Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

Miscellaneous IP Ratings Chart

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

MISCELLANEOUS IP RATINGS CHART

WHEREAS / RECITALS

WHEREAS, Client Name: (the "Client") operates or specifies equipment subject to ingress protection requirements; and

WHEREAS, Service Provider Name: (the "Provider") performs inspection, testing and certification of equipment IP ratings and provides documented IP Ratings Chart as set forth below; and

WHEREAS, the parties desire to record the scope, testing results, and contractual terms governing the identification, testing, and representation of ingress protection (IP) ratings for specified equipment.

SCOPE OF WORK

IP RATINGS CHART

The following table records each item inspected, the claimed IP rating, observed ingress protection levels, testing details, and Provider's determination of compliance.

#
Equipment / Description
Manufacturer / Model
Claimed IP
Dust Level (0-6)
Water Level (0-9)
Test Date
Complies

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

CERTIFICATION & TEST NOTES

Testing Protocols and Standards Applied:

PAYMENT TERMS

Late fee applied as: on overdue balances after days.

TERM AND TERMINATION

Effective Date: ; Termination Date (if any): .

Either party may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon days' prior written notice. Termination for material breach is effective upon written notice if the breaching party fails to cure within days after receipt of notice.

CONFIDENTIALITY

Each party shall hold in confidence all proprietary information disclosed by the other party in connection with this Agreement, including inspection data, test methods, and results ("Confidential Information"), and shall not disclose Confidential Information to third parties except as reasonably necessary to perform its obligations or as required by law. The receiving party shall use at least the same standard of care to protect Confidential Information as it uses to protect its own confidential information, but in no event less than reasonable care.

Confidentiality obligations shall continue for years following termination or expiration of this Agreement, except for information that becomes public through no fault of the receiving party, or that is independently developed by the receiving party without use of the disclosing party's Confidential Information.

LIMITATION OF LIABILITY & REPRESENTATIONS

Provider represents that tests recorded herein were conducted in substantial conformity with the testing protocols set forth above. Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, Provider makes no other warranties, express or implied, including fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall either party be liable for consequential, incidental, or punitive damages arising from testing, inspection, or reliance on the IP Ratings Chart, and aggregate liability shall be limited to amounts actually paid under this Agreement.

GOVERNING LAW

This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of without regard to conflict of law principles.

ENTIRE AGREEMENT

This document, together with any attachments and documented test results identified herein, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, proposals, negotiations, and representations, whether written or oral. Any amendment must be in writing and signed by authorized representatives of both parties.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The undersigned each warrant that they are authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of the party for which they sign and that the information and test results provided in this IP Ratings Chart are accurate to the best of their knowledge as of the dates signed below.

Client:

By:

Date:

Service Provider:

By:

Date:

Enter text✕

What the Miscellaneous IP Ratings Chart Covers

The Miscellaneous IP Ratings Chart is a concise technical reference that summarizes standard Ingress Protection (IP) codes used to communicate enclosure resistance to solid particles and liquids. It explains first-digit ratings for solids (0–6) and second-digit ratings for liquids (0–9), shows combined examples like IP65 and IP67, and lists typical testing conditions and acceptance criteria. The chart is intended to help engineers, procurement teams, and compliance reviewers select appropriate enclosures, document testing outcomes, and keep a consistent record of protection levels across products and suppliers.

Why use a standardized IP Ratings Chart

A standardized chart reduces ambiguity in specifications, shortens review cycles, and improves cross-team alignment on environmental protection requirements.

Why use a standardized IP Ratings Chart

Primary users and collaborators

Engineering, product management, quality assurance, and procurement commonly consult the chart when defining or verifying enclosure protection.

  • Product engineers specifying enclosure ingress protection for device designs and prototypes
  • Quality assurance teams validating test results against IP standard criteria
  • Procurement and field service staff selecting and replacing enclosures for in-field equipment

Technical writers, regulatory reviewers, and field service teams also reference the chart to document compliance and guide maintenance decisions.

Core components of a professional chart

A professional Miscellaneous IP Ratings Chart groups clear legends, numeric definitions, test conditions, sample applications, format guidance, and version control for accurate use.

Code Legend

Defines each IP digit and the meaning of combined codes so readers can quickly interpret ratings without external lookup.

Testing Notes

Summarizes the laboratory or field test setup, water depth or exposure times, and acceptance thresholds tied to each rating level.

Common Examples

Lists typical products or components that meet specific IP codes to help teams choose realistic protection targets.

Applicability

Explains which industries or environments the chart covers and when additional ingress testing or standards apply.

Revision History

Includes version, author, and change log entries so users can track updates and the date of the most recent validation.

Source References

Cites the normative standards and test procedures used to build the chart so results can be reproduced by testing labs.

Required fields to include on each chart entry

Device Model: Manufacturer model number
IP Code: Two‑digit IP rating
Test Standard: IEC or equivalent
Test Date: MM/DD/YYYY
Test Lab: Accredited laboratory
Supporting Files: Reports or photos attached

Step-by-step: complete an IP Ratings chart entry

Follow these sequential steps to record, verify, and publish an IP rating entry for a product or assembly.

  • 01
    Gather data: Collect model, vendor, and existing test reports.
  • 02
    Confirm standard: Select the applicable IEC or equivalent test method.
  • 03
    Record results: Enter the two-digit IP code, test date, and lab.
  • 04
    Review & publish: Have QA approve and add revision metadata.

Configure an online chart workflow

Map fields and approvals before publishing the chart to ensure consistent data capture and controlled updates.

Field Configuration
Model Number Required text field, validate format
IP Rating Dropdown with allowed codes
Test Report File upload, PDF preferred
QA Approval Role-based signer required

Where completed charts typically go

Completed entries are routed to internal repositories, suppliers, and compliance teams depending on the use case.

  • Internal Archive: Store in document management for future audits.
  • Supplier Exchange: Share required ratings with vendors for procurement.
  • Regulatory Folder: Place test certificates for compliance reviews.
  • Field Pack: Include condensed chart in service documentation.

Technical requirements for digital creation and sharing

Use software that supports common file types, role-based approvals, and an audit trail for verification.

  • Supported formats: PDF, DOCX, Excel
  • Integrations: Salesforce, NetSuite, Google Workspace
  • Authentication: Email, SMS, or stronger MFA

Choose platforms with export options and tamper-evident storage so records remain reproducible for audits and regulatory review.

Comparing eSignature options for signing and distributing the chart

Basic vendor pricing and capability differences for common eSignature vendors, shown to help select an appropriate signing and distribution provider.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial 7-day free trial Varies Varies Varies Varies
Bulk Send Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes Yes Yes No No
Envelope Cap No cap 100 envelopes/user/year Varies Varies Varies

Common questions and troubleshooting tips

Answers to frequently asked questions about reading the chart, confirming tests, and using digital signing and storage in the United States.


Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users