Is an electronic signature valid?

Yes. Electronic signatures are legally recognized under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. §7001) and UETA where adopted. Ensure intent, consent, attribution, and retention to meet the legal validity test.

When do I need notarization or witnesses?

Most manuscript approvals do not require notarization. Use notarization or witness fields only if state law, institutional policy, or transfer-of-rights language explicitly requires it.

How do I prove who signed?

Collect audit evidence: timestamp, signer email, IP address, and authentication method. Stronger authentication (SMS, KBA, ID verification) reduces disputes.

Can I require additional reviewer authentication?

Yes. Configure multi-factor authentication or ID verification in the signing workflow for sensitive or regulated approvals.

What if the wrong draft was signed?

Document the error, withdraw or supersede the approval with a new request referencing the corrected version, and retain both records for audit and dispute defense.

How long should I keep approvals?

Follow the retention schedule: keep active records during the agreement term plus at least three years; healthcare records require six years per 45 CFR §164.530(j).

Electronic Signature
Templates
Miscellaneous
Manuscript Approval Request

Manuscript Approval Request

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

MANUSCRIPT APPROVAL REQUEST

WHEREAS

WHEREAS, Author Name: is the sole author and copyright owner (or authorized representative) of the literary work identified below; and

WHEREAS, Requesting Party / Publisher: seeks written approval, confirmation of required revisions, and authorization to proceed with specified editorial or production activities with respect to the manuscript described herein.

MANUSCRIPT IDENTIFICATION

Manuscript Title:

Version/Edition: Submission Date:

Word Count / Length: Delivery Medium:

SCOPE OF WORK

Description of Requested Approval, Editorial Actions, or Production Tasks

REQUESTED CHANGES / REVIEWER COMMENTS

Summary of Changes Requested by Requesting Party (if any)

Reviewer Name: Role / Affiliation: Review Date:

APPROVAL OPTIONS

Approve as-is: no further changes required for publication or production.
Approve with minor revisions: Editorial or stylistic corrections limited to the scope described above and not requiring substantive rework.
Require major revisions / resubmission: Substantial rewriting or new material required; resubmission required for further review.

PAYMENT TERMS

Compensation Amount (if applicable):

Payment Schedule / Milestones

Late Payment Fee: Payment Method:

TERM AND TERMINATION

Effective Start Date: Expected Completion / End Date:

Either party may terminate this request for material breach or failure to perform after days' written notice. Termination does not relieve either party of obligations accrued prior to termination, including payment for completed work and confidentiality obligations.

CONFIDENTIALITY

The parties acknowledge that the manuscript and any related materials disclosed in connection with this request constitute confidential information. Each party shall: (a) use the confidential information solely for purposes of review, approval, editing and production; (b) restrict disclosure to its employees, contractors or agents on a need-to-know basis who are bound by confidentiality obligations at least as protective as those herein; and (c) take commercially reasonable measures to protect the confidentiality of such materials. Confidentiality survives termination for a period of five (5) years or longer if required by law.

REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

The Author represents and warrants that: (i) the Author is the sole author or is duly authorized to act on behalf of all authors and rights holders of the manuscript; (ii) the manuscript is original and does not infringe any third-party rights; (iii) no third-party permission is required beyond those already disclosed to the Requesting Party; and (iv) any material facts that could reasonably be expected to affect approval, publication, or distribution have been disclosed in writing.

Check to confirm representation: I affirm the foregoing representations and warranties.

RIGHTS AND LICENSES

Unless otherwise agreed in a separate publishing or licensing agreement, the Author grants the Requesting Party a limited, non-exclusive license to use the approved manuscript for the specific editorial, production, or distribution activities described in this request. Any broader grant of rights shall be set forth in a separate, written agreement signed by both parties.

GOVERNING LAW

This Manuscript Approval Request shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of without regard to conflict of laws principles.

ENTIRE AGREEMENT

This document constitutes the entire Manuscript Approval Request between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior oral or written communications regarding the same. Any amendment or modification must be in writing and signed by both parties.

