Can the form be signed electronically?

Yes. Electronic signatures are legally binding under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. §7001) and UETA where adopted, provided intent, consent, attribution, and retention requirements are met. Exceptions (for example wills or some court filings) may still require paper or specific procedures.

Electronic vs digital signature — which to use?

Electronic signature is the broad legal category; a digital signature is a cryptographic subset (PKI). Use a digital signature when non‑repudiation and cryptographic integrity are required by regulation or internal policy.

How long should records be kept?

Follow regulatory minima: IRS records for three years (IRC §6501(a)) and HIPAA records for six years (45 CFR §164.530(j)); retain longer if litigation, investigations, or contract terms require it.

Are notarization or witnesses required?

Most discrimination testing forms do not require notarization, but state or evidentiary rules may call for notarized affidavits or witness statements in specific contexts; check state rules for variations.

What if the form contains an error after signing?

Document the error, prepare a corrected addendum or amendment, obtain signatures again, and preserve both versions with a clear revision history to support chain of custody.

How can I revoke or cancel a submitted form?

Revocation depends on process: if internal, follow policy to mark the record revoked and notify stakeholders; if submitted to an external regulator, follow the regulator's procedures and retain records of the revocation request.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Legal
Legal Discrimination Testing Form

Legal Discrimination Testing Form

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

LEGAL DISCRIMINATION TESTING FORM

This Legal Discrimination Testing Agreement is entered into as of Effective Date: by and between Client Name: and Testing Provider Name: .

Client Address Provider Address

RECITALS

WHEREAS, Client seeks objective testing, documentation and reporting to determine whether policies, practices, or conduct of a Target Entity result in unlawful discrimination; and

WHEREAS, Testing Provider represents that it has experience and the technical competence to conduct investigative testing in accordance with accepted testing methodologies and to collect, preserve and report evidence suitable for administrative, civil or regulatory use; and

WHEREAS, the parties desire to set forth the terms under which Testing Provider will conduct discrimination testing and deliver reports and evidence to Client.

NOW THEREFORE

In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows:

1. SCOPE OF SERVICES

1.1 Testing Provider will perform discrimination testing described in this section and any attached test plan. Testing shall be limited to the categories selected below and the locations identified in this form.

Type(s) of Testing (check all that apply)

Housing Employment Public Accommodation Lending Education Other:

Target Entity Name Target Entity Address/Location

Testing Dates (anticipated): From To .

Specific Operations or Policies to Observe

2. TEST METHODOLOGY

2.1 Testing Provider shall perform tests in a manner consistent with accepted investigative methodologies. Tests may include matched-pair testing, mystery shopping, telephone or in-person inquiries, and document requests. Test protocols shall be documented in a test plan prepared by Testing Provider and provided to Client in accordance with Section 9.

2.2 Planned Methodology (check applicable and provide names where requested):

Matched-pair testing Mystery shopper Telephone inquiry Document/photo request

Primary Tester (if applicable) Secondary Tester

3. EVIDENCE COLLECTION, PRESERVATION AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY

3.1 Testing Provider shall collect, label, and maintain evidence in a manner that preserves chain of custody and admissibility. All physical and electronic evidence shall be stored securely and documented with date, time, and collector identity.

Describe Evidence to Be Collected

Recording Devices: Audio Video Photographs

Recording Device Details / Serial Numbers / Storage Media Evidence Storage Location

4. REPORTING; USE OF RESULTS

4.1 Testing Provider will prepare a written report documenting methodology, observations, collected evidence and an evidentiary index. The report shall not include personally identifying information of testers beyond what is necessary for chain-of-custody documentation unless required by law.

Report Recipient

Permitted Use of Report (check all that apply):

Litigation Administrative complaint Internal training Regulatory reporting

Report Retention Period

5. CONFIDENTIALITY AND DATA PROTECTION

5.1 Each party shall maintain confidential all non-public information disclosed in connection with the testing. Client may disclose reports to counsel or regulatory authorities as required by law. Testing Provider shall implement reasonable administrative, technical and physical safeguards to protect collected data.

5.2 Notwithstanding confidentiality, Testing Provider shall promptly notify Client of any legal process, subpoena or governmental request seeking access to test materials and shall cooperate with Client and counsel to contest or limit disclosure where appropriate.

