seat loose replaced recliner mechanism,

c. Rattled when started in morning, replaced engine and short block,

d. has knock or pop in rear when changing gears, 20 ( days)

4) a. Has ticking or rubbing sound from center dash hood when driving slow, turning affects sound,

b. Has hesitation when taking off from stop at backfires. 20 ( day)

5) a. Replacement engine 20 ( day)

6) a. Transmission goes out in on 20 Transmission dismantled and inspected, transmission, returned on 20

b. Major oil leaks, rear main oil seal reported no problem found at this time 20 ( days)

7) a. has engine oil leak, work performed on area or under times pops or leaks oil, rear main oil leak , replaced leaking, 20, returned on 20 ( days)

8) a. Has engine oil leaks, put bolt in stud hole for clutch rod 20 ( day)

9) a. Has engine oil leak, Camshaft Plug leaking, replaced rear camshaft plugs in back of engine ( day)

COUNT I

BREACH OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES

8. Plaintiff adopts and realleges all the foregoing as though set out herein in full.

9. Plaintiff would further show that at the time of delivery of said vehicle there was a statutory implied warranty of fitness and merchantability from Defendants and and by authority of the Code. Plaintiff is a consumer within the meaning and intention of 's enactment of this of this Uniform Commercial Code Section. The Defendants are considered as merchants within the contemplation of the UCC Act. Under these sections, buyer is authorized to revoke acceptance and entitled to recover his purchase price.

10. Defendants warranted as a matter of law, as aforesaid, that the vehicle was suitable for the purposes for which it was manufactured, and would pass without objection in the ordinary course of business trade. Defendants failed to properly perform the warranty work, despite receiving notice and being advised of said defects, and neither was able, nor competent nor willing to cure said defects. Plaintiff was damaged by said defects. Plaintiff was damaged by said breach of the implied warranties and is entitled to recover therefor.

COUNT II

BREACH OF EXPRESS WARRANTIES

11. Plaintiff realleges and adopts all of the foregoing as part of this Count as though copied herein in fully.

12. The vehicle was sold within certain express warranty extending to Plaintiff by through its agent-dealer, A copy of the warranty is attached as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof.

13. The express warranties were breached as the result of and being unable or unwilling to repair and cure the defects, therein causing the warranties to fail to perform, or fulfill the intended purpose, and Plaintiff has consequently been damaged, and Plaintiff is entitled to recover.

COUNT III

"MOTOR VEHICLE WARRANTY ENFORCEMENT ACT"

14. The breach of the statutory "Motor Vehicle Warranty Enforcement Act" found in Code Annotated, Section 63-17-151, et seq. Plaintiff has given notice and has gone through arbitration with GM for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of the "Motor Vehicle Warranty Enforcement Act" and would further show that he has given the Defendants, and , many opportunities to cure said defects. They have totally failed to make the vehicle fit for the purpose for which it was manufactured and for its intended use which impairs the use, market value, or safety of the motor vehicle to the Plaintiff after a reasonable number of attempts, and Plaintiff has therefore, been damaged and is entitled to recover under this act.

COUNT IV

MAGNUSON-MOSS ACT

15. The breach of the statutory implied warranty also gives rise to the violation of the Magnuson-Moss warranty Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act, Section 110(C), 15 U.S.C.A., Section 2301, et seq. Plaintiff has given proper notice and has gone through arbitration with for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of the Magnuson-Moss Act, and would further show that he has given the Defendants, and , many opportunities to cure said defects and would further show that they have totally failed to make the vehicle fit for the purpose for which it was manufactured and for its intended use which impairs the use, market value, or safety of the motor vehicle to the Plaintiff after a reasonable number of attempts, and Plaintiff has, therefore, been damaged and is entitled to recover under this act.

16. Plaintiff would show that as a result of the breach of the foregoing mentioned warranties, he is entitled to recover the following, including, but not limited to, the purchase price of the automobile, and consequential damages consisting of sales tax, license, registration and other fees, finance charge, towing expenses, rental expense, time and inconvenience, loss of business opportunity and all costs and expenses, including attorney fees based on actual time expended, determined by this Court to have been reasonably incurred by the Plaintiff or in connection with the commencement and prosecution of such action as provided in Code.

