Are electronic signatures valid for this comparison?

Yes. Electronic signatures meet legal validity under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and state UETA laws when intent, consent, attribution, and record retention requirements are satisfied. Exceptions such as certain court filings or wills may still require wet signatures.

What signer authentication is recommended?

Use email verification for low-risk signers; choose SMS one-time passcodes, SSO, or knowledge-based authentication for higher assurance. For regulated industries, consider multi-factor methods and identity proofing consistent with 21 CFR Part 11 or HIPAA administrative safeguards.

When is notarization or witness required?

Most internal policy comparisons do not require notarization. If the comparison is incorporated into a contract or legal filing, notarization or witnesses may be required by state law. Confirm specific requirements where a document will be recorded or submitted to a court or agency.

How do I correct mistakes after signing?

If a signed comparison contains an error, create a signed amendment or corrected endorsement and have authorized parties execute it. Preserve the original executed copy and maintain the audit trail showing the correction, signers, and reason for transparency.

How long should I keep the executed comparison?

Retain executed comparisons to support claims and audits. Follow IRS minimums (three years), HIPAA six-year rule for PHI-related materials (45 CFR §164.530(j)), and any longer state or industry retention schedules that apply to your organization.

Can I rely on signNow for compliance support?

An eSignature vendor can support compliance if the platform provides audit trails, encryption, and certifications. signNow uses TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit and AES-256 at rest, holds SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 attestations, and supports HIPAA with a BAA when required.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Insurance
Insurance EPLI Comparison

Insurance EPLI Comparison

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

INSURANCE EPLI COMPARISON

Applicant / Insured Information

Applicant Name Doing Business As (DBA) Address

Primary Contact Name

Title / Position

Telephone

Email

Federal Tax ID / EIN

Date of Formation

Number of Employees Primary Business / Industry Description

Policy Comparison — Carrier 1

Insurer / Carrier Name

Quote Reference:

Policy Type:

Policy Period — Start: End:

Limit of Liability

Deductible/Retention

Annual Premium

Defense Costs: Inside Limit Outside Limit

Retroactive Date:

Extended Reporting Period (ERP): Available

Coverage Checklist — Carrier 1

Wrongful Termination
Discrimination
Harassment / Hostile Work Environment
Retaliation
Wage & Hour (if offered)
Third-Party Discrimination (clients/customers)

Exclusions / Notable Policy Exclusions (Carrier 1) Endorsements / Additional Coverages Offered (Carrier 1) Claims Handling / Settlement Provisions (Carrier 1)

Policy Comparison — Carrier 2

Insurer / Carrier Name

Quote Reference:

Policy Type:

Policy Period — Start: End:

Limit of Liability

Deductible/Retention

Annual Premium

Defense Costs: Inside Limit Outside Limit

Retroactive Date:

Extended Reporting Period (ERP): Available

Coverage Checklist — Carrier 2

Wrongful Termination
Discrimination
Harassment / Hostile Work Environment
Retaliation
Wage & Hour (if offered)
Third-Party Discrimination (clients/customers)

Exclusions / Notable Policy Exclusions (Carrier 2) Endorsements / Additional Coverages Offered (Carrier 2) Claims Handling / Settlement Provisions (Carrier 2)

Policy Comparison — Carrier 3

Insurer / Carrier Name

Quote Reference:

Policy Type:

Policy Period — Start: End:

Limit of Liability

Deductible/Retention

Annual Premium

Defense Costs: Inside Limit Outside Limit

Retroactive Date:

Extended Reporting Period (ERP): Available

Coverage Checklist — Carrier 3

Wrongful Termination
Discrimination
Harassment / Hostile Work Environment
Retaliation
Wage & Hour (if offered)
Third-Party Discrimination (clients/customers)

Exclusions / Notable Policy Exclusions (Carrier 3) Endorsements / Additional Coverages Offered (Carrier 3) Claims Handling / Settlement Provisions (Carrier 3)

Exclusions, Limitations, and Material Information

The following statements apply to all quoted or compared coverages to the extent indicated. Coverage is subject to the policy language, terms, conditions, exclusions and limits. Any quoted premium or terms are subject to underwriting approval, audit and verification of the information provided. Known claims, prior acts or pending litigation may materially affect insurability or terms.

Material Known Claims / Circumstances (describe any pending or prior claims) Additional Comments / Broker Notes

Beneficiary Designation (for return of unearned premium or similar)

Beneficiary Name Relationship to Applicant Percentage of Benefit

Declaration and Certification

I certify that the information provided in this comparison is true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that this comparison is for evaluation purposes only and does not alter, amend or bind any insurer to provide coverage. Final coverage, limits, exclusions and premium are determined by the issued policy and subject to underwriting review. I acknowledge that carriers may modify terms based on investigation, audit, or discovery of additional information.