6. COMPLIANCE, ETHICS AND LIMITATIONS

6.1 Testing Provider will not instruct testers to commit trespass, break into locked or private areas, destroy property, or engage in fraudulent misrepresentation beyond authorized investigative practices. Testing Provider will comply with applicable local, state and federal law while conducting testing.

Special Legal Constraints or Client Instructions

7. INDEMNIFICATION AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY

7.1 Client shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Testing Provider and its employees against claims arising from Client directives that cause Testing Provider to act outside of lawfully permissible investigative practices. Testing Provider shall indemnify Client against claims arising from gross negligence or willful misconduct by Testing Provider.

7.2 Except for willful misconduct or gross negligence, neither party shall be liable for consequential, incidental or punitive damages.

8. NOTICES

Client Notice Contact Provider Notice Contact

9. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State selected by the parties. The parties consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located within that state for disputes arising under this Agreement.

Entire Agreement: This Agreement, including any attached test plan and exhibits, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, whether written or oral.

Severability: If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect.

Amendments; Waiver: No amendment shall be effective unless in writing and signed by both parties. Failure to enforce any provision shall not constitute a waiver of that provision.

10. AUTHORIZATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND ATTACHMENTS

10.1 Client hereby authorizes Testing Provider to undertake the testing described in this Agreement and represents that Client has authority to retain Testing Provider for the stated purposes.

10.2 Tester Certification: The undersigned tester(s) certify that to the best of their knowledge the information in reports and evidence logs will be true, accurate and complete and that the chain of custody documentation is accurate.

Attachments (check all enclosed): Test Plan Consent Forms (if any) Evidence Files Index Witness Statements

SIGNATURES

The undersigned represent and warrant that they are authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the party for which they sign.

Client:

By:

Date:

Testing Provider:

By:

Date:

What the Legal Discrimination Testing Form Is and when it applies

The Legal Discrimination Testing Form documents procedures, results, and reviewer conclusions when assessing policies, practices, or systems for disparate impact or intentional discrimination. It collects facts about the tested population, the test method, data sources, outcomes, and any corrective actions proposed. The form is used by compliance officers, HR teams, outside counsel, auditors, and expert analysts to generate a reproducible record for internal review, regulatory responses, or litigation support.

Why a formal testing form matters for compliance and defensibility

A standard Legal Discrimination Testing Form creates a consistent evidentiary trail, supports regulatory reporting, and helps demonstrate good‑faith efforts to identify and remedy discriminatory effects under federal statutes and agency guidance. It reduces variability in analysis and strengthens documentation for audits or court review.

Primary users and recipients of the testing record

The completed form is usually retained by compliance or legal departments and shared with regulators, counsel, or stakeholders as required.

Compliance and legal teams responsible for regulatory response and litigation support.
Human resources and talent analytics groups running hiring or promotion impact analyses.
External auditors, expert witnesses, and third‑party consultants validating methodology and results.

Core sections every professional Legal Discrimination Testing Form should include

A robust form organizes the review into discrete, auditable sections so reviewers can recreate methods and findings. The following components are common and support legal defensibility.

Identification

Document title, version, preparer name, organization, and date of the test.

Scope

Population, time period, and specific policy, practice, algorithm, or process evaluated.

Methodology

Statistical tests, control variables, sampling method, and assumptions used in analysis.

Data Sources

Datasets used, extraction dates, fields included, and any data cleaning steps.

Findings

Quantitative results, confidence intervals, adverse impact metrics, and narrative interpretation.

Remedies & Monitoring

Recommended changes, implementation timeline, owner, and follow‑up measurement plan.

Required form fields and essential metadata

Test Title: Short descriptive name

Preparer: Name and role

Effective Date: MM/DD/YYYY

Data Range: Start and end dates

Protected Classes: Enumerate categories tested

Signatures: Reviewer and approver

Step-by-step: completing and validating the Legal Discrimination Testing Form

Follow these sequential steps to prepare, validate, and finalize the testing form so it meets professional and legal expectations.

01

Prepare data: Assemble datasets, document sources, and apply cleaning steps.
02

Define scope: Set population, timeframe, and protected attributes for the test.
03

Run analysis: Apply chosen statistical tests and record parameters.
04

Review & sign: Legal and compliance review, then sign and date the form.

Where to send the form and how routing typically works

A clear routing plan ensures stakeholders receive the record promptly and creates an audit trail for internal controls and external inquiries.

Internal archive: Store master copy with compliance or legal department.
Regulatory submission: Send to regulator only when formally requested or required.
External counsel: Share analysis and raw data under counsel privilege when advising remediation.
Operational teams: Distribute remedial actions and monitoring tasks to responsible owners.

Configuring a digital workflow for the form

When building the form in an eSignature or document platform, configure fields and routing so data, signature, and audit trail are captured automatically.

Field	Configuration
Signature	Required, signer name + date
Attachments	Allow upload for supporting datasets
Reviewer Order	Sequential approval workflow
Audit Log	Enable IP, timestamp, and action capture

Digital signing and secure eSubmission considerations

Ensure the platform meets regulatory requirements relevant to your industry (for example HIPAA for health data) and retains a searchable audit trail.

Authentication: Email, SMS, or stronger methods
Document formats: PDF, DOCX supported
Integrations: CRM and cloud storage links

Timelines and typical processing expectations

Timelines vary by internal review cycles and external requests; the items below are common deadlines and expectations to track.

Internal review cycle:

Allow 7–21 business days for technical review and legal sign‑off depending on scope.

Regulatory response window:

Respond to regulator inquiries per the notice timeframe listed in the request.

Follow-up testing:

Schedule post-remediation re-tests within 90–180 days of implemented changes.

Retention trigger date:

Retention begins on the form's effective date or the date of final signature.

Ad hoc reporting:

Provide reports and logs within the timeframe required by the agency or subpoena.

Common mistakes that reduce evidentiary value

Incomplete methodology descriptions that omit software versions, parameters, or control variables make independent verification impossible and weaken defenses.
Failing to record exact data extracts or timestamps prevents reproduction and raises questions about data integrity during audits.
Using ambiguous population definitions or mixing cohorts without clear labels can produce misleading impact measures and incorrect conclusions.
Relying on unsigned or image‑only signatures without preserving an audit trail can lead to enforceability disputes under ESIGN/UETA.

Legal and administrative risks of deficient or inaccurate forms

Regulatory inquiry: Enforcement actions possible

Litigation exposure: Increased discovery risk

Reputational harm: Public disclosure risk

Remediation costs: Operational and legal fees

Data loss: Incomplete records impair defense

Sanctions: Court or agency sanctions

eSignature vendor overview for executing the form (signNow placed first)

Compare baseline pricing and a few common features across vendors. Use vendor contracts and plan details to confirm any items marked 'Varies' before purchase decisions.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	Varies	Varies	Varies	Varies
Bulk Send	Yes	Varies	Varies	Varies	Varies
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Envelope Cap	No cap	100 envelopes/user/year	Varies	Varies	Varies

Frequently asked questions about completing and submitting the form

Answers below address common legal, procedural, and technical questions users raise when preparing the Legal Discrimination Testing Form.

Need help? Contact support

Can the form be signed electronically?
Yes. Electronic signatures are legally binding under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. §7001) and UETA where adopted, provided intent, consent, attribution, and retention requirements are met. Exceptions (for example wills or some court filings) may still require paper or specific procedures.
Electronic vs digital signature — which to use?
Electronic signature is the broad legal category; a digital signature is a cryptographic subset (PKI). Use a digital signature when non‑repudiation and cryptographic integrity are required by regulation or internal policy.
How long should records be kept?
Follow regulatory minima: IRS records for three years (IRC §6501(a)) and HIPAA records for six years (45 CFR §164.530(j)); retain longer if litigation, investigations, or contract terms require it.
Are notarization or witnesses required?
Most discrimination testing forms do not require notarization, but state or evidentiary rules may call for notarized affidavits or witness statements in specific contexts; check state rules for variations.
What if the form contains an error after signing?
Document the error, prepare a corrected addendum or amendment, obtain signatures again, and preserve both versions with a clear revision history to support chain of custody.
How can I revoke or cancel a submitted form?
Revocation depends on process: if internal, follow policy to mark the record revoked and notify stakeholders; if submitted to an external regulator, follow the regulator's procedures and retain records of the revocation request.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now