Can interview notes be e-signed?

Yes. Electronic signatures are generally valid under the ESIGN Act and UETA where adopted (15 U.S.C. ch. 96; UETA). Ensure intent, consent, attribution, and retention are documented.

How long must notes be kept?

Retention varies by context. Keep notes at least 1–3 years; apply HIPAA six-year rule if PHI is present (45 CFR §164.530(j)) and follow any state-specific requirements.

Who has access to stored notes?

Limit access by role using ATS permissions and audit logs. Access controls reduce privacy risk and help demonstrate compliance if records are requested.

What if an interviewer misses required fields?

Require validation rules in the form or return incomplete notes to the interviewer for completion. Timely corrections preserve accuracy and auditability.

Can notes be used in disputes?

Yes. Well-documented, job-related notes with timestamps and attribution strengthen the employer's position in disputes or adverse-action defenses.

How do I correct an error after submission?

Follow your company's amendment process: add an addendum noting the correction, who made it, and why. Preserve originals to maintain an audit trail.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Miscellaneous
Interview Feedback Notes

Interview Feedback Notes

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

INTERVIEW FEEDBACK NOTES

Company Name: Reviewer Name:

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the Company engages certain personnel to conduct candidate interviews and document evaluation notes for hiring decisions and related administrative purposes; and

WHEREAS, Reviewer is duly authorized by the Company to perform interview evaluations and to provide written feedback reflecting observed competencies, behaviors, and recommendations; and

WHEREAS, the parties desire to record the scope, handling, and confidentiality of interview feedback and to document the reviewer's conclusions in a standardized format for Company records.

INTERVIEW DETAILS

Candidate Name Position Applied For

Interview Date: Interview Type: In-person Video Phone

Panel Members / Interviewers

SCOPE OF WORK

The Reviewer will evaluate the Candidate in accordance with the Company's hiring criteria, provide objective observations, and recommend next steps. The evaluation shall be limited to job-related competencies, documented facts, and professional impressions. Reviewer shall not include discriminatory or non-job-related commentary.

Detailed Scope Description

EVALUATION SUMMARY

Communication (1-5): Technical Skills (1-5): Cultural Fit (1-5): Overall (1-5):

Key Strengths Areas for Improvement Additional Comments

Recommendation: Hire Do Not Hire Second Interview Consider for Other Role

PAYMENT TERMS

If Reviewer provides professional interviewing services as an external consultant, compensation shall be as follows.

Amount Payment Schedule Late Fee

TERM AND TERMINATION

This agreement commences on and shall continue until , unless earlier terminated in accordance with this section.

Either party may terminate this agreement for convenience upon providing written notice to the other party at least days prior to the intended termination date. Termination for cause may be immediate where a material breach is not cured within 10 days of written notice.

CONFIDENTIALITY

Reviewer acknowledges that interview notes, candidate materials, and hiring deliberations are Confidential Information of the Company. Reviewer shall not disclose Confidential Information to any third party, except to persons within the Company with a legitimate need to know, and shall take reasonable measures consistent with industry practice to protect such information from unauthorized disclosure. Confidential Information does not include information that is or becomes generally available to the public through no breach of this agreement by Reviewer.

Upon request or upon termination, Reviewer shall promptly return or certify destruction of all physical and electronic materials containing Confidential Information, except to the extent retention is required by law and then only to the minimum extent necessary.

GOVERNING LAW; ENTIRE AGREEMENT

This agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State specified by the Company. The parties consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts located within that state for any disputes arising under this agreement.

This document, together with any company policies expressly incorporated herein, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter and supersedes all prior agreements, understandings, and communications, whether written or oral.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND CERTIFICATION

By signing below, Reviewer certifies that the facts and observations recorded in this Interview Feedback Notes are true and accurate to the best of their knowledge, that they have conducted the interview in compliance with applicable law and Company policy, and that they will maintain the confidentiality of candidate information as set forth above.

Reviewer acknowledges that improper disclosure of Confidential Information or inclusion of discriminatory, defamatory, or knowingly false statements may result in disciplinary action or other legal consequences.