COUNT V

PUNITIVE DAMAGES

17. Defendants, in being unable to repair the defects complained of and continuing inability to correct said defects with new parts as needed, and in particular the driveline clunk, showed a total disregard for Plaintiff's rights and such acts were willful and wanton and calculated to discourage and dissuade Plaintiff from pursuing his remedies any further and punitive damages should be awarded to discourage and deter like treatment to purchasers in the future.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiff prays for a judgment against Defendants for the purchase price of automobile, together with all consequential damages in the sum of $ as compensatory damages and attorney's fees in a reasonable amount and punitive damages in the sum of $.

Respectfully submitted,

BY:

His Attorney

Enter text

What a Complaint for Breach of Warranty Is

A Complaint for Breach of Warranty is a civil pleading filed in state or federal court alleging that a seller or manufacturer failed to honor express or implied warranty obligations associated with goods or services. It sets out factual allegations, the specific warranty breached, the remedy sought (damages, rescission, or reimbursement), and the legal basis for recovery. Plaintiffs commonly attach the purchase agreement, warranty documents, and proof of loss. The complaint initiates litigation and triggers service, discovery, and court scheduling procedures under applicable procedural rules.

Why Filing This Complaint Matters

Filing a Complaint for Breach of Warranty allows an injured buyer to seek monetary relief, rescission, or specific performance, preserves statutory limitation periods, and creates a formal record for settlement or trial. It clarifies claims and puts the defendant on notice of alleged defects.

Why Filing This Complaint Matters

Who Typically Prepares and Files This Complaint

Buyers, consumer advocates, businesses, and their attorneys commonly prepare and file this complaint after warranty failures.

  • Individual consumers seeking refunds, repairs, or replacement under an express or implied warranty.
  • Small businesses pursuing damages for defective supplies, equipment failures, or inadequate services.
  • Attorneys representing class actions or individual plaintiffs in commercial or consumer warranty disputes.

Real examples of signed evidence workflows in warranty matters

These real-world examples show how organizations capture signed evidence and assemble exhibits efficiently when preparing warranty breach complaints for filing.

Optica Ventures

Optica Ventures' legal team needed a reliable way to collect signed purchase records and repair authorizations when asserting warranty claims.

  • The interface is simple and easy-to-use.
  • By centralizing signed records and providing an auditable timestamped trail, the team could assemble exhibits faster and submit more complete complaints, reducing pre-filing evidence collection time and enhancing clarity for opposing counsel and the court.

BIS

BIS required secure, compliant signature capture for warranty correspondence and affidavit collection prior to filing complaints.

  • We felt most comfortable with airSlate SignNow given their SOC 2 certification.
  • SOC 2 controls and audit reports supported chain of custody verification for signed repair acknowledgements and warranty rejection notices during discovery and pretrial exchanges, helping counsel respond to evidence requests with complete timestamped documentation.

Core elements every professional complaint should include

A professional Complaint for Breach of Warranty combines precise factual pleading, statutory citations, clear damages requests, and properly attached supporting exhibits to meet court form and notice requirements.

Parties

Identify plaintiff and defendant with full legal names, entity types, and contact addresses; include registered agent or principal place of business for corporations to support proper service and venue and to avoid misnomer issues.

Warranty details

State the express or implied warranty terms, purchase date, SKU or model numbers, and any written warranty statements; attach manufacturer literature, warranty certificates, or contract language as exhibits to substantiate the claim.

Breach facts

Describe the defect, discovery date, repair attempts, communications with the seller, and how the product or service failed to conform to the stated warranty standards to satisfy factual pleading requirements.

Damages sought

Specify compensatory damages, consequential losses, attorney fees if statute permits, rescission or restitution requests, and any statutory penalties claimed under applicable consumer protection laws or warranty statutes.

Legal basis

Cite relevant statutes and common law theories such as UCC warranty provisions, applicable state consumer protection statutes, and any federal statutes like the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act when federal coverage applies.

Relief and jury demand

State the precise relief requested, including monetary amounts where known, equitable remedies, and a jury demand if available; ensure signatures, verification, and attorney contact information comply with local court rules.

Step-by-step filing checklist

Follow these steps to complete and file a Complaint for Breach of Warranty accurately and to preserve legal rights.