By checking this box I certify the above statements and disclosures are accurate and complete.

Applicant Name:

Signature:

Date:

What an Insurance EPLI Comparison Is and When It’s Used

An Insurance EPLI Comparison is a structured document used to evaluate Employment Practices Liability Insurance policies across carriers and policy variants. It organizes coverage limits, deductibles, retained amounts, defense costs, exclusions, claim reporting requirements, and endorsement language so purchasers and risk managers can compare tradeoffs side-by-side. For U.S. transactions, electronic execution and distribution of the comparison can comply with the ESIGN Act and state UETA law when intent, consent, attribution, and retention criteria are met. Many organizations use secure eSignature platforms such as signNow to collect signatures, preserve an audit trail, and store completed comparisons for regulatory and audit purposes.

Why a Clear Comparison Matters for Procurement and Risk

A concise Insurance EPLI Comparison clarifies coverage differences, supports procurement decisions, and documents compliance with contractual or regulatory obligations. It reduces ambiguity during renewals and claims, helps budget for premiums and retentions, and provides an auditable record when electronic signatures and secure storage are used.

Typical Users and Stakeholders

HR leaders, risk managers, insurance brokers, and procurement teams use this comparison to evaluate policy terms and financial exposure consistently.

Small and mid-size employers evaluating renewal options and budgeting for employment-practices risk.
Insurance brokers comparing carrier forms, endorsements, and claim-handling service levels.
Corporate legal and compliance teams assessing exclusions, reporting obligations, and indemnity wording.

Keep the finished comparison with procurement and legal records so stakeholders can reference consistent terms during renewals, audits, and claim discussions.

Core Elements to Include in Every Comparison

Core elements of a professional Insurance EPLI Comparison include standardized metrics, policy language excerpts, financial terms, exclusions, claims handling details, and a summary recommendation for decision-makers.

Coverage

List insuring clauses, covered acts, limits per claim and aggregate, and sublimits for employment torts such as discrimination, harassment, retaliation, and wrongful termination, including any applicable endorsements or sublimits.

Retentions

Specify retention or deductible amounts per claim and per policy period, whether the retention is eroded by defense costs, and examples of scenarios that would trigger the retention.

Defense Costs

Clarify whether defense expenses are within limits or outside limits, billing control provisions, phraseology on consent-to-settle, insurer obligations for choice of counsel, and allocation for mixed claims involving covered and uncovered matters.

Exclusions

Identify standard and carrier-specific exclusions such as intentional acts, wage-and-hour claims, bodily injury, or criminal conduct, and note any carve-backs or endorsements that restore coverage.

Claims Handling

Document notice timing, claims reporting procedures, tolling agreements, cooperation clauses, and insurer investigation obligations, including contact information for claims representatives and escalation paths and typical response times.

Pricing

Compare annual premium, rating basis (per employee, per payroll), policy period, premium adjustments, audit provisions, and any credits or discounts for loss control measures or deductible options.

Essential Data Fields to Capture

Full Legal Name: Enter the legal name of the insured entity exactly as on the policy.

Policy Number: Record the carrier-issued policy identifier exactly as shown on declarations.

Coverage Limits: List per-claim and aggregate limits numerically.

Effective Date: Enter effective date as MM/DD/YYYY.

Carrier Contact: Provide claims and underwriting contact information.

Endorsements Attached: Attach endorsements and exclusions pages.

Consequences of an Incorrect or Incomplete Comparison

Incorrect Comparison: May lead to underinsurance

Misstated Limits: Triggers coverage disputes

Late Notice: Claims may be denied

Noncompliance: Regulatory exposure possible

Tax Impacts: Budgeting errors

Contract Risk: Invalid indemnity allocation

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Comparing premium only without examining defense costs, exclusions, or aggregate limits leads to misleading cost conclusions and coverage gaps at claim time.
Failing to note whether defense costs erode limits can cause unexpected exhaustion of coverage during protracted litigation or multiple related claims.
Using inconsistent date formats or missing effective dates compromises claim timing analysis and may invalidate comparisons across renewal cycles.
Not tracking carrier-specific notice requirements, consent-to-settle language, or consent clauses increases the risk of disputes and delayed defense responses.

Step-by-Step: Complete a Reliable Comparison

Complete the Insurance EPLI Comparison in a clear sequence: gather policies, extract terms, compare metrics, and record observations with sources and dates.

01

Gather Documents: Collect current policies and endorsements from each carrier.
02

Extract Terms: Capture limits, retentions, exclusions, and defense provisions.
03

Populate Matrix: Enter standardized data rows for direct side-by-side comparison.
04

Review & Sign: Have authorized signatories confirm and sign electronically under ESIGN/UETA.