Company Representative:

By:

Date:

Reviewer:

By:

Date:

What an Interview Feedback Notes Is and Why It Matters

An Interview Feedback Notes document captures an interviewer’s observations, competency ratings, behavioral examples, and hiring recommendation for a specific candidate and role. It standardizes reviewer input so hiring teams compare responses consistently, documents decision rationale for compliance and audit purposes, and creates a clear record for later reference. These notes are frequently stored in applicant tracking systems, attached to candidate files, and can be completed on paper or electronically to support secure retention and controlled access during the recruitment lifecycle.

Clear benefits from consistent interview documentation

Consistent Interview Feedback Notes reduce bias, improve hiring decisions, and create defensible records for compliance and audits. Standard fields help reviewers focus on job-related criteria and preserve context for later hiring or legal review.

Typical users and where notes fit in the hiring workflow

These notes support hiring decisions, internal audits, and defense in adverse action or discrimination claims when retained and managed according to policy.

HR coordinators and recruiters who collect, consolidate, and file interview records for open positions.
Hiring managers and team leads who evaluate candidate fit and compare standardized reviewer inputs.
Interview panel members and subject-matter experts who complete structured assessments immediately after interviews.

Step-by-step: completing an Interview Feedback Notes

Follow these sequential actions to create complete, compliant feedback after each candidate interview.

01

Open the form: Select the correct job requisition and candidate profile before starting.
02

Record basics: Enter date, interviewer name, and role using MM/DD/YYYY format.
03

Evaluate competencies: Rate job-relevant skills and provide concise examples of observed behavior.
04

Sign and submit: Sign, date, and route to HR or upload to the ATS within established timeframes.

Essential sections that make a professional feedback note

A complete Interview Feedback Notes includes standardized sections that capture identity, assessment, evidence, and administrative metadata for reliable decision-making.

Candidate Details

Name, contact, requisition, and application ID so the note links precisely to the correct candidate record and avoids mismatches during ATS aggregation or background checks.

Interview Context

Date, interview type (phone, video, onsite), interviewer role, and interview stage to clarify where feedback fits in the hiring sequence and which competencies were evaluated.

Competency Ratings

Standardized score fields for technical skills, culture fit, communication, and problem solving that enable apples-to-apples comparisons across candidates.

Evidence & Examples

Concise behavioral examples or candidate quotes that justify each rating; specifics increase the note's credibility in later reviews or legal discovery.

Recommendation

Clear hire decision with rationale tied to role requirements and any conditions or follow-up items such as reference checks or additional interviews.

Signer Metadata

Interviewer signature, printed name, timestamp, and authentication evidence (if e-signed) to establish attribution and preserve auditability.

Tips to keep notes objective, useful, and defensible

Apply consistent practices to reduce risk, improve decision quality, and streamline review.

Use job-related language

Limit comments to observable behaviors tied to published job requirements. Avoid references to protected characteristics or subjective labels that can create legal exposure during adverse-action reviews.

Capture examples immediately

Complete notes within 24–72 hours while memory is fresh. Timely entries increase accuracy and reduce inconsistencies between reviewers.

Maintain consistent scales

Standardize rating scales across interviewers and roles. Provide calibration sessions so scores mean the same thing across reviewers and hiring managers.

Secure and centralize storage

Store notes in the ATS or secure HR system with role-based access controls and retention policies to meet audit and litigation needs.

Common pitfalls to avoid when preparing feedback notes

Leaving fields blank or inconsistent identifiers that prevent the note from linking to the candidate record and complicate later retrieval.
Using vague, subjective language instead of concrete behaviors or examples, which weakens the record in performance comparisons or legal review.
Failing to sign or timestamp the note, removing a key element of attribution required for audit trails and defensibility.
Storing notes in unsecured email or personal folders rather than the ATS, increasing risk of unauthorized access and noncompliance.

Risks if interview records are incomplete or mismanaged

Discovery Exposure: In litigation, poor records can increase liability and undermine defenses.

Discrimination Claims: Inconsistent documentation may elevate risk of adverse-action or discrimination findings.