ATTACHMENTS

List of Attached Files or Exhibits Provided with this Request

ADDITIONAL TERMS

Special Conditions, Deadlines, or Instructions

Author Printed Name:

By:

Date:

Requesting Party / Publisher Printed Name:

By:

Date:

What a Manuscript Approval Request Is and When It’s Used

A Manuscript Approval Request is a formal document authors, editors, or project managers use to obtain written clearance before publishing, submitting, or releasing written work. It captures author identification, manuscript metadata, required approvals (legal, compliance, or institutional), and any conditions such as confidentiality, redaction requirements, or embargo dates. The form creates an auditable record of who approved what and when, and it can include attachments (drafts, redline versions, supporting permissions). Electronic execution under ESIGN or UETA is commonly used to speed processing and preserve a tamper-evident audit trail.

Why a Formal Approval Request Matters

A clear request reduces publication risk by documenting consent, copyright assignment, conflict-of-interest disclosures, and regulatory checks. It creates an auditable timeline of approvals, limits unexpected liability, and reduces administrative delay while preserving rights and version history.

Who typically completes and approves this form

The Manuscript Approval Request is used by authors, editorial teams, compliance officers, institutional administrators, and legal counsel to coordinate signoffs across stakeholders.

Authors and co-authors who must confirm authorship, contributions, and disclosures.
Editors and project managers responsible for version control and publication scheduling.
Legal or compliance reviewers who verify rights, permissions, and regulatory compliance.

Use this document whenever multiple reviews or formal signoffs are required before external submission, public release, or when regulated content (health, education, finance) is involved.

Core sections every professional request should include

A comprehensive Manuscript Approval Request groups metadata, declarations, permissions, reviewer actions, signature blocks, and attachments so approvals are clear and auditable.

Manuscript Metadata

Title, version number, abstract, word count, and intended publication outlet. Accurate metadata prevents version confusion and ensures routing to the correct reviewers.

Author Declarations

Authorship confirmation, contributions, conflict-of-interest disclosures, and copyright statements. These declarations establish attribution and legal responsibility for content.

Permissions & Rights

Third-party content permissions, image releases, and copyright transfer or license language. Clear permissions avoid post-publication takedowns or infringement claims.

Approvals & Conditions

List of required signatories, conditional approvals (redactions, embargoes), and any administrative hold notes. Captures constraints that affect publication timing.

Version Control

Attach the manuscript file and change log. Note version identifiers and date stamps to link approvals to a specific draft.

Signature Blocks

Signed lines for each approver with printed name, title, date, and method of execution (electronic or notarized). Include witness or notarization fields if required.

Step-by-step: completing and circulating the request

Follow these steps to prepare, route, and record approvals with minimal back-and-forth.

01

Prepare: Attach the specific manuscript draft and list required approvers.
02

Populate fields: Complete metadata, declarations, and permissions sections accurately.
03

Route for review: Send in role order to reviewers with clear due dates.
04

Capture signatures: Collect signatures and retain the signed file plus audit trail.

Recommended digital workflow settings

Configure a digital workflow to match your approval chain and evidence requirements.

Field	Configuration
Signing Order	Set strict, sequential signing for legal reviews
Authentication	Use email + SMS code or stronger methods for sensitive approvals
Reminder Schedule	Automate reminders at 3 and 7 days for pending signers
Retention Policy	Apply document retention metadata on completion

Digital signing and integration considerations

Choose a platform that supports required authentication, audit trails, and the integrations you need.

Integrations: Salesforce, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace
File Formats: PDF, DOCX supported for uploads
Security: AES-256 at rest; TLS 1.2/1.3

Ensure the platform can export a certificate of completion and tamper-evident signed file. Verify HIPAA, 21 CFR Part 11, or other compliance addenda where regulated content is involved.

Where to send the completed request

Route the signed request to the people and systems that need a permanent copy.

Primary Repository: Document management system or editorial database
Legal Counsel: For copyright and licensing review
Compliance Office: When regulated data or disclosures are present
Author Copy: Provide the author the executed request and certificate

Typical timelines and processing expectations

Establish clear internal deadlines to avoid publication delays and ensure reviewers have time for substantive review.