  • 01
    Draft complaint: Describe parties, purchase, warranty terms, and breach facts.
  • 02
    Attach documents: Include contract, receipt, warranty, photos, and repair records.
  • 03
    Choose jurisdiction: File in proper state or federal court per venue rules.
  • 04
    Serve defendant: Use authorized process server or marshal to effect service.

What happens after you file the complaint

This overview shows where the complaint is filed, how service is completed, and what happens after filing.

  • File complaint: Clerk assigns case number and files stamp evidencing the filing.
  • Serve papers: Deliver complaint and summons per state or federal rules.
  • Defendant response: Answer, motion to dismiss, or other pleadings within the response deadline.
  • Discovery: Exchange documents, depositions, and inspections to develop evidence.

Recommended e-filing and signature workflow settings

Set up an e-filing workflow to collect plaintiff signatures, attach exhibits, and route certified copies to counsel and court.

Field Configuration
Preferred electronic signature delivery method and options Email link with audit trail; SMS multi-factor optional for higher assurance.
Mandatory form fields to capture claimant identity and dates Full names, MM/DD/YYYY dates, signature block, and exhibit checklist required.
Accepted attachments and exhibit file types Photographs, invoices, warranty certificates, repair logs, and PDFs for court exhibits.
Signer authentication level and verification steps Email verification by default; consider KBA or SMS for elevated-risk signers.
Post-signing distribution and archival destinations Deliver signed copies to parties, counsel, and preserve audit trail in secure archive.

Delivery formats, integrations, and authentication to consider

Digital submission supports email, certified mail, court e-filing portals, and secure cloud storage when permitted by local rules.

  • Formats: PDF/A and DOCX accepted; preserve original file.
  • Integrations: Salesforce, Microsoft 365, NetSuite, Google Workspace and Box connectors available for workflow automation.
  • Authentication: Email link, SMS code, or knowledge-based authentication options.

Key timing and deadline considerations

Key timing elements include the applicable statute of limitations, service deadlines, and court response periods that affect case viability and remedies.

Statute of limitations:

Varies by state; commonly 2–4 years for warranty claims—verify state law before filing.

Service timeline:

Complete service per state rules or Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to avoid dismissal.

Defendant response period:

Typically 20–30 days in federal court after service; state rules may differ.

Pre-suit notice requirements:

Some statutes require demand or cure periods before filing; check state consumer laws.

Discovery and scheduling:

Initial disclosures and case management conferences typically occur within 30–90 days after filing.

Essential information fields to include on every complaint

Plaintiff Name: Full legal name as party on record.
Defendant Name: Full legal business or individual name.
Purchase Date: MM/DD/YYYY format of sale or service.
Warranty Type: Express, implied, or statutory warranty noted.
Attached Exhibits: Contracts, receipts, photos, repair invoices.
Relief Sought: Damages amount or equitable remedy described.

Penalties and risks of filing an incorrect complaint

Statute Limitations: Misstated dates can bar recovery.
Service Defects: Improper service may dismiss case.
Insufficient Facts: Court may grant motion to dismiss.
Incorrect Jurisdiction: Case transferred or dismissed.
Sanctions Risk: Frivolous claims risk fee sanctions.
Evidence Gaps: Weak proof reduces settlement leverage.

Common mistakes to avoid when preparing a complaint

  • Failing to attach warranty documents or sales receipts makes it difficult to prove contractual terms and may lead to dismissal or a finding the plaintiff lacks standing.
  • Using vague or conclusory allegations rather than specific factual descriptions of defect, date, and impact undermines credibility and invites a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
  • Missing proper service of process or using incorrect defendant names delays proceedings and can result in case dismissal without prejudice until corrected.
  • Not including statutory notice requirements or pre-suit demand where required by state law can forfeit statutory remedies or limit available damages.

eSignature vendor comparison for preparing and signing complaints

Compare basic pricing and key features that commonly matter when assembling and signing Complaint for Breach of Warranty documents across platforms.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial 7-day free trial Varies by plan Varies by plan Varies by plan Varies by plan
Bulk Send Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes Yes Yes No No

Frequently asked questions about Complaint for Breach of Warranty

Answers to frequent questions about preparing, filing, and enforcing a Complaint for Breach of Warranty in U.S. courts.


Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users