Privacy Breach: Improper storage can trigger data-breach obligations and state privacy penalties.

Noncompliance: Failure to retain records per policy can violate internal or regulatory requirements.

Operational Delay: Missing notes slow hiring decisions and candidate communication.

Audit Failure: Incomplete audit trails impede internal and external reviews.

Time expectations for completing and processing interview notes

Set clear submission and processing timelines so feedback is timely and useful for hiring decisions and compliance.

Immediate completion:

Submit notes within 24–72 hours after the interview to preserve accuracy.

HR consolidation:

HR should consolidate panel feedback within 3 business days for decision cycles.

Candidate communication:

Communicate next steps to candidates within the timeframe defined by company policy to reduce drop-off.

Retention triggers:

Retain notes according to record-retention policy; see the retention timeline for minimum periods.

Adverse action windows:

Allow time for reference checks and review before adverse action to meet procedural fairness expectations.

Typical routing and handling workflow for completed notes

A clear routing sequence ensures notes reach decision-makers and are archived correctly.

Submit to ATS: Attach the completed note to the candidate record immediately after submission.
Notify HR: Automatically alert HR for consolidation and compliance review.
Share with Hiring Team: Provide hiring manager access for final decision-making and calibration.
Archive Securely: Move final documents to secure storage with access controls and retention tags.

Configuring online workflows for Interview Feedback Notes

Typical workflow settings ensure consistent routing, authentication, and storage when using an electronic form.

Field	Configuration
Routing Rule	Auto-route to HR and hiring manager after submission
Authentication	Email link or SSO for interviewer identity verification
Storage Location	ATS candidate file with retention tags
Notifications	Email alerts for missing or late feedback

Technical requirements for digital completion and secure storage

Verify encryption, audit trails, and role-based access are in place to meet internal policy and applicable legal obligations.

File formats: PDF, DOCX, and HTML compatibility for ATS import
Integrations: Connectors for ATS, HRIS, and cloud storage (e.g., signNow, NetSuite, Google Workspace)
Authentication: Email/SAML and optional SMS or multi-factor authentication

Who signs and approves final interview notes

Hiring Manager

Typically reviews consolidated panel feedback, documents final decision rationale, and signs off on hire/no-hire. Their approval creates the record used for onboarding or adverse-action justification and should be authenticated and timestamped.

HR Coordinator

Collects individual interviewer notes, confirms completeness, attaches documents to the ATS, and signs or certifies the record as retained in accordance with policy and retention schedules.

Basic eSignature pricing and capability comparison for Interview Feedback Notes workflows

Comparing vendor starting prices and core capabilities that affect high-volume interview and HR workflows; signNow appears first per vendor ordering rules.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	Yes, 7-day free trial	Varies by vendor	Varies by vendor	Varies by vendor	Varies by vendor
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No
Envelope Cap	No envelope cap	100 envelopes/user/year	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan

FAQs and troubleshooting for Interview Feedback Notes

Answers to common questions about completing, signing, storing, and updating interview feedback records.

Need help? Contact support

Can interview notes be e-signed?
Yes. Electronic signatures are generally valid under the ESIGN Act and UETA where adopted (15 U.S.C. ch. 96; UETA). Ensure intent, consent, attribution, and retention are documented.
How long must notes be kept?
Retention varies by context. Keep notes at least 1–3 years; apply HIPAA six-year rule if PHI is present (45 CFR §164.530(j)) and follow any state-specific requirements.
Who has access to stored notes?
Limit access by role using ATS permissions and audit logs. Access controls reduce privacy risk and help demonstrate compliance if records are requested.
What if an interviewer misses required fields?
Require validation rules in the form or return incomplete notes to the interviewer for completion. Timely corrections preserve accuracy and auditability.
Can notes be used in disputes?
Yes. Well-documented, job-related notes with timestamps and attribution strengthen the employer's position in disputes or adverse-action defenses.
How do I correct an error after submission?
Follow your company's amendment process: add an addendum noting the correction, who made it, and why. Preserve originals to maintain an audit trail.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now