Submission Lead Time:

Request approvals at least 10 business days before intended publication

Legal Review Window:

Allow 5–10 business days for legal counsel review

Editorial Review:

Allow 3–7 business days depending on complexity

Final Signoff:

Expect 1–3 business days for signature completion

Processing SLA:

Track and escalate items not signed within ten business days

Key milestones from draft to published record

Use these milestones to map responsibility and prevent last-minute holds.

01

Draft Finalized

Manuscript draft and attachments are locked for review

02

Internal Reviews

Legal and compliance complete substantive checks

03

Approval Requested

Approval request circulated to required signers

04

Execution Recorded

Signed document stored with audit trail

Common mistakes that create delays or invalidate approvals

Submitting a different draft than the one signed, causing version disputes and rework.
Using informal initials instead of full printed name and signature, which some reviewers reject.
Failing to list required approvers, leaving legal or compliance steps incomplete.
Providing incorrect email addresses for signers, preventing delivery of electronic signing links.

Key risks and potential consequences of flawed approval records

Contract Breach: Liability for unauthorized publication

Copyright Exposure: Loss of exclusive rights or infringement claims

HIPAA Violation: Civil penalties if PHI improperly disclosed

FERPA Violation: Sanctions for unauthorized educational records release

Reputational Harm: Loss of trust and professional consequences

Invalid Signature: Approval may be legally unenforceable

Essential information to capture on the form

Signer Identity: Full legal name

Title/Role: Organizational position

Date Signed: MM/DD/YYYY format

Signature Method: eSign or notarized

Manuscript ID: Version identifier

Attachments: List of included files

How to save and export completed requests

Preserve the signed request and evidence by exporting standard file types and storing them in controlled systems.

Signed PDF

Export a tamper-evident PDF that includes embedded audit data and the certificate of completion for legal recordkeeping and archival.

Audit Certificate

Save the signer audit report (timestamps, IP addresses, authentication method) as a separate document for compliance review.

Source Files

Retain original editable files (DOCX) alongside the signed PDF to document the underlying content and enable future edits.

Repository Tags

Apply metadata tags (manuscript ID, approvers, retention date) to records management systems for easy retrieval and legal hold.

Comparing common eSignature options for handling approval requests

Vendor pricing and feature availability vary. signNow appears first as a secure option that supports required compliance controls without envelope caps.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	Varies by vendor	Varies by vendor	Varies by vendor	Varies by vendor
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Varies
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Envelope Cap	No cap	100 envelopes/user/year	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan

Real-world examples of electronic approvals in practice

These customer examples show how electronic approvals reduce friction while preserving auditability.

Fertility Centers of Illinois

A clinical administrator used a digital approval workflow to centralize consent and approvals.

The platform integrated with records.
John Butler: "The airSlate SignNow team has been exceptional, responsive, the API has been great, and we're extremely happy that we chose airSlate SignNow as a company."

BIS

A services firm standardized approvals across legal and operations teams.

Central templates reduced review cycles.
Dan Rotelli: "We felt most comfortable with airSlate SignNow given their SOC 2 certification and strict focus on ESIGN and UETA act compliance."

Frequently asked questions and troubleshooting

Common questions about validity, signatures, and distribution when using a Manuscript Approval Request.

Need help? Contact support

Is an electronic signature valid?
Yes. Electronic signatures are legally recognized under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. §7001) and UETA where adopted. Ensure intent, consent, attribution, and retention to meet the legal validity test.
When do I need notarization or witnesses?
Most manuscript approvals do not require notarization. Use notarization or witness fields only if state law, institutional policy, or transfer-of-rights language explicitly requires it.
How do I prove who signed?
Collect audit evidence: timestamp, signer email, IP address, and authentication method. Stronger authentication (SMS, KBA, ID verification) reduces disputes.
Can I require additional reviewer authentication?
Yes. Configure multi-factor authentication or ID verification in the signing workflow for sensitive or regulated approvals.
What if the wrong draft was signed?
Document the error, withdraw or supersede the approval with a new request referencing the corrected version, and retain both records for audit and dispute defense.
How long should I keep approvals?
Follow the retention schedule: keep active records during the agreement term plus at least three years; healthcare records require six years per 45 CFR §164.530(j).

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now