Typical Workflow for Preparation and Execution

Typical routing for completion and review: internal analyst prepares the draft, legal reviews, broker confirms accuracy, and authorized signer executes the final comparison.

Upload Document: Add the comparison as a PDF or DOCX to the eSignature platform.
Assign Fields: Place signature, date, and role fields for each party.
Set Authentication: Choose signer verification: email, SMS code, or advanced methods.
Send for Signature: Distribute signing links or in-person QR/kiosk options to signers.

Configure an Online Workflow for Consistent Execution

Configure an online workflow that enforces required fields, signer order, authentication strength, and archival settings before sending for electronic signature.

Field	Configuration
Signer Order	Sequential signing by role, enforce order
Required Fields	Require signatures, dates, and initials as indicated
Authentication	Email plus optional SMS code or KBA for high-risk
Retention Settings	Set automatic archival and export to secure storage

Platform Capabilities to Check

Ensure the eSignature platform supports required file formats, integrations, authentication, and compliance standards for storing and sharing Insurance EPLI Comparisons.

Formats: PDF and Word (DOCX) supported
Integrations: Salesforce, NetSuite, Google Workspace
Authentication: Email/SMS, SSO, optional KBA

eSignature Vendor Pricing and Feature Snapshot

Vendor pricing and feature comparison for eSignature solutions commonly used to execute and archive Insurance EPLI Comparison documents.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	Varies by vendor	Varies by vendor	Varies by vendor	Varies by vendor
Bulk Send	Yes (Business Premium)	Plan-dependent	Plan-dependent	Plan-dependent	Plan-dependent
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No

Timing Considerations and Typical Deadlines

Key deadlines for completing and distributing an Insurance EPLI Comparison align with renewal cycles, claim reporting windows, and procurement timetables.

Before Renewal Submission:

Complete comparison at least 60–90 days prior to renewal to support negotiation.

Claims Reporting Window:

Follow insurer notice requirements; report incidents promptly to preserve coverage.

Broker Review Period:

Allow 7–14 business days for broker and carrier review on complex accounts.

Approval & Signature:

Obtain authorized signatures and dated execution prior to final submission.

Record Archival:

Archive executed comparison within 7 days and retain per retention policy.

Download, Export, and Supporting Document Options

Export and ancillary documentation options allow teams to save, share, and archive Insurance EPLI Comparisons in standard formats for legal review and recordkeeping.

Download Formats

Support for PDF/A, standard PDF, and DOCX export lets legal and compliance teams ingest completed comparisons into document management systems, maintain metadata, and ensure long-term preservation.

Signed Certificate

Include a certificate of completion that records signer identity, timestamps, IP addresses, and the action log; preserve the audit trail for evidence in disputes or regulatory reviews.

Supporting Docs

Attach loss runs, claims notices, carrier correspondence, and policy endorsements; these supporting documents clarify prior loss history, reservation of rights notices, and coverage interpretations.

Storage Options

Save copies to secure cloud repositories with role-based access, versioning, and retention tags to align with corporate records management and compliance obligations.

Frequently Asked Questions and Practical Answers

Answers to frequent questions about preparing, signing, and storing an Insurance EPLI Comparison, including electronic signature legality and common execution errors.

Need help? Contact support

Are electronic signatures valid for this comparison?
Yes. Electronic signatures meet legal validity under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and state UETA laws when intent, consent, attribution, and record retention requirements are satisfied. Exceptions such as certain court filings or wills may still require wet signatures.
What signer authentication is recommended?
Use email verification for low-risk signers; choose SMS one-time passcodes, SSO, or knowledge-based authentication for higher assurance. For regulated industries, consider multi-factor methods and identity proofing consistent with 21 CFR Part 11 or HIPAA administrative safeguards.
When is notarization or witness required?
Most internal policy comparisons do not require notarization. If the comparison is incorporated into a contract or legal filing, notarization or witnesses may be required by state law. Confirm specific requirements where a document will be recorded or submitted to a court or agency.
How do I correct mistakes after signing?
If a signed comparison contains an error, create a signed amendment or corrected endorsement and have authorized parties execute it. Preserve the original executed copy and maintain the audit trail showing the correction, signers, and reason for transparency.
How long should I keep the executed comparison?
Retain executed comparisons to support claims and audits. Follow IRS minimums (three years), HIPAA six-year rule for PHI-related materials (45 CFR §164.530(j)), and any longer state or industry retention schedules that apply to your organization.
Can I rely on signNow for compliance support?
An eSignature vendor can support compliance if the platform provides audit trails, encryption, and certifications. signNow uses TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit and AES-256 at rest, holds SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 attestations, and supports HIPAA with a BAA when required